Highways numbered 666 - which states have them?

Started by KCRoadFan, May 21, 2022, 12:25:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

US 89

Quote from: thenetwork on May 22, 2022, 01:25:01 PM
Quote from: US 89 on May 21, 2022, 12:32:25 AM
Quote from: KCRoadFan on May 21, 2022, 12:25:51 AM
I know, of course, that US 666 in Colorado and New Mexico was famously renumbered to US 491 a while back, because of sign theft, I believe.

US 666 went through Utah too...  :poke:

And yes, it was sign theft. The three states literally couldn't keep the road signed and people were apparently getting lost. That combined with a high fatality rate on New Mexico's portion (dangerous 2-lane highway with a good amount of traffic and a lot of drunk driving incidents) meant conditions were ripe for a renumbering. NM was the main driver behind that effort.   

666 also used to go west from Gallup and down to Douglas AZ, but the extension of US 191 provided a great opportunity for Arizona to renumber their portion.

And I believe the last traces of US-666 were around Monticello, UT when UDOT had unisigns noting the conversion (NEW US-491 IS THE FORMER US-666).  Those signs were finally removed around 2007-08.

There is a “491, Former 666” reassurance marker still standing in Gallup, northbound shortly after the route begins at I-40.


ethanhopkin14

Quote from: US 89 on May 22, 2022, 10:51:09 PM
Quote from: thenetwork on May 22, 2022, 01:25:01 PM
Quote from: US 89 on May 21, 2022, 12:32:25 AM
Quote from: KCRoadFan on May 21, 2022, 12:25:51 AM
I know, of course, that US 666 in Colorado and New Mexico was famously renumbered to US 491 a while back, because of sign theft, I believe.

US 666 went through Utah too...  :poke:

And yes, it was sign theft. The three states literally couldn't keep the road signed and people were apparently getting lost. That combined with a high fatality rate on New Mexico's portion (dangerous 2-lane highway with a good amount of traffic and a lot of drunk driving incidents) meant conditions were ripe for a renumbering. NM was the main driver behind that effort.   

666 also used to go west from Gallup and down to Douglas AZ, but the extension of US 191 provided a great opportunity for Arizona to renumber their portion.

And I believe the last traces of US-666 were around Monticello, UT when UDOT had unisigns noting the conversion (NEW US-491 IS THE FORMER US-666).  Those signs were finally removed around 2007-08.

There is a "491, Former 666"  reassurance marker still standing in Gallup, northbound shortly after the route begins at I-40.

Bang!

Max Rockatansky

Quote from: ethanhopkin14 on May 24, 2022, 05:48:12 PM
Quote from: US 89 on May 22, 2022, 10:51:09 PM
Quote from: thenetwork on May 22, 2022, 01:25:01 PM
Quote from: US 89 on May 21, 2022, 12:32:25 AM
Quote from: KCRoadFan on May 21, 2022, 12:25:51 AM
I know, of course, that US 666 in Colorado and New Mexico was famously renumbered to US 491 a while back, because of sign theft, I believe.

US 666 went through Utah too...  :poke:

And yes, it was sign theft. The three states literally couldn't keep the road signed and people were apparently getting lost. That combined with a high fatality rate on New Mexico's portion (dangerous 2-lane highway with a good amount of traffic and a lot of drunk driving incidents) meant conditions were ripe for a renumbering. NM was the main driver behind that effort.   

666 also used to go west from Gallup and down to Douglas AZ, but the extension of US 191 provided a great opportunity for Arizona to renumber their portion.

And I believe the last traces of US-666 were around Monticello, UT when UDOT had unisigns noting the conversion (NEW US-491 IS THE FORMER US-666).  Those signs were finally removed around 2007-08.

There is a "491, Former 666"  reassurance marker still standing in Gallup, northbound shortly after the route begins at I-40.

Bang!

So basically watch eBay if you are sign collector?

OCGuy81

Might be a tangent, but are there states that won't issue 666 on license plates? I know Oregon does as one of my cars has plates starting with 666



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.