Now you can add Mahomes to the list of qb's that have more super bowl rings than Rodgers. I can't believe anyone could even argue Rodgers being the best of all time with just one super bowl ring.
Rings should not be the only metric for determining a good quarterback.
Yes, the QB's are tagged with win-loss-tied records, like they are
the reason a team wins, loses, or ties. This is similar to pitchers in baseball as if they play all defensive positions and hit in all nine spots.
It is a team game. All facets have to be hitting on all cylinders to be a champion. Look at great HOF QB's who never won a Super Bowl: Sonny Jurgensen, Dan Marino, Dan Fouts, Jim Kelly, and Fran Tarkenton. There are QB's that have won one: Joe Namath, Len Dawson, Johnny Unitas (even though he was injured early in Super Bowl V and Earl Morrall finished the game), Ken Stabler, Joe Theismann, Jim McMahon, Doug Williams, Jeff Hostetler, Mark Rypien, Steve Young (as a starter), Brett Favre, Kurt Warner, Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Joe Flacco, Russell Wilson, and the aforementioned Aaron Rodgers.
It is a team effort to win championships. Yes, it helps to have a very good or excellent QB, however, he is not the
only reason championships are won. It is the media that seems to be enamored with how many rings a QB has as the metric, with the gullible sports fans blindly following that edict.