Specifically, only one of each. Example: I-277/US 74/NC 16 in Charlotte, NC.
I-395/US 202/ME 15 in Bangor
I-93/US 1/MA 3 in downtown Boston
I-95/US 3/ MA 128 in Burlington
Used to be I-86/US 6/US 44/CT 15 in CT
Conyers, Georgia has I-20 / US 278 / GA 12 together:
(https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4176/33667547563_bd0f5fdb8e_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/Ti5YVZ)
I-66/US 17/VA 55
Quote from: jp the roadgeek on July 18, 2017, 09:56:47 AM
I-395/US 202/ME 15 in Bangor
I-93/US 1/MA 3 in downtown Boston
I-95/US 3/ MA 128 in Burlington
Don't forget I-95/US 1/MA 128 between Dedham & Canton
Signed: I-94/US 59/MN 210. Technically, US 52 is part of it as well but is unsigned. So I guess this is both correct and wrong given the OP's criteria.
I-380/US 218/IA 27 between Cedar Rapids and Iowa City, I-380/US 20/IA 27 east of Waterloo, and I-35/US 18/IA 27 south of Clear Lake.
I-585/US 176/SC 9
Someday:
I-285/US 52/NC 8
There are 2 in SE Wisconsin both on the same highway.
I-41/US 45/WI-100
I-41/US 45/WI-167
Also one up by Manitowoc
I-43/US-10/WI-42
Also one in Hudson
I-94/US-12/WI-35
And yet another one
I-39/US-51/WI-23
If I-39 is ever extended north you will have
I-39/US-51/WI-29
Cap City Freeway Sacramento, CA US-50 is cosigned with I-305 and CA-99, and CA-51 plus cosigned with Business 80 on the North/South Section of CA-51.
I-35/US 69/MO 110 in Liberty, Missouri
Counting only signed routes, or unsigned ones too?
If we count only signed routes:
I-20/US 278/GA 12 (as mentioned by formulanone above)
I-75/US 41/GA 7 between Valdosta and Hahira
If unsigned routes also count:
Neither of the above (also GA 402 and GA 401, respectively)
I-285/US 19/GA 407
I-16/US 17/GA 404
Not eligible:
I-516/US 80 and I-516/US 17 involve four state routes, three of them signed
I-985/US 23 involves two unsigned state routes (365 and 419)
I-78/US 22/NJ 173 near Clinton, NJ though this one is very brief
Quote from: PHLBOS on July 18, 2017, 11:23:44 AM
Quote from: jp the roadgeek on July 18, 2017, 09:56:47 AM
I-395/US 202/ME 15 in Bangor
I-93/US 1/MA 3 in downtown Boston
I-95/US 3/ MA 128 in Burlington
Don't forget I-95/US 1/MA 128 between Dedham & Canton
.
The I-93/US 1/MA 3 also has a silent MA 1A concurrency for most of its length.
Quote from: jp the roadgeek on July 18, 2017, 04:58:06 PM
Quote from: PHLBOS on July 18, 2017, 11:23:44 AM
Quote from: jp the roadgeek on July 18, 2017, 09:56:47 AM
I-395/US 202/ME 15 in Bangor
I-93/US 1/MA 3 in downtown Boston
I-95/US 3/ MA 128 in Burlington
Don't forget I-95/US 1/MA 128 between Dedham & Canton
The I-93/US 1/MA 3 also has a silent MA 1A concurrency for most of its length.
While true (good luck trying to follow 1A on/off I-93/US 1 in Downtown Boston near the Sumner/Callahan Tunnels); such isn't really worth mentioning (in the spirit of this thread) since there's already a
visible concurrency along I-93 & US 1 along the O'Neill Tunnel/Expressway/Southeast Expressway w/MA 3.
Quote from: bing101 on July 18, 2017, 02:35:25 PM
Cap City Freeway Sacramento, CA US-50 is cosigned with I-305 and CA-99
I have no words.
Quote from: dvferyance on July 18, 2017, 01:51:40 PM
There are 2 in SE Wisconsin both on the same highway.
I-41/US 45/WI-100
I-41/US 45/WI-167
Also US 41. I-41 is a glorified section of it with the very same number.
