AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

TRIVIA MOVED BACK TO WEDNESDAY. Your host isn't any happier about these changes than you are. Sign up to host in the future.

Author Topic: I-44 Tulsa  (Read 4058 times)

Gridlock

  • Trail
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 10
  • Last Login: May 05, 2009, 03:19:24 PM
I-44 Tulsa
« on: February 04, 2009, 12:13:57 PM »

Work has begun on widening I-44 between Riverside and Yale.

Does anybody know when work will begin on Yale to Sheridan segment?  Strange, this stretch (Yale to BA) has highest traffic counts, yet its the absolutely last section in the city to be widened.
Logged

Scott5114

  • Admin
  • Freeway
  • *****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4091
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 04:08:28 AM
    • scott5114.name
Re: I-44 Tulsa
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2009, 04:53:45 PM »

All I can say is thank goodness.
Logged
There is no secret war with Nimbya.

Chris

  • Regional Moderator
  • Turnpike
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1721
  • International road enthusiast

  • Age: 25
  • Location: the Netherlands
  • Last Login: June 18, 2013, 12:57:37 PM
    • Flickr
Re: I-44 Tulsa
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2009, 03:20:37 AM »

Is Tulsa congested during rushhour? It seems to have quite an extensive freeway/tollway network.

Scott5114

  • Admin
  • Freeway
  • *****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4091
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 04:08:28 AM
    • scott5114.name
Re: I-44 Tulsa
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2009, 05:36:39 AM »

I-44 in Tulsa is a pain at any time of day! Only two narrow lanes with lots of curves spells lots of congestion and hair-raising moments... it's a very outdated freeway. If I could scrounge up enough cash to bypass Tulsa via the Creek Turnpike, I'd always do it!
Logged
There is no secret war with Nimbya.

SSOWorld

  • No, the other one
  • Global Moderator
  • Expressway
  • ***
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1308
  • Interstate <Make up your mind!>

  • Location: Not close enough to the California ocean
  • Last Login: June 17, 2013, 08:13:59 AM
Re: I-44 Tulsa
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2009, 10:24:23 AM »

Good thing I didn't drive it yet... I mainly used I-244 while I was in Tulsa in 2002. (of course that means I still have some clinching to do. )
Logged
Give me a car and some roads - I'll just go where the car takes me.

Scott O.
Website not available at this time...
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/ssoworld-roads/

I demand a reality check.

Gridlock

  • Trail
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 10
  • Last Login: May 05, 2009, 03:19:24 PM
Re: I-44 Tulsa
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2009, 11:46:12 AM »

IMO, Tulsa is not very congested during rush hours compared to most cities.  I-44 has 2 substandard 4 lane segments (original construction from the 1950's) which are congested and where chuncks of concrete from the bridges/overpasses periodically fall on the streets below (sometimes a whole forms a hole all the way thru the bridge deck!).  These are Riverside to OK 51 (reconstruction now underway) and I-244 merge to US 412/OK66 interchange in Catoosa area which is also scheduled for widening soon.  The Catoosa segment has gotten much more congested recently due to nearby casino which is expanding and being rebranded into a Hard Rock Casino/hotel/restaurant/resort.

OK 51 and US 169 are probably the busiest commuter routes but move well except at substandard cloverleaf interchanges (OK51/I-44 and OK51/US169) where backups occur every rush hour.  OK 51 has recently been expanded to 8 lanes well out into Broken Arrow.  US 169 is 6 lane from I-244 south to Creek Turnpike.
Logged

mightyace

  • Freeway
  • ****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3235
  • Age: 48
  • Last Login: October 04, 2012, 01:36:29 PM
    • My Flickr Photos
Re: I-44 Tulsa
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2009, 07:58:21 PM »

I was looking at the aerial view on Google Maps (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=tulsa,+ok&sll=46.187437,-123.137512&sspn=1.2968,2.82074&ie=UTF8&t=h&ll=36.173599,-95.737181&spn=0.023626,0.044074&z=15&layer=c&cbll=36.177105,-95.739985&panoid=iRgXrHQV0VnnVZQG183ykw&cbp=12,59.4068584102908,,0,3.24732229795521) and saw an apparently abandoned stretch of highway between the Will Rogers Turnpike and Historic Route 66.

Is this an earlier alignment of the Will Rogers, say before the Creek Turnpike was built?
Logged
My Flickr Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mightyace

I'm out of this F***KING PLACE!

okroads

  • State Highway
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 510
  • Age: 29
  • Location: Oklahoma City, OK
  • Last Login: June 17, 2013, 09:37:14 PM
    • OKRoads Flickr
Re: I-44 Tulsa
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2009, 09:34:19 PM »

I was looking at the aerial view on Google Maps (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=tulsa,+ok&sll=46.187437,-123.137512&sspn=1.2968,2.82074&ie=UTF8&t=h&ll=36.173599,-95.737181&spn=0.023626,0.044074&z=15&layer=c&cbll=36.177105,-95.739985&panoid=iRgXrHQV0VnnVZQG183ykw&cbp=12,59.4068584102908,,0,3.24732229795521) and saw an apparently abandoned stretch of highway between the Will Rogers Turnpike and Historic Route 66.

Is this an earlier alignment of the Will Rogers, say before the Creek Turnpike was built?

That is exactly what it is. The Creek Turnpike in that section was finished around 2002, and I-44 was rerouted along U.S. 412 for an extra mile east to the Creek.

mightyace

  • Freeway
  • ****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3235
  • Age: 48
  • Last Login: October 04, 2012, 01:36:29 PM
    • My Flickr Photos
Re: I-44 Tulsa
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2009, 09:48:36 PM »

That is exactly what it is. The Creek Turnpike in that section was finished around 2002, and I-44 was rerouted along U.S. 412 for an extra mile east to the Creek.

Do you think they'll ever release the ROW as its no longer in use?
Logged
My Flickr Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mightyace

I'm out of this F***KING PLACE!

okroads

  • State Highway
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 510
  • Age: 29
  • Location: Oklahoma City, OK
  • Last Login: June 17, 2013, 09:37:14 PM
    • OKRoads Flickr
Re: I-44 Tulsa
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2009, 10:41:14 PM »

That is exactly what it is. The Creek Turnpike in that section was finished around 2002, and I-44 was rerouted along U.S. 412 for an extra mile east to the Creek.

Do you think they'll ever release the ROW as its no longer in use?
Considering that we are talking about Oklahoma, probably not.  :-D I don't know for sure, though.

Scott5114

  • Admin
  • Freeway
  • *****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4091
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 04:08:28 AM
    • scott5114.name
Re: I-44 Tulsa
« Reply #10 on: March 14, 2009, 01:11:59 AM »

Believe it or not, that section of bypassed freeway still has BGSes on it! (I saw some pictures of it on an urban exploration site.) I kinda want to explore it next time I'm around Tulsa...

It was also used as a prop in a Senator's reelection ads. The message basically was "Our roads suck! Vote for me, I'll fix them!" Yeah, of course that road sucks; it's been closed to traffic since 2002...
Logged
There is no secret war with Nimbya.
 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.