News:

Thank you for your patience during the Forum downtime while we upgraded the software. Welcome back and see this thread for some new features and other changes to the forum.

Main Menu

False Arch Bridges

Started by bugo, May 31, 2010, 04:47:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

bugo

There's no bridge category so I'll post it here.  Has anyone ever heard of a false arch bridge?  There's one in Minot, ND.  The arches are not structural.  The bridge is a cantilevered deck open spandrel arch.  The arches above the substructure are ornamental only.  The bridge was built this way because the town wanted a Marsh rainbow arch bridge but didn't want to pay the Marsh company patent fees.  So they built it this way.  It's a very unique bridge.  Are there any other false arch bridges in the US and A?

Here's the link: http://www.flickr.com/photos/watuzi/sets/72157623035010748/


vdeane

I suspect the arches on the Troop-Howell bridge in Rochester, NY are just for looks.  The modern bridge replaced a simple beam bridge that is otherwise identical to it.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

Duke87

A few of the Merritt Parkway's famous bridges are like that. The underside is flat, the "arch" is just a shape formed by panels on the sides.
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.

bugo


cl94

Since this thread was bumped...

Quote from: vdeane on May 31, 2010, 06:52:17 PM
I suspect the arches on the Troop-Howell bridge in Rochester, NY are just for looks.  The modern bridge replaced a simple beam bridge that is otherwise identical to it.

Beams are way too shallow for the arches to not be structural on that bridge.

Maybe this deserves its own topic, but what about false cable-stayed bridges? Franklin County, Ohio has two.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

iBallasticwolf2

Quote from: cl94 on June 08, 2015, 08:16:53 PM
Since this thread was bumped...

Quote from: vdeane on May 31, 2010, 06:52:17 PM
I suspect the arches on the Troop-Howell bridge in Rochester, NY are just for looks.  The modern bridge replaced a simple beam bridge that is otherwise identical to it.

Beams are way too shallow for the arches to not be structural on that bridge.

Maybe this deserves its own topic, but what about false cable-stayed bridges? Franklin County, Ohio has two.

Isn't these two overpasses in Cincinnati false cable-stayed bridges?

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.099107,-84.509162,3a,75y,170.27h,92.89t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s5ps0FeDHzyf889QDL8UiMA!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@39.097429,-84.515474,3a,75y,14.87h,92.48t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sTx2hqMwpr4UIoGcWE_DiHg!2e0
Only two things are infinite in this world, stupidity, and I-75 construction

Duke87

An example of the Merritt Parkway bridges I mentioned before:
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.126956,-73.467542,3a,75y,36.61h,94.45t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sHMaounlKSnzfCIpUKtNg0Q!2e0

It's made to look like an arch when viewed while approaching, but the curved form is just non-structural concrete plates. One of them on this bridge was missing for several years.
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.