Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.
Quote from: Plutonic Panda on Today at 02:41:57 AMI thought they couldn't widen roads anymore in California because of the VMT crap.
Quote from: shadyjay on May 01, 2024, 04:02:55 PMHaving control cities on a beltway is kind of tricky. The signs from the Mass Pike to I-95/128 in Newton did used to say "POINTS NORTH" and "SOUTH SHORE". Honestly, it made sense. I-95/128 controls have been Braintree, Dedham, Waltham, Peabody, Gloucester. Braintree was mostly phased out in favor of Boston, which may make sense from an interstate standpoint, but that's not necessarily where everyone's going. "Mass Pike Points West" signs didn't even have I-90 shields way back when, so that was more of your directional.
Then there's the signs modified for a sense of consistency between directions. Like the ones heading east on the pike for I-84 that say "Hartford/NY City". Noone in their right mind would be going east and looking for NY City. But because the westbound signs say that, they were changed. Same goes for heading west on the pike and getting off at I-495, where "Portsmouth NH" is used. Would'nt Lowell make more sense?
Heck, we could discuss control city follies until the cows come home, but, heck, that would just be "udder"ly ridiculous.
Quote from: epzik8 on May 01, 2024, 08:36:44 PMUS 340 Business in Page County?
Quote from: TempoNick on April 29, 2024, 12:49:18 AMI was driving through there today and I'm still shaking my head at everything that's being built over there. Don't get me wrong, the work is impressive, but I'm wondering if a better and less complicated solution wouldn't have been to:
1. Leave everything as is along the split, with minor improvements.
2. Divert traffic from I-70 westbound at James Road to Ohio 104 as was suggested once as sort of an express lane for I-70 thru traffic. It would also eliminate having to drive all the curves along existing I-70.
3. Existing I-70 West of James to get another number. (I know ODOT talked about downgrading it to a boulevard, but that sounded stupid to me.)
4. I-71 routed along I-670 and 315 without multiplexing with I-70.
It seems like this would have solved multiple problems without all the complexity of this project. I know other problems would be created, but there are some spots along I-670 that were never right, particularly the ramps around Neil and Goodale.