{"id":58187,"date":"2024-09-13T12:47:28","date_gmt":"2024-09-13T16:47:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/?p=58187"},"modified":"2024-11-11T15:48:45","modified_gmt":"2024-11-11T20:48:45","slug":"3d-mapping-tins-dems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/3d-mapping-tins-dems\/","title":{"rendered":"3D Mapping &#8211; TINs and DEMs"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-1 fusion-flex-container has-pattern-background has-mask-background nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling\" style=\"--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;\" ><div class=\"fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap\" style=\"max-width:1144px;margin-left: calc(-4% \/ 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% \/ 2 );\"><div class=\"fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-0 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column\" style=\"--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-order-medium:0;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-order-small:0;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;\"><div class=\"fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column\"><div class=\"fusion-text fusion-text-1\"><p>Moving on from Spatial Data Quality in GIS Special Topics, the next Lab focuses on surfaces with a comparison of the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and Triangular Irregular Network (TIN). A surface in GIS is a geographic phenomena represented as continuous data. Continuous spatial data references geographic objects characterized by very gradual boundaries such as temperature or elevation.<\/p>\n<div>The most common way to represent elevation data is with contour lines. Contour lines are 2-dimensional features with attributes containing the value of the surface at a given location. They can be derived by the TIN vector model or the DEM raster model.<\/div>\n<div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div>TINs are used exclusively to represent a 3-dimensional surface. A series of linked irregular triangles comprised from elevation points (nodes) in 3D (X,Y,Z) coordinates&nbsp;(Manandhar, 2005)&nbsp;occurring at any given location&nbsp;represent the 3D surface. The topological relationship of the network of triangles creates a continuous surface. The normal vector of each triangle is used to assign the properties of Slope and Aspect.<\/div>\n<div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div>DEMs are the simplest way to represent a topographic surface. A DEM is a regular raster that uses a regular rectangular grid method (Manandhar, 2005) with cell values representing elevation or spot height. The cell size of a DEM determines the resolution. Therefore a DEM with a high number of smaller sized cells provides more accuracy than a DEM with less larger sized cells. Data becomes more implicit with larger cell sizes.<\/div>\n<div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div>One part of this week&#8217;s lab utilizes a DEM to develop a 3-dimensional Ski Run Suitability Map. Initially the supplied DEM was converted to a TIN for the 3D component for the Local Scene. The suitability parameters included Elevation where areas exceeding 2,500 meters are most favorable, Slope where angles between 30 and 45 degrees rank highest, and Aspect where south and west facing slopes are most preferred.<\/div>\n<div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div>Following reclassification, respective rasters were generated from the DEM using geoprocessing tools in ArcGIS Pro. These in turn were input into the Weighted Overlay tool where the suitability rate for aspect is 25%, elevation is 40% and slope is 35%.<\/div>\n<\/div><div class=\"fusion-image-element awb-imageframe-style awb-imageframe-style-below awb-imageframe-style-1\" style=\"text-align:center;--awb-caption-margin-top:10px;--awb-caption-margin-bottom:10px;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h4_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h4_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h4_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h4_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h4_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h4_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h4_typography-letter-spacing);\"><span class=\" fusion-imageframe imageframe-none imageframe-1 hover-type-none\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gis-classes\/Part_B.png\" class=\"fusion-lightbox\" data-rel=\"iLightbox[3d-mapping]\" data-title=\"Ski Run Suitability Map\" title=\"Ski Run Suitability Map\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"768\" height=\"508\" alt=\"The final 3D Ski Run Suitability Map for Lab 2.1 Part B\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gis-classes\/Part_B-768x508.png\" class=\"img-responsive wp-image-58188 disable-lazyload\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gis-classes\/Part_B-320x212.png 320w, https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gis-classes\/Part_B-480x318.png 480w, https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gis-classes\/Part_B-768x508.png 768w, https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gis-classes\/Part_B.png 1247w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><\/span><div class=\"awb-imageframe-caption-container\" style=\"text-align:center;\"><div class=\"awb-imageframe-caption\"><h4 class=\"awb-imageframe-caption-title\">The final 3D Ski Run Suitability Map for Lab 2.1 Part B<\/h4><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-text fusion-text-2\"><p>The next part of the lab further explores TINs with adjustments to symbology between elevation, slope and aspect. The deliverable included the generation of contours and selecting appropriate colors.