All right, so, looking at the map of northeast Oklahoma and southeast Kansas, here's one thing I've always wondered: as far as the alignment of US 69 between Commerce and the US 160/69 junction east of Columbus and south of Pittsburg, why is it that the main routing of 69 follows the road through Columbus and Picher, rather than the road through Quapaw and Baxter Springs (which is instead designated as "Alt US 69")? For travelers headed north from Miami and Commerce or south from Pittsburg, the latter route, through Baxter Springs, involves no turns (the driver stays on the same road), whereas following the official 69 designation requires two turns. In addition, Picher was abandoned not that long ago due to being deemed too toxic to live in (old lead mine site), so one would think that the powers-that-be would want long-distance through traffic to avoid the area.
Personally, if I were AASHTO, I would swap the designations; that is, route "main 69" through Baxter Springs and Quapaw while putting "Alt 69" on the Columbus-Picher alignment. (Alternatively, the latter road, headed south from Columbus, could instead be designated as a southward extension of K-7; however, that would require KDOT to renumber the mileposts along the entire route. Also, the Oklahoma portion, from Picher to 69 near Commerce, would have to be another number because OK 7 already exists elsewhere in the state; in this case of an extended K-7, I could see Oklahoma's section of the Picher road as similarly being a northward extension of OK 69A. Or, a third option: once 69 is on the Baxter Springs alignment, just turn the Columbus-Picher road over to the respective counties in both states.)
Your thoughts? I wonder if I can get input from people who live in the area, or are at least familiar with it.
(Here's a map of the area, for reference:
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.0596904,-94.8425884,11z)