AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

TRIVIA MOVED BACK TO WEDNESDAY. Your host isn't any happier about these changes than you are. Sign up to host in the future.

Author Topic: I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)  (Read 1665 times)

DevalDragon

  • Trail
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 22
  • Age: 35
  • Location: Chicago, Illinois
  • Last Login: June 11, 2013, 01:44:25 AM
    • Deval Dragon's Website

Because I like driving thru the Wheeling Tunnel :-p

Because people are dumb and will stay on the mainline 35 route instead of taking a 3di advertised as a bypass. Why do people stay on I-70 through Wheeling, WV?
Logged

NE2

  • Interstate
  • *****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 6041
  • Age: -100
  • Location: central Florida
  • Last Login: Today at 03:00:56 AM
I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2012, 11:44:04 AM »

And bumping threads, apparently.
Logged
"Yawn" is shorthand for "We've already discussed this ad nauseam and there's no point in going through the motions again".

Florida route log | pre-1945

bugo

  • Turnpike
  • ***
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2461
  • Location: Creek Nation
  • Last Login: Today at 04:03:49 AM
I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2012, 11:06:41 AM »

Because people are dumb and will stay on the mainline 35 route instead of taking a 3di advertised as a bypass. Why do people stay on I-70 through Wheeling, WV?

Because I wanted to see the tunnel.
Logged

Scott5114

  • Admin
  • Freeway
  • *****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4091
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 04:08:28 AM
    • scott5114.name
I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2012, 10:27:44 PM »

Because people are dumb and will stay on the mainline 35 route instead of taking a 3di advertised as a bypass. Why do people stay on I-70 through Wheeling, WV?

Because I wanted to see the tunnel.

Well, yeah, that's why I took I-70 through the tunnel the one time I was in Wheeling (and also to clinch the I-70 in WV mileage). But those aren't really valid reasons for most people.
Logged
There is no secret war with Nimbya.

bugo

  • Turnpike
  • ***
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2461
  • Location: Creek Nation
  • Last Login: Today at 04:03:49 AM
I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2012, 10:42:31 PM »

They should really sign I-470 as I-70 and I-70 as Business I-70.
Logged

agentsteel53

  • invisible hand
  • Site Contributor
  • Likes The Forum Way, Way Too Much
  • **
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12476
  • long live button copy!

  • Age: 32
  • Location: San Diego, CA
  • Last Login: June 18, 2013, 10:28:09 PM
    • AARoads Shield Gallery
I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2012, 11:45:24 PM »

They should really sign I-470 as I-70 and I-70 as Business I-70.

I disagree, because I feel that business interstates should have direct access to at least the theoretical possibility of actual businesses.

limited-access roads should not be "green interstates".
Logged

Takumi

  • Turnpike
  • ***
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1641
  • midsibidi the crasy man

  • Age: 27
  • Location: Lnrvdxkk Oblast, Alanland
  • Last Login: June 18, 2013, 11:00:47 PM
    • Flashing Lights (blog)
I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2012, 11:53:56 PM »

limited-access roads should not be "green interstates".

*coughpiedmonttriadcough*
Logged
"It's only a Honda" is shorthand for "I'm embarrassed that I lost to a car that cost less than mine did."

Latest blog post: Hampton Roads III | Latest video: VA 182

bugo

  • Turnpike
  • ***
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2461
  • Location: Creek Nation
  • Last Login: Today at 04:03:49 AM
I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #7 on: March 20, 2012, 01:37:39 AM »

They should really sign I-470 as I-70 and I-70 as Business I-70.

I disagree, because I feel that business interstates should have direct access to at least the theoretical possibility of actual businesses.

limited-access roads should not be "green interstates".

Call it I-870.  Whatever you want to call it.  The point was to get mainline I-70 traffic to take I-470.
Logged

NE2

  • Interstate
  • *****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 6041
  • Age: -100
  • Location: central Florida
  • Last Login: Today at 03:00:56 AM
I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2012, 01:56:08 AM »

Older thread on I-470: http://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=2509.0
Apparently I-470 has grade issues. So trucks should be encouraged to use I-70.

I suppose a valid question is why, with the US 250 freeway now built, the downtown ramps that necessitate I-70 being one lane are still there. Would it be reasonable to have traffic instead take US 250 to 16th Street?
Logged
"Yawn" is shorthand for "We've already discussed this ad nauseam and there's no point in going through the motions again".

