While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex
Quote from: paulthemapguy on July 13, 2025, 10:54:30 AMJuly 14: Post the junction of a US highway with a 1 in the tens place and a US highway with a 4 in the tens place.
QuoteJuly 14: Post the junction of a US highway with a 1 in the tens place and a US highway with a 4 in the tens place.
Quote from: TempoNick on July 13, 2025, 05:25:30 PMI-73 plus the beginnings of an outer-outerbelt would be lovely.
Findlay to Sunbury, circle down around Newark, then down to Lancaster to connect to US 33 and then to I-77 would be the cheap way to do it since US 33 doesn't have to have too much upgrading done to it.
I don't have a problem with the original plans to upgrade US 23 and US 52, but it just seems a lot of work needs to be done to get that up to snuff.
Quote from: The Ghostbuster on July 13, 2025, 08:52:16 PMShould Ohio even be pursuing construction of Interstate 73? Michigan abandoned study on their portion of 73 in 2001. West Virginia and Virginia (mostly) have no plans to construct their portion of the Interstate. If US 23 needs upgrades, do that, but without the Interstate strings attached.Why not? Michigan won't give a s*** unless the feds want to fund reconstruction of US-23 north to Flint or building a freeway between Toledo and Jackson on their dime (or 9 cents out of said dime). But I-73's existence in Ohio doesn't need Michigan's involvement.
Quote from: The Ghostbuster on July 13, 2025, 08:52:16 PMShould Ohio even be pursuing construction of Interstate 73? Michigan abandoned study on their portion of 73 in 2001. West Virginia and Virginia (mostly) have no plans to construct their portion of the Interstate. If US 23 needs upgrades, do that, but without the Interstate strings attached.
Quote from: vdeane on July 13, 2025, 12:05:31 PMQuote from: jeffandnicole on July 13, 2025, 12:15:39 AMThey really can't, which is a byproduct of short-sightedness of the current design.Did they rebuild the plaza or not?
The Express roadway is 2 lanes wide with shoulders. They could reduce the shoulders to a few feet on each side to add a 3rd lane, but then that puts traffic within a few feet of fairly tall jersey barriers in locations, along with the elimination of the breakdown lane. There's also a slight curve, so that presents sight-distance issues. The tolling location itself is constricted by the supports to the overhead equipment, which also allows maintenance personnel to work overheads without interfering with traffic below. https://maps.app.goo.gl/Tqhu4XRfMTSrbPe59 .
Quote from: vdeane on July 13, 2025, 12:05:31 PMThe solution would be to reconstruct the lanes and have only one lane go to the cash lanes. Any toll authority that is building ORT infrastructure within the past ~20 years should have been doing so with the same number of lanes ORT as exist on the thru travel lanes. They days of only some lanes being ORT with some defaulting to cash should have been over decades ago. This was known pre-covid. Delaware even built US 301 as AET!