AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The AARoads Wiki is live! Come check it out!

Author Topic: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In  (Read 12406 times)

jeffe

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 98
  • Location: California
  • Last Login: December 10, 2023, 02:19:19 AM
Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« on: May 27, 2017, 04:54:43 PM »

There as been talk of Caltrans phasing out Botts Dots in other discussions.  I've also noticed that District 11 (San Diego) has been experimenting with using 6-inch wide lane lines.   

On 19 May 2017 Caltrans issued the following memo:
Implementation of Six-Inch Wide Traffic Lines and Discontinuing Use of Non-Reflective Raised Pavement Markers

All new lanelines, edgelines, and centerlines will be 6 inches wide instead of the current 4 inches.  When lines are refreshed during maintenance, they will be replaced with the new wider lines.  An exception is made for lines with reflectors on either side (e.g. a double yellow line) because the wider lines will not fit without moving the reflectors.

The standard plans will be updated in July to reflect these changes.

This rescinds the previous directive which allowed for thermoplastic striping to be placed over Botts Dots:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/trafficops/policy/00-02.pdf

Overall, this should increase lane line visibility. Wider shoulder lines have been shown to help reduce the rate of vehicles running off the road.  However, I've always found the dots to be helpful with keeping vehicles from drifting out of a lane.   
Logged

myosh_tino

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2809
  • Silicon Valley Roadgeek

  • Age: 50
  • Location: Cupertino, CA
  • Last Login: March 17, 2024, 01:25:52 PM
    • Silicon Valley Roads @ Markyville.com
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2017, 12:25:08 PM »

Interestingly enough, the just released project plans for the northbound I-680 express lane from 237 to 84 calls for the use of Botts Dots on the lane lines.  The general purpose lane lines use Botts Dots on top of 4-inch wide thermoplastic striping while the express lane lines use Botts Dots on top of 8-inch wide thermoplastic striping.  Whether this gets changed with an addendum remains to be seen.
Logged
Quote from: golden eagle
If I owned a dam and decided to donate it to charity, would I be giving a dam? I'm sure that might be a first because no one really gives a dam.

Max Rockatansky

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 24921
  • Age: 41
  • Location: Route 9, Sector 26
  • Last Login: Today at 12:44:16 AM
    • Gribblenation
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2017, 12:47:40 PM »

Personally I can't stand the botts dots make, I'll be glad see them replaced with a wider side stripe. Those things get frustraing as all hell on mountain roads like 245 or 198.
Logged

myosh_tino

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2809
  • Silicon Valley Roadgeek

  • Age: 50
  • Location: Cupertino, CA
  • Last Login: March 17, 2024, 01:25:52 PM
    • Silicon Valley Roads @ Markyville.com
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2017, 01:00:26 PM »

Those things get frustraing as all hell on mountain roads like 245 or 198.

How so?  I would think the sound they make when you drive over them is extremely useful on mountain roads because it gives instant feedback when you drift over the centerline.

On a related note, double-yellow lines will remain 4 inches wide.
Logged
Quote from: golden eagle
If I owned a dam and decided to donate it to charity, would I be giving a dam? I'm sure that might be a first because no one really gives a dam.

Max Rockatansky

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 24921
  • Age: 41
  • Location: Route 9, Sector 26
  • Last Login: Today at 12:44:16 AM
    • Gribblenation
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2017, 01:12:14 PM »

Those things get frustraing as all hell on mountain roads like 245 or 198.

How so?  I would think the sound they make when you drive over them is extremely useful on mountain roads because it gives instant feedback when you drift over the centerline.

On a related note, double-yellow lines will remain 4 inches wide.

Really it's just a personal nitpick, I should clarify they do their job just fine.  However in the instance of 245 there is a section between 180 and Dunlap Road where the width of the highway might 13-15 feet in places.  Rather than slathering botts dots all over I'd rather see Caltrans go to a single-lane configuration like a 35, 146, 36, 4, or 172 have in use with accompanying signage..."One-Lane Road Ahead" on a big yellow advisory sign tends to grab attention.  It does get a little frustrating when you can't help but be on the center line and you're getting pounded by botts dots. 
Logged

jeffe

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 98
  • Location: California
  • Last Login: December 10, 2023, 02:19:19 AM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2017, 01:35:10 AM »

On a related note, double-yellow lines will remain 4 inches wide.

Yeah, existing double yellow lines will remain 4 inches wide due to the placement of reflectors on either side of the lines.  However, installations on new pavement will be 6 inches with a 3 inch gap in the middle.  The updated design for Detail 22 is shown here: Revised Standard Plan A20A.


