News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.

Main Menu

I-265 Ohio River Bridge

Started by mgk920, March 06, 2012, 11:50:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

NWI_Irish96

Quote from: tidecat on December 03, 2013, 08:38:39 PM
I thought Exit 0 was going away.  Was I wrong?

My understanding is that Southbound Exit 0 is being eliminated but it will still exist Northbound. 
Indiana: counties 100%, highways 100%
Illinois: counties 100%, highways 61%
Michigan: counties 100%, highways 56%
Wisconsin: counties 86%, highways 23%


thefro

Quote from: cabiness42 on December 04, 2013, 07:58:44 AM
Quote from: tidecat on December 03, 2013, 08:38:39 PM
I thought Exit 0 was going away.  Was I wrong?

My understanding is that Southbound Exit 0 is being eliminated but it will still exist Northbound.

That'd be smart as it already is a bottleneck as-is.  Add people changing lanes quickly to try to dart off the Interstate and avoid the tolls and it could get pretty bad in the future.

NWI_Irish96

I-65 Exit 1 Southbound (Stansifer Ave/10th St/US 31) has a new traffic pattern.  The ramp/access road has been shifted to the right onto new pavement. 
Indiana: counties 100%, highways 100%
Illinois: counties 100%, highways 61%
Michigan: counties 100%, highways 56%
Wisconsin: counties 86%, highways 23%

NWI_Irish96

The ramp from I-65 northbound to I-64 westbound has been closed indefinitely due to the discovery of a failing support column.
The I-64 eastbound to I-65 southbound ramp is already closed to due bridge construction.

I-264 is the detour for both closures.
Indiana: counties 100%, highways 100%
Illinois: counties 100%, highways 61%
Michigan: counties 100%, highways 56%
Wisconsin: counties 86%, highways 23%

ARMOURERERIC

I don't now the sequence of construction, obviously, but in light of this development, could they not just close all ramps from 65 North to 64 and all ramps from 64 going south on 65, would that speed up construction?

hbelkins

Quote from: cabiness42 on December 22, 2013, 07:23:42 AM
The ramp from I-65 northbound to I-64 westbound has been closed indefinitely due to the discovery of a failing support column.
The I-64 eastbound to I-65 southbound ramp is already closed to due bridge construction.

I-264 is the detour for both closures.

The contractor on site for the new bridge is going to fix the support column.


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

NE2

They should have built 265 first. Then 86ed 64 west of 65.
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

NWI_Irish96

Quote from: NE2 on December 22, 2013, 02:54:41 PM
They should have built 265 first. Then 86ed 64 west of 65.

That never was/is going to happen.  A lot of really rich people live in Floyd county and commute to downtown Louisville via I-64.
Indiana: counties 100%, highways 100%
Illinois: counties 100%, highways 61%
Michigan: counties 100%, highways 56%
Wisconsin: counties 86%, highways 23%

tdindy88

Although I am not one to necessarily argue for the 8664 idea, didn't that plan include keeping the I-64 freeway segment from I-264 to Downtown Louisville but without the freeway connection to 65 and 71?

hbelkins



Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

tidecat

Quote from: tdindy88 on December 22, 2013, 06:23:22 PM
Although I am not one to necessarily argue for the 8664 idea, didn't that plan include keeping the I-64 freeway segment from I-264 to Downtown Louisville but without the freeway connection to 65 and 71?
Yes.  The stub of I-64 ("I-364" under the 8664 plan) would have run from the current junction of I-64 and I-265 to 22nd Street.
Clinched: I-264 (KY), I-265 (KY), I-359 (AL), I-459 (AL), I-865 (IN)

silverback1065

Quote from: tidecat on January 04, 2014, 03:43:49 PM
Quote from: tdindy88 on December 22, 2013, 06:23:22 PM
Although I am not one to necessarily argue for the 8664 idea, didn't that plan include keeping the I-64 freeway segment from I-264 to Downtown Louisville but without the freeway connection to 65 and 71?
Yes.  The stub of I-64 ("I-364" under the 8664 plan) would have run from the current junction of I-64 and I-265 to 22nd Street.

well the 8664 people lost they need to get over it and accept the new plan

seicer

There is no losing or winning. There is compromise and revaluation. After the beltway has been completed, it would be good to reexamine traffic patterns and how they shift and see if the 8664 proposal would be worth exploring. After all, the viaduct along the river will need significant rehabilitation in another 20 years - and its demolition could be justified - just like many other elevated highways.

tidecat

Sherman, that might be 8664's next best shot - wait for I-64 over the Great Lawn to need replacement.  Depending on growth patterns, it might also be wise to push one of the two as a companion part of the plan:

(1) An extension and new non-interstate bridge for US 31W from the Portland area, to Vincennes Street.  US 31W can use IN-111 and IN-311 to rejoin US 31 at Sellersburg, which of course is to where US 31E would be extended.  This makes the Portland area more accessible from Indiana, and provides an alternative should there be a problem with I-64 over the Ohio River.

