photos of old signs on the internet

Started by agentsteel53, January 28, 2009, 03:08:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Hellfighter

#150
Hellfighter
Please
PLEASE
use
width
=
800


Hellfighter

I'm sorry, the site said it was 780x540. My Mistake.  :-(

Alps

And what if the site told you to jump off a cliff?  Would you do it?  huh huh would ya would ya huh?

rickmastfan67


WillWeaverRVA

Will Weaver
WillWeaverRVA Photography | Twitter

"But how will the oxen know where to drown if we renumber the Oregon Trail?" - NE2

Hellfighter


BigMattFromTexas

This sign looks pretty old and faded.
BigMatt

Ian

UMaine graduate, former PennDOT employee, new SoCal resident.
Youtube l Flickr

agentsteel53

live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Ian

UMaine graduate, former PennDOT employee, new SoCal resident.
Youtube l Flickr

froggie

Quoteplease don't encourage the highway department to take down old signs

If the signs are obsolete or faded, why not?

oscar

Quote from: agentsteel53 on October 18, 2009, 05:39:28 PM
please don't encourage the highway department to take down old signs. 

Sometimes I get that concern when I post photos of old cutout-style state route markers in Hawaii, that I make it too easy for transportation departments or sign thieves to take them down.  But while the old signs are gradually disappearing, many still remain (except on Kauai, where all the old signs were already gone by the time I started visiting Hawaii). 

Maybe Hawaiians are a buncha slackers on removing or stealing old signs, but I suspect many mainlanders also find they have better things to do.   
my Hot Springs and Highways pages, with links to my roads sites:
http://www.alaskaroads.com/home.html

agentsteel53

Quote from: froggie on October 18, 2009, 07:54:31 PM

If the signs are obsolete or faded, why not?


they are correctly referring to their intended routes, and are perfectly legible.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

agentsteel53

Quote from: oscar on October 18, 2009, 08:20:27 PM

Maybe Hawaiians are a buncha slackers on removing or stealing old signs, but I suspect many mainlanders also find they have better things to do.   

it is quite the logistical feat - tough to just drive over in your pickup truck full of tools, snag the sign, and drive home.  

furthermore, Hawaii stopped using the cutouts pretty late in the came compared to other places.  As far as I know, they were the last state to abandon the embossed cutouts, sometime around 1968.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Alex

Quote from: PennDOTFan on October 18, 2009, 04:46:27 PM
Surprisingly, these are still in service in Wilmington, DE...
http://picasaweb.google.com/Iansignal/DelawareTrafficSignalsAndRoadSigns#5394039031651997458
http://picasaweb.google.com/Iansignal/DelawareTrafficSignalsAndRoadSigns#5394039046348218050
http://picasaweb.google.com/Iansignal/DelawareTrafficSignalsAndRoadSigns#5394039063650619522

Those two Interstate 95 shields are from the original construction of the freeway. 1979 spec'd shields were only used briefly in the state. I remember a southbound shield posted ahead of Christiana Marsh at the merge of the c/d roadway from Delaware 141 and a handful of shields on the Mall Road encircling Christiana Mall. All of those shields were removed by the end of 1994. There are just six state-named shields left for Interstate 95...

hbelkins

Quote from: agentsteel53 on October 18, 2009, 08:42:14 PM
Quote from: froggie on October 18, 2009, 07:54:31 PM

If the signs are obsolete or faded, why not?


they are correctly referring to their intended routes, and are perfectly legible.

But they most certainly do not meet modern reflectivity standards.


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

agentsteel53

Quote from: hbelkins on October 19, 2009, 12:27:57 PM

But they most certainly do not meet modern reflectivity standards.

they still work.  they don't work as well as some other signs, but that's like saying "let's destroy all '89 Honda Civics because they're not as good as '05 ones"
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

CanesFan27

Yes, old signs are great...but I don't get the fuss so many in this hobby has about signs...as a friend of mine says...your hobby really should be called signgeeking vs. roadgeeking.  I have to admit I agree.


agentsteel53

Quote from: CanesFan27 on October 19, 2009, 05:05:21 PM
Yes, old signs are great...but I don't get the fuss so many in this hobby has about signs...as a friend of mine says...your hobby really should be called signgeeking vs. roadgeeking.  I have to admit I agree.


meanwhile I don't get the fuss about "a new alignment of 540 just opened! gotta go drive it!"
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

CanesFan27

Jake,

I don't either..since I don't get fussed up about it.  :-p  There's nothing wrong with liking signs - as much as yourself or others do - or road construction etc.

I just find it interesting how much of the hobby is based on signs vs. travel. 

mightyace

Quote from: agentsteel53 on October 19, 2009, 05:29:34 PM
Quote from: CanesFan27 on October 19, 2009, 05:05:21 PM
Yes, old signs are great...but I don't get the fuss so many in this hobby has about signs...as a friend of mine says...your hobby really should be called signgeeking vs. roadgeeking.  I have to admit I agree.

meanwhile I don't get the fuss about "a new alignment of 540 just opened! gotta go drive it!"

To each his/her own, I guess.

For me, I'm interested in both the signs and the alignment things mentioned above, but I don't get the traffic signals.  I often look at the posts there any say to myself.  "What's the fuss, those two signal types look the same to me."
My Flickr Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mightyace

I'm out of this F***KING PLACE!

agentsteel53

Quote from: mightyace on October 19, 2009, 06:41:03 PM
For me, I'm interested in both the signs and the alignment things mentioned above, but I don't get the traffic signals.  I often look at the posts there any say to myself.  "What's the fuss, those two signal types look the same to me."

I'm not as big into the signals (mainly because I've seen too many red ones in my life!) but they are still better than new infrastructure.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

agentsteel53

Quote from: CanesFan27 on October 19, 2009, 06:39:49 PM
I just find it interesting how much of the hobby is based on signs vs. travel. 


I'd like to think I'm pretty heavily into travel ;)
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

hbelkins

Quote from: CanesFan27 on October 19, 2009, 06:39:49 PM
Jake,

I don't either..since I don't get fussed up about it.  :-p  There's nothing wrong with liking signs - as much as yourself or others do - or road construction etc.

I just find it interesting how much of the hobby is based on signs vs. travel. 


I'm probably the quintessential "sign geek" but I honestly enjoy the roads, the scenery, the bridges, all of it.


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

US71

Quote from: hbelkins on October 20, 2009, 09:29:22 AM

I'm probably the quintessential "sign geek" but I honestly enjoy the roads, the scenery, the bridges, all of it.

I like to travel and see new places. Along the way, I take photos, but often just exploring new places is good, too (like my trip along US 71 in Iowa last month) ;)
Like Alice I Try To Believe Three Impossible Things Before Breakfast



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.