Fixed link. —Roadfro
« Last Edit: August 18, 2017, 10:30:10 AM by roadfro »
Logged

andy3175

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1508
  • Location: San Diego, California, USA
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 02:58:36 PM
    • AARoads
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2017, 01:12:00 AM »

An article on this appeared in Mr. Roadshow:

http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/08/23/caltrans-says-bye-bye-to-botts-dots/

Quote
To the dismay of most California drivers, it's now official. Those popular Botts' Dots will disappear from state roadways.

Caltrans has approved removing the nonreflective pavement markers that for the last five decades have warned motorists when they veer out of their lanes. The 20 million now in use will be replaced over time with new markers that are cheaper and safer to install and can better guide the thousands of self-driving cars that are in our future. ...

Last week the state sent out notices that it is discontinuing use of nonreflective pavement markers and is increasing the width of all 4-inch wide traffic lines to 6-inch wide lines on highways.

California is one of just four states using Botts' Dots. New federal standards have caused most to say farewell to the devices that were the idea of Elbert Botts, a Caltrans chemical engineer who once taught at San Jose State University.

But the move is not popular. Of the first 74 comments Caltrans received, all opposed getting rid of the bumps that have given motorists a gentle rumble as they unknowingly cross into another lane.
Logged
Regards,
Andy

www.aaroads.com

roadfro

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4870
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Last Login: March 17, 2024, 07:21:57 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2017, 01:31:40 AM »

^ I'm curious... The article/interview says that California is one of only 4 states still using Botts Dots. I know Nevada is another. What are the other two states?
Logged
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

mgk920

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 5590
  • Location: Appleton, WI USA
  • Last Login: Today at 01:09:45 AM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2017, 09:42:53 AM »

^ I'm curious... The article/interview says that California is one of only 4 states still using Botts Dots. I know Nevada is another. What are the other two states?

Hawaii is one.

Mike
Logged

jeffe

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 98
  • Location: California
  • Last Login: December 10, 2023, 02:19:19 AM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2017, 04:13:24 AM »

^ I'm curious... The article/interview says that California is one of only 4 states still using Botts Dots. I know Nevada is another. What are the other two states?

Hawaii is one.

Mike

I believe Washington State is the other one.
Logged

Tarkus

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 361
  • Age: 38
  • Location: Oregon
  • Last Login: March 17, 2022, 05:37:10 AM
    • SimCity 4 Devotion
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2017, 04:22:54 AM »

I believe Washington State is the other one.

Most likely.  There's a lot of roads in Washington (particularly on the western side of the state) that just use raised pavement markings for striping instead of paint/thermoplastic.
Logged

bing101

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 5345
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 01:54:25 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2017, 08:57:07 AM »

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbert_Dysart_Botts

Interestingly the first Botts dots was tested in West Sacramento and Vacaville according to this article.
Logged

myosh_tino

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2809
  • Silicon Valley Roadgeek

  • Age: 50
  • Location: Cupertino, CA
  • Last Login: March 17, 2024, 01:25:52 PM
    • Silicon Valley Roads @ Markyville.com
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2017, 01:01:40 PM »

An article on this appeared in Mr. Roadshow:

http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/08/23/caltrans-says-bye-bye-to-botts-dots/

Quote
To the dismay of most California drivers, it's now official. Those popular Botts' Dots will disappear from state roadways.

Caltrans has approved removing the nonreflective pavement markers that for the last five decades have warned motorists when they veer out of their lanes. The 20 million now in use will be replaced over time with new markers that are cheaper and safer to install and can better guide the thousands of self-driving cars that are in our future. ...

Last week the state sent out notices that it is discontinuing use of nonreflective pavement markers and is increasing the width of all 4-inch wide traffic lines to 6-inch wide lines on highways.

California is one of just four states using Botts' Dots. New federal standards have caused most to say farewell to the devices that were the idea of Elbert Botts, a Caltrans chemical engineer who once taught at San Jose State University.

But the move is not popular. Of the first 74 comments Caltrans received, all opposed getting rid of the bumps that have given motorists a gentle rumble as they unknowingly cross into another lane.

According to everything I've read, the elimination of Botts Dots and the 6-inch striping only applies to highways under Caltrans' control.  There are many local municipalities who use Botts Dots to mark centerlines and lane lines.  I would suspect they would continue to do so.
Logged
Quote from: golden eagle
If I owned a dam and decided to donate it to charity, would I be giving a dam? I'm sure that might be a first because no one really gives a dam.

i-215

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 85
  • Location: SoCal and Salt Lake City
  • Last Login: February 16, 2024, 09:41:31 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2017, 05:23:49 PM »

^ I'm curious... The article/interview says that California is one of only 4 states still using Botts Dots. I know Nevada is another. What are the other two states?

