Large-enough cities passed over for control-city status

Started by golden eagle, April 11, 2016, 11:36:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

thspfc

Quote from: zachary_amaryllis on April 22, 2021, 08:38:13 AM
for a long time, i-25 nb out of denver was posted 'cheyenne', even though fort collins is a). larger, b.) closer and c.) a destination for more nb traffic than cheyenne. the traffic count goes down drastically after you pass the fort collins exits. i get that cheyenne is a state capital, but that seems more like wyoming's issue..
Only explanation for that is Cheyenne is a state capital and the principal city of its own "metro area"  (if you can call it that), while Fort Collins is sort of a suburb. But Fort Collins does make much more sense.


JayhawkCO

Quote from: thspfc on April 22, 2021, 10:35:21 AM
Quote from: zachary_amaryllis on April 22, 2021, 08:38:13 AM
for a long time, i-25 nb out of denver was posted 'cheyenne', even though fort collins is a). larger, b.) closer and c.) a destination for more nb traffic than cheyenne. the traffic count goes down drastically after you pass the fort collins exits. i get that cheyenne is a state capital, but that seems more like wyoming's issue..
Only explanation for that is Cheyenne is a state capital and the principal city of its own "metro area"  (if you can call it that), while Fort Collins is sort of a suburb. But Fort Collins does make much more sense.

Fort Collins is only a suburb insofar as the whole I-25 corridor has "filled up", but it's definitely the prominent city of the Fort Collins/Greeley/Loveland area.

Chris

Roadgeekteen

Quote from: zachary_amaryllis on April 22, 2021, 08:38:13 AM
for a long time, i-25 nb out of denver was posted 'cheyenne', even though fort collins is a). larger, b.) closer and c.) a destination for more nb traffic than cheyenne. the traffic count goes down drastically after you pass the fort collins exits. i get that cheyenne is a state capital, but that seems more like wyoming's issue..
How large was Fort Collins when Cheyenne was signed?
God-emperor of Alanland, king of all the goats and goat-like creatures

Current Interstate map I am making:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?hl=en&mid=1PEDVyNb1skhnkPkgXi8JMaaudM2zI-Y&ll=29.05778059819179%2C-82.48856825&z=5

JayhawkCO

Quote from: Roadgeekteen on April 22, 2021, 11:45:30 AM
Quote from: zachary_amaryllis on April 22, 2021, 08:38:13 AM
for a long time, i-25 nb out of denver was posted 'cheyenne', even though fort collins is a). larger, b.) closer and c.) a destination for more nb traffic than cheyenne. the traffic count goes down drastically after you pass the fort collins exits. i get that cheyenne is a state capital, but that seems more like wyoming's issue..
How large was Fort Collins when Cheyenne was signed?

In 1980, Fort Collins had 65,092.  It's 2019 estimated population is 170,243.  Pretty huge growth.

Chris

Flint1979

Fort Collins is a midsized college town so I think I can see Fort Collins being used going NB from Denver. It's 60 miles away so it's not much different than signing Flint on NB I-75 in Detroit.

jaehak

I agree with signing Fort Collins northbound from Denver, but I don't think they should have switched it in Cheyenne. It should still be 25 south Denver. Signing Fort Collins there is like signing Aurora on eastbound 88 over Chicago.

zachary_amaryllis

Quote from: jaehak on April 22, 2021, 01:20:24 PM
I agree with signing Fort Collins northbound from Denver, but I don't think they should have switched it in Cheyenne. It should still be 25 south Denver. Signing Fort Collins there is like signing Aurora on eastbound 88 over Chicago.

southbound, denver makes sense. as you go sb from chyoming, it starts picking up as you pass fort collins, tho there is a lot of sb traffic from cheyenne that goes to fort collins as well. maybe both? probably no simple answer.
clinched:
I-64, I-80, I-76 (west), *64s in hampton roads, 225,270,180 (co, wy)

Roadgeekteen

I find it strange that on I-49 south in Missouri, the bigger Fayetteville is passed over in favor of the smaller Fort Smith.
God-emperor of Alanland, king of all the goats and goat-like creatures

Current Interstate map I am making:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?hl=en&mid=1PEDVyNb1skhnkPkgXi8JMaaudM2zI-Y&ll=29.05778059819179%2C-82.48856825&z=5

MATraveler128

I-90 also skips both Rochester and Syracuse and signs Buffalo instead. Same deal in Buffalo where Albany is signed.
Decommission 128 south of Peabody!

