AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: 71  (Read 6307 times)

Angelo71

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 618
  • Location: Winchester, Virginia
  • Last Login: May 29, 2022, 01:35:56 PM
71
« on: August 08, 2020, 08:49:13 PM »

71
« Last Edit: April 30, 2021, 02:05:07 PM by Angelo71 »
Logged

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 18215
  • Nit picker of unprecedented pedantry

  • Age: 33
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 10:02:05 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2020, 08:51:27 PM »

They didn't have anywhere else they needed to go.
Logged

I-55

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 898
  • Midwesterner and Southerner

  • Location: Indiana
  • Last Login: March 30, 2023, 12:13:27 PM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2020, 01:07:41 AM »

They didn't have anywhere else they needed to go.

I think some of us can agree that I-76 (e) could use an extension westward and/or eastward. I-79 has nowhere to go unless its routed along Corridor L to I-75 (which will never happen), I-71 has been discussed on this forum to overtake the WK Parkway to I-69 (or I-24), and I-78, along with everything not stated above, is short because it has nowhere else to go without pipe dream extensions.

The only interstates that were designed for long distances are the x5s, x0s, I-64 (defacto I-50/60), I-94 (effectively a second I-90), I-84w (no x0s in grid), I-77 (no x5s in the grid), and congressional/coalition designated corridors like I-69, I-29/49, I-57 and I-14 (which doesn't nearly fully exist yet). Other than that, most other interstates are short city connectors that don't need to go very far, and if they went further they'd be in the middle of nowhere or redundant to another interstate highway. Many routes are restricted by geography, particularly in the northeast. The extra distance isn't needed and often the interstate has nowhere to go.
Logged
Let's Go Purdue Basketball Whoosh

ilpt4u

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3052
  • Location: Southern IL
  • Last Login: Today at 09:56:33 PM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2020, 01:25:53 AM »

Another bit about I-76: Iím pretty sure both the Eastern and Western branches were originally I-80S/branch routes from I-80. They became I-76s in 1976 - celebrating the Republic making it 200 years
Logged

TheDon102

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 115
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Throgs Neck, Bronx NY
  • Last Login: Today at 08:07:59 PM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2020, 12:01:31 PM »

I-78 was supposed to be a longer route but it was (mostly) cancelled in New York City so....
Logged

Roadgeekteen

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 14526
  • Limon should not be a control city

  • Age: 19
  • Location: Needham/Amherst
  • Last Login: Today at 08:14:30 PM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2020, 12:39:48 PM »

What
Logged
God-emperor of Alanland, king of all the goats and goat-like creatures

Current Interstate map I am making:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?hl=en&mid=1PEDVyNb1skhnkPkgXi8JMaaudM2zI-Y&ll=29.05778059819179%2C-82.48856825&z=5

1

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 13373
  • Age: 24
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: Today at 10:05:19 PM
    • Flickr account
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #6 on: August 09, 2020, 12:43:00 PM »

What

What the OP is saying is that the four Interstates mentioned aren't that long, unlike some others such as I-44, I-64, and I-81 (deliberately excluding the multiples of 5). However, the OP, in both this thread and in others, keeps using words that don't refer to length, sometimes confusing it with width and sometimes just being ambiguous.
Logged
Clinched

Traveled, plus several state routes

kinupanda

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 87
  • Age: 40
  • Location: San Antonio, TX
  • Last Login: March 19, 2023, 09:08:51 PM
    • kinupanda.com
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2020, 06:53:46 PM »

Why are those highways so small I love those highways but they're so small. Why is that?
They're doing the best they can. :-(
Logged

zzcarp

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 558
  • Age: 45
  • Location: Westminster, CO
  • Last Login: March 31, 2023, 03:45:39 PM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2020, 08:56:33 AM »

I-71 occurs as the right length. It parallels US 42 and shares the same cities (Cleveland, Louisville) for its termini.

I-76, formerly I-80S, has had extensions proposed at both ends. In Ohio, I-80S on some early planning documents was to diverge from I-80/90/Ohio Turnpike at the US 250 exit at Milan and follow the US 250 and US 224 corridors to the current I-76 west terminus at I-71. None of this corridor past Lodi was improved, and it's been removed from planning documents for over 50 years.

On its eastern end, it's been proposed and studied to extend I-76 down the Atlantic City Expressway. My understanding is that NJDOT believes it could cause motorist confusion and that there's no benefit to doing it. There are likely substandard design features that would need upgraded before it could be signed newly as an Interstate.

Re I-79, south of Charleston there is only one freeway corridor through the mountains.  I-77 'won' the designation as it supplanted/parallels historic US 21 its entire length.
Logged
So many miles and so many roads

ethanhopkin14

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2059
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Last Login: March 29, 2023, 11:36:14 AM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2020, 09:28:30 AM »

A more reasonable question would be why are I-30 and I-45 so small (short)?
Logged

ethanhopkin14

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2059
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Last Login: March 29, 2023, 11:36:14 AM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #10 on: August 10, 2020, 09:29:29 AM »

They didn't have anywhere else they needed to go.