Quote from: bing101 on July 18, 2017, 02:35:25 PM
Cap City Freeway Sacramento, CA US-50 is cosigned with I-305 and CA-99
Except that I-305 is not signed (but should).
I-255/US 50/IL 3, between Exits 6 and 10, between Columbia and Dupo, IL, Southeast corner of STL Beltway/Bypass/whatever
84/30/55 in Idaho
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.corcohighways.org%2Fhighways%2Fid%2F55%2F84to69%2F2.jpg&hash=928abff1ac902b28fd06ef0fa72c5324db15006d)
80/30/789 in Wyoming
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.corcohighways.org%2Fhighways%2Fwy%2F789%2F80to80%2F1.jpg&hash=a45d0fc772720377140a23c22c37577de2a80ba9)
Do Business Routes count? Bus I-94, Bus US-127, M-50 in Jackson.
Else I can't find any in MI. The fact that there's only 2 Interstate/US concurrencies of any consequence contributes to that greatly.
Two other (questionable) ones from the North Star State:
I-94/US 52/MN 27
I-94/US 12/MN 95
We could do WI for a while probably.
I-94/US 12/WIS 35
I-39/US 51/WIS 23
I-20, US 84, TX 70 Southeast of Sweetwater TX
Technically I-70/US-6/CO-9 between Frisco and Silverthorne, CO, but CDOT despises signing Interstate/US Route duplexes.
At least they reluctantly co-signed CO-9 with I-70.
I-72, US 36, and IL/MO 110 near Quincy, IL/Hannibal, MO...
Thanks to that CKC Expressway...
And going historical, part of present I-88 and IL 110 used to be Toll US 30, tho it was never all 3 at the same time
Quote from: PHLBOS on July 18, 2017, 05:18:03 PM
Quote from: jp the roadgeek on July 18, 2017, 04:58:06 PM
Quote from: PHLBOS on July 18, 2017, 11:23:44 AM
Quote from: jp the roadgeek on July 18, 2017, 09:56:47 AM
I-395/US 202/ME 15 in Bangor
I-93/US 1/MA 3 in downtown Boston
I-95/US 3/ MA 128 in Burlington
Don't forget I-95/US 1/MA 128 between Dedham & Canton
The I-93/US 1/MA 3 also has a silent MA 1A concurrency for most of its length.
While true (good luck trying to follow 1A on/off I-93/US 1 in Downtown Boston near the Sumner/Callahan Tunnels); such isn't really worth mentioning (in the spirit of this thread) since there's already a visible concurrency along I-93 & US 1 along the O'Neill Tunnel/Expressway/Southeast Expressway w/MA 3.
MA 1A officially is routed northbound via I-90 East to East Boston. There are To 1A trailblazers on the ramp from I-93. Also MA 3A runs as a silent concurrency from Neponset Circle north to Storrow Drive, so north of Exit 12 you are on I-93/US 1/MA 3/(MA 1A)/(MA 3A)
I-70, US 40, and K-4 in Topeka, KS, which is joined by US 75 in the middle
I-99/US 220/PA 26 north of State College is the only case of this in Pennsylvania.
Quote from: bob7374 on July 18, 2017, 11:44:45 PMMA 1A officially is routed northbound via I-90 East to East Boston. There are To 1A trailblazers on the ramp from I-93.
Yes, there are
TO 1A trailblazers and even a supplemental BGS directing airport/E. Boston-bound traffic along northbound I-93/US 1 traffic to use I-90 East (Exit 20); however saying that such is the
official 1A from its northbound parent is open for debate; especially since MA 1A northbound does exist via the Callahan Tunnel.
A northbounder
could theoretically exit off I-93 further north at Exit 23 and follow surface streets (North to Congress to New Chardon) to MA 1A North & the Callahan Tunnel. The only logical reason for anyone to do such (outside of a roadgeek seeking a clinch) would be if the Ted Williams Tunnel was closed for repairs, accident and/or police activity.