Oregon was using them when I lived there about 15 years ago.  I'm not sure if they've phased them out too or not.
Logged

compdude787

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 605
  • Age: 28
  • Location: Lynnwood, WA
  • Last Login: March 05, 2024, 09:47:57 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2017, 07:28:21 PM »

^ I'm curious... The article/interview says that California is one of only 4 states still using Botts Dots. I know Nevada is another. What are the other two states?

Oregon was using them when I lived there about 15 years ago.  I'm not sure if they've phased them out too or not.

Oregon seems to be using raised rib markings now, along with Washington. Those are my favorite kind of striping.

bing101

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 5345
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 01:54:25 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #15 on: August 29, 2017, 12:18:07 PM »

US-50 in Sacramento has no Botts Dots as of August 2017.
Logged

joshI5

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 17
  • Location: Los Angeles
  • Last Login: March 13, 2024, 01:30:06 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #16 on: August 30, 2017, 07:25:53 PM »

I wonder what this will mean for HOV/HOT lane markings, when access is permitted. Doesn't the MUTCD require/recommend that preferential lane markings be double the width than those of normal lane markings? If so, I wonder whether Caltrans will widen the typical 8-inch wide stripe to a hearty 12 inches, or if they will employ a new design in adjustment to this update.
Logged

roadfro

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4870
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Last Login: March 17, 2024, 07:21:57 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #17 on: August 30, 2017, 10:54:28 PM »

I wonder what this will mean for HOV/HOT lane markings, when access is permitted. Doesn't the MUTCD require/recommend that preferential lane markings be double the width than those of normal lane markings? If so, I wonder whether Caltrans will widen the typical 8-inch wide stripe to a hearty 12 inches, or if they will employ a new design in adjustment to this update.

MUTCD Sec. 3A-06, standard: A normal line is 4-6 inches wide. A wide line is at least twice the width of a normal line.
MUTCD Sec. 3D-02, standard: For buffer-separated and contiguous preferential lanes, the dividing lane line(s) are to be wide white lines.
Logged
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

myosh_tino

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2809
  • Silicon Valley Roadgeek

  • Age: 50
  • Location: Cupertino, CA
  • Last Login: March 17, 2024, 01:25:52 PM
    • Silicon Valley Roads @ Markyville.com
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2017, 11:43:21 AM »

I wonder what this will mean for HOV/HOT lane markings, when access is permitted. Doesn't the MUTCD require/recommend that preferential lane markings be double the width than those of normal lane markings? If so, I wonder whether Caltrans will widen the typical 8-inch wide stripe to a hearty 12 inches, or if they will employ a new design in adjustment to this update.

MUTCD Sec. 3A-06, standard: A normal line is 4-6 inches wide. A wide line is at least twice the width of a normal line.
MUTCD Sec. 3D-02, standard: For buffer-separated and contiguous preferential lanes, the dividing lane line(s) are to be wide white lines.

I guess the key words are "at least twice the width" meaning Caltrans can use 6-inch normal lines and 8-inch wide lines.  Any ideas how wide the lines on the I-15 Express Lanes in Las Vegas are?

Note: "at least twice" meaning 2x or more... 6-inch normal means wide lines must be at least 12 inches... wasn't sure what I was thinking when I wrote the above post... sorry!
« Last Edit: September 11, 2017, 01:20:20 PM by myosh_tino »
Logged
Quote from: golden eagle
If I owned a dam and decided to donate it to charity, would I be giving a dam? I'm sure that might be a first because no one really gives a dam.

roadfro

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4870
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Last Login: March 17, 2024, 07:21:57 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #19 on: September 01, 2017, 10:37:03 AM »

I wonder what this will mean for HOV/HOT lane markings, when access is permitted. Doesn't the MUTCD require/recommend that preferential lane markings be double the width than those of normal lane markings? If so, I wonder whether Caltrans will widen the typical 8-inch wide stripe to a hearty 12 inches, or if they will employ a new design in adjustment to this update.

MUTCD Sec. 3A-06, standard: A normal line is 4-6 inches wide. A wide line is at least twice the width of a normal line.
MUTCD Sec. 3D-02, standard: For buffer-separated and contiguous preferential lanes, the dividing lane line(s) are to be wide white lines.

I guess the key words are "at least twice the width" meaning Caltrans can use 6-inch normal lines and 8-inch wide lines.  Any ideas how wide the lines on the I-15 Express Lanes in Las Vegas are?

