AARoads Forum

Regional Boards => Central States => Topic started by: M86 on November 29, 2013, 02:32:40 AM

Title: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: M86 on November 29, 2013, 02:32:40 AM
I've tried to search through the forum for my question, but I've come up empty... Even though I know this had to have come up for discussion at some time.

What is the standard for Missouri traffic signals?  I've seen so many traffic signals with an "up" arrow for traffic going through/straight, instead of the solid green.  Was this a standard back in the day... or is MoDOT still installing it?  I just drove through an intersection in Joplin on Range Line Road, and the signal assemblies (for a green light) on the arm were a mix of an up arrow and solid green... but I believe MoDOT did that for the right turn lane.
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: Scott5114 on November 29, 2013, 04:08:47 AM
There are a lot of MoDOT signals with green up arrows in Springfield, too.

Traffic signals are kind of interesting in Missouri, since MoDOT handles everything to do with them on state highways, including signage, so MoDOT standard mastarm signage (which I believe is identical to a diagram in the MUTCD) overrides whatever house style a city has. (For example, prior to the 2009 MUTCD, it was easy to tell whose signals were whose in Springfield–MoDOT used all caps and Springfield used mixed case.)
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: M86 on November 30, 2013, 04:19:38 AM
The green up arrows are all over Missouri (at least the western part of it).

Here's a newer traffic signal at US 60 & Kodiak Road outside of Neosho:
http://goo.gl/maps/jdak7

It has the "up" arrows and the non-all caps signage... and they dropped the "Route" :)
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: US71 on November 30, 2013, 10:52:11 AM
A lot of this may be changing as Missouri is slowly adopting the Flashing Yellow Arrow.

http://www.ky3.com/news/local/red-green-and-flashingyellow-new-style-of-traffic-signals-arrive-in-the-ozarks/-/21048998/23218950/-/11o94wp/-/index.html
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: M86 on December 01, 2013, 03:56:50 AM
Quote from: US71 on November 30, 2013, 10:52:11 AM
A lot of this may be changing as Missouri is slowly adopting the Flashing Yellow Arrow.
http://www.ky3.com/news/local/red-green-and-flashingyellow-new-style-of-traffic-signals-arrive-in-the-ozarks/-/21048998/23218950/-/11o94wp/-/index.html
Wow... I'm surprised it took this long for the flashing yellow to enter SW MO.

I don't think it'll change much... I still want to know the standard for the "up" arrows, or installing solid greens on signals.  Now if MoDOT will just stick with non-uppercase signage on signal poles.
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: Revive 755 on December 01, 2013, 08:55:51 PM
The main MoDOT standard for green arrows is under 902.5.11 in MODOT's policy guide:
http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=902.5_Traffic_Control_Signal_Features_%28MUTCD_Chapter_4D%29#902.5.30_Signal_Indications_for_Right-Turn_Movements_.E2.80.93_General_.28MUTCD_Section_4D.21.29 (http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=902.5_Traffic_Control_Signal_Features_%28MUTCD_Chapter_4D%29#902.5.30_Signal_Indications_for_Right-Turn_Movements_.E2.80.93_General_.28MUTCD_Section_4D.21.29)

It appears the green arrow is used when the opposing left turn is left on green arrow only.
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: M86 on December 02, 2013, 03:09:11 AM
Quote from: Revive 755 on December 01, 2013, 08:55:51 PM
The main MoDOT standard for green arrows is under 902.5.11 in MODOT's policy guide:
http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=902.5_Traffic_Control_Signal_Features_%28MUTCD_Chapter_4D%29#902.5.30_Signal_Indications_for_Right-Turn_Movements_.E2.80.93_General_.28MUTCD_Section_4D.21.29 (http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=902.5_Traffic_Control_Signal_Features_%28MUTCD_Chapter_4D%29#902.5.30_Signal_Indications_for_Right-Turn_Movements_.E2.80.93_General_.28MUTCD_Section_4D.21.29)

It appears the green arrow is used when the opposing left turn is left on green arrow only.

Thank you for that info.  I've seen MoDOT signals that defy that rule... Bah... I'll let it rest! :)
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: Mdcastle on December 08, 2013, 12:19:52 PM
Quote from: Revive 755 on December 01, 2013, 08:55:51 PM
The main MoDOT standard for green arrows is under 902.5.11 in MODOT's policy guide:
http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=902.5_Traffic_Control_Signal_Features_%28MUTCD_Chapter_4D%29#902.5.30_Signal_Indications_for_Right-Turn_Movements_.E2.80.93_General_.28MUTCD_Section_4D.21.29 (http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=902.5_Traffic_Control_Signal_Features_%28MUTCD_Chapter_4D%29#902.5.30_Signal_Indications_for_Right-Turn_Movements_.E2.80.93_General_.28MUTCD_Section_4D.21.29)

It appears the green arrow is used when the opposing left turn is left on green arrow only.

