AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: North Carolina  (Read 980691 times)

Henry

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 7707
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Chicago, IL/Seattle, WA
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 11:26:29 PM
    • Henry Watson's Online Freeway
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #650 on: December 29, 2015, 11:43:24 AM »

I have mentioned before in another thread about having the Raleigh-Norfolk corridor be numbered I-46 (although in my post in Fictional Highways, the routing was different).  The US 70 corridor should be I-42, if an I-number needs to be assigned to this.

I would say both routes qualify for a two-digit interstate number.  Heck, we have countless examples of short two-digit interstates located in one state.  I'm fine with anything between 40-64.   :nod:
As am I, although I'd prefer anything in the 40s range.
Logged
Go Cubs Go! Go Cubs Go! Hey Chicago, what do you say? The Cubs are gonna win today!

slorydn1

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1084
  • If I pass you on the right, you're doing it wrong.

  • Age: 53
  • Location: New Bern, North Carolina
  • Last Login: July 11, 2020, 03:34:36 AM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #651 on: December 30, 2015, 08:53:26 PM »

Although I'd be fine with a 2di number for the US-70 corridor I would think it would be better to save a 2di number for a longer multi-state route (man if only they could figure out a way to get I-30 from Little Rock to New Bern, but I digress into fictional territory, lol).

I would think that an odd 3di would be fine for the corridor, which would be a spur off of a major 2di anyway. As someone else had stated, 340 is available in NC and would be perfect for this corridor.

Man, and to think, it could have been I-40 had things gone differently back in the 60's and 70's.
Logged
Please Note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of any governmental agency, non-governmental agency, quasi-governmental agency or wanna be governmental agency

Counties: Counties Visited

WashuOtaku

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 653
  • Location: North Carolina
  • Last Login: March 20, 2023, 09:12:06 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #652 on: December 31, 2015, 08:06:01 AM »

Although I'd be fine with a 2di number for the US-70 corridor I would think it would be better to save a 2di number for a longer multi-state route (man if only they could figure out a way to get I-30 from Little Rock to New Bern, but I digress into fictional territory, lol).

I would think that an odd 3di would be fine for the corridor, which would be a spur off of a major 2di anyway. As someone else had stated, 340 is available in NC and would be perfect for this corridor.

Man, and to think, it could have been I-40 had things gone differently back in the 60's and 70's.

Save a 2di number till when exactly?  Are there big plans for more interstates that will need these spare numbers too? 

I get what you are saying but there is no plans for these numbers anytime, exact same reason why Texas went ahead and snagged I-2, because it's available.  Creating super-long 3di would be foolish when a 2di is available and would still be longer than several other Intrastate 2di, I-40 to Morehead City is roughly 130 miles.

Remember, back in the '60s and '70s, North Carolina had roughly 5 million people, today it's double that.  Needs were very different back then as oppose today now.
Logged

CanesFan27

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1369
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 07:20:55 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #653 on: January 01, 2016, 05:48:43 PM »

My attempt to describe the current state and future needs and plans of the three new Interstate corridors (two new / one extended) here in North Carolina:

http://surewhynotnow.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-fast-act-brings-two-new-interstate.html
Logged

OracleUsr

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 919
  • Age: 52
  • Location: North Carolina
  • Last Login: March 06, 2023, 10:09:25 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #654 on: January 02, 2016, 10:04:36 PM »

Hey, CanesFan, I have a question about Raleigh.  What are they doing to the Saunders St. interchange on I-40?  I found it odd that they have the second ramp signs covered up in both directions of I-40, does that mean they're only going to have an Exit 298 now instead of 298A-B?
Logged
Anti-center-tabbing, anti-sequential-numbering, anti-Clearview BGS FAN

CanesFan27

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1369
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 07:20:55 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #655 on: January 02, 2016, 10:46:47 PM »

Hey, CanesFan, I have a question about Raleigh.  What are they doing to the Saunders St. interchange on I-40?  I found it odd that they have the second ramp signs covered up in both directions of I-40, does that mean they're only going to have an Exit 298 now instead of 298A-B?

