AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The AARoads Wiki is live! Come check it out!

Author Topic: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange  (Read 679450 times)

jeffandnicole

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 14528
  • Age: 48
  • Location: South Jersey
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 11:29:22 PM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2925 on: November 01, 2022, 06:14:28 PM »

...and twinning/replacing the bridge over the Delaware River.  The latter was supposed to be prioritized due to a crack found a few years ago.

The NJ Turnpike Authority is in charge of leading large projects with the bridge, and has included that in their current multi-year Capital Project plan.
Logged

Crown Victoria

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 415
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Eastern PA
  • Last Login: Today at 03:57:39 AM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2926 on: November 03, 2022, 08:36:15 AM »

Looking at the latest Capital Plan, the Total Reconstruction map, and the various pages for the I-95/Turnpike interchange, it looks like Sections A, C, and D30 are due for construction as soon as next year. This would involve widening of the Turnpike from the Bensalem interchange to I-95.

As far as the missing movements at the interchange itself, we may still wait a while...

https://www.paturnpike.com/traveling/construction/site/i-95-interchange-project/design-construction-details/section-a
https://files.paturnpike.com/production/docs/default-source/resources/traveling-resources/total-recon-map-march-2022.pdf?sfvrsn=d9cf9a14_11
https://files.paturnpike.com/production/docs/default-source/resources/investor-relations/capital-plan/fy23-capital-plan.pdf?sfvrsn=fe252d1a_4 (look for I-95 Stage 2 under Interchanges)
Logged

bluecountry

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 0
  • Last Login: September 17, 2023, 05:19:20 PM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2927 on: November 07, 2022, 03:45:52 PM »

I'd rank the ramp pair importance from most to least in this way (only including the incomplete ones):

I-95 SB->I-295 EB and I-295 WB->I-95 NB
I-276 EB->I-95 SB and I-95 NB->I-276 WB
I-295 WB->I-276 WB and I-276 EB->I-295 EB

This is just based on how easy it is to make those movements presently without said ramps.
And these are not happening anytime soon?
Logged

famartin

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1101
  • Location: Trenton NJ area
  • Last Login: November 27, 2023, 11:18:42 PM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2928 on: November 07, 2022, 04:00:49 PM »

I kinda wish they'd do the ramps from 95 SB to 295 EB/295 WB to 95 NB first... I think its the next most needed missing move (and it would give me a better alternate route to/from work than the Burlington-Bristol Bridge currently provides  :-D).
Logged

Alps

  • y u m
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15704
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 40
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 07:10:29 PM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2929 on: November 07, 2022, 10:32:06 PM »

I kinda wish they'd do the ramps from 95 SB to 295 EB/295 WB to 95 NB first... I think its the next most needed missing move (and it would give me a better alternate route to/from work than the Burlington-Bristol Bridge currently provides  :-D).
I think 295 WB to 276 WB and 276 EB to 295 EB would be the next most needed.

MASTERNC

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 984
  • Last Login: Today at 11:04:05 AM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2930 on: November 08, 2022, 08:11:54 AM »

I kinda wish they'd do the ramps from 95 SB to 295 EB/295 WB to 95 NB first... I think its the next most needed missing move (and it would give me a better alternate route to/from work than the Burlington-Bristol Bridge currently provides  :-D).
I think 295 WB to 276 WB and 276 EB to 295 EB would be the next most needed.

Still, those two movements are handled by US 1, which is a freeway, so the urgency really isn't there.  The only real slowdown is the Bensalem interchange, but that has gotten better now that the interchange construction on US 1 is done.
Logged

famartin

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1101
  • Location: Trenton NJ area
  • Last Login: November 27, 2023, 11:18:42 PM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2931 on: November 08, 2022, 10:29:56 AM »

I kinda wish they'd do the ramps from 95 SB to 295 EB/295 WB to 95 NB first... I think its the next most needed missing move (and it would give me a better alternate route to/from work than the Burlington-Bristol Bridge currently provides  :-D).
I think 295 WB to 276 WB and 276 EB to 295 EB would be the next most needed.

Still, those two movements are handled by US 1, which is a freeway, so the urgency really isn't there.  The only real slowdown is the Bensalem interchange, but that has gotten better now that the interchange construction on US 1 is done.

Exactly, US 1 provides those, and after the big construction project near Neshaminy Mall is finished, it should function much better, further decreasing the need for 295 WB->276 WB/276 EB->295EB
Logged

Alps

  • y u m
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15704
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 40
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 07:10:29 PM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2932 on: November 08, 2022, 08:08:02 PM »

I kinda wish they'd do the ramps from 95 SB to 295 EB/295 WB to 95 NB first... I think its the next most needed missing move (and it would give me a better alternate route to/from work than the Burlington-Bristol Bridge currently provides  :-D).
I think 295 WB to 276 WB and 276 EB to 295 EB would be the next most needed.

Still, those two movements are handled by US 1, which is a freeway, so the urgency really isn't there.  The only real slowdown is the Bensalem interchange, but that has gotten better now that the interchange construction on US 1 is done.

Exactly, US 1 provides those, and after the big construction project near Neshaminy Mall is finished, it should function much better, further decreasing the need for 295 WB->276 WB/276 EB->295EB
The 1 ramps always seem to feature chronic backups and 1 is a slog for that bit. So let's see if you're right.

famartin

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1101
  • Location: Trenton NJ area
  • Last Login: November 27, 2023, 11:18:42 PM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2933 on: November 08, 2022, 08:39:15 PM »

I kinda wish they'd do the ramps from 95 SB to 295 EB/295 WB to 95 NB first... I think its the next most needed missing move (and it would give me a better alternate route to/from work than the Burlington-Bristol Bridge currently provides  :-D).
I think 295 WB to 276 WB and 276 EB to 295 EB would be the next most needed.

Still, those two movements are handled by US 1, which is a freeway, so the urgency really isn't there.  The only real slowdown is the Bensalem interchange, but that has gotten better now that the interchange construction on US 1 is done.

Exactly, US 1 provides those, and after the big construction project near Neshaminy Mall is finished, it should function much better, further decreasing the need for 295 WB->276 WB/276 EB->295EB
The 1 ramps always seem to feature chronic backups and 1 is a slog for that bit. So let's see if you're right.

They’ve widened the interchange and 1 south of the interchange… now they’re widening north of the interchange. I think that will help a lot.
Logged

jeffandnicole

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 14528
  • Age: 48
  • Location: South Jersey
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 11:29:22 PM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2934 on: April 17, 2023, 10:38:06 PM »

In a very clear indication that the 95/PA Turnpike Interchange is committed to be completed, the DVRPC (Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission) has on their 4/27/23 Board Meeting Agenda a request to add a $153 Million design and construction phase to design and fully connect I-95, I-295 and I-276 in Pennsylvania and widen to 6 lanes I-276 in the immediate vicinity of this area, collectively known as Stage 2 of the overall interchange project.  (Note:  This money won't pay for the entire interchange and widening; this is just a small part of the overall funding needed.) 

Stage 2 includes the following distinct design/construction sections:
> D30 (mainline Turnpike widening and reconstruction between the Bensalem Boulevard and I-95 overpasses);
> Section A (mainline Turnpike widening and reconstruction near the Bensalem Interchange to the Neshaminy Falls toll plaza);
> Section C (mainline Turnpike widening and reconstruction from the Neshaminy Falls Toll Plaza to the Bensalem Boulevard overpass);
> Section E (Turnpike/US 13 mainline interchange reconstruction and mainline widening to the west); and
> Section D40 (the remaining six ramps of the I-276/I-95/I-295 Interchange and related mainline improvements).

Sections D30, A, and C are progressing through final design. Sections E and D40 completed preliminary design and await identified funding sources for the respective design/construction phases to enable them to proceed. Only Sections D30 and A are anticipated to proceed to the construction phase during the FY2023 TIP.

