AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered at https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=33904.0
Corrected several already and appreciate your patience as we work through the rest.

Author Topic: South Lincoln Beltway trip report  (Read 2338 times)

SD Mapman

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1774
  • The best pace is a pace, and today is a good day.

  • Location: Running somewhere in Lawrence County
  • Last Login: Today at 03:33:01 PM
South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« on: December 21, 2022, 07:54:56 PM »

Figured I'd make this its own thread. Before the arctic blast of death settles in tomorrow and the ice completely covers my car I was able to travel the completed length of the South Lincoln Beltway (NE 2) this afternoon. It's a nice drive, though a bit surreal for someone like me who's been traveling to Lincoln for cross country meets, parties, etc. before any dirt work on this whatsoever. Old NE 2 is indeed Nebraska Parkway, with no business designation, and L55W has also been decommissioned. Sorry if the photos aren't the greatest, the ice was starting to come in.


Legacy signage for NE 2 by the S. 84th Walmart


Legacy milepost. There weren't any on the beltway yet.


New streetblade for old NE 2.


The snow-covered field straight ahead is where the road used to go.

More to come after dinner.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2022, 08:41:15 PM by SD Mapman »
Logged
The traveler sees what he sees, the tourist sees what he has come to see. - G.K. Chesterton

SD Mapman

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1774
  • The best pace is a pace, and today is a good day.

  • Location: Running somewhere in Lawrence County
  • Last Login: Today at 03:33:01 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2022, 08:40:55 PM »


First "JUNCTION 2" sign.


Lanes for each direction.


Several signs that tell people you have to turn left for East 2 (since no one is used to doing that).


First sign for Old Hwy 2.


Second sign for Old Hwy 2.


Exit signage for Old Hwy 2.
Logged
The traveler sees what he sees, the tourist sees what he has come to see. - G.K. Chesterton

SD Mapman

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1774
  • The best pace is a pace, and today is a good day.

  • Location: Running somewhere in Lawrence County
  • Last Login: Today at 03:33:01 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2022, 08:48:46 PM »


Upcoming exits, only the 70th St one is currently open.


First reassurance shield on the Beltway.


Signage for the closed 84th St exit.


Signage for the closed 84th St exit.


Sign gantries sitting on the closed bridge.


Reassurance shield and signage for the currently open exit (14 blocks to the mile in Lincoln).
Logged
The traveler sees what he sees, the tourist sees what he has come to see. - G.K. Chesterton

SD Mapman

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1774
  • The best pace is a pace, and today is a good day.

  • Location: Running somewhere in Lawrence County
  • Last Login: Today at 03:33:01 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2022, 09:38:03 PM »


Use 68th St to get to Roca and Hickman (farm towns that have become suburbs).


68th/70th exit.


Next two exits.


Shield after the 68th/70th exit.


Jamaica Ave./Bennet Rd exit.


No more exits till 77.


Last NE 2 shield.


77 coming up.


Last exit on the bypass.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2022, 10:38:27 PM by SD Mapman »
Logged
The traveler sees what he sees, the tourist sees what he has come to see. - G.K. Chesterton

webny99

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 12831
  • Age: 24
  • Location: Monroe County, NY
  • Last Login: Today at 09:21:10 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2022, 10:09:09 PM »

Thanks for sharing! Great to see this nearing completion. It is indeed a surreal experience to drive through a finished project after following its progress for years.
Logged

triplemultiplex

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3964
  • "You read it; you can't unread it!"

  • Location: inside the beltline
  • Last Login: December 01, 2023, 04:12:32 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2022, 10:20:07 AM »

Wow, full concrete shoulders like it's I-80.  Looks like a great facility.
My only complaint is that they didn't build it 20 years ago so it could've been closer into the city.

Now get to work freeway-converting the rest of US 77 between NE 2 and I-80, Nebraska. Chop, chop!
Logged
"That's just like... your opinion, man."

mvak36

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1350
  • Last Login: Today at 03:18:28 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2022, 06:46:55 PM »

^ And the East Beltway.
Logged
Counties: Counties visited
Travel Mapping: Summary

SD Mapman

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1774
  • The best pace is a pace, and today is a good day.

  • Location: Running somewhere in Lawrence County
  • Last Login: Today at 03:33:01 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2022, 10:11:03 PM »

Wow, full concrete shoulders like it's I-80.  Looks like a great facility.
My only complaint is that they didn't build it 20 years ago so it could've been closer into the city.

Now get to work freeway-converting the rest of US 77 between NE 2 and I-80, Nebraska. Chop, chop!
Feels like they built it to interstate standards, NDOT and the City should just bite the bullet and apply for I-280 to finish it off.
Logged
The traveler sees what he sees, the tourist sees what he has come to see. - G.K. Chesterton

The Ghostbuster

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4646
  • Age: 39
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Last Login: December 02, 2023, 07:44:05 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #8 on: December 22, 2022, 10:30:14 PM »

Little chance of that happening. And I’ve never been to Nebraska.
Logged

mrose

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 242
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Melbourne, AU / Denver, CO
  • Last Login: December 01, 2023, 12:59:34 AM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #9 on: December 23, 2022, 08:55:24 AM »

Need to get going on those at-grades on 77.
Logged

Bobby5280

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4011
  • Location: Lawton, OK
  • Last Login: December 02, 2023, 08:56:13 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #10 on: December 23, 2022, 12:07:32 PM »