Brent, I'm fairly certain it's only a result of ramps being closed as they are rebuilt.  We rarely travel the lower half of the beltline so I'm not exactly sure.  Brian would know - ask on southeast roads on facebook - he's on more often there.
Logged

OracleUsr

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 919
  • Age: 52
  • Location: North Carolina
  • Last Login: March 06, 2023, 10:09:25 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #656 on: January 02, 2016, 10:55:28 PM »

Oh, okay, gotcha.  Thank you.
Logged
Anti-center-tabbing, anti-sequential-numbering, anti-Clearview BGS FAN

NJRoadfan

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1754
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: March 22, 2023, 09:07:11 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #657 on: January 03, 2016, 02:02:19 PM »

I actually drove thru there this morning (US-401 North to I-40 East). The on ramp was open, but couldn't see much else.
Logged

Mileage Mike

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 108
  • Location: Charlotte, NC
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 06:47:38 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #658 on: January 03, 2016, 05:32:35 PM »

My attempt to describe the current state and future needs and plans of the three new Interstate corridors (two new / one extended) here in North Carolina:

http://surewhynotnow.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-fast-act-brings-two-new-interstate.html

After this is all said and done Eastern NC might have one of the highest miles of interstate highway per capita in the country.

I'm in favor of all of them except that Raleigh-Norfolk corridor.  That one seems to offer little benefit and would likely carry a large cost that would be better spent on other NC road projects.
Logged

wdcrft63

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 871
  • Location: Durham, NC
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 07:35:48 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #659 on: January 23, 2016, 09:12:25 PM »

Of the proposed interstate projects in eastern NC, it's clear that only the US 70 corridor has a high priority. It will get built. The others ... not for a long time.
Logged

Buffaboy

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1165
  • Make I-90 thru Buffalo 8 lanes NOW!

  • Age: 26
  • Location: Buffalo and Sacramento
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 06:26:13 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #660 on: January 23, 2016, 09:39:12 PM »

Why does CLT need express lanes? From when I was there over the summer, the traffic on I-77 seemed to move freely.
Logged
What's not to like about highways and bridges, intersections and interchanges, rails and planes?

My Wikipedia county SVG maps: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Buffaboy

rickmastfan67

  • The Invisible One
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3130
  • I want I-67 in PA!!!!

  • Age: 38
  • Location: Pittsburgh, Pa, USA
  • Last Login: March 18, 2023, 09:08:48 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #661 on: January 24, 2016, 02:53:16 AM »

Why does CLT need express lanes? From when I was there over the summer, the traffic on I-77 seemed to move freely.

Which section of I-77 where you on and what time of day?  I-77 is horriblely underpowered with only 2 lanes each way North of I-485.  Traffic there can be a nightmare.

WashuOtaku

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 653
  • Location: North Carolina
  • Last Login: March 20, 2023, 09:12:06 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #662 on: January 24, 2016, 08:35:45 AM »

Why does CLT need express lanes? From when I was there over the summer, the traffic on I-77 seemed to move freely.

Then you didn't drive on it during rush hour.
Logged

Mileage Mike

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 108
  • Location: Charlotte, NC
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 06:47:38 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #663 on: January 24, 2016, 04:10:03 PM »

Why does CLT need express lanes? From when I was there over the summer, the traffic on I-77 seemed to move freely.

77 is the most congested highway in the state. It's way overcapacity in both directions even off peak hours. The only part that flows smoothly is between 85 and 485 and that's because it's the only section with 4 lanes on each side. The part south of 85 needs to be at least 5 lanes each side but is currently only 3.
Logged

bob7374

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1816
  • Age: 58
  • Location: East Weymouth, Massachusetts
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 11:42:29 AM
    • Bob Malme's Road Pages
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #664 on: February 03, 2016, 12:01:53 PM »

NCDOT has chosen preferred alternatives for Complete 540 project around Raleigh:
https://apps.ncdot.gov/NewsReleases/details.aspx?r=12208

MazdaStrider

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 26
  • Location: Greensboro, NC
  • Last Login: July 20, 2016, 12:03:08 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #665 on: February 03, 2016, 12:52:31 PM »

NCDOT has chosen preferred alternatives for Complete 540 project around Raleigh:
https://apps.ncdot.gov/NewsReleases/details.aspx?r=12208


That means there is going to be a complex interchange between I-40, US 70 and NC 540 southeast of Raleigh. I wonder how will location look like when it is open.
Logged

wdcrft63

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 871
  • Location: Durham, NC
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 07:35:48 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #666 on: February 03, 2016, 01:54:07 PM »

NCDOT has chosen preferred alternatives for Complete 540 project around Raleigh:
https://apps.ncdot.gov/NewsReleases/details.aspx?r=12208


That means there is going to be a complex interchange between I-40, US 70 and NC 540 southeast of Raleigh. I wonder how will location look like when it is open.