As you know, this
oddity w/1A was the result of the Big Dig project not building/providing direct access to all the harbor tunnels from both directions of I-93, and US 1 being rerouted from Storrow Drive onto I-93 just prior to any Big Dig-related construction. To be sure, there are issues with these partial interchanges but I can assure you that any related-complaints are because of partial-access to/from the tunnels themselves and
not because of a route number discontinuity/interuption.
I-35 / US 50 / K-31:
(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/264/32640785626_5457b9e360_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/RJmynY)
I-35 / US 40 / K-18:
(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/725/32302464390_9ae3118af3_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/Rdszgd)
Quote from: formulanone on July 19, 2017, 05:48:02 PM
I-35 / US 50 / KS 31:
Leudimin's edit: changed state route to unified nomenclature
Now we need to find a way to put a county route going West there :sombrero:.
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on July 19, 2017, 06:29:14 PM
Quote from: formulanone on July 19, 2017, 05:48:02 PM
I-35 / US 50 / KS 31:
Leudimin's edit: changed state route to unified nomenclature
Now we need to find a way to put a county route going West there :sombrero:.
Careful, the folks from Michigan and Kansas stand by their single-letter-and-hyphen road abbreviations!
Sunshine Skyway Bridge in Florida crossing Tampa Bay:
I-275, US 19, SR 93
(SR 93 is unsigned)
Louisiana has one and only one:
I-49, US 167, & LA 28
iPhone
Quote from: GaryV on July 18, 2017, 06:56:06 PM
Do Business Routes count? Bus I-94, Bus US-127, M-50 in Jackson.
Else I can't find any in MI. The fact that there's only 2 Interstate/US concurrencies of any consequence contributes to that greatly.
At the time it opened in 1962, a section of the north—south freeway in Grand Rapids was signed as I-296/US 131/M-37, but later M-37 was moved and still later I-296 was removed from signage.
I-135 / US 81 / KS 4
I-135 / US 81 / KS 15
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on July 18, 2017, 06:13:51 PM
Quote from: bing101 on July 18, 2017, 02:35:25 PM
Cap City Freeway Sacramento, CA US-50 is cosigned with I-305 and CA-99
Except that I-305 is not signed (but should).
Wouldn't mind seeing it signed. But it also used to be I-80, I think, before it was rerouted on the northerly bypass of Sac'to (proposed I-880 at the time).
I-20/I-59/US 11/AL 5 between Bessemer, AL and Green Pond, AL. If unsigned ones also count, then any instance of a US route multiplexing an Interstate will bring a state route with it, such as AL 3 for US 31.
Quote from: freebrickproductions on July 20, 2017, 01:59:34 PM
I-20/I-59/US 11/AL 5 between Bessemer, AL and Green Pond, AL. If unsigned ones also count, then any instance of a US route multiplexing an Interstate will bring a state route with it, such as AL 3 for US 31.
This thread is about exactly one of each. That one has two Interstates, so it doesn't count.
Quote from: NE2 on July 18, 2017, 05:18:18 PM
Quote from: bing101 on July 18, 2017, 02:35:25 PM
Cap City Freeway Sacramento, CA US-50 is cosigned with I-305 and CA-99
I have no words.
Yeah - he forgot CA 16, which disqualifies the whole shebang :bigass:
I-35/US 69/MO 110 in Claycomo right before MO 110's terminus.
https://goo.gl/maps/EggisLFjVTy (https://goo.gl/maps/EggisLFjVTy)
I-90/US-14/SD-79 west of Rapid City.
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on July 18, 2017, 06:13:51 PM
Quote from: dvferyance on July 18, 2017, 01:51:40 PM
There are 2 in SE Wisconsin both on the same highway.
I-41/US 45/WI-100
I-41/US 45/WI-167
Also US 41. I-41 is a glorified section of it with the very same number.
Quote from: bing101 on July 18, 2017, 02:35:25 PM
Cap City Freeway Sacramento, CA US-50 is cosigned with I-305 and CA-99
Except that I-305 is not signed (but should).