For more information, and the opportunity to comment publicly if you wish, visit https://www.dvrpc.org/committees/board/11948 and https://www.dvrpc.org/asp/boardcomment/detail.asp?id=3792

Stage 1 was the direct connection of the I-95 ramps which opened several years ago.  There is also a Stage 3 to the project, which is to replace the Delaware River Bridge with a new parallel bridge over the Delaware River, which by this indication is going to be many years away.
Logged

Alps

  • y u m
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15704
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 40
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 07:10:29 PM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2935 on: April 18, 2023, 05:38:44 PM »

In a very clear indication that the 95/PA Turnpike Interchange is committed to be completed, the DVRPC (Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission) has on their 4/27/23 Board Meeting Agenda a request to add a $153 Million design and construction phase to design and fully connect I-95, I-295 and I-276 in Pennsylvania and widen to 6 lanes I-276 in the immediate vicinity of this area, collectively known as Stage 2 of the overall interchange project.  (Note:  This money won't pay for the entire interchange and widening; this is just a small part of the overall funding needed.) 

Stage 2 includes the following distinct design/construction sections:
> D30 (mainline Turnpike widening and reconstruction between the Bensalem Boulevard and I-95 overpasses);
> Section A (mainline Turnpike widening and reconstruction near the Bensalem Interchange to the Neshaminy Falls toll plaza);
> Section C (mainline Turnpike widening and reconstruction from the Neshaminy Falls Toll Plaza to the Bensalem Boulevard overpass);
> Section E (Turnpike/US 13 mainline interchange reconstruction and mainline widening to the west); and
> Section D40 (the remaining six ramps of the I-276/I-95/I-295 Interchange and related mainline improvements).

Sections D30, A, and C are progressing through final design. Sections E and D40 completed preliminary design and await identified funding sources for the respective design/construction phases to enable them to proceed. Only Sections D30 and A are anticipated to proceed to the construction phase during the FY2023 TIP.

For more information, and the opportunity to comment publicly if you wish, visit https://www.dvrpc.org/committees/board/11948 and https://www.dvrpc.org/asp/boardcomment/detail.asp?id=3792

Stage 1 was the direct connection of the I-95 ramps which opened several years ago.  There is also a Stage 3 to the project, which is to replace the Delaware River Bridge with a new parallel bridge over the Delaware River, which by this indication is going to be many years away.
public comment: please choose my company for all remaining design work
signed, anonymous

MASTERNC

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 984
  • Last Login: Today at 11:04:05 AM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2936 on: April 18, 2023, 05:49:49 PM »

Doesn’t the rather new toll plaza need to be widened since there are only two express lanes and the cash lanes are closed off? Not sure if the room is there (and they just need relocated gantries).
Logged

sprjus4

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 8653
  • Location: Hampton Roads, VA
  • Last Login: Today at 12:09:29 AM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2937 on: April 18, 2023, 06:08:28 PM »

Doesn’t the rather new toll plaza need to be widened since there are only two express lanes and the cash lanes are closed off? Not sure if the room is there (and they just need relocated gantries).
They’re likely just going to demolish the toll plaza altogether and replace it with all-electronic-tolling gantries.
Logged

odditude

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 722
  • Location: NOVA
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 09:34:33 PM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2938 on: April 18, 2023, 09:36:03 PM »

The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (PTC) has requested that DVRPC amend the FY2023 TIP for Pennsylvania by adding a new I-95, PA Turnpike Interchange Stage 2 project into the TIP, in the amount of $153,000,000 Turnpike (TPK) funding...

the significant part is not just that there's an amendment request, but that the PTC is saying "here's the funding, do the thing"
Logged

vdeane

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 14293
  • Age: 32
  • Location: The 518
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 09:33:25 PM
    • New York State Roads
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2939 on: April 18, 2023, 10:10:02 PM »

Doesn’t the rather new toll plaza need to be widened since there are only two express lanes and the cash lanes are closed off? Not sure if the room is there (and they just need relocated gantries).
They’re likely just going to demolish the toll plaza altogether and replace it with all-electronic-tolling gantries.
It's too bad that they didn't have the foresight to make the gantries wide enough for a wider turnpike.  Then they could have just left them as-is, demolish the cash booths, and put some barrier down, with no new toll equipment needed.
Logged
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

MASTERNC

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 984
  • Last Login: Today at 11:04:05 AM
Re: I-95/Penna Turnpike Interchange
« Reply #2940 on: June 07, 2023, 10:32:41 AM »

The D30 contract is now advertised for bidding by late July
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.