<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trunks aren&#8217;t just for elephants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aaroads.com/blog/2007/08/28/trunks-arent-just-for-elephants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aaroads.com/blog/2007/08/28/trunks-arent-just-for-elephants/</link>
	<description>Road news.  Pictures.  Crazed ranting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:24:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stéphane Dumas</title>
		<link>http://www.aaroads.com/blog/2007/08/28/trunks-arent-just-for-elephants/comment-page-1/#comment-10602</link>
		<dc:creator>Stéphane Dumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aaroads.com/blog/?p=119#comment-10602</guid>
		<description>Some parts of the Trans-Texas corridors are a good idea (I-69 extension, TX-130) but others are a way exagerated (like the idea of a Trans-Texas parralel to I-10 between San Antonio and El Paso, a east-west link in Northern Maine will be more useful http://www.bangornews.com/news/t/news.aspx?articleid=153480&amp;zoneid=500 also mentionned at Canroads mailing list at http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/22322 )

And there aren&#039;t the only part wishing some 4-lanes divided highway/&quot;rural expressway&quot; coming in isolated areas. Some wish then the proposed Heartland expressway http://www.heartlandexpressway.com/ could play a role similar to the Appalachian regional corridors into a High-plains corridor/Great-plains corridor combined with the Ports-to-plains corridor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some parts of the Trans-Texas corridors are a good idea (I-69 extension, TX-130) but others are a way exagerated (like the idea of a Trans-Texas parralel to I-10 between San Antonio and El Paso, a east-west link in Northern Maine will be more useful <a href="http://www.bangornews.com/news/t/news.aspx?articleid=153480&#038;zoneid=500" rel="nofollow">http://www.bangornews.com/news/t/news.aspx?articleid=153480&#038;zoneid=500</a> also mentionned at Canroads mailing list at <a href="http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/22322" rel="nofollow">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/22322</a> )</p>
<p>And there aren&#8217;t the only part wishing some 4-lanes divided highway/&#8221;rural expressway&#8221; coming in isolated areas. Some wish then the proposed Heartland expressway <a href="http://www.heartlandexpressway.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.heartlandexpressway.com/</a> could play a role similar to the Appalachian regional corridors into a High-plains corridor/Great-plains corridor combined with the Ports-to-plains corridor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

