News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.

Main Menu

PA Turnpike News

Started by mightyace, February 16, 2009, 05:29:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Beltway

Quote from: ysuindy on September 19, 2017, 12:05:14 PM
Quote from: Beltway on September 19, 2017, 11:54:08 AM
Quote from: cpzilliacus on September 19, 2017, 10:07:49 AM
Quote from: ysuindy on September 19, 2017, 12:26:20 AM
Quote from: ARMOURERERIC on July 30, 2017, 09:00:24 PM
On the PTC wedsite under Design and Construction, the PTC has announced that they will be replacing 2 mainline bridges using the Accelerated Bridge Construction method.  One on each side of the state.  They expect in each case for the mainline to only be shut down for a weekend.
The closing in the West will be this weekend.  Turnpike will be closed from 9 p.m. Friday to 4 a.m. Monday between I-376 (New Castle) and I-79
http://triblive.com/local/allegheny/12748809-74/weekend-turnpike-closure-means-long-detour-for-motorists
If I was going that way, I would use the combination of I-79 and I-70 to avoid this.  It is about 50 miles on the Turnpike and the detour is about 92 miles, even though I-70 between New  Stanton and Washington, Pennsylvania is having  some construction work done but still has a high suck factor.
How about using I-79 and I-80 to bypass the segment?  That is an extra 25 miles and is all-Interstate.
For through traffic on the Turnpikes, that is the approach to take.  Eastbound exits the Ohio Turnpike west of Youngstown on i-80 East to 79 South in Pittsburgh and then pick up the Pennsylvania Turnpike again.  Reverse the approach heading West.  Much quicker than the posted detour.

Local traffic would have other issues, but from the west I-376 can be used to access most of Pittsburgh.
http://www.roadstothefuture.com
http://www.capital-beltway.com

Baloney is a reserved word on the Internet
    (Robert Coté, 2002)


cpzilliacus

Quote from: ysuindy on September 19, 2017, 12:05:14 PM
For through traffic on the Turnpikes, that is the approach to take.  Eastbound exits the Ohio Turnpike west of Youngstown on i-80 East to 79 South in Pittsburgh and then pick up the Pennsylvania Turnpike again.  Reverse the approach heading West.  Much quicker than the posted detour.

That is indeed better. I assumed the closure was at the other I-376 interchange (Penn-Lincoln Parkway).
Opinions expressed here on AAROADS are strictly personal and mine alone, and do not reflect policies or positions of MWCOG, NCRTPB or their member federal, state, county and municipal governments or any other agency.

cl94

Long-distance traffic should just stay on I-80 to US 322 and hop on in Harrisburg. That would avoid the inevitable interchange congestion. With no traffic, difference is 15 minutes.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

thenetwork

#1803
Sounds like the PTC wants to financially screw through traffic with more tolls by suggesting the 376/80/79 detour.  This includes those entering PA from the west, paying full price at the border to go one exit then more tolls on I-376 either way.  And those coming from I-79 will have to drop some coin somewhere if they follow the detour into Ohio.

cl94

Quote from: thenetwork on September 19, 2017, 05:25:25 PM
Sounds like the PTC wants to financially screw through traffic with more tolls by suggesting the 376/80/79 detour.  This includes those entering PA from the west, paying full price at the border to go one exit then more tolls on I-376 either way.  And those coming from I-79 will have to drop some coin somewhere if they follow the detour into Ohio.

Well yeah, PTC doesn't want to lose money off of this detour. Note that the closed section is free, but exiting at I-376 requires paying a toll unless you utilize PA 351. They may actually MAKE money off of this thing (as shocking as that sounds).
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

MASTERNC

#1805
Quote from: cl94 on September 19, 2017, 06:52:26 PM
Quote from: thenetwork on September 19, 2017, 05:25:25 PM
Sounds like the PTC wants to financially screw through traffic with more tolls by suggesting the 376/80/79 detour.  This includes those entering PA from the west, paying full price at the border to go one exit then more tolls on I-376 either way.  And those coming from I-79 will have to drop some coin somewhere if they follow the detour into Ohio.


