AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Congratulations to AlpsROADS (Steve), winner of our May trivia! Our next trivia night is coming up on June 19, to be hosted by Steve. Sign up to host in the future.

Author Topic: A second Diverging Diamond planned in Minnesota  (Read 1105 times)

froggie

  • Freeway
  • ****
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 3155
  • Location: Norfolk, VA/Greensboro, VT/Wherever the Navy sends me...
  • Last Login: Today at 06:40:59 AM
    • Froggie's Place
A second Diverging Diamond planned in Minnesota
« on: March 11, 2011, 02:38:39 PM »

This time on US 52 at Elk Run, between Oronoco and Pine Island.
Logged

J N Winkler

  • Freeway
  • ****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3171
  • Location: Wichita, Kansas/Oxford, Great Britain
  • Last Login: Today at 01:53:47 AM
Re: A second Diverging Diamond planned in Minnesota
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2011, 03:04:17 PM »

Apparently it is a design-build, with the procurement process taking place last year (RFP issued June 3, award announced November 23).
Logged
"It is necessary to spend a hundred lire now to save a thousand lire later."--Piero Puricelli, explaining the need for a first-class road system to Benito Mussolini

kphoger

  • Freeway
  • ****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3232
  • Location: Wichita, KS
  • Last Login: May 20, 2013, 11:22:27 PM
Re: A second Diverging Diamond planned in Minnesota
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2011, 01:34:09 PM »

Diverging diamonds are fun!  I went out of my way last time I was in Springfield, MO, to navigate the one there.  I also frequently drive to Minnesota; they need to put one on I-35, though, so it would be on my way... Stinkers...
Logged
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.

kphoger

  • Freeway
  • ****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3232
  • Location: Wichita, KS
  • Last Login: May 20, 2013, 11:22:27 PM
Re: A second Diverging Diamond planned in Minnesota
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2011, 10:34:50 AM »

Ooh!  Just found out there's a new one in Branson, at an exit I use frequently on trips there.  Jct US-65 / MO-248, just north of the Branson Landing roundabout.
Logged
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.

J N Winkler

  • Freeway
  • ****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3171
  • Location: Wichita, Kansas/Oxford, Great Britain
  • Last Login: Today at 01:53:47 AM
Re: A second Diverging Diamond planned in Minnesota
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2011, 10:56:49 AM »

For me the US 52/Elk Run DDI will be even more fun when I can download and study the plans for it.  If it had been done as a conventional design-bid-build contract, the plans would likely be available on MnDOT's EDMS sometime around now.  Since it is a design-build, the record drawings will be uploaded significantly in arrears (probably up to five years) of completion.

MnDOT sign design sheets are fun--nearly always pattern-accurate with none of that Clearview nonsense.
Logged
"It is necessary to spend a hundred lire now to save a thousand lire later."--Piero Puricelli, explaining the need for a first-class road system to Benito Mussolini

M86

  • Viaduct
  • ***
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 97
  • Last Login: July 07, 2012, 10:02:49 PM
Re: A second Diverging Diamond planned in Minnesota
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2012, 04:59:40 AM »

Not sure if I've mentioned this at all, but they are considering a Diverging Diamond in Sioux Falls, SD as well... It's at the 41st Street & I-29 interchange.
http://sddot.com/PE/projdev/planning_ss_I29Exit77.asp
There's a link to the study.  It looks like they are considering a SPUI as well.  Knowing that study area well, I would say either would be a huge improvement.
Also within the study, they are considering a center turn overpass at 41st & Louise, or triple left turn lanes.  Either would be a first for South Dakota.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2012, 05:03:07 AM by M86 »
Logged
 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.