Florida route log | pre-1945

texaskdog

  • State Highway
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 864
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Last Login: June 18, 2013, 04:51:45 PM
I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2012, 10:59:43 AM »

They should really sign I-470 as I-70 and I-70 as Business I-70.

I disagree, because I feel that business interstates should have direct access to at least the theoretical possibility of actual businesses.

limited-access roads should not be "green interstates".

I think the mainline interstate should always avoid town, and the "1xx" should head into town.  Such as putting the thru I-94 traffic onto 694 and get it out of downtown.  Drivers who want to find downtown will find it.
Logged

rte66man

  • County Route
  • *****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 312
  • Location: Warr Acres, OK
  • Last Login: June 18, 2013, 06:23:24 PM
I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #10 on: March 20, 2012, 11:26:38 AM »

When did this thread get hijacked?

Last I checked, I 70 runs nowhere near Austin, TX.

rte66man
Logged

bugo

  • Turnpike
  • ***
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2461
  • Location: Creek Nation
  • Last Login: Today at 04:03:49 AM
I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #11 on: March 20, 2012, 06:11:31 PM »

When did this thread get hijacked?

Last I checked, I 70 runs nowhere near Austin, TX.

Threads are going to drift.  That's the nature of the beast.  Some of the best discussions come out of thread drift.
Logged

Steve

  • Do Not Molest
  • Admin
  • Interstate
  • *****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 6400
  • Fire Sather! Fire Goodell! Ban Isiah Thomas!

  • Age: 30
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: June 18, 2013, 11:40:24 PM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #12 on: March 20, 2012, 07:28:53 PM »

You know, I didn't even notice I-470/70 wasn't the original topic...
Logged
~ Steve
http://www.alpsroads.net
If the rainbow in my avatar offends you, you're wrong.

hbelkins

  • DOT Employee
  • Freeway
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4159
  • All bytes used & opinions given here are my own.

  • Age: 51
  • Location: Kentucky
  • Last Login: June 18, 2013, 11:25:36 PM
    • Millennium Highway
Re: I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2012, 12:02:43 PM »

And it somehow got moved into the Ohio Valley forum...
Logged
I'm for the 14 and the 29, and whoever's racing against the 24 and the 48.

texaskdog

  • State Highway
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 864
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Last Login: June 18, 2013, 04:51:45 PM
Re: I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2012, 01:13:44 PM »

I thought we were talking about I-95 not being connected in New Jersey?
Logged

kphoger

  • Freeway
  • ****
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3496
  • Location: Wichita, KS
  • Last Login: June 18, 2013, 10:16:15 PM
Re: I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #15 on: March 22, 2012, 02:07:17 PM »

And I thought it started out with the optimal speed limit for I-366 from Juneau to Ketchikan...
Logged
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.

Henry

  • State Highway
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 846
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Chicago, IL/Seattle, WA
  • Last Login: June 18, 2013, 11:57:51 AM
    • Henry Watson's Online Freeway
Re: I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #16 on: April 07, 2012, 09:25:52 PM »

limited-access roads should not be "green interstates".

*coughpiedmonttriadcough*
And Sacramento too.

They should really sign I-470 as I-70 and I-70 as Business I-70.

I disagree, because I feel that business interstates should have direct access to at least the theoretical possibility of actual businesses.

limited-access roads should not be "green interstates".

I think the mainline interstate should always avoid town, and the "1xx" should head into town.  Such as putting the thru I-94 traffic onto 694 and get it out of downtown.  Drivers who want to find downtown will find it.
While that may be true, the opposite is set up in most areas. Which is why, for example, I-85 goes through the middle of Atlanta, instead of around it, like I-285 does.

I think this discussion should be brought up in the Fictional Highways section, because AFAIK, WV wouldn't want to flip I-70 and I-470 around just for the sake of keeping through traffic out of Wheeling.
Logged
Check out my ImageShack profile!

texaskdog

  • State Highway
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 864
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Last Login: June 18, 2013, 04:51:45 PM
Re: I-70/470 (Re: Potential I-35 Austin Bypass/I-35 Business/SH 130 Flip??)
« Reply #17 on: April 09, 2012, 09:03:52 PM »

Figure these days most cities would want to keep thru traffic away from their downtowns
Logged
 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.