Lowest untraveled number: 56

Roadgeekteen

Quote from: BlueOutback7 on September 01, 2022, 07:06:10 AM
I-90 also skips both Rochester and Syracuse and signs Buffalo instead. Same deal in Buffalo where Albany is signed.
We've mentioned these examples before. I would sign Syracuse but not Rochester as it is a bit off the highway.
God-emperor of Alanland, king of all the goats and goat-like creatures

Current Interstate map I am making:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?hl=en&mid=1PEDVyNb1skhnkPkgXi8JMaaudM2zI-Y&ll=29.05778059819179%2C-82.48856825&z=5

bing101

#210
US-101 North to San Jose if you are going north on US-101 from Ventura.
Also you can argue that US-101 should have San Jose as a Control city in Downtown Los Angeles given that it is the largest city in Northern California.

hbelkins

Quote from: Roadgeekteen on September 01, 2022, 03:05:19 AM
I find it strange that on I-49 south in Missouri, the bigger Fayetteville is passed over in favor of the smaller Fort Smith.

Fort Smith -- now a major interstate junction.

Fayetteville -- not a major interstate junction.


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

Roadgeekteen

Quote from: hbelkins on September 01, 2022, 08:13:56 PM
Quote from: Roadgeekteen on September 01, 2022, 03:05:19 AM
I find it strange that on I-49 south in Missouri, the bigger Fayetteville is passed over in favor of the smaller Fort Smith.

Fort Smith -- now a major interstate junction.

Fayetteville -- not a major interstate junction.
I realize that but the NWA metro area is bigger than the Fort Smith metro area, Fayetteville has a major university, and it has walmart. What does Fort Smith have besides the I-40 junction?
God-emperor of Alanland, king of all the goats and goat-like creatures

Current Interstate map I am making:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?hl=en&mid=1PEDVyNb1skhnkPkgXi8JMaaudM2zI-Y&ll=29.05778059819179%2C-82.48856825&z=5

keithvh

Quote from: bing101 on September 01, 2022, 07:55:21 PM
US-101 North to San Jose if you are going north on US-101 from Ventura.
Also you can argue that US-101 should have San Jose as a Control city in Downtown Los Angeles given that it is the largest city in Northern California.

US-101 North from Ventura should be Santa Barbara --- that's just my opinion.  It's currently San Francisco.

I definitely do NOT think US-101 should be signed San Jose (or SF) anywhere in Los Angeles County.  Ventura works.

SeriesE

Quote from: keithvh on September 02, 2022, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: bing101 on September 01, 2022, 07:55:21 PM
US-101 North to San Jose if you are going north on US-101 from Ventura.
Also you can argue that US-101 should have San Jose as a Control city in Downtown Los Angeles given that it is the largest city in Northern California.

US-101 North from Ventura should be Santa Barbara --- that's just my opinion.  It's currently San Francisco.

I definitely do NOT think US-101 should be signed San Jose (or SF) anywhere in Los Angeles County.  Ventura works.

I feel like San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara are both control city-worthy for US 101

hobsini2

Quote from: Roadgeekteen on September 01, 2022, 09:13:39 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on September 01, 2022, 08:13:56 PM
Quote from: Roadgeekteen on September 01, 2022, 03:05:19 AM
I find it strange that on I-49 south in Missouri, the bigger Fayetteville is passed over in favor of the smaller Fort Smith.

Fort Smith -- now a major interstate junction.

Fayetteville -- not a major interstate junction.
I realize that but the NWA metro area is bigger than the Fort Smith metro area, Fayetteville has a major university, and it has walmart. What does Fort Smith have besides the I-40 junction?
And technically, the I-40 junction is in Van Buren and not Ft Smith. Ft Smith is entirely south of the river.
I knew it. I'm surrounded by assholes. Keep firing, assholes! - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

hobsini2

Quote from: SeriesE on September 02, 2022, 04:01:02 PM
Quote from: keithvh on September 02, 2022, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: bing101 on September 01, 2022, 07:55:21 PM
US-101 North to San Jose if you are going north on US-101 from Ventura.
Also you can argue that US-101 should have San Jose as a Control city in Downtown Los Angeles given that it is the largest city in Northern California.

US-101 North from Ventura should be Santa Barbara --- that's just my opinion.  It's currently San Francisco.

I definitely do NOT think US-101 should be signed San Jose (or SF) anywhere in Los Angeles County.  Ventura works.

I feel like San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara are both control city-worthy for US 101
Santa Barbara for sure. SLO maybe as a secondary. Salinas/Monterey is a more important area but too close to San Jose to be a primary.
I knew it. I'm surrounded by assholes. Keep firing, assholes! - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

wriddle082

Murfreesboro, TN is now large enough to be a control city, or at least a secondary one heading out of Nashville.  Population over 100k now, it's a college town, and they have an interstate junction.