Well yeah, PTC doesn't want to lose money off of this detour. Note that the closed section is free, but exiting at I-376 requires paying a toll unless you utilize PA 351. They may actually MAKE money off of this thing (as shocking as that sounds).


Add to the fact I-376 has gone cashless, which is sure to cause some confusion.

thenetwork

Quote from: cl94 on September 19, 2017, 06:52:26 PM
Quote from: thenetwork on September 19, 2017, 05:25:25 PM
Sounds like the PTC wants to financially screw through traffic with more tolls by suggesting the 376/80/79 detour.  This includes those entering PA from the west, paying full price at the border to go one exit then more tolls on I-376 either way.  And those coming from I-79 will have to drop some coin somewhere if they follow the detour into Ohio.

Well yeah, PTC doesn't want to lose money off of this detour. Note that the closed section is free, but exiting at I-376 requires paying a toll unless you utilize PA 351. They may actually MAKE money off of this thing (as shocking as that sounds).

I'd love to see the Ohio Turnpike screw over the PTC by having numerous VMS's prior to Youngstown advising people of the closure and to follow Exit 218 off the pike and remain on I-80 East all the way over to I-79.  Save people the extra detour mileage and outlandish tolls in the Keystone State.   :bigass:

MASTERNC

Quote from: thenetwork on September 19, 2017, 05:25:25 PM
Sounds like the PTC wants to financially screw through traffic with more tolls by suggesting the 376/80/79 detour.  This includes those entering PA from the west, paying full price at the border to go one exit then more tolls on I-376 either way.  And those coming from I-79 will have to drop some coin somewhere if they follow the detour into Ohio.

They kind of are

https://twitter.com/OhioTurnpike/status/911292139404918784

cl94

Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

MASTERNC

Quote from: cl94 on September 22, 2017, 03:39:00 PM
Quote from: MASTERNC on September 22, 2017, 03:15:51 PM
They kind of are

https://twitter.com/OhioTurnpike/status/911292139404918784

Heh heh heh. WB traffic will still get screwed over, but EB is good.

There is no toll WB when they get back on the Turnpike, but there is the electronic toll on 376.

Mergingtraffic

The PA TPKE YouTube video says tolls are waived.
I only take pics of good looking signs. Long live non-reflective button copy!
MergingTraffic https://www.flickr.com/photos/98731835@N05/

MASTERNC

Quote from: Mergingtraffic on September 22, 2017, 09:40:36 PM
The PA TPKE YouTube video says tolls are waived.

Guess they figure the tolls on 376 are minimal enough to take the revenue hit.

ixnay

Quote from: Mergingtraffic on September 22, 2017, 09:40:36 PM
The PA TPKE YouTube video says tolls are waived.

I searched "Pennsylvania Turnpike" on YT and couldn't find the vid.  Would you mind linking it, please?

ixnay

MASTERNC

Quote from: ixnay on September 23, 2017, 08:43:48 AM
Quote from: Mergingtraffic on September 22, 2017, 09:40:36 PM
The PA TPKE YouTube video says tolls are waived.

I searched "Pennsylvania Turnpike" on YT and couldn't find the vid.  Would you mind linking it, please?

ixnay

Sure

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAP3AUdyqv8

Beltway

Quote from: MASTERNC on September 23, 2017, 11:46:30 AM
Quote from: ixnay on September 23, 2017, 08:43:48 AM
I searched "Pennsylvania Turnpike" on YT and couldn't find the vid.  Would you mind linking it, please?
ixnay
Sure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAP3AUdyqv8

Ghaack!  A picture is worth a thousand words.  They really did recommend that routing, huh?
http://www.roadstothefuture.com
http://www.capital-beltway.com

Baloney is a reserved word on the Internet
    (Robert Coté, 2002)

cl94

Again, they don't want to lose the toll money at the Ohio border. $7/car adds up ($5 for E-ZPass).
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

Beltway

#1816
Quote from: cl94 on September 23, 2017, 12:43:11 PM
Again, they don't want to lose the toll money at the Ohio border. $7/car adds up ($5 for E-ZPass).

They just can't be that petty.  It is only for 3 days and for an extraordinary situation of a full highway closure.