This is one of the things that's useful if you know about it, but is probably too subtle to make a difference for the average driver.
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: ColossalBlocks on August 07, 2016, 11:29:03 PM
MoDot is changing a lot of stuff. Remember traffic lights with full reds but green and yellow arrows? Those are gone now. Soon MoDot is probably going to replace all the Doghouse lights with 4 LED lights.
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: US71 on August 07, 2016, 11:44:31 PM
Quote from: ColossalBlocks on August 07, 2016, 11:29:03 PM
MoDot is changing a lot of stuff. Remember traffic lights with full reds but green and yellow arrows? Those are gone now. Soon MoDot is probably going to replace all the Doghouse lights with 4 LED lights.

Liberty, MO is fond of 3 light set-ups with the bottom being a combo green arrow/flashing yellow arrow.
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: M86 on August 22, 2016, 04:11:12 AM
Quote from: US71 on August 07, 2016, 11:44:31 PM
Liberty, MO is fond of 3 light set-ups with the bottom being a combo green arrow/flashing yellow arrow.
Yeah, I'm thinking they borrowed that from some of the western KC, KS burbs.  Over there, in Lenexa (if I remember right) anyway, they would use a 4 signal and have the bottom light do yellow/green arrow.

It's bad practice.  Color blindness and driver expectancy play a part. 
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: jeffandnicole on August 22, 2016, 06:19:11 AM
Quote from: M86 on August 22, 2016, 04:11:12 AM
Quote from: US71 on August 07, 2016, 11:44:31 PM
Liberty, MO is fond of 3 light set-ups with the bottom being a combo green arrow/flashing yellow arrow.
Yeah, I'm thinking they borrowed that from some of the western KC, KS burbs.  Over there, in Lenexa (if I remember right) anyway, they would use a 4 signal and have the bottom light do yellow/green arrow.

It's bad practice.  Color blindness and driver expectancy play a part. 

Some states have used green/yellow combo arrows for *decades*. The only place where people complain about it is here by people who are not colorblind.  I've never see where colorblind people - including those like my dad - have ever said they had an issue with a combo green/yellow arrow.
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: Scott5114 on August 24, 2016, 06:31:36 PM
I don't think it's so much colorblindness that's an issue, but the lack of the visual cue of the arrow "jumping" from segment to segment that serves as a noticeable indication the light has changed. Just changing color is more subtle.
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: ColossalBlocks on September 28, 2016, 09:47:07 PM
This coming from a Missourian, It is the crappy straight signal.

https://goo.gl/maps/5MnN14vZcQ12 (https://goo.gl/maps/5MnN14vZcQ12)
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: US71 on September 28, 2016, 11:10:06 PM
Quote from: ColossalBlocks on September 28, 2016, 09:47:07 PM
This coming from a Missourian, It is the crappy straight signal.

https://goo.gl/maps/5MnN14vZcQ12 (https://goo.gl/maps/5MnN14vZcQ12)
Looks like the other way has a Flashing Yellow Arrow, so some kind of signal is needed.
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: M86 on October 17, 2016, 01:48:46 AM
Quote from: ColossalBlocks on September 28, 2016, 09:47:07 PM
This coming from a Missourian, It is the crappy straight signal.

https://goo.gl/maps/5MnN14vZcQ12 (https://goo.gl/maps/5MnN14vZcQ12)
I don't see anything of issue at that intersection. What's wrong with that?
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: ColossalBlocks on December 29, 2016, 06:05:53 PM
The crappy straight mast arm signal. Nothing but straight.
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: jakeroot on December 29, 2016, 06:14:54 PM
Quote from: ColossalBlocks on December 29, 2016, 06:05:53 PM
The crappy straight mast arm signal. Nothing but straight.

Huh? Are we talking about something visible in Street View?

EDIT: The signal or the mast arm? Be specific, bud.
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: US71 on December 29, 2016, 08:32:07 PM
Quote from: ColossalBlocks on December 29, 2016, 06:05:53 PM
The crappy straight mast arm signal. Nothing but straight.
Is this more your liking?
https://goo.gl/maps/ZcVmCf9cfKt
Title: Re: Missouri Traffic Signals
Post by: Revive 755 on December 29, 2016, 09:59:35 PM
Quote from: ColossalBlocks on December 29, 2016, 06:05:53 PM
The crappy straight mast arm signal. Nothing but straight.

Be thankful MoDOT didn't use some sort of span wire.  They don't exactly have the budget to go for more decorative mast arms at the moment.