AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Dumbbell vs Dogbone Roundabout Interchanges  (Read 17091 times)

SSR_317

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 363
  • Why does FHWA hate "Exit 0"?

  • Age: 65
  • Location: Indianapolis
  • Last Login: May 09, 2022, 01:06:06 PM
Re: Dumbbell vs Dogbone Roundabout Interchanges
« Reply #25 on: January 09, 2022, 01:56:28 PM »

With the discussion about roundabount signage, what's the general opinion on this one? Personally, I like it, though the through movement road could be added to the top (in this case, OH 161 West).
It's fine, but I feel the thru movement should also have a street name and/or route shield at the top of the sign, for the benefit of those who are either clueless or have just turned onto the road from an adjacent home/business/parking lot/etc.
Logged

Avalanchez71

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1894
  • Location: Middle Tennessee
  • Last Login: April 15, 2022, 06:12:23 PM
Re: Dumbbell vs Dogbone Roundabout Interchanges
« Reply #26 on: January 11, 2022, 09:31:52 AM »

Tennessee has grasped the use of roundabouts much at this time.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.