I think some of us can agree that I-76 (e) could use an extension westward and/or eastward. I-79 has nowhere to go unless its routed along Corridor L to I-75 (which will never happen), I-71 has been discussed on this forum to overtake the WK Parkway to I-69 (or I-24), and I-78, along with everything not stated above, is short because it has nowhere else to go without pipe dream extensions.

The only interstates that were designed for long distances are the x5s, x0s, I-64 (defacto I-50/60), I-94 (effectively a second I-90), I-84w (no x0s in grid), I-77 (no x5s in the grid), and congressional/coalition designated corridors like I-69, I-29/49, I-57 and I-14 (which doesn't nearly fully exist yet). Other than that, most other interstates are short city connectors that don't need to go very far, and if they went further they'd be in the middle of nowhere or redundant to another interstate highway. Many routes are restricted by geography, particularly in the northeast. The extra distance isn't needed and often the interstate has nowhere to go.

Just curious, where would you extend I-76(E) from it's western terminus?
Logged

1

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 13373
  • Age: 24
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: Today at 10:05:19 PM
    • Flickr account
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2020, 09:31:04 AM »

They didn't have anywhere else they needed to go.

I think some of us can agree that I-76 (e) could use an extension westward and/or eastward. I-79 has nowhere to go unless its routed along Corridor L to I-75 (which will never happen), I-71 has been discussed on this forum to overtake the WK Parkway to I-69 (or I-24), and I-78, along with everything not stated above, is short because it has nowhere else to go without pipe dream extensions.

The only interstates that were designed for long distances are the x5s, x0s, I-64 (defacto I-50/60), I-94 (effectively a second I-90), I-84w (no x0s in grid), I-77 (no x5s in the grid), and congressional/coalition designated corridors like I-69, I-29/49, I-57 and I-14 (which doesn't nearly fully exist yet). Other than that, most other interstates are short city connectors that don't need to go very far, and if they went further they'd be in the middle of nowhere or redundant to another interstate highway. Many routes are restricted by geography, particularly in the northeast. The extra distance isn't needed and often the interstate has nowhere to go.

Just curious, where would you extend I-76(E) from it's its western terminus?

The most common proposal I've seen is to Fort Wayne.
Logged
Clinched

Traveled, plus several state routes

ethanhopkin14

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2059
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Last Login: March 29, 2023, 11:36:14 AM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2020, 09:43:23 AM »

They didn't have anywhere else they needed to go.

I think some of us can agree that I-76 (e) could use an extension westward and/or eastward. I-79 has nowhere to go unless its routed along Corridor L to I-75 (which will never happen), I-71 has been discussed on this forum to overtake the WK Parkway to I-69 (or I-24), and I-78, along with everything not stated above, is short because it has nowhere else to go without pipe dream extensions.

The only interstates that were designed for long distances are the x5s, x0s, I-64 (defacto I-50/60), I-94 (effectively a second I-90), I-84w (no x0s in grid), I-77 (no x5s in the grid), and congressional/coalition designated corridors like I-69, I-29/49, I-57 and I-14 (which doesn't nearly fully exist yet). Other than that, most other interstates are short city connectors that don't need to go very far, and if they went further they'd be in the middle of nowhere or redundant to another interstate highway. Many routes are restricted by geography, particularly in the northeast. The extra distance isn't needed and often the interstate has nowhere to go.

Just curious, where would you extend I-76(E) from it's its western terminus?

The most common proposal I've seen is to Fort Wayne.

It sure would be nice to extend it to Chicago and connect it to I-80.
Logged

ethanhopkin14

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2059
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Last Login: March 29, 2023, 11:36:14 AM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #13 on: August 10, 2020, 05:53:58 PM »

Is it like driving a car on a bike lane?  Like the pavement isn't wide enough for a car?
Logged

I-55

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 898
  • Midwesterner and Southerner

  • Location: Indiana
  • Last Login: March 30, 2023, 12:13:27 PM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #14 on: August 10, 2020, 06:14:23 PM »

Is it like driving a car on a bike lane?  Like the pavement isn't wide enough for a car?

At least in the Holland Tunnel
Logged
Let's Go Purdue Basketball Whoosh

Hot Rod Hootenanny

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 2636
  • Your roadmeet didn't happen, if I was not there.

  • Age: 48
  • Location: Middle of Nowhere, Ohio
  • Last Login: Today at 10:11:17 PM
    • 20th Century roadfan material
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2020, 08:26:14 PM »

They didn't have anywhere else they needed to go.

I think some of us can agree that I-76 (e) could use an extension westward and/or eastward. I-79 has nowhere to go unless its routed along Corridor L to I-75 (which will never happen), I-71 has been discussed on this forum to overtake the WK Parkway to I-69 (or I-24), and I-78, along with everything not stated above, is short because it has nowhere else to go without pipe dream extensions.