Actually, neither is CA 99, except for trailblazer "TO CA 99" signage on the BGS's approaching US 50 from NB 99 and SB I-5, directing 99 traffic over the W-X freeway in either direction. There's also "TO CA 99" signage on the WB US 50 BGS approaching NB I-5. Otherwise, not a reassurance shield for either US 50 or CA 99 to be found on that stretch of freeway. I-305, OTOH, would be completely redundant; Caltrans has elected to publicize US 50 as the primary "target" route EB, and "TO I-80" likewise for WB. I-305 is simply a funding mechanism for maintenance of that segment, plus the chargeable part of unsigned CA 51 north from the US 50 interchange to the C street/UPRR underpasses, all of which was original I-80 before the '82 changes.
I-395 and U.S. 1 in Virginia and the District of Columbia.
I-70 and U.S. 40 in Maryland (two separate segments).
I-68 and U.S. 40.
I-68 and U.S. 40 and U.S. 220.
I-68 and U.S. 40 and U.S. 219.
I-68 and U.S. 219.
Unsigned I-595 and U.S. 50
Unsigned I-595 and U.S. 50 and U.S. 301.
I-95 and U.S. 17 in Virginia.
I-64 and U.S. 60 in two segments in Virginia (through Clifton Forge and across the Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel).
Quote from: cpzilliacus on July 20, 2017, 04:03:06 PM
I-395 and U.S. 1 in Virginia and the District of Columbia.
I-70 and U.S. 40 in Maryland (two separate segments).
I-68 and U.S. 40.
I-68 and U.S. 40 and U.S. 220.
I-68 and U.S. 40 and U.S. 219.
I-68 and U.S. 219.
Unsigned I-595 and U.S. 50
Unsigned I-595 and U.S. 50 and U.S. 301.
I-95 and U.S. 17 in Virginia.
I-64 and U.S. 60 in two segments in Virginia (through Clifton Forge and across the Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel).
The OP's asking for concurrencies containing
one of each route type (one Interstate, one US
and one SR) for a
minimum total of 3 routes along stretches.
Former: I-64/US 60/VA 168
In Indiana:
- I-69, US-27 and SR 1 (until US-27 was decommissioned) north of Ft Wayne
- I-465, US-31, US-36, US-40, US-52, US-421, SR 37 and SR 67 (although all but I-465 are un-signed) on Indianapolis' east side
- I-65, US-31 (formerly US-31E) and SR 62 (until SR 62 was moved onto I-265) in Jeffersonville
- I-64, US-460, and SR 62 (until US-460 was truncated) in New Albany
- I-74, US-421 and Truck SR-9 in Shelbyville
Quote from: sparker on July 20, 2017, 03:41:08 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on July 18, 2017, 06:13:51 PM
Quote from: dvferyance on July 18, 2017, 01:51:40 PM
There are 2 in SE Wisconsin both on the same highway.
I-41/US 45/WI-100
I-41/US 45/WI-167
Also US 41. I-41 is a glorified section of it with the very same number.
Quote from: bing101 on July 18, 2017, 02:35:25 PM
Cap City Freeway Sacramento, CA US-50 is cosigned with I-305 and CA-99
Except that I-305 is not signed (but should).
Actually, neither is CA 99, except for trailblazer "TO CA 99" signage on the BGS's approaching US 50 from NB 99 and SB I-5, directing 99 traffic over the W-X freeway in either direction. There's also "TO CA 99" signage on the WB US 50 BGS approaching NB I-5. Otherwise, not a reassurance shield for either US 50 or CA 99 to be found on that stretch of freeway. I-305, OTOH, would be completely redundant; Caltrans has elected to publicize US 50 as the primary "target" route EB, and "TO I-80" likewise for WB. I-305 is simply a funding mechanism for maintenance of that segment, plus the chargeable part of unsigned CA 51 north from the US 50 interchange to the C street/UPRR underpasses, all of which was original I-80 before the '82 changes.
And to sign the entire quinplex (I-305, Bus I-80, US 50, CA 16, and CA 99) would definitely violate message loading guidelines, as awesome as it'd be to see it in its full glory.
Quote from: Bickendan on July 21, 2017, 04:32:51 AM
And to sign the entire quinplex (I-305, Bus I-80, US 50, CA 16, and CA 99) would definitely violate message loading guidelines, as awesome as it'd be to see it in its full glory.
