AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Due to a threat of legal action were forced to take the forum offline to expunge a number of posts from a banned user. We are working to resolve the database situation and restore the forum to full functionality as soon as possible.

Author Topic: 710 Improvements (Ports of LA/LB to SR 60)  (Read 11531 times)

Plutonic Panda

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3659
  • Location: Los Angeles/OKC
  • Last Login: Today at 06:10:11 AM
Re: 710 Improvements (Ports of LA/LB to SR 60)
« Reply #25 on: November 04, 2021, 08:01:57 PM »

I hope the people of South Pasadena are happy. Their NIMBYism has contributed to a nationwide crisis.

That "contributed to" is doing some heavy lifting in that claim.

I think it's pretty obvious that the ports of LA/LB would operate more efficiently with the 710 gap closed.
It would if the 710 connected with CA-2 and had a tunnel going under the mountain to Palmdale. Then that should connect with a High Desert Freeway going from I-10 to I-15 to I-5. That’d probably cost in the area of 30-50 billion dollars to do all of that plus the 10 billion for the 710 tunnel. So I wonder how quickly that money could be recouped with tolls, truck fees, not to mention the increased GPD and productivity from all of the new connections.

Build it all as one project, roads have 7 lanes each way, and call it the Connecting SoCal Freight Initiative. It’d be comparable to the gateway program in the NE for passenger rail. Something like that would do wonders to help with the current congestion issues but of course it’s too ambitious and likely won’t happen in our lifetimes if ever.
Logged

Plutonic Panda

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3659
  • Location: Los Angeles/OKC
  • Last Login: Today at 06:10:11 AM
Re: 710 Improvements (Ports of LA/LB to SR 60)
« Reply #26 on: June 07, 2022, 09:59:04 PM »

This project is officially canceled:

Quote
Los Angeles County officials scrapped plans to widen an 18-mile stretch of highway that connects the busiest port complex in the country to east Los Angeles and several other freeways in the area. It’s a major victory for local activists, who argued that the increased traffic would add air pollution and other problems to nearby residents, who are predominantly Black and Hispanic. Federal environmental regulators were already scrutinizing the expansion plans for potential violations of the Clean Air Act.

https://www.route-fifty.com/infrastructure/2022/06/two-states-cancel-highway-expansions-after-years-planning/367771/

LA Times article: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-05-26/710-freeway-expansion-los-angeles-plan-killed
Logged

Occidental Tourist

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 842
  • Last Login: Today at 03:43:38 PM
Re: 710 Improvements (Ports of LA/LB to SR 60)
« Reply #27 on: June 08, 2022, 05:56:27 PM »

*sigh. If they’re worried about the health of residents along the corridor, at the least they should modernize some of the off-ramps and widen the freeway from Harbor Scenic Drive to the 405 to eliminate the bottleneck caused by all of the trucks dumping from the port onto 3 lanes of traffic. There’s room to add a fourth lane and it can’t be great for the ambient particulate levels in West Long Beach for trucks to be dead-stopped from the Gerald Desmond to Willow Street from 2 to 6pm everyday.
Logged

kernals12

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2590
  • Love highways and cars. Hate public transit.

  • Location: Suburban Boston
  • Last Login: Today at 07:57:22 AM
Re: 710 Improvements (Ports of LA/LB to SR 60)
« Reply #28 on: June 08, 2022, 07:03:46 PM »

*sigh. If they’re worried about the health of residents along the corridor, at the least they should modernize some of the off-ramps and widen the freeway from Harbor Scenic Drive to the 405 to eliminate the bottleneck caused by all of the trucks dumping from the port onto 3 lanes of traffic. There’s room to add a fourth lane and it can’t be great for the ambient particulate levels in West Long Beach for trucks to be dead-stopped from the Gerald Desmond to Willow Street from 2 to 6pm everyday.

The other issue is noise, which would get worse with a 4th lane and if traffic could move faster.
Logged

Occidental Tourist

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 842
  • Last Login: Today at 03:43:38 PM
Re: 710 Improvements (Ports of LA/LB to SR 60)
« Reply #29 on: June 08, 2022, 09:20:21 PM »

*sigh. If they’re worried about the health of residents along the corridor, at the least they should modernize some of the off-ramps and widen the freeway from Harbor Scenic Drive to the 405 to eliminate the bottleneck caused by all of the trucks dumping from the port onto 3 lanes of traffic. There’s room to add a fourth lane and it can’t be great for the ambient particulate levels in West Long Beach for trucks to be dead-stopped from the Gerald Desmond to Willow Street from 2 to 6pm everyday.

The other issue is noise, which would get worse with a 4th lane and if traffic could move faster.

Which is worse, though? Some hours of fast moving traffic and louder noise intermixed with more hours of trucks idling and producing more particulate matter, or more hours of faster traffic and more noise interspersed with fewer hours of more particulate matter?

I don’t purport to have the expertise to answer that question.  I’m just trafficking in the language used to justify killing highway projects.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.