Besides, a number of trips would still be best routed thru that section to I-376, such as to the central and to about 2/3 of the Pittsburgh area.
http://www.roadstothefuture.com
http://www.capital-beltway.com

Baloney is a reserved word on the Internet
    (Robert Coté, 2002)

cl94

Quote from: Beltway on September 23, 2017, 12:48:59 PM
Quote from: cl94 on September 23, 2017, 12:43:11 PM
Again, they don't want to lose the toll money at the Ohio border. $7/car adds up ($5 for E-ZPass).

They just can't be that petty.  It is only for 3 days and for an extraordinary situation of a full highway closure.

Yes, they can. Act 44 means they need all the money they can get.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

Beltway

Quote from: cl94 on September 23, 2017, 12:50:00 PM
Quote from: Beltway on September 23, 2017, 12:48:59 PM
Quote from: cl94 on September 23, 2017, 12:43:11 PM
Again, they don't want to lose the toll money at the Ohio border. $7/car adds up ($5 for E-ZPass).
They just can't be that petty.  It is only for 3 days and for an extraordinary situation of a full highway closure.
Yes, they can. Act 44 means they need all the money they can get.

If true then they should be ashamed of themselves.  What about the extra costs to motorists, their customers, if they take an unnecessarily longer route?
http://www.roadstothefuture.com
http://www.capital-beltway.com

Baloney is a reserved word on the Internet
    (Robert Coté, 2002)

ixnay

Thanks for the vid link, Mergingtraffic.

ixnay

jeffandnicole

The biggest problem with detours is if they take people out of the way, will they know how to get back to the bypassed exits?

The best option WB would've been North to I-80, then west into Ohio.

EB is a bit trickier.  As NJDOT has told me, it's tough signing detours in advanced of the exit because people will ignore the signs.

It would be best if Ohio had their VMS signage announcing the closure to get people to use I-80 EB into PA.  For those that ignore that signage, or who enter beyond that 76/80 interchange, then the official detour route comes into effect.

Quote from: cl94 on September 23, 2017, 12:50:00 PM
Quote from: Beltway on September 23, 2017, 12:48:59 PM
Quote from: cl94 on September 23, 2017, 12:43:11 PM
Again, they don't want to lose the toll money at the Ohio border. $7/car adds up ($5 for E-ZPass).

They just can't be that petty.  It is only for 3 days and for an extraordinary situation of a full highway closure.

Yes, they can. Act 44 means they need all the money they can get.

If they were that petty, they would've claimed the NJ/PA Turnpike Bridge's crack was 'minor' and no need to close the bridge (no doubt NJTA would overrule that though). 


cl94

If anyone is curious about how Google/Waze is routing people right now:

Heading east, other direction is same
Destination along Turnpike west of Exit 57 (I-376 east): I-80 -> I-79 -> I-76
Exit 57 to Exit 242 (I-83): I-76 -> I-376 -> I-76
Exit 247 (I-283) and east: I-80 -> I-99 -> US 322 -> US 22 -> I-81 NB -> I-83 -> I-283 -> I-76

If you're starting between I-80 and the closure point, 376 is a better detour regardless of your destination.

From Google, 376 has more traffic than usual and Turnpike Exit 57 has some backups, but conditions on the Turnpike itself don't look too bad.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

ixnay

Quote from: cl94 on September 19, 2017, 04:23:08 PMLong-distance traffic should just stay on I-80 to US 322 and hop on in Harrisburg. That would avoid the inevitable interchange congestion. With no traffic, difference is 15 minutes.

Via exit 161, then taking I-99 down to 322 in State College?  State College would be slightly overshot this way.

ixnay

cl94

Quote from: ixnay on September 24, 2017, 07:56:35 AM
Quote from: cl94 on September 19, 2017, 04:23:08 PMLong-distance traffic should just stay on I-80 to US 322 and hop on in Harrisburg. That would avoid the inevitable interchange congestion. With no traffic, difference is 15 minutes.

Via exit 161, then taking I-99 down to 322 in State College?  State College would be slightly overshot this way.

ixnay

That is indeed how Google and Waze is routing through traffic at this time. Supposedly 25 minutes faster than I-376 through Pittsburgh with current traffic.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

ARMOURERERIC

Was the PTC smart enough to make the new bridge able to accommodate 6 lanes.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.