<\/p>\n<\/div><div class=\"fusion-image-element awb-imageframe-style awb-imageframe-style-below awb-imageframe-style-2\" style=\"text-align:center;--awb-caption-margin-top:10px;--awb-caption-margin-bottom:10px;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h4_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h4_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h4_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h4_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h4_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h4_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h4_typography-letter-spacing);\"><span class=\" fusion-imageframe imageframe-none imageframe-2 hover-type-none\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gis-classes\/Part_C.png\" class=\"fusion-lightbox\" data-rel=\"iLightbox[3d-mapping]\" data-title=\"TIN with Graduated Color for Slope and Contours\" title=\"TIN with Graduated Color for Slope and Contours\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"768\" height=\"508\" alt=\"TIN with Graduated Color for Slope and Contours\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%27http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%27%20width%3D%271247%27%20height%3D%27825%27%20viewBox%3D%270%200%201247%20825%27%3E%3Crect%20width%3D%271247%27%20height%3D%27825%27%20fill-opacity%3D%220%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" data-orig-src=\"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gis-classes\/Part_C-768x508.png\" class=\"lazyload img-responsive wp-image-58189\"\/><\/a><\/span><div class=\"awb-imageframe-caption-container\" style=\"text-align:center;\"><div class=\"awb-imageframe-caption\"><h4 class=\"awb-imageframe-caption-title\">Cividis color TIN with 50 meter contours and 250 meter index contours.<\/h4><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-text fusion-text-3\"><div>The last section of the lab provides a point feature class that will represent the mass points for a TIN. Geoprocessing of these points were input along with a study area soft clip polygon boundary in the Create TIN tool. The resulting TIN was modified symbolically to show contours set at an interval of 100 meters.<\/div>\n<div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div>The same mass points feature class was input into the Spline tool to create a DEM. Contours were subsequently generated from the DEM with additional geoprocessing. The two contour feature classes were then compared.<\/div>\n<\/div><div class=\"fusion-image-element awb-imageframe-style awb-imageframe-style-below awb-imageframe-style-3\" style=\"text-align:center;--awb-caption-margin-top:10px;--awb-caption-margin-bottom:10px;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h4_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h4_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h4_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h4_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h4_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h4_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h4_typography-letter-spacing);\"><span class=\" fusion-imageframe imageframe-none imageframe-3 hover-type-none\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gis-classes\/Part_D.png\" class=\"fusion-lightbox\" data-rel=\"iLightbox[3d-mapping]\" data-title=\"Comparison of TIN and DEM based Contours\" title=\"Comparison of TIN and DEM based Contours\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"445\" height=\"576\" alt=\"Comparison of TIN and DEM based Contours\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%27http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%27%20width%3D%272550%27%20height%3D%273300%27%20viewBox%3D%270%200%202550%203300%27%3E%3Crect%20width%3D%272550%27%20height%3D%273300%27%20fill-opacity%3D%220%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" data-orig-src=\"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gis-classes\/Part_D-445x576.png\" class=\"lazyload img-responsive wp-image-58190\"\/><\/a><\/span><div class=\"awb-imageframe-caption-container\" style=\"text-align:center;\"><div class=\"awb-imageframe-caption\"><h4 class=\"awb-imageframe-caption-title\">Comparison of TIN and DEM based Contours<\/h4><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-text fusion-text-4\"><div>While not necessarily more accurate, the DEM based contours have smoother curvature resulting from the implicit data values from each grid cell (Manandhar, 2005). Appearing more jagged in areas with less slope, the TIN based contours are derived from every node, where 3D coordinates are more explicit. There are less Faces (triangles) in flatter areas.<\/div>\n<div>\u00a0<\/div>\n<div>References:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<div>Manandhar, N. (2005). Comparison of TIN and Grid Method of Contour Generation from Spot Height.\u00a0<i>Nepalese Journal on Geoinformatics, 4,<\/i>\u00a01-8.<\/div>\n<div><span data-keep-original-tag=\"false\" data-original-attrs=\"\"> https:\/\/www.nepjol.info\/index.php\/NJG\/article\/view\/51271\/38351<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":58188,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1600,1585,1581,1608,1606],"class_list":["post-58187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-3d-visualization","tag-cartography","tag-geographic-information-systems","tag-gis4930","tag-modeling"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58187"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58187\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58191,"href":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58187\/revisions\/58191"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/58188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aaroads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}