News:

Needing some php assistance with the script on the main AARoads site. Please contact Alex if you would like to help or provide advice!

Main Menu

US 95 Downtown Access Project, Las Vegas

Started by Kniwt, February 24, 2020, 05:50:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Sub-Urbanite

1958 called, it wants its urban planning back

Quote from: Plutonic Panda on September 20, 2023, 03:27:07 PM
It doesn't need to have balance. It just needs to move cars as quickly as possible and that's exactly what it will accomplish. That is completely appropriate for this area.


SeriesE

Wouldn't it be cheaper to close the Casino Center Blvd exit if close exit spacing is a concern?

Plutonic Panda

Quote from: Sub-Urbanite on September 20, 2023, 10:59:15 PM
1958 called, it wants its urban planning back

Quote from: Plutonic Panda on September 20, 2023, 03:27:07 PM
It doesn't need to have balance. It just needs to move cars as quickly as possible and that's exactly what it will accomplish. That is completely appropriate for this area.
Nice attempt at a joke that stopped being funny back in the 2000s.

DenverBrian

1958 called, it wants you to know it's 65 years in the past.

roadfro

Quote from: SeriesE on September 21, 2023, 12:59:27 AM
Wouldn't it be cheaper to close the Casino Center Blvd exit if close exit spacing is a concern?

Yes, it would be. However, Casino Center is the southbound part of a one-way couplet (4th St being the northbound counterpart) providing one of the most efficient routes through downtown Las Vegas. Without this half interchange, the Las Vegas Blvd interchange is the only direct freeway access to the downtown core. Even the Las Vegas Blvd interchange is probably still too close to I-15 to meet modern recommendations for spacing between a service interchange and a system interchange.

Today's Spaghetti Bowl has C/D roadways in most directions, and this is the only leg lacking any.
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

mrsman

Quote from: roadfro on September 23, 2023, 10:22:30 PM
Quote from: SeriesE on September 21, 2023, 12:59:27 AM
Wouldn't it be cheaper to close the Casino Center Blvd exit if close exit spacing is a concern?

Yes, it would be. However, Casino Center is the southbound part of a one-way couplet (4th St being the northbound counterpart) providing one of the most efficient routes through downtown Las Vegas. Without this half interchange, the Las Vegas Blvd interchange is the only direct freeway access to the downtown core. Even the Las Vegas Blvd interchange is probably still too close to I-15 to meet modern recommendations for spacing between a service interchange and a system interchange.

Today's Spaghetti Bowl has C/D roadways in most directions, and this is the only leg lacking any.

Yeah.  Downtown LV is a significant enough location that it simply cannot be bypassed.  There may be ways to construct the interchange better to handle the weaving, but access to these exits in some way or fashion is critical.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.