Roadgeekteen

Quote from: wriddle082 on September 04, 2022, 06:29:21 PM
Murfreesboro, TN is now large enough to be a control city, or at least a secondary one heading out of Nashville.  Population over 100k now, it's a college town, and they have an interstate junction.
It's still a suburb though, so I would prefer it to only be a secondary.
God-emperor of Alanland, king of all the goats and goat-like creatures

Current Interstate map I am making:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?hl=en&mid=1PEDVyNb1skhnkPkgXi8JMaaudM2zI-Y&ll=29.05778059819179%2C-82.48856825&z=5

hotdogPi

Quote from: Roadgeekteen on September 04, 2022, 09:49:10 PM
Quote from: wriddle082 on September 04, 2022, 06:29:21 PM
Murfreesboro, TN is now large enough to be a control city, or at least a secondary one heading out of Nashville.  Population over 100k now, it's a college town, and they have an interstate junction.
It's still a suburb though, so I would prefer it to only be a secondary.

It's in a similar position to Manchester NH with regard to population of both the suburb and the main city and distance between the two cities. I wouldn't skip Manchester on I-93.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 44, 50
MA 22, 40, 107, 109, 117, 119, 126, 141, 159
NH 27, 111A(E); CA 133; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Ted$8roadFan

Quote from: 1 on September 05, 2022, 06:24:12 AM
Quote from: Roadgeekteen on September 04, 2022, 09:49:10 PM
Quote from: wriddle082 on September 04, 2022, 06:29:21 PM
Murfreesboro, TN is now large enough to be a control city, or at least a secondary one heading out of Nashville.  Population over 100k now, it's a college town, and they have an interstate junction.
It's still a suburb though, so I would prefer it to only be a secondary.

It's in a similar position to Manchester NH with regard to population of both the suburb and the main city and distance between the two cities. I wouldn't skip Manchester on I-93.

I've always wondered why Manchester was skipped over in favor of Concord as a control city on I-93 north since it is the largest city in NH, and 93 actually passes through it.

roadman65

Bridgeport, CT is passed over for New Haven, CT out of NYC and was always used on the CT Turnpike for ages. 


Bridgeport is the largest city in the state and gets skipped. I can see SB being prior to the much larger NYC, but NB it's really not in the forthcoming of anything larger until maybe Providence.
Every day is a winding road, you just got to get used to it.

Sheryl Crowe

Ted$8roadFan

Stamford, CT has now surpassed New Haven as the second-largest city in Connecticut (2020 pop. 135,470).It is large enough to be a control city and to my knowledge isn't one.

CtrlAltDel

#223
Quote from: hobsini2 on September 04, 2022, 06:16:41 PM
Quote from: SeriesE on September 02, 2022, 04:01:02 PM
Quote from: keithvh on September 02, 2022, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: bing101 on September 01, 2022, 07:55:21 PM
US-101 North to San Jose if you are going north on US-101 from Ventura.
Also you can argue that US-101 should have San Jose as a Control city in Downtown Los Angeles given that it is the largest city in Northern California.

US-101 North from Ventura should be Santa Barbara --- that's just my opinion.  It's currently San Francisco.

I definitely do NOT think US-101 should be signed San Jose (or SF) anywhere in Los Angeles County.  Ventura works.

I feel like San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara are both control city-worthy for US 101
Santa Barbara for sure. SLO maybe as a secondary. Salinas/Monterey is a more important area but too close to San Jose to be a primary.

In my view, San Francisco is the next major destination on the route, and it would get the nod. Ventura is essentially part of the LA area, and so I would definitely not go with that. It's not even the city's real name, although I admit that's not an important factor.
Interstates clinched: 4, 57, 275 (IN-KY-OH), 465 (IN), 640 (TN), 985
State Interstates clinched: I-26 (TN), I-75 (GA), I-75 (KY), I-75 (TN), I-81 (WV), I-95 (NH)

Roadgeekteen

Quote from: Ted$8roadFan on September 05, 2022, 07:41:54 AM
Stamford, CT has now surpassed New Haven as the second-largest city in Connecticut (2020 pop. 135,470).It is large enough to be a control city and to my knowledge isn’t one.
I believe it is because New Haven is more famous and is not in the NYC metro area, as Stamford and Bridgeport are. And I might be wrong, but I do recall seing some signs for Stamford on I-95 north.
God-emperor of Alanland, king of all the goats and goat-like creatures

Current Interstate map I am making:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?hl=en&mid=1PEDVyNb1skhnkPkgXi8JMaaudM2zI-Y&ll=29.05778059819179%2C-82.48856825&z=5



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.