The only interstates that were designed for long distances are the x5s, x0s, I-64 (defacto I-50/60), I-94 (effectively a second I-90), I-84w (no x0s in grid), I-77 (no x5s in the grid), and congressional/coalition designated corridors like I-69, I-29/49, I-57 and I-14 (which doesn't nearly fully exist yet). Other than that, most other interstates are short city connectors that don't need to go very far, and if they went further they'd be in the middle of nowhere or redundant to another interstate highway. Many routes are restricted by geography, particularly in the northeast. The extra distance isn't needed and often the interstate has nowhere to go.

Just curious, where would you extend I-76(E) from it's western terminus?
Multiple roadgeek pipedreams for I-76 E have it going south on I-71 to Mansfield, Ohio and then following US 30 west to somewhere (depending on the proposal) near Chicago.
Logged
Less important than dead cats.

STLmapboy

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1107
  • Age: 18
  • Location: St. Louis
  • Last Login: March 09, 2023, 01:04:36 AM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #16 on: August 11, 2020, 08:41:48 PM »

Why are 95, 5, and 75 so tall?
Logged
Teenage STL area roadgeek.
Missouri>>>>>Illinois

thspfc

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 3829
  • I-180 in Wyoming >>>>> I-70 in Colorado

  • Age: 2015
  • Location: WI
  • Last Login: Today at 10:08:15 PM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #17 on: August 11, 2020, 08:53:43 PM »

I don't know but I-80 and I-90 are so big.
Logged
Whether a team makes the playoffs isn't comparable to whether they are above .500. Part of making the playoffs is getting the wins when you need them to get in, which Brady/Belichick always found a way to do. That's skill. Being above .500 or below .500 is just however things shake out. That's luck.

thspfc

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 3829
  • I-180 in Wyoming >>>>> I-70 in Colorado

  • Age: 2015
  • Location: WI
  • Last Login: Today at 10:08:15 PM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #18 on: August 11, 2020, 08:58:47 PM »

Is it like driving a car on a bike lane?  Like the pavement isn't wide enough for a car?

At least in the Holland Tunnel
This guy gets it
Logged
Whether a team makes the playoffs isn't comparable to whether they are above .500. Part of making the playoffs is getting the wins when you need them to get in, which Brady/Belichick always found a way to do. That's skill. Being above .500 or below .500 is just however things shake out. That's luck.

jmacswimmer

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1319
  • BING BONG

  • Age: 26
  • Location: Maryland
  • Last Login: March 31, 2023, 03:38:53 PM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #19 on: August 11, 2020, 10:27:36 PM »

Why are 95, 5, and 75 so tall?

I-15 & I-35 would like a word.
Logged
"Now, what if da Bearss were to enter the Indianapolis 5-hunnert?"
"How would they compete?"
"Let's say they rode together in a big buss."
"Is Ditka driving?"
"Of course!"
"Then I like da Bear buss."
"DA BEARSSS BUSSSS"

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 18215
  • Nit picker of unprecedented pedantry

  • Age: 33
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 10:02:05 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #20 on: August 12, 2020, 02:49:32 PM »

Logged

1

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 13373
  • Age: 24
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: Today at 10:05:19 PM
    • Flickr account
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #21 on: August 12, 2020, 02:54:08 PM »



These need to exist as forum emojis.
Logged
Clinched

Traveled, plus several state routes

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 18215
  • Nit picker of unprecedented pedantry

  • Age: 33
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 10:02:05 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #22 on: August 12, 2020, 02:58:03 PM »

These need to exist as forum emojis.

What emotion would you even convey with those? "Oh, I see FritzOwl posted again. "
Logged

odditude

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 703
  • Location: NOVA
  • Last Login: March 31, 2023, 07:29:59 PM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #23 on: August 12, 2020, 06:06:52 PM »

These need to exist as forum emojis.

What emotion would you even convey with those? "Oh, I see FritzOwl posted again. "

how 'bout...
  • I-69: legislative silliness
  • I-76: "named highway X should be an interstate!" (see: Atlantic City Expressway, NJ Tpk from exits 1-6)
  • I-86: interstates for interstates' sake
  • I-99: grid? what grid?
Logged

Ben114

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 479
  • yep that's me

  • Age: 19
  • Location: Blackstone Valley, MA
  • Last Login: February 13, 2023, 02:04:34 AM
Re: Why is I-71, I-76, I-78, I-79 so small
« Reply #24 on: August 12, 2020, 06:30:26 PM »

These need to exist as forum emojis.

What emotion would you even convey with those? "Oh, I see FritzOwl posted again. "

how 'bout...
  • I-69: legislative silliness
  • I-76: "named highway X should be an interstate!" (see: Atlantic City Expressway, NJ Tpk from exits 1-6)
  • I-86: interstates for interstates' sake
  • I-99: grid? what grid?
Also, I-97: two digits 'cause why not!
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.