Regional Boards > Central States

Proposed US 412 Upgrade

<< < (4/142) > >>

sprjus4:
^

I think in this case, given the roads are already existing as toll roads, itís not a problem. Itís not like they are proposing a new toll on an existing free highway.

Plutonic Panda:
^^^ not all of the road.

sprjus4:

--- Quote from: Plutonic Panda on May 23, 2021, 12:46:03 AM ---^^^ not all of the road.

--- End quote ---
But no new portion will be tolled. Where the toll roads already exist, they will remain. Simple.

Plutonic Panda:

--- Quote from: sprjus4 on May 23, 2021, 12:59:53 AM ---
--- Quote from: Plutonic Panda on May 23, 2021, 12:46:03 AM ---^^^ not all of the road.

--- End quote ---
But no new portion will be tolled. Where the toll roads already exist, they will remain. Simple.

--- End quote ---
For the most part yes you are correct though I wish Oklahoma could be the anomaly.

Scott5114:

--- Quote from: sprjus4 on May 22, 2021, 10:09:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: US 89 on May 22, 2021, 03:21:42 PM ---
--- Quote from: Finrod on May 22, 2021, 03:13:59 PM ---Does anyone know how close the Cimarron Turnpike is to interstate standards?  That would be the segment from I-35 to Tulsa.

--- End quote ---

Most of the Cimarron Turnpike has a cable barrier or even a grass median with no left shoulder.

--- End quote ---
The design with the cable barrier median is likely what the remainder will get, and it will be sufficient enough for designation. The I-44 extension to Texas along the Bailey Turnpike had the raised grass median design in areas remaining until recently replaced with cable barrier.

--- End quote ---

Of course, that designation was done in 1982. FHWA was a lot less of a stickler about Interstate standards back then.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version