Even if they eliminate the 5 at-grade intersections on US-77 between I-80 and NB-2 the resulting freeway would still be a spur, not a loop. So "I-280" wouldn't make any sense. It would have to be an odd number designation. And I think it might seem a little weird for two different Interstate spur routes going off I-80 with only one exit between them
Logged

mvak36

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1350
  • Last Login: Today at 03:18:28 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #11 on: December 23, 2022, 02:27:20 PM »

Even if they eliminate the 5 at-grade intersections on US-77 between I-80 and NB-2 the resulting freeway would still be a spur, not a loop. So "I-280" wouldn't make any sense. It would have to be an odd number designation. And I think it might seem a little weird for two different Interstate spur routes going off I-80 with only one exit between them
If they do the East beltway then I-280 would make sense. But that’s a long ways away from construction and I’m not sure if NDOT or the city of Lincoln wants an interstate designation.
Logged
Counties: Counties visited
Travel Mapping: Summary

Stephane Dumas

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2740
  • Last Login: Today at 08:39:20 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #12 on: December 23, 2022, 04:37:08 PM »

Even if they eliminate the 5 at-grade intersections on US-77 between I-80 and NB-2 the resulting freeway would still be a spur, not a loop. So "I-280" wouldn't make any sense. It would have to be an odd number designation. And I think it might seem a little weird for two different Interstate spur routes going off I-80 with only one exit between them
If they do the East beltway then I-280 would make sense. But that’s a long ways away from construction and I’m not sure if NDOT or the city of Lincoln wants an interstate designation.
 

That would enter into fictional category but US-34 could be rerouted on the East Beltway instead of going downtown Lincoln or NB-43 is rerouted on the East Beltway.
Logged

SD Mapman

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1774
  • The best pace is a pace, and today is a good day.

  • Location: Running somewhere in Lawrence County
  • Last Login: Today at 03:33:01 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #13 on: December 24, 2022, 03:17:37 PM »

Even if they eliminate the 5 at-grade intersections on US-77 between I-80 and NB-2 the resulting freeway would still be a spur, not a loop. So "I-280" wouldn't make any sense. It would have to be an odd number designation. And I think it might seem a little weird for two different Interstate spur routes going off I-80 with only one exit between them
If they do the East beltway then I-280 would make sense. But that’s a long ways away from construction and I’m not sure if NDOT or the city of Lincoln wants an interstate designation.
 

That would enter into fictional category but US-34 could be rerouted on the East Beltway instead of going downtown Lincoln or NB-43 is rerouted on the East Beltway.
That was more "if they want both the west and east legs finished they should apply for an interstate" kinda thing. The west beltway plans appear to have been scrubbed from NDOT's website, and I've only ever seen the East Beltway on a City page: https://www.lincoln.ne.gov/City/Departments/LTU/LTU-Projects/Planned/East-Beltway

For what it's worth, they designed the Old Hwy 2 interchange for a connection to the proposed East bypass. Honestly if they don't go Interstate when the full loop is complete that routing you described (34 from O to I-80, N-43 from Rokeby to O) is probably what'll happen. Nebraska seems to have no problem with multiple designations on freeway segments (like US 6-L28B-US 275 from Omaha to Fremont).
« Last Edit: December 24, 2022, 03:24:15 PM by SD Mapman »
Logged
The traveler sees what he sees, the tourist sees what he has come to see. - G.K. Chesterton

Stephane Dumas

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2740
  • Last Login: Today at 08:39:20 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #14 on: December 24, 2022, 04:40:38 PM »

Interesting to note that map show a proposed ROW north of I-80. https://www.lincoln.ne.gov/files/sharedassets/public/ltu/projects/east-beltway-detail-map.pdf  Probably for some ramp to link with US-6 but is it far-fetched to think then NB DOT might have once thought of bigger plans north of the East Belway terminus?

As the west beltway which is US-77, we're lucky they hadn't deleted that document yet. http://www.nebraskatransportation.org/projects/linc-w-beltway/index.htm
Logged

Revive 755

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4754
  • Last Login: November 29, 2023, 11:06:02 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #15 on: January 04, 2023, 10:55:08 PM »

The signing on the beltway approaching US 77 could be better:
  • Thinking there should be a control city for northbound US 77 on the advance signs - Lincoln would still work.
  • The signing seems unclear that the beltway defaults onto northbound US 77.  The 1/2 mile sign really looks misleading.  Thinking there should have been an overhead assembly there with separate signs for NB and SB US 77 (the NB sign could use "Ahead" there).
Logged

SD Mapman

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1774
  • The best pace is a pace, and today is a good day.

  • Location: Running somewhere in Lawrence County
  • Last Login: Today at 03:33:01 PM
Re: South Lincoln Beltway trip report
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2023, 11:11:22 PM »

Interesting to note that map show a proposed ROW north of I-80. https://www.lincoln.ne.gov/files/sharedassets/public/ltu/projects/east-beltway-detail-map.pdf  Probably for some ramp to link with US-6 but is it far-fetched to think then NB DOT might have once thought of bigger plans north of the East Belway terminus?
Think that's all it was sadly, don't remember where I saw it but there was another version of the East Beltway that had an at-grade at US 6.

The signing on the beltway approaching US 77 could be better:
  • Thinking there should be a control city for northbound US 77 on the advance signs - Lincoln would still work.
  • The signing seems unclear that the beltway defaults onto northbound US 77.  The 1/2 mile sign really looks misleading.  Thinking there should have been an overhead assembly there with separate signs for NB and SB US 77 (the NB sign could use "Ahead" there).

Yeah, that's a bit confusing if you're not from around there.
Logged
The traveler sees what he sees, the tourist sees what he has come to see. - G.K. Chesterton

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.