News:

Thank you for your patience during the Forum downtime while we upgraded the software. Welcome back and see this thread for some new features and other changes to the forum.

Main Menu

Ohio route icon versus actual state outline

Started by jbnv, August 18, 2016, 11:16:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

jbnv

Can someone link me to an image or page describing how the Ohio route icon doesn't conform to the actual outline of the state? Using this in a blog post. Thanks.
🆕 Louisiana Highways on Twitter | Yes, I like Clearview. Deal with it. | Redos: US | La. | Route Challenge


Henry

Well, that's not the only state whose outline signs don't conform to the actual shape. FWIW, the ones in AL, AZ, AR, GA and MO definitely don't.
Go Cubs Go! Go Cubs Go! Hey Chicago, what do you say? The Cubs are gonna win today!

Brandon

There's nearly conforming to the state shape, then there's this:

Quote from: US71 on September 21, 2010, 11:41:42 AM


LA 1 gets hit with the Ugly Stick in Shreveport

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=3521.0
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

jbnv

#3
Quote from: Henry on August 18, 2016, 12:45:22 PM
Well, that's not the only state whose outline signs don't conform to the actual shape. FWIW, the ones in AL, AZ, AR, GA and MO definitely don't.

Of course not the only one, but the first one I thought of here.

The post is a response to a guy who thinks we should change the "boot" icon to reflect uninhabitable area:

🆕 Louisiana Highways on Twitter | Yes, I like Clearview. Deal with it. | Redos: US | La. | Route Challenge

vtk



http://vidthekid.info/misc/shape-sr.html

The shape isn't supposed to match exactly; the deviations are probably intended to allow more room for a number.
Wait, it's all Ohio? Always has been.

jbnv

Quote from: vtk on August 18, 2016, 08:22:56 PM
http://vidthekid.info/misc/shape-sr.html

The shape isn't supposed to match exactly; the deviations are probably intended to allow more room for a number.

Exactly. The deviation increases the room for the number, makes the symbol more square, and smooths out some of the jagged edges.
🆕 Louisiana Highways on Twitter | Yes, I like Clearview. Deal with it. | Redos: US | La. | Route Challenge

jwolfer

Florida is missing most of the west coast! And for the past 30 years or so the Keys

Alps

Quote from: vtk on August 18, 2016, 08:22:56 PM


http://vidthekid.info/misc/shape-sr.html

The shape isn't supposed to match exactly; the deviations are probably intended to allow more room for a number.
Aren't there more recent Ohio shields that come closer to the actual shape?

paulthemapguy

How many thousands of hours do you want a guy to cut a shape out of a piece of prismatic sheeting?  Jesus.

There's a noble phrase in the field of engineering, upon which all construction is based.  Without this motto, this rule #1, nothing would ever be accomplished, and the motto goes a little something like this:

"Good enough."

Rule number 2 of engineering is to always have duct tape.

They made Ohio a bit more square, it looks like.  That's what they did with South Dakota, which is much wider than the route shield implies.
Avatar is the last interesting highway I clinched.
My website! http://www.paulacrossamerica.com Now featuring all of Ohio!
My USA Shield Gallery https://flic.kr/s/aHsmHwJRZk
TM Clinches https://bit.ly/2UwRs4O

National collection status: 361/425. Only 64 route markers remain

kphoger

Quote from: paulthemapguy on August 20, 2016, 01:32:35 PM
How many thousands of hours do you want a guy to cut a shape out of a piece of prismatic sheeting?  Jesus.

There's a noble phrase in the field of engineering, upon which all construction is based.  Without this motto, this rule #1, nothing would ever be accomplished, and the motto goes a little something like this:

"Good enough."

Rule number 2 of engineering is to always have duct tape.

They made Ohio a bit more square, it looks like.  That's what they did with South Dakota, which is much wider than the route shield implies.

Wow.  Ease up a little, man.  He just said he wanted to use the illustration in a blog post.  Have you read that blog post?  Does he even disagree with you?

Quote from: jbnv on August 18, 2016, 11:16:20 AM
Using this in a blog post. Thanks.
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

hbelkins

I've seen some recent variations of the Ohio state route marker that look absolutely horrendous. I don't know if they are geographically correct or not, but they look awful when compared to the long-standing marker's appearance.

And then there are a few that are reversed.