(2) A southwestern bridge to connect the Gene Snyder Freeway to I-64 in Indiana.
Clinched: I-264 (KY), I-265 (KY), I-359 (AL), I-459 (AL), I-865 (IN)

silverback1065

Quote from: tidecat on January 05, 2014, 06:32:27 PM
Sherman, that might be 8664's next best shot - wait for I-64 over the Great Lawn to need replacement.  Depending on growth patterns, it might also be wise to push one of the two as a companion part of the plan:

(1) An extension and new non-interstate bridge for US 31W from the Portland area, to Vincennes Street.  US 31W can use IN-111 and IN-311 to rejoin US 31 at Sellersburg, which of course is to where US 31E would be extended.  This makes the Portland area more accessible from Indiana, and provides an alternative should there be a problem with I-64 over the Ohio River.

(2) A southwestern bridge to connect the Gene Snyder Freeway to I-64 in Indiana.

This is assuming indiana would agree on doing that.  311 doesn't exist anymore, and 111 barely still exists.

hbelkins

It's taken them decades just to build the I-265 east end bridge. With Brent Spence needing replacement and a new I-69 crossing also needed, I don't think Louisville will be getting any more bridges anytime soon.

I also don't think the 8664 idea will go anywhere. As badly as I talk about Louisville, there are some people with intelligence there.  :bigass:


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

froggie

QuoteIt's taken them decades just to build the I-265 east end bridge. With Brent Spence needing replacement and a new I-69 crossing also needed, I don't think Louisville will be getting any more bridges anytime soon.

A stronger argument could be made for either a new I-64 bridge or a new bridge nearby it than for a new I-69 bridge.  Especially with the way Federal funding has gone over the past few years, I-69 is at best on life support, if not flatlining.

NWI_Irish96

Quote from: tidecat on January 05, 2014, 06:32:27 PM
(2) A southwestern bridge to connect the Gene Snyder Freeway to I-64 in Indiana.

The problem with building that bridge is not just the bridge, but the 15 or so miles from the bridge up to I-64, over some very hilly terrain.  It's also questionable how useful such a bridge would be for purposes other than going to the Horseshoe.
Indiana: counties 100%, highways 100%
Illinois: counties 100%, highways 61%
Michigan: counties 100%, highways 56%
Wisconsin: counties 86%, highways 23%

NE2

The terrain appears to level off greatly west of SR 11. Not that this bridge would necessarily be a good idea, but the hills probably aren't a problem.
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

NWI_Irish96

Some traffic changes coming up on the Indiana side:

On the east end: Beginning Thursday afternoon, the westbound lanes of IN 265 will close from 10th Street to Coopers Lane.  Eastbound and westbound traffic will each use one of the eastbound lanes.  People who commute to/from Clark Maritime Center via IN 265 are going to see increased travel times.

Downtown: Beginning Monday morning, Missouri Ave will be closed between Court Ave and Clark Blvd for utility work.
Indiana: counties 100%, highways 100%
Illinois: counties 100%, highways 61%
Michigan: counties 100%, highways 56%
Wisconsin: counties 86%, highways 23%

thefro

http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20140124/NEWS01/301240050/Ohio-River-bridges-price-tag-slashed-by-240-million

Both bridges are now supposed to be substantially complete by the end of 2016 according to this article.  East End Bridge by October 2016 (8 months ahead of schedule) and new downtown bridge by December 2016 (19 months ahead of schedule).

They've saved $240 million from the estimated price tag, mainly by shaving 200 feet off the tunnel on the Kentucky approach ($200 million savings) and by lower construction costs due to the schedule being sped up.

hbelkins

I'll be in Louisville June 4-6 for a work conference and that would make it awfully handy to have a meet there on Saturday, June 7.

However... https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=11553.0

As you can see there, I probably won't have a chance to scout for the meet and come up with a tour.

Would some of the posters on this thread who live near Louisville be willing to help out with putting something together?


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

NWI_Irish96

I live in the area and have time, but I've never organized or even been to a road meet before, so I'm not sure exactly what I would need to do.
Indiana: counties 100%, highways 100%
Illinois: counties 100%, highways 61%
Michigan: counties 100%, highways 56%
Wisconsin: counties 86%, highways 23%

Brandon

Quote from: cabiness42 on February 07, 2014, 02:18:10 PM
I live in the area and have time, but I've never organized or even been to a road meet before, so I'm not sure exactly what I would need to do.

You'd need to come up with a small amount of places to go see on a short tour.  Any new construction projects, any historic roads/bridges, etc that you think people might find interesting and photogenic.

Here's a thread about hosting a road meet: https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=9498.0
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

hbelkins

Quote from: cabiness42 on February 07, 2014, 02:18:10 PM
I live in the area and have time, but I've never organized or even been to a road meet before, so I'm not sure exactly what I would need to do.

I'd like to find places to see the progress of construction on both sides of the river for both bridges. Places where we could park with good access to views of construction sites.

It'd be best to confine talk about the meet itself to the meet thread I started.


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.