Yeah, even GDOT thinks that would be a bit much (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.0713918,-81.1384002,3a,37.5y,106.39h,94.94t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sT2Rg8BfpGFfWjGqLmLdfLA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (At least I assume that's the reason for not signing southbound 25 here, and leaving out 26 entirely.)
I-40/US 180/AZ 99 Exits 245-252
Quote from: sparker on July 20, 2017, 03:41:08 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on July 18, 2017, 06:13:51 PM
Quote from: dvferyance on July 18, 2017, 01:51:40 PM
There are 2 in SE Wisconsin both on the same highway.
I-41/US 45/WI-100
I-41/US 45/WI-167
Also US 41. I-41 is a glorified section of it with the very same number.
Quote from: bing101 on July 18, 2017, 02:35:25 PM
Cap City Freeway Sacramento, CA US-50 is cosigned with I-305 and CA-99
Except that I-305 is not signed (but should).
Actually, neither is CA 99, except for trailblazer "TO CA 99" signage on the BGS's approaching US 50 from NB 99 and SB I-5, directing 99 traffic over the W-X freeway in either direction. There's also "TO CA 99" signage on the WB US 50 BGS approaching NB I-5. Otherwise, not a reassurance shield for either US 50 or CA 99 to be found on that stretch of freeway. I-305, OTOH, would be completely redundant; Caltrans has elected to publicize US 50 as the primary "target" route EB, and "TO I-80" likewise for WB. I-305 is simply a funding mechanism for maintenance of that segment, plus the chargeable part of unsigned CA 51 north from the US 50 interchange to the C street/UPRR underpasses, all of which was original I-80 before the '82 changes.
Also Business 80 was previously signed for the west end of US-50 but was removed last year. CA-51 is the only one keeping the business 80 signs for now.
I-44/US-62/SH-37 in Cleveland County, OK (and a little bit of McClain County)
Quote from: PHLBOS on July 19, 2017, 04:44:17 PM
Quote from: bob7374 on July 18, 2017, 11:44:45 PMMA 1A officially is routed northbound via I-90 East to East Boston. There are To 1A trailblazers on the ramp from I-93.
Yes, there are TO 1A trailblazers and even a supplemental BGS directing airport/E. Boston-bound traffic along northbound I-93/US 1 traffic to use I-90 East (Exit 20); however saying that such is the official 1A from its northbound parent is open for debate; especially since MA 1A northbound does exist via the Callahan Tunnel.
A northbounder could theoretically exit off I-93 further north at Exit 23 and follow surface streets (North to Congress to New Chardon) to MA 1A North & the Callahan Tunnel. The only logical reason for anyone to do such (outside of a roadgeek seeking a clinch) would be if the Ted Williams Tunnel was closed for repairs, accident and/or police activity.
As you know, this oddity w/1A was the result of the Big Dig project not building/providing direct access to all the harbor tunnels from both directions of I-93, and US 1 being rerouted from Storrow Drive onto I-93 just prior to any Big Dig-related construction. To be sure, there are issues with these partial interchanges but I can assure you that any related-complaints are because of partial-access to/from the tunnels themselves and not because of a route number discontinuity/interuption.
Got the time to check the official Mass Route Log. It states that North 1A uses the ramp from I-93 N to I-90 East then I-90 to East Boston. Have no problem with MassDOT continuing to sign 1A North through the Callahan since it's been that way for a long time and as you say most drivers aren't going to make a complaint about the signed route number interruption. This wouldn't have been an issue if MassDOT didn't insist that the alternate routes continue along their parents in a hidden concurrency.
Quote from: bob7374 on July 24, 2017, 02:49:29 PMGot the time to check the official Mass Route Log. It states that North 1A uses the ramp from I-93 N to I-90 East then I-90 to East Boston. Have no problem with MassDOT continuing to sign 1A North through the Callahan since it's been that way for a long time and as you say most drivers aren't going to make a complaint about the signed route number interruption. This wouldn't have been an issue if MassDOT didn't insist that the alternate routes continue along their parents in a hidden concurrency.
I guess this is one case where the real world & roadmaps (including ones MassDOT's own) don't agree with the route logs. To my knowledge, the Ted Williams Tunnel was
never planned to be a part of 1A. Yes, the pull-through BGS' at the airport exit (#26) read
1A NORTH rather than
90 EAST; but I believe such was due to I-90 ending at 1A not shortly after the airport exit.
OTOH, 1A southbound is clearly signed up to the Sumner Tunnel.