In the north, NDOT uses a wider width for normal lines on all freeways, which I believe is 6 inches. But I think the I-15 express lane lines are a bit wider (not around them enough to directly compare though), so I'd guess they use 8 inches.
Logged
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

AndyMax25

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 113
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Last Login: February 20, 2024, 11:51:32 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #20 on: September 10, 2017, 09:21:08 PM »

Just came across some very recent 6" installation. This is on the southbound side of the Santa Ana Freeway I-5 just south of downtown LA. Botts dots have clearly been deliberately removed.
Logged

jrouse

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 303
  • Location: Sacramento, CA
  • Last Login: March 11, 2024, 08:42:28 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #21 on: September 11, 2017, 12:20:46 AM »

I wonder what this will mean for HOV/HOT lane markings, when access is permitted. Doesn't the MUTCD require/recommend that preferential lane markings be double the width than those of normal lane markings? If so, I wonder whether Caltrans will widen the typical 8-inch wide stripe to a hearty 12 inches, or if they will employ a new design in adjustment to this update.

MUTCD Sec. 3A-06, standard: A normal line is 4-6 inches wide. A wide line is at least twice the width of a normal line.
MUTCD Sec. 3D-02, standard: For buffer-separated and contiguous preferential lanes, the dividing lane line(s) are to be wide white lines.

As of right now,  Caltrans is planning to retain 8 inch stripes for HOV lanes.  Going to 12-inch is not an option, as we already have many areas where they can barely comply with the 8-inch requirement.  We may also look at the possibility of using 6-inch stripe. We are aware that none of these proposals meet MUTCD standards and will need to address that.

Logged

jrouse

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 303
  • Location: Sacramento, CA
  • Last Login: March 11, 2024, 08:42:28 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #22 on: September 15, 2017, 02:58:03 PM »

I wonder what this will mean for HOV/HOT lane markings, when access is permitted. Doesn't the MUTCD require/recommend that preferential lane markings be double the width than those of normal lane markings? If so, I wonder whether Caltrans will widen the typical 8-inch wide stripe to a hearty 12 inches, or if they will employ a new design in adjustment to this update.

MUTCD Sec. 3A-06, standard: A normal line is 4-6 inches wide. A wide line is at least twice the width of a normal line.
MUTCD Sec. 3D-02, standard: For buffer-separated and contiguous preferential lanes, the dividing lane line(s) are to be wide white lines.

As of right now,  Caltrans is planning to retain 8 inch stripes for HOV lanes.  Going to 12-inch is not an option, as we already have many areas where they can barely comply with the 8-inch requirement.  We may also look at the possibility of using 6-inch stripe. We are aware that none of these proposals meet MUTCD standards and will need to address that.

An update:
We will continue to use 8-inch stripe.  Our traffic engineering team is interpreting the MUTCD standard liberally and believes that 8-inch meets the requirements for wide stripes.  We will not be using 6-inch double white stripes on HOV lanes as they don't meet the MUTCD requirement.
Logged

roadfro

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4870
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Last Login: March 17, 2024, 07:21:57 PM
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #23 on: September 17, 2017, 10:09:33 AM »

I guess the key words are "at least twice the width" meaning Caltrans can use 6-inch normal lines and 8-inch wide lines.  Any ideas how wide the lines on the I-15 Express Lanes in Las Vegas are?

In the north, NDOT uses a wider width for normal lines on all freeways, which I believe is 6 inches. But I think the I-15 express lane lines are a bit wider (not around them enough to directly compare though), so I'd guess they use 8 inches.

I'm down in Vegas right now and recently drove on I-15. I was unaware in my original post that the section of I-15 between 215 and Sahara with the express lanes is currently using raised pavement markers and paint to mark normal lane lines. With this, it looked to me like the normal lane lines and the solid express lane lines were the same width, so I think the express lane lines are 6 inches (instead of the 8 inches I speculated previously).
Logged
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

myosh_tino

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2809
  • Silicon Valley Roadgeek

  • Age: 50
  • Location: Cupertino, CA
  • Last Login: March 17, 2024, 01:25:52 PM
    • Silicon Valley Roads @ Markyville.com
Re: Caltrans: Botts Dots Out, 6-inch Lane Lines In
« Reply #24 on: September 17, 2017, 10:39:56 AM »

I'm down in Vegas right now and recently drove on I-15. I was unaware in my original post that the section of I-15 between 215 and Sahara with the express lanes is currently using raised pavement markers and paint to mark normal lane lines. With this, it looked to me like the normal lane lines and the solid express lane lines were the same width, so I think the express lane lines are 6 inches (instead of the 8 inches I speculated previously).

Looking at this Google Maps Street View of I-15 in Las Vegas, it's clear to me that the painted lane lines are 6 inches wide as the Botts Dots remain entirely within the painted stripe.  To me, the white wide lines to the right of the image are 12 inches wide (2 x the 6-inch lane lines) but the width of the express lane lines appear to be somewhere in between the 6-inch lane lines and the 12-inch wide lines.
Logged
Quote from: golden eagle
If I owned a dam and decided to donate it to charity, would I be giving a dam? I'm sure that might be a first because no one really gives a dam.

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.