No surprise at this choice. Construction could begin by the end of 2017.
Logged

The Ghostbuster

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3810
  • Age: 38
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 07:56:06 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #667 on: February 03, 2016, 03:00:06 PM »

I wish they would do away with that toll law so all of NC 540 could be Interstate 540 the entire way around the beltway.
Logged

froggie

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 12613
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 11:54:35 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #668 on: February 03, 2016, 03:34:23 PM »

What toll law?  There's nothing in Federal law stopping NC from requesting adding 540 as an Interstate.  If there's a "toll law", it's at the state level.
Logged

froggie

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 12613
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 11:54:35 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #669 on: February 03, 2016, 03:38:28 PM »

On the subject of 540, I had come up with an interchange concept several years ago for a theoretical 40/540/70 East junction.  I may clean it up for better presentation.
Logged

The Ghostbuster

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3810
  • Age: 38
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 07:56:06 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #670 on: February 03, 2016, 04:25:11 PM »

I thought there was a law prohibiting toll roads from becoming Interstates, on an account of how they were funded. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't this law the reason Virginia's Highway 895 is a state highway and not an Interstate? I also assumed this law is why the toll portions of the 540 beltway also have to be a state highway and not an Interstate.
Logged

froggie

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 12613
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 11:54:35 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #671 on: February 03, 2016, 05:05:37 PM »

There's a general prohibition against toll roads receiving Federal highway funding, but Federal law does allow new toll roads *NOT* built with Federal funding to be added to the Interstate system if they're logical extensions and are constructed to Interstate standards.  Relatively recent examples include I-185 in SC and I-355 in the outer Chicago suburbs.

The reason for why VA 895 wasn't added was because Federal highway funding was used in its planning.  This may be the same reason why 540 south of RTP wasn't added as an Interstate, either.
Logged

wdcrft63

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 871
  • Location: Durham, NC
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 07:35:48 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #672 on: February 03, 2016, 05:06:15 PM »

I wish they would do away with that toll law so all of NC 540 could be Interstate 540 the entire way around the beltway.
Although NCDOT is famous for upgrading freeways to interstate status, I don't think it has any intention of asking for an interstate designation for the toll sections of the beltway. Once upon a time there was a thought that the completed beltway would be renunbered I-640, but that I believe that idea is dead now that everyone is accustomed to calling the road 540.
Logged

bob7374

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1816
  • Age: 58
  • Location: East Weymouth, Massachusetts
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 11:42:29 AM
    • Bob Malme's Road Pages
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #673 on: February 04, 2016, 11:10:55 AM »

My attempt to describe the current state and future needs and plans of the three new Interstate corridors (two new / one extended) here in North Carolina:

http://surewhynotnow.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-fast-act-brings-two-new-interstate.html
WRAL has a report about upgrades planned for the US 70 corridor. The report says that NCDOT will be putting up 'Future Interstate Corridor' signs soon:
http://www.wral.com/us-70-expansion-could-soon-be-reality/15305954/

This blog piece discusses possible numbers for the future interstate corridors:
http://letsgetmoving.org/rta-blog/raleigh-norfolk-495-44-50-89-56/

orulz

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 158
  • Age: 40
  • Location: NC
  • Last Login: March 12, 2023, 06:04:24 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #674 on: February 04, 2016, 11:11:30 AM »

On the subject of 540, I had come up with an interchange concept several years ago for a theoretical 40/540/70 East junction.  I may clean it up for better presentation.

I too find this interchange to be fascinating.

The Environmental Impact Statement does show a proposed design. It looks like a cross between a turbine and a giant high speed three and a half level stacked incomplete roundabout, with the existing cloverleaf kept plus three new ones. The turbiney-roundabouty thingy has two weaves shown, plus two weaves between cloverleafs.

The weave on I-40E is long so it would probably be OK but it's a little disappointing to me that US70W -> NC540W doesn't get a flyover.

Something tells me this design is still a work in progress.
https://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/PDEA/Web/Complete540/maps/C540_6A_PHM.pdf - see the one marked "Orange to Green"
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.