As MassDOT's insistence on hidden concurrencies for A/Alternate routes w/their parent routes; don't other states do similar?
I-86/US 219/NY 17 near Salamanca. I believe it's the only such example in NY.
Quote from: bassoon1986 on July 20, 2017, 12:02:41 AM
Louisiana has one and only one:
I-49, US 167, & LA 28
iPhone
Bassoon: I have looked, studied & stared at Google maps & a paper map. I even drove to Alexandria about a month ago. But for the life of me, I don't see where the 49/167/28 Concurrency takes place.
167 & 28 are together on the Pineville Expressway as you approach I-49. I saw the signs for 167 pointing to I-49 south, but LA 28 pointing to north I-49 (and why the hell DOTD didn't bother putting LA 28 on the BGSs bugs me & pisses me off, but oh well :banghead:) Am I mistaken?
Quote from: cjk374 on July 29, 2017, 08:05:53 AM
Quote from: bassoon1986 on July 20, 2017, 12:02:41 AM
Louisiana has one and only one:
I-49, US 167, & LA 28
iPhone
Bassoon: I have looked, studied & stared at Google maps & a paper map. I even drove to Alexandria about a month ago. But for the life of me, I don't see where the 49/167/28 Concurrency takes place.
167 & 28 are together on the Pineville Expressway as you approach I-49. I saw the signs for 167 pointing to I-49 south, but LA 28 pointing to north I-49 (and why the hell DOTD didn't bother putting LA 28 on the BGSs bugs me & pisses me off, but oh well :banghead:) Am I mistaken?
Oh shoot, you're right. I think for some reason I was thinking of just a BGS with all 3. In Pineville where 28 meets the expressway it shows "TO I-49, US 167 South, LA 28 West".
LA 28 is included where the Pineville Expressway merges to I-49. It shows 49 north and 28 west with Shreveport. As well as on the BGS for Exit 86 going northbound on I-49 from downtown. It shows US 71, US 165 and LA 28. Everywhere else 28 is a supplemental shield on the freeways.
So Louisiana doesn't have any examples of Interstate/US Route/Louisiana Shield. Unless you count hidden I-910, US 90 Business, and LA 23 which is only on the service roads on the Westbank of New Orleans.
iPhone
Several in Tulsa OK:
I-444 (unsigned)/US 64-75/OK-51
I-244/US-64/OK-51
I-44/US-412/OK-66
And a few more in OKC:
I-44/US-62/OK-3
I-240/US-62/OK-3
I-40/US-270/OK-3
Not posted, but
Arkansas:
I-49/US 71/US 62/AR 16
Also I-49/US62/ US 71/AR 12 (on a technicality)
Quote from: catsynth on July 20, 2017, 01:21:33 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on July 18, 2017, 06:13:51 PM
Quote from: bing101 on July 18, 2017, 02:35:25 PM
Cap City Freeway Sacramento, CA US-50 is cosigned with I-305 and CA-99
Except that I-305 is not signed (but should).
Wouldn't mind seeing it signed. But it also used to be I-80, I think, before it was rerouted on the northerly bypass of Sac'to (proposed I-880 at the time).
IIRC, when I-80 was singed along the WX, US 50 ended at the Oak Park Interchange. The WX was never signed as both I-80 and US 50. US 50 was extended along the WX to West Sacramento when I-80 was rerouted on the bypass and Biz-80 came to be signed on the WX.
Quote from: dvferyance on July 20, 2017, 02:47:45 PM
I-90/US-14/SD-79 west of Rapid City.
Also the 90/14/34 between Sturgis and Whitewood counts!
I-10/US 90/SH 130.
https://goo.gl/maps/Ux31pYto5Js
To encourage trucks to use the tolled Austin/San Antonio Bypass, TxDOT extended the SH 130 a few years ago, meaning you can now follow the SH 130/Toll 130 designation from I-35 south of San Antonio to I-35 near Georgetown.
It also gave us a triple concurrency.