AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New rules to ensure post quality. See this thread for details.

Author Topic: Ben Franklin Bridge approach question  (Read 5517 times)

Revive 755

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4466
  • Last Login: January 19, 2022, 10:47:56 PM
Ben Franklin Bridge approach question
« on: March 05, 2009, 12:24:32 AM »

Aerial photo for reference:http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&ie=UTF8&ll=39.956234,-75.148705&spn=0.003783,0.010986&t=k&z=17

I've read that a better connection was once planned and canceled, but I'm curious as to why a direct connection from EB I-676 to the bridge couldn't have been done.  It doesn't look like it would be that hard; just a little grade adjustment and take away two of the current WB lanes approaching N 7th.
Logged

PAHighways

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1515
  • Not affiliated with PennDOT nor the PTC

  • Location: SWPA!
  • Last Login: May 20, 2020, 12:48:37 PM
    • Pennsylvania Highways
Re: Ben Franklin Bridge approach question
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2009, 08:38:03 PM »

The reason for there being no direct connection between the Vine Street Expressway and the Ben Franklin Bridge is that the city balked at more of Franklin Square being destroyed for the sake of an interchange.  Although PennDOT doesn't consider 676 going over the bridge anyway.
Logged

Alps

  • y u m
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 14715
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 38
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: Today at 01:04:22 AM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: Ben Franklin Bridge approach question
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2009, 07:22:35 PM »

I'd like to piggyback a question on this thread:  Had the current configuration been implemented in the 1960's instead of waiting till the 1990's, would the gap be on I-76 itself (the way it had been) instead of I-676?  Or would I-76 have been moved to its present alignment, creating two routes (676 and 176)?

PAHighways

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1515
  • Not affiliated with PennDOT nor the PTC

  • Location: SWPA!
  • Last Login: May 20, 2020, 12:48:37 PM
    • Pennsylvania Highways
Re: Ben Franklin Bridge approach question
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2009, 09:11:26 PM »

The gap would be on I-76, but PennDOT would have probably moved it anyway to keep the Schuylkill one designation.
Logged

PAHighways

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1515
  • Not affiliated with PennDOT nor the PTC

  • Location: SWPA!
  • Last Login: May 20, 2020, 12:48:37 PM
    • Pennsylvania Highways
Re: Ben Franklin Bridge approach question
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2009, 03:44:24 PM »

Traffic at the Ben Franklin Bridge Approach Studied

The final solution engineers want is a $120 million flyover ramp between the bridge and I-676, but changes in traffic patterns will be implemented in the mean time.
Logged

Duke87

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 5727
  • Age: 34
  • Location: Stamford, CT
  • Last Login: January 22, 2022, 10:03:59 AM
Re: Ben Franklin Bridge approach question
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2009, 08:51:33 PM »

Something that seems a bit ambiguous: by "a ramp" do they mean one that will carry traffic in both directions or just from the bridge (which seems to be the focus)?
Logged
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.