State outline route markers are reason #1 why they should never be widened for three-digit routes, and instead a thinner font should be used and keep the markers square.


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

Brandon

Quote from: Alps on August 19, 2016, 12:11:35 AM
Quote from: vtk on August 18, 2016, 08:22:56 PM


http://vidthekid.info/misc/shape-sr.html

The shape isn't supposed to match exactly; the deviations are probably intended to allow more room for a number.
Aren't there more recent Ohio shields that come closer to the actual shape?

The Ohio Turnpike had one, in the shield gallery: www.aaroads.com/shields/show.php?image=OH19590801
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

vtk

#12
Quote from: Alps on August 19, 2016, 12:11:35 AM
Quote from: vtk on August 18, 2016, 08:22:56 PM


http://vidthekid.info/misc/shape-sr.html

The shape isn't supposed to match exactly; the deviations are probably intended to allow more room for a number.
Aren't there more recent Ohio shields that come closer to the actual shape?

There are many off-spec variants in the field. They do not represent a more recent standard; they're just off-spec. Notable variants include the geographically more accurate shape (apparently used by a few contractors and municipalities), the near-spec version from Wikipedia which was apparently based on a picture from OMUTCD that isn't meant to define the outline shape (District 5 seems to have picked that one up), and a sloppy clipart version (featured in the shield gallery as "2002 spec", probably just one contractor's version).
Wait, it's all Ohio? Always has been.

Hot Rod Hootenanny

As far as "Geographically correct" Ohio route shields, someone in ODOT had too much time on his hands one week.

This photo was taken in 2000(?), maybe earlier. The Oh 44 shield has since been replaced.
Please, don't sue Alex & Andy over what I wrote above

Red Roads


cbeach40

and waterrrrrrr!

wanderer2575

Quote from: hbelkins on August 20, 2016, 04:29:59 PM
I've seen some recent variations of the Ohio state route marker that look absolutely horrendous. I don't know if they are geographically correct or not, but they look awful when compared to the long-standing marker's appearance.


So you don't appreciate the artistic expression in something like this?  (Neither do I):




Quote from: hbelkins on August 20, 2016, 04:29:59 PM
State outline route markers are reason #1 why they should never be widened for three-digit routes, and instead a thinner font should be used and keep the markers square.

I agree.  Plus, although somewhat OT and I'm sure Ohio isn't the only culprit, I hate it, hate it, hate it when they use oversized direction tabs with stretched three-digit route markers, especially when concurrent with one- or two-digit routes:



GreenLanternCorps

Quote from: wanderer2575 on December 05, 2016, 04:10:31 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on August 20, 2016, 04:29:59 PM
I've seen some recent variations of the Ohio state route marker that look absolutely horrendous. I don't know if they are geographically correct or not, but they look awful when compared to the long-standing marker's appearance.


So you don't appreciate the artistic expression in something like this?  (Neither do I):




Quote from: hbelkins on August 20, 2016, 04:29:59 PM
State outline route markers are reason #1 why they should never be widened for three-digit routes, and instead a thinner font should be used and keep the markers square.

I agree.  Plus, although somewhat OT and I'm sure Ohio isn't the only culprit, I hate it, hate it, hate it when they use oversized direction tabs with stretched three-digit route markers, especially when concurrent with one- or two-digit routes:



That could have been accomplished with a single pole and three signs...

:banghead:

GCrites

Chesapeake and Proctorville are in West Virginia though for all intents and purposes

Buck87

I actually like the ones with with a more geographically accurate outline

compdude787

I don't really care if the outline is geographically correct or not.

paulthemapguy

Quote from: GCrites80s on January 08, 2017, 08:59:04 PM
Chesapeake and Proctorville are in West Virginia though for all intents and purposes

Thank you for wording that cliche in the correct way!  Everyone gets it wrong.

Quote from: compdude787 on January 22, 2017, 03:43:48 PM
I don't really care if the outline is geographically correct or not.

And thank you, sir.  A voice of reason if ever there was one. (not sarcastic)
Avatar is the last interesting highway I clinched.
My website! http://www.paulacrossamerica.com Now featuring all of Ohio!
My USA Shield Gallery https://flic.kr/s/aHsmHwJRZk
TM Clinches https://bit.ly/2UwRs4O

National collection status: 361/425. Only 64 route markers remain



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.