AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Dumbbell vs Dogbone Roundabout Interchanges  (Read 17091 times)

SSR_317

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 363
  • Why does FHWA hate "Exit 0"?

  • Age: 65
  • Location: Indianapolis
  • Last Login: May 09, 2022, 01:06:06 PM
Re: Dumbbell vs Dogbone Roundabout Interchanges
« Reply #25 on: January 09, 2022, 01:56:28 PM »
Quote from: SkyPesos on June 29, 2021, 08:18:46 PM
With the discussion about roundabount signage, what's the general opinion on this one? Personally, I like it, though the through movement road could be added to the top (in this case, OH 161 West).
It's fine, but I feel the thru movement should also have a street name and/or route shield at the top of the sign, for the benefit of those who are either clueless or have just turned onto the road from an adjacent home/business/parking lot/etc.
Logged

Avalanchez71

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1894
  • Location: Middle Tennessee
  • Last Login: April 15, 2022, 06:12:23 PM
Re: Dumbbell vs Dogbone Roundabout Interchanges
« Reply #26 on: January 11, 2022, 09:31:52 AM »
Tennessee has grasped the use of roundabouts much at this time.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.