News:

Am able to again make updates to the Shield Gallery!
- Alex

Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
Northeast / Re: Interstate 81 in Syracuse
Last post by vdeane - Today at 03:00:55 PM
Quote from: Rothman on Today at 01:22:31 AM
Quote from: roadman65 on Today at 12:46:47 AMI see Salt City Construction is one of the contractors for the viaduct removal.  They are a New York based firm and started last year on their contracted work.

On their work details I see a roundabout will be installed at one of the new intersections.

The main viaduct removal hasn't been put out to bid yet.  Most recent contract let is for Contract 5 -- southern portion of I-81 leading up to the viaduct.

Salt City has won previous contracts' work...
The press release mentions viaduct removal as part of this contract.  Not all of it, but still.  And I definitely remember seeing the roundabout in the plans.

https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-hochul-announces-major-milestone-part-transformative-i-81-viaduct-project-award-fifth
#2
Photos, Videos, and More / Re: New York State Roads
Last post by vdeane - Today at 02:51:02 PM
This week, I added photos for I-690/NY 690 and I-490; improved marking of stub ramps in exit lists where all traffic must exit; updated the I-81, I-690/NY 690, and Niagara Scenic Parkway exit lists; added the historic Robert Moses State Parkway exit list; and updated the Niagara Scenic Parkway article.

Also, if anyone knows of a good way to recover lost pictures in Linux, it would be appreciated.  The originals of the I-490 photos are gone because I accidentally hit CTRL-X instead of CTRL-C when doing the early parts of today's update, and I didn't noticed until long after I had run the script to resize the images and create the thumbnails. :( And since I normally run a backup after doing a site update rather than before, I don't have one.  I tried testdisk and photorec, but neither could find anything on my hard drive or my camera's SD card.

https://nysroads.com/
https://nysroads.com/list-nsp.php
#3
Road Enthusiasts Meetings / Re: Winnipeg road meet (June 7...
Last post by oscar - Today at 02:27:05 PM
Please count me in. I have most of my itinerary to Winnipeg (via Ontario) planned and reserved.
#4
Off-Topic / Re: Minor things that please y...
Last post by kernals12 - Today at 01:57:32 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on Today at 10:13:24 AMThey sure did love the Ford Panther Body cars and W Body cars from GM.

Awkwardly, they loved GM's front drive x-bodies.
#5
Southeast / Re: Interstate 42 (E)
Last post by branched-out - Today at 01:48:34 PM
Quote from: PColumbus73 on April 01, 2025, 09:47:02 PMMaybe someone else already pointed this out, but assuming you were on NC 540 going east onto I-42, you could make a 360o loop by taking the exit to I-40 west and continue around the circle back to I-42 east. OR even a 270o loop to I-40 east.

Could be North Carolina's version of Rhonda the Roundabout
No, a 270 loop (NC-540 East around the turbine to I-40 East) is the best you can do there. It is a separate ramp going from I-40 East around to I-42 East.  That ramp isn't accessible from the rest of the turbine.
#6
Traffic Control / Re: All Four Cardinal Directio...
Last post by ilpt4u - Today at 01:39:03 PM
Another example on a single BGS panel with all four cardinal directions is East St Louis, at the I-55/64/70 interchange

I-55S/I-70W: Left Exit 3A I-64 East/IL 3 North | I-64/US 40 West/I-55/IL 3/Great River Road South

https://maps.app.goo.gl/Ev81kP8JwpGP4aP69
#7
Traffic Control / Re: Unique, Odd, or Interestin...
Last post by Max Rockatansky - Today at 01:31:44 PM
^^^

The only problem with CA 153 is that it is the fifth shortest California State Highway.  If we are counting what has actual reassurance shields it is the second shortest behind CA 77.
#8
Traffic Control / Re: All Four Cardinal Directio...
Last post by ilpt4u - Today at 01:30:31 PM
Happens now entering the Indy Beltway/I-465/69/74 on the southern leg, since 465 and 74 are signed E-W and 69 is signed N-S

Quoting tdindy88 from the I-69 Indiana thread on Great Lakes board
Quote from: tdindy88 on April 13, 2025, 05:30:01 AMI was able to get a couple of pictures yesterday of the new signage at I-65 and I-465/74/69 on the south side with the new control cities.





The first picture is at the ramp from southbound I-65 to the I-465 ramps. It is interesting how there are three control cities along the Ohio River all in this one location.

The second picture is at the split of the westbound and eastbound ramps. Coming from the south, the northbound I-65 ramp to I-465 has a similar set of signs.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=4855.5543
#9
I-39: since most of it is US 51
I-84(W): only the part overlapping US 30
I-255: just that with US 50 and IL 3

US 89: concurrent sections with I-15 and US 6 in Utah
US 97: a small segment in Weed, California
US 166: see US 400
US 189: that with US 40 or I-80
US 141: the bit that's also US 41 and I-41
US 276: short concurrent section with US 64
US 400: with US 166 in KS/MO and US 54 in Wichita
US 425: only with either US 65 or US84
#10
Southeast / Re: Interstate 42 (E)
Last post by brian440i - Today at 01:25:30 PM
This should not be a red flag.

There was an article a while back that Phase One was to be completed this summer.  Now sounding like August 2025 per above, which is good as I was worried they were going to change the traffic pattern before the heavy July 4th Vacation Traffic, with all Beach Condos rented around the Holiday.

Phase One was defined as the completion of the Local Roads and the New Entrance and Exit Ramps along the new Interchanges so that Existing US 70 can be shifted onto the Entrance and Exit Ramps.

Phase Two was then allowing the Bridges to be built in the Path of Existing US 70 Roadway.

The NC Project Site has been terrible at communicating Phase 1 and Phase 2 for the James City Project.

Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.