AARoads Forum

User Content => Road Trips => Topic started by: hbelkins on June 03, 2021, 04:34:34 PM

Title: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on June 03, 2021, 04:34:34 PM
I don't know if the US 160 trip is ever going to happen, but my brother has floated the idea of a trip to Montana next month or in August, and told me to be thinking about a route.

I definitely want to go through North Dakota, as it and Montana are two of the last four lower 48 states I haven't been in (Washington and Oregon are the others). I saw something about Rugby, ND, being the geographic center of North America with the requisite monument, and thought that might be a neat place to stop.

Rugby's on US 2, which gave me a thought: Not sure that my brother would be amenable to going that far out of the way, but I thought about crossing the Mighty Mac and going west through the UP of Michigan. Everything I've ever read about the UP indicates that it's a whole 'nother world up there.

If he's amenable to going that far north out of the way and then making a 90-degree left turn, what would be a good suggested routing to get the full flavor of the UP? It looks like US 2 skirts the lake for much of its length. What would be a fairly-direct route west that would still provide the UP experience?

And from there, routes west to Rugby that aren't too terribly slow but still allow for a good taste of northern Wisconsin, Minnesota, and North Dakota?

Not sure what his final destination in Montana would be, but he mentioned Glacier, which he's been to before but I haven't.

Not sure about a return routing. Probably something direct; it might involve Yellowstone.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: Max Rockatansky on June 03, 2021, 04:45:51 PM
US 2 is about your best bet if you want to stay direct and get some occasional views of Lake Michigan.  Really though the right way to do the UP is to loop US 41 up to Copper Harbor and back down via M-26 back to Houghton.  The Keweenaw Peninsula is the signature part of the UP given amount of historic infrastructure and towns up there related to the mines.

The northern tip of WI 13 is a good alternate to US 2 and has plenty of scenery on Lake Superior.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: J N Winkler on June 03, 2021, 05:16:36 PM
I did some quick checking into routes between Pikeville, Kentucky (using that as a proxy for your actual starting point) and Glacier National Park.  Google Maps' suggested most direct route is about 2022 miles and takes you through big metro areas like Chicago and Minneapolis/St. Paul.  The most direct route that passes through St. Ignace, Michigan (north end of the Mackinac Bridge) adds only 150 miles, takes you right through Rugby in North Dakota, and puts you within shouting distance of Whitefish Point (home to the Great Lakes Shipwreck Museum and near where the Edmund Fitzgerald sank) and Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore in Yooperland, the Apostle Islands in far north Wisconsin, the Mesabi Range (big-time iron mining country) in northern Minnesota, and Theodore Roosevelt National Park in North Dakota.

In the Upper Peninsula, this route also shunts you from the north end of Lake Michigan to the south edge of Lake Superior, so you get to experience both sides to some degree.

I have driven long lengths of some of the routes involved, including US 2 and M-28 in the Upper Peninsula, and I would describe them as fairly fast, with good availability of passing lanes.  At the time I visited (2016), the two-lane speed limit in Michigan was still 55 and the State Police were enforcing it aggressively, but I think US 2 and M-28 at least have since been raised to 65.

This part of the country does have a very remote feel, though Duluth is an important inland port and the Apostle Islands in particular attract heavy visitation.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: oscar on June 03, 2021, 05:44:46 PM
Glacier NP's Going-to-the-Sun Road, one of the park's prime attractions, now requires reservations (https://www.nps.gov/glac/planyourvisit/gtsrticketedentry.htm), which you must obtain up to seven days before entering the park.

Most of US 2 in Montana, east of the park, is mind-numbingly boring. But at least it's fast, with 70mph speed limits between towns.

Williston ND, along US 2 in ND's northwestern corner, is probably a good place to look for lodging and other traveler services, now that the Bakken oil boom has calmed down a bit. It was a bit pricey when I was there last in 2016 (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=18290.msg2156542#msg2156542).
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: webny99 on June 03, 2021, 05:55:27 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on June 03, 2021, 04:34:34 PM
... I thought about crossing the Mighty Mac and going west through the UP of Michigan. Everything I've ever read about the UP indicates that it's a whole 'nother world up there.

If he's amenable to going that far north out of the way and then making a 90-degree left turn, what would be a good suggested routing to get the full flavor of the UP? It looks like US 2 skirts the lake for much of its length. What would be a fairly-direct route west that would still provide the UP experience?

And from there, routes west to Rugby that aren't too terribly slow but still allow for a good taste of northern Wisconsin, Minnesota, and North Dakota?

Taking the Mackinac Bridge has the advantage of avoiding Chicagoland and the Twin Cities, which could at least partially counter any added time depending on when you'd be passing through. It is absolutely a worthwhile detour in my opinion, especially if you've never been to the UP.

My recommendation would be to stay on US 2 heading west from the Mackinac Bridge until at least M-117, and then take your choice of routing (likely M-117, M-77, or M-94) up to M-28. That route meets back up with US 2 at Wakefield not far from the Wisconsin line. Personally, I think M-28 is preferable to US 2 for several reasons: it's less mileage, it has better scenery (including of the Lake Superior shoreline, which you can't go to the UP and not see), and it passes through the "heart" of the UP, including Marquette, the largest city in the UP.

Max mentioned taking the detour up to Copper Harbor, but if you don't have time for that, the Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore (just east of Munising) is a great stop that's not far from M-28.

US 2 is probably going to be your best bet west of the UP. There are some two-lane sections, especially in Wisconsin and Minnesota, but much of it is four-lane divided west of Bemidji.

Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: webny99 on June 03, 2021, 05:59:52 PM
Quote from: oscar on June 03, 2021, 05:44:46 PM
Most of US 2 in Montana, east of the park, is mind-numbingly boring. But at least it's fast, with 70mph speed limits between towns.

You could probably confirm this, but I understand it's somewhat scenic in western North Dakota. (Never done it myself, but know friends and family that have.)
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: oscar on June 03, 2021, 06:48:38 PM
Quote from: webny99 on June 03, 2021, 05:59:52 PM
You could probably confirm this, but I understand it's somewhat scenic in western North Dakota. (Never done it myself, but know friends and family that have.)

Some parts of western ND like Theodore Roosevelt NP are scenic, but not the parts near US 2.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: Max Rockatansky on June 03, 2021, 06:55:23 PM
Quote from: oscar on June 03, 2021, 06:48:38 PM
Quote from: webny99 on June 03, 2021, 05:59:52 PM
You could probably confirm this, but I understand it's somewhat scenic in western North Dakota. (Never done it myself, but know friends and family that have.)

Some parts of western ND like Theodore Roosevelt NP are scenic, but not the parts near US 2.

I-94 through TR National Park is one of the most scenic Interstate segments out there.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on June 04, 2021, 07:39:39 PM
Quote from: oscar on June 03, 2021, 05:44:46 PM
Glacier NP's Going-to-the-Sun Road, one of the park's prime attractions, now requires reservations (https://www.nps.gov/glac/planyourvisit/gtsrticketedentry.htm), which you must obtain up to seven days before entering the park.

He knew about the Glacier reservation requirement, and had mentioned it to me when he asked if I was interested in going to Glacier.

He's interested in visiting Dillon, which is on I-15 west of Yellowstone. Back in 1984, he spent six weeks there as part of a geology class at Eastern Kentucky University. They alternated between staying at the college dorm there and camping out in the field. He said he had passed through Dillon once since 1984, but was interested in seeing how much it had changed from what he remembered.

That was a busy summer for him. Not only did he do the Montana geology trip, but spent the summer Olympics in LA as a photographer/photo lab technician; a gig a photographer friend of his hooked him up with.

I'm not sure if he has any opinions on Chicago traffic, but if we don't do a UP routing, I'd advise I-74 to I-39 to avoid the metro area.

We'd be leaving from Owenton, Ky., smack dab in the middle of the triangle formed by I-64, I-71, and I-75, which means probably using US 421 to access I-74 no matter if we went through Chicagoland or the I-39 bypass.

I'd try to get him to stay on I-75 through Detroit for more mileage on that route, but he's not a roadgeek.

My only entrance into the UP was crossing the bridge, exiting at US 2, and turning around and coming back south.

I took a gander at the map and figured that making our way to M-28 would probably be a decent way to get across the UP, since we'd reconnect with US 2 at some point.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: webny99 on June 04, 2021, 09:03:42 PM
Quote from: webny99 on June 03, 2021, 05:55:27 PM
My recommendation would be to stay on US 2 heading west from the Mackinac Bridge until at least M-117, and then take your choice of routing (likely M-117, M-77, or M-94) up to M-28. That route meets back up with US 2 at Wakefield not far from the Wisconsin line. Personally, I think M-28 is preferable to US 2 for several reasons: it's less mileage, it has better scenery (including of the Lake Superior shoreline, which you can't go to the UP and not see), and it passes through the "heart" of the UP, including Marquette, the largest city in the UP.

Quote from: hbelkins on June 04, 2021, 07:39:39 PM
I took a gander at the map and figured that making our way to M-28 would probably be a decent way to get across the UP, since we'd reconnect with US 2 at some point.

:cheers:
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on June 08, 2021, 04:30:54 PM
This was a tentative routing he planned, but he said he would probably reverse it (go west through North Dakota and back across I-70). This was before I mentioned the UP to him, and he seemed amenable to that. I mentioned that I had been told that it only added ~150 miles over going through Chicago, and he said, "Anything is better than going through Chicago."

No date chosen yet. I'm hoping it will be in early July.

https://goo.gl/maps/vdaHrB8RuvVwgVW77
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hobsini2 on June 16, 2021, 12:11:04 PM
Quote from: webny99 on June 03, 2021, 05:59:52 PM
Quote from: oscar on June 03, 2021, 05:44:46 PM
Most of US 2 in Montana, east of the park, is mind-numbingly boring. But at least it's fast, with 70mph speed limits between towns.

You could probably confirm this, but I understand it's somewhat scenic in western North Dakota. (Never done it myself, but know friends and family that have.)

US 2 west of Minot to Williston and towards Glasgow is a scenic but quick route. Teddy Roosevelt NP south of Williston is very similar to the Badlands in SD in feel. Beautiful.
If you stay along the 2 corridor, you have good lodging options in Escanaba MI, Duluth, Bemidji, Grand Forks, Minot and Williston.  Minot has a cool aviation museum on the northside of town before the AFB.  BTW, one thing that may be a shock to the system, it was for me, is in some ND bars there is live blackjack.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: ChimpOnTheWheel on June 16, 2021, 06:34:35 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on June 04, 2021, 07:39:39 PM
We'd be leaving from Owenton, Ky., smack dab in the middle of the triangle formed by I-64, I-71, and I-75, which means probably using US 421 to access I-74 no matter if we went through Chicagoland or the I-39 bypass.

I'd try to get him to stay on I-75 through Detroit for more mileage on that route, but he's not a roadgeek.

My only entrance into the UP was crossing the bridge, exiting at US 2, and turning around and coming back south.

I took a gander at the map and figured that making our way to M-28 would probably be a decent way to get across the UP, since we'd reconnect with US 2 at some point.

In my mind I see two routes from Owenton to St. Ignace, both of which split off north of Toledo.

The all-freeway route, is US-23 between Toledo and Flint, bypassing Detroit and getting you away from heavy I-75 traffic. You pass through Ann Arbor.

The other route I could think of is probably using US-23 into Michigan, then US-223 (exit 5 off of US-23) to US-127 to Grayling, then I-75. You pass through Jackson, Lansing, Mt. Pleasant and Clare instead. Less busy [or so I suspect], but adds about 12 miles and US-223 is a sideroad.

(US-127 is a freeway from south of Jackson almost all the way up to I-75 in Grayling. Only 16 miles of US-127 [a small section north of Lansing] isn't freeway, I believe.)
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on June 16, 2021, 07:37:01 PM
Looks like this may be happening in mid-August. He's trying to navigate the GTSR admission ticket process. They open up reservations two days in advance of the day you want, and a pass is good for the stated date and seven days afterwards.

We may also extend the trip south into Utah to the Moki Dugway and he said he's interested in going to Mexican Hat. This may turn into a two-week excursion.

Downside is that he's mentioned possibly camping a couple of nights. I'm not into camping. To me, "roughing it" is not having a refrigerator in your motel room.  :bigass:
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hobsini2 on June 16, 2021, 08:30:04 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on June 16, 2021, 07:37:01 PM
Looks like this may be happening in mid-August. He's trying to navigate the GTSR admission ticket process. They open up reservations two days in advance of the day you want, and a pass is good for the stated date and seven days afterwards.

We may also extend the trip south into Utah to the Moki Dugway and he said he's interested in going to Mexican Hat. This may turn into a two-week excursion.

Downside is that he's mentioned possibly camping a couple of nights. I'm not into camping. To me, "roughing it" is not having a refrigerator in your motel room.  :bigass:
Oh come now HB. You can be one with NATURE! At least he's not signing you up for Naked & Afraid. :)
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: froggie on June 16, 2021, 10:58:43 PM
QuoteDownside is that he's mentioned possibly camping a couple of nights. I'm not into camping. To me, "roughing it" is not having a refrigerator in your motel room.

On the flip side, camping tends to be cheaper than even motel rooms (let alone hotel rooms).  And during the summer is fairly plentiful in the Upper Midwest.

Regarding earlier comments about routing and such:

Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: JREwing78 on June 16, 2021, 11:41:56 PM
If you like waterfalls or lighthouses, follow M-123 after crossing the Mackinac Bridge. That will lead you to Whitefish Point and the Great Lakes Shipwreck Museum, as well as Tahquemenon Falls State Park. You can then return to M-28 and get your fill of Lake Superior scenery going through Munising and Marquette.

If you take US-2 over to M-117 or M-77 instead, the Cut River bridge about 20 miles out of St. Ignace is worth a stop. Time permitting, definitely make a run to Copper Harbor. Porcupine Mountains State Park is also a very worthy visit. The North Shore of Lake Superior (MN-61 north of Duluth) is also very scenic and worth a drive.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on June 30, 2021, 06:20:21 PM
Looks like this is a go for mid-August. My brother got his GSTR pass for Aug. 16, and it's good for seven days, so if we don't get there until the 17th, we're still good.

Here's what he has planned, although this is going to change somewhat because we're leaving the afternoon of Aug. 13 and won't make it much farther than Toledo or Ann Arbor that afternoon.

1 Somewhere in the UP
2 Somewhere in ND or maybe eastern MT
3 Near St. Mary MT
4 Somewhere on the other side of Glacier NP
5 Somewhere around Dillon MT
6 Somewhere around Dillon MT
7 Somewhere in ID on the other side of the Magruder Road, or camped along the road
8 Somewhere near Craters of the Moon in ID
9 Somewhere near Dinosaur National Monument in CO
10 Moab UT
11 Monument Valley or Kayenta AZ
12 Somewhere in CO on I-70
13 Somewhere in KS
14 home (late)

Based on staying near Ann Arbor on the 13th, I figured it out to where we would probably make it to Ironwood on the 14th, Minot the 15th, somewhere near Glacier on the 16th.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: thspfc on June 30, 2021, 08:31:22 PM
I've never driven US-2 east of the Escanaba area, so I can't comment there. But US-2 between Escanaba and Ironwood is pretty dull, in my opinion at least. There are quite a few borderline ghost towns as a result of the copper mining boom in the 20th century, which is cool. US-2 crossing the Wisconsin/Michigan border three times is also interesting. To be fair US-41 and M-28 between Escanaba and Ironwood isn't exactly I-70 in Colorado.

Of course, I've driven a lot on the roads of northern WI and the UP, so the terrain is less interesting to me that I presume it would be to someone who is less familiar.

US-2 in Wisconsin misses the heart of the lakeland, but it goes along Lake Superior.

Your best bets for lodging in the UP are Escanaba (on US-2 and US-41), Marquette (on US-41 and M-28), and Ironwood. Ashland WI is a little bit further. Duluth isn't too far away either.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on July 10, 2021, 07:45:24 PM
So, now I'm looking for suggestions on places to eat. Any noteworthy regional chains or local places?

We found a small regional chain called Buddy's BBQ in Kingston, Tenn., when we went to see the eclipse a few years ago. That was a nice find with some decent food. Something like that would be great. (Not necessarily BBQ, but a brand unique to a certain area or region.)

General route is I-75/US 23/I-75 to the UP, US 2/some M-route/M-28/US 2 from St. Ignace all the way across the UP through Wisconsin/Minnesota/North Dakota/Montana to Glacier, the I-15 corridor down to the SLC area, as-yet unknown routes down to the Four Corners/Mexican Hat/Kayenta area, more as-yet unknown routes back northeast to I-70 somewhere in Colorado, then I-70 and I-64 back to the Bluegrass. I'm not sure if I-70 in Kansas or Missouri is too far north to be in Braum's territory or not, but that's a place I wouldn't mind stopping at again.

(Don't say "Culver's" since we'll be in Wisconsin, as they've been here in my region for 25 years and are one of my favorite fast-food burger places.)

Do I understand correctly that In-n-Out has made it to the SLC area? There was not one convenient to where I was when I was in the San Francisco area a couple of years ago, so I didn't get to try it. But I'm still not happy that their menu and available toppings appear to be limited compared to Five Guys and other places.

Also, what are the best chain gas station/c-store brands we'll encounter? Thinking more of prices, decent restrooms, and meal options a la Sheetz. I'm not sure if we will be in Kwik Trip/Kwik Star territory or not. Given the length of surface routes we'll be traveling, I'm not sure how many of the big truck stop chains (which are usually dependable) we'll encounter. I can't see there being a Love's or Pilot/Flying J along US 2 every 75 or so miles the way they are on I-64.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: Mapmikey on July 10, 2021, 08:07:51 PM
Been several years since I've been to these areas other than UP (2019).

Potato Ole's at Taco Johns (Rockies states have lots of these)
Pie at Shari's (Idaho Falls has one...they're mostly far NW chain)...they also used to have a decent lunch special
Sounds like you are set on In-N-Out if you are in SLC but a local place we enjoyed on our 2010 trip there was Ruth's Diner.  Also good was Pat's BBQ and Red Iguana (Mexican)
We had a good meal (salads) at Drifters in Escanaba; a different UP option is apparently there are a bunch of pasty stands...
Try to score some Navaho Fry Bread when you're in the 4-corners area..comes all kind of ways including as a Navaho Taco.  If you end up in Flagstaff for some reason, go to Salsa Brava and be sure to get the grilled vegetables.
Blue Mountain Cafe on I-70 a little east of St Louis has terrific pie and large home cooked meals

If you're willing to use US 127 up through Michigan there is a phenomenal shawarma place in Holt MI near Lansing called Zaytoons.  Very reasonably priced and good lunchbox serving size.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: corco on July 11, 2021, 12:40:28 AM
The Magruder Road! That's a neat drive but it's not really a casual roadtripping road - I'd recommend carrying lots and lots of water (in case you get stuck), extra fuel, and a backup spare tire  if you don't have one - as well as good regular tires (not cheap Chinese all-terrains). You'll need reasonably high clearance too - probably a "real" SUV/truck and not some wimpy crossover. I did it in an '02 Jeep Liberty some years back and it was okay but wouldn't recommend doing it in anything much less rugged, especially later in the summer when it's going to start to rut and washboard

Absolutely beautiful country though - the drive over the Magruder and then from Elk City to Craters of the Moon is just about the best Idaho has to offer - especially if you go through Stanley/Lowman instead of Boise. Hopefully the whole state won't be on fire when you go.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: J N Winkler on July 11, 2021, 01:09:19 AM
Quote from: hbelkins on July 10, 2021, 07:45:24 PMGeneral route is I-75/US 23/I-75 to the UP, US 2/some M-route/M-28/US 2 from St. Ignace all the way across the UP through Wisconsin/Minnesota/North Dakota/Montana to Glacier, the I-15 corridor down to the SLC area, as-yet unknown routes down to the Four Corners/Mexican Hat/Kayenta area, more as-yet unknown routes back northeast to I-70 somewhere in Colorado, then I-70 and I-64 back to the Bluegrass. I'm not sure if I-70 in Kansas or Missouri is too far north to be in Braum's territory or not, but that's a place I wouldn't mind stopping at again.

As regards the as-yet unknown routes:

*  Between SLC and the Four Corners area, the fast route is US 191, though SR 12, SR 24, and SR 95 are important for access to the national parks and Lake Powell.  SR 95 has a deep cut (https://www.google.com/maps/@37.4955424,-109.6460782,3a,75y,322.16h,86.68t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1slCSpp4C10sGj8NxJs2TUHQ!2e0!7i3328!8i1664) not far from Blanding (the StreetView imagery doesn't really do it justice; a photo of it was in my Windows wallpaper rotation for a few years).

*  Four Corners area to I-70 eastbound is kind of tricky, as some of Colorado's most rugged mountains stand in the way.  US 160 functions as the fast east-west transit route in southern Colorado but does bog down in Durango and Pagosa Springs.  US 285 (Alamosa-Buena Vista) and US 24 (Buena Vista-Leadville) follow valley floors, and once past Leadville you can use SR 91 to work your way to I-70 near Frisco.  The Million Dollar Highway segment of US 550 (Silverton-Ouray; the guardrail-free part in the Uncompahgre Gorge is the last ten miles or so south of Ouray) is in the area, but entails a less direct routing.  If you intend to cut the corner and avoid Denver, you can stay on US 24 east of Buena Vista.  However, this is a high plateau route until you get past Colorado Springs (Hartsel is at almost 9000 ft), so you will really be feeling the lack of power.

As for Braum's, Salina apparently has a couple, including one just off one of the I-135 exits.  This is apparently about as far north as it gets--it doesn't have a presence in Topeka or Kansas City.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: US 89 on July 11, 2021, 01:10:00 AM
Some routing ideas through my neck of the woods (Utah/western CO area)...

SLC to Dinosaur: if you have time, I'd recommend taking Utah 35 rather than US 40 between the Park City and Duchesne areas. 35 takes maybe 15 minutes more, but it is arguably more scenic and has quite a bit less in the way of traffic - especially truck traffic. The Duchesne-Vernal corridor is a significant oil/natural gas producing region and 40 is always filled with tanker trucks heading to refineries in the Salt Lake area.

Dinosaur to Moab: get to Moab via Utah 128. It is far more scenic than 191 between Moab and I-70 and it has less traffic. Coming from Colorado, 128 is only 10 minutes longer than 191 - plus you get to visit the somewhat well-known ghost town of Cisco.

Monument Valley: be aware that at least as of now, a lot of stuff in that area is still closed for covid. That area is all on the Navajo reservation which got hit very hard early on, and they haven't really gotten to reopening things yet. That includes Monument Valley Tribal Park and I believe the Four Corners monument as well. Fortunately, you can see most of the good stuff in Monument Valley just from US 163. Goosenecks State Park and the Moki Dugway in that area are also worth a stop - and if you do the Dugway, you might as well drive a few more miles down the dirt county road to Muley Point, which has panoramic views of the San Juan river canyon with Monument Valley in the background.

Heading east from there to CO: I-70 currently floods in Glenwood Canyon about once every week or two now thanks to a wildfire last summer. US 50 is also closed most weekdays between Montrose and Colorado 92 due to construction (and only one-lane traffic on weekends, I think) so that is a poor detour. If you run into that situation, Colorado 82 over Independence Pass is a ridiculously scenic alternate that should be open unless some idiot semitruck follows his GPS and gets stuck trying to climb it (this has happened more than once). I've never done 160 over Wolf Creek Pass, but from what I've heard it's fairly scenic, and depending on where you want to join up with 70 that might be your best bet.




Quote from: Mapmikey on July 10, 2021, 08:07:51 PM
Sounds like you are set on In-N-Out if you are in SLC but a local place we enjoyed on our 2010 trip there was Ruth's Diner.  Also good was Pat's BBQ and Red Iguana (Mexican)

If you do Red Iguana and get scared by the hour-plus wait for a table, be aware that there is a Red Iguana 2 just a block away on South Temple. It doesn't quite have the same vibe to it as the original on North Temple, but they serve the same food there... and you get seated a lot quicker. Ruth's is up Emigration Canyon which is a neat drive if you haven't done it before.

That said, yes there are indeed multiple In-N-Out locations throughout the Wasatch Front. I have never waited less than 20 minutes at any of them.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on July 11, 2021, 03:36:46 PM
My brother is driving, and we're going to be traveling in his as-yet-unseen-by-me Nissan Titan 4WD pickup, and he's mentioned a handful of scenic routes, possibly including Magruder. I'm more or less just along for the ride.

After looking at In-n-Out's menu again, I think I'll pass. They just don't offer condiments I like (ketchup and mustard, or A-1, or BBQ sauce, the way Five Guys does) and instead seem to offer only some proprietary spread that looks like Thousand Island dressing. (No thanks). A glance at their offerings makes me wonder why they're so popular.

I might be willing to give Whataburger another chance if we encounter any. Aren't they in the Denver area?

We would probably have time for lengthy waits only in the evenings, as lunches would probably be grab something and eat it on the road.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hobsini2 on July 12, 2021, 07:58:47 AM
Quote from: hbelkins on July 10, 2021, 07:45:24 PM
So, now I'm looking for suggestions on places to eat. Any noteworthy regional chains or local places?

We found a small regional chain called Buddy's BBQ in Kingston, Tenn., when we went to see the eclipse a few years ago. That was a nice find with some decent food. Something like that would be great. (Not necessarily BBQ, but a brand unique to a certain area or region.)

General route is I-75/US 23/I-75 to the UP, US 2/some M-route/M-28/US 2 from St. Ignace all the way across the UP through Wisconsin/Minnesota/North Dakota/Montana to Glacier, the I-15 corridor down to the SLC area, as-yet unknown routes down to the Four Corners/Mexican Hat/Kayenta area, more as-yet unknown routes back northeast to I-70 somewhere in Colorado, then I-70 and I-64 back to the Bluegrass. I'm not sure if I-70 in Kansas or Missouri is too far north to be in Braum's territory or not, but that's a place I wouldn't mind stopping at again.

(Don't say "Culver's" since we'll be in Wisconsin, as they've been here in my region for 25 years and are one of my favorite fast-food burger places.)

Do I understand correctly that In-n-Out has made it to the SLC area? There was not one convenient to where I was when I was in the San Francisco area a couple of years ago, so I didn't get to try it. But I'm still not happy that their menu and available toppings appear to be limited compared to Five Guys and other places.

Also, what are the best chain gas station/c-store brands we'll encounter? Thinking more of prices, decent restrooms, and meal options a la Sheetz. I'm not sure if we will be in Kwik Trip/Kwik Star territory or not. Given the length of surface routes we'll be traveling, I'm not sure how many of the big truck stop chains (which are usually dependable) we'll encounter. I can't see there being a Love's or Pilot/Flying J along US 2 every 75 or so miles the way they are on I-64.
I spend quite enough time traveling in the Great Plains and Midwest for storm chasing so this is from my experience. I have also linked some websites to help.
First the gas question.
In Wisconsin and Minnesota, you will find Kwik Trip all over the state. There are Flying J/Pilots in Grand Forks, Fargo, Minot, Williston, Sidney MT, Great Falls, Shelby MT on the way to Glacier. Here is the link to the website: https://pilotflyingj.com/ 
Love's is fewer along that route but there are several the further south you go. Love's: https://www.loves.com/en/location-and-fuel-price-search/locationsearchresults#?type=Travel%20Stop,Country%20Store
TA & Petro is another truck stop chain but not as frequent on the locations in the Midwest and Great Plains. https://www.ta-petro.com/location
Sapp Brothers is primarily in Nebraska and Kansas.
Speedway and Thornton's are also good for gas and a clean restroom.

As for food...
You can pass Whataburger. I have tried it 3 times in 3 different areas. Not a fan.
You do find more A&W Restaurants in Wisconsin and Minnesota and those are better than Culver's in my opinion.
My brother says that Gronk's (lunch) and Breakwater (breakfast) in Superior WI are excellent.
Too bad that you're not going to St Paul MN. The best pulled pork (with cherry bourbon sauce) I ever had was there near the University of St Thomas at The Bark & The Bite. If I didn't live 6 hours away, I would go there frequently.
Farm House at the Breckenridge Brewery is good. That's in Littleton, CO.
When we went to Moab, we ate at The Spoke on Center a couple times. The fish tacos and the pasta carbonara are excellent. it is a bit pricey but worth it.

Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: Rothman on July 12, 2021, 08:14:32 AM
A&W better than Culver's?  No way.

Breakwater has changed hands over the years.  A third iteration of the restaurant opened in 2019.

When I lived in Superior, we mostly headed into Duluth when we ate out.

That said, if the DQ still has the same managers, it was the best run franchise in the country...if you're into DQ.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: texaskdog on July 12, 2021, 08:15:32 AM
Quote from: hbelkins on June 30, 2021, 06:20:21 PM
Looks like this is a go for mid-August. My brother got his GSTR pass for Aug. 16, and it's good for seven days, so if we don't get there until the 17th, we're still good.

Here's what he has planned, although this is going to change somewhat because we're leaving the afternoon of Aug. 13 and won't make it much farther than Toledo or Ann Arbor that afternoon.



1 Somewhere in the UP
2 Somewhere in ND or maybe eastern MT
3 Near St. Mary MT
4 Somewhere on the other side of Glacier NP
5 Somewhere around Dillon MT
6 Somewhere around Dillon MT
7 Somewhere in ID on the other side of the Magruder Road, or camped along the road
8 Somewhere near Craters of the Moon in ID
9 Somewhere near Dinosaur National Monument in CO
10 Moab UT
11 Monument Valley or Kayenta AZ
12 Somewhere in CO on I-70
13 Somewhere in KS
14 home (late)

Based on staying near Ann Arbor on the 13th, I figured it out to where we would probably make it to Ironwood on the 14th, Minot the 15th, somewhere near Glacier on the 16th.

Okay this agenda allows absolutely no time to do anything in the UP so why bother?
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hobsini2 on July 12, 2021, 09:19:08 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 12, 2021, 08:14:32 AM
A&W better than Culver's?  No way.
Did I stutter? Those butterburgers at Culver's are not that great. And A&W is a better root beer. So yes, IMO, it is better.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: Rothman on July 12, 2021, 10:38:59 AM
Quote from: hobsini2 on July 12, 2021, 09:19:08 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 12, 2021, 08:14:32 AM
A&W better than Culver's?  No way.
Did I stutter? Those butterburgers at Culver's are not that great. And A&W is a better root beer. So yes, IMO, it is better.
Well, I suppose if one accepts a comparison of a burger to a root beer.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on July 12, 2021, 11:11:09 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 12, 2021, 08:14:32 AM

That said, if the DQ still has the same managers, it was the best run franchise in the country...if you're into DQ.

DQ is the only fast food place in Beattyville, not counting Subway. So I tend to pass on it, as I can get DQ anytime (they also have a new location in Jackson so I don't patronize it very often).

Quote from: hobsini2 on July 12, 2021, 09:19:08 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 12, 2021, 08:14:32 AM
A&W better than Culver's?  No way.
Did I stutter? Those butterburgers at Culver's are not that great. And A&W is a better root beer. So yes, IMO, it is better.

A&W is common in my area, frequently paired with LJS. We even had an A&W at home for a few years.  A&W will do in a pinch, but I prefer Culver's. I actually prefer Culver's to a lot of the "gourmet" burger places like Smashburger and Five Guys.

Quote from: texaskdog on July 12, 2021, 08:15:32 AM
Okay this agenda allows absolutely no time to do anything in the UP so why bother?

Just to get a flavor of the lay of the land and the geography. It's been passed off as this mythical place unlike the rest of the country, so it would be neat to see. There's also county collecting to be done (and a clinch of US 2 in Wisconsin).
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: JayhawkCO on July 12, 2021, 12:06:29 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on July 11, 2021, 03:36:46 PM
I might be willing to give Whataburger another chance if we encounter any. Aren't they in the Denver area?

Not yet.  They are coming from what I read somewhere though.

Chris
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: vdeane on July 12, 2021, 12:41:15 PM
Quote from: texaskdog on July 12, 2021, 08:15:32 AM
Okay this agenda allows absolutely no time to do anything in the UP so why bother?
That's an interesting question, given that this is a forum for roadgeeks...
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: Duke87 on July 16, 2021, 01:22:03 AM
US A&W is garbage. Canadian A&W is far superior.

Anyway, as for the question that started this, the big Montana C-Store chain is Town Pump. You will definitely find those along US 2. And Montana is also Cenex territory. If you're seeking hot food you may need to seek it elsewhere though.

That said, US 2 is a major enough corridor that you will find familiar fast food chains. Wolf Point, Glasgow, Havre, Shelby, and Cut Bank all have one or more. I think you'll be fine.

Especially since you're not doing what I did and driving from Sandpoint to Williston in one shot. That was the day I crossed two time zone boundaries in the same day heading east. Don't do this. :-D
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on July 16, 2021, 10:33:40 AM
Quote from: Duke87 on July 16, 2021, 01:22:03 AM
US A&W is garbage. Canadian A&W is far superior.

I don't think US A&W is garbage, but the old legacy drive-in stores are better than the more recent ones that franchised with LJS. Most of the latter ones are almost all gone now anyway, at least from the upper Midwest.

The one I frequented across from my college campus was more like an actual restaurant, with daily soup specials available.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: JayhawkCO on July 16, 2021, 10:50:52 AM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on July 16, 2021, 10:33:40 AM
Quote from: Duke87 on July 16, 2021, 01:22:03 AM
US A&W is garbage. Canadian A&W is far superior.

I don't think US A&W is garbage, but the old legacy drive-in stores are better than the more recent ones that franchised with LJS. Most of the latter ones are almost all gone now anyway, at least from the upper Midwest.

The one I frequented across from my college campus was more like an actual restaurant, with daily soup specials available.

Just checked and the one that was in my dad's home town, Lake City, MN, seems to be gone now, locally known as "the root beer stand".  Sad.  Lots of memories from there.

Chris
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on July 16, 2021, 01:52:02 PM
Sudden thought (after seeing Oscar's latest post in the "Uno" thread): How far along is North Dakota in the replacement of the old-style state route markers with the new ones?

South Carolina still had quite a few stragglers the last time I was there. Did North Dakota put more effort into changing out the signs, or are they doing it on as as-needed basis the way South Carolina did?

Heck, I think you can still find some Oklahoma circles that haven't been replaced by meat cleavers in some places.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: cl94 on July 16, 2021, 03:02:23 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on July 16, 2021, 01:52:02 PM
Sudden thought (after seeing Oscar's latest post in the "Uno" thread): How far along is North Dakota in the replacement of the old-style state route markers with the new ones?

South Carolina still had quite a few stragglers the last time I was there. Did North Dakota put more effort into changing out the signs, or are they doing it on as as-needed basis the way South Carolina did?

Heck, I think you can still find some Oklahoma circles that haven't been replaced by meat cleavers in some places.

ND is doing it as signs are due for replacement. There were plenty of old shields around in May, possibly a majority.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: oscar on July 16, 2021, 05:43:40 PM
Quote from: cl94 on July 16, 2021, 03:02:23 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on July 16, 2021, 01:52:02 PM
Sudden thought (after seeing Oscar's latest post in the "Uno" thread): How far along is North Dakota in the replacement of the old-style state route markers with the new ones?
ND is doing it as signs are due for replacement. There were plenty of old shields around in May, possibly a majority.

Agreed. Two particulars I noticed:

-- I'd have thought that there would be an emphasis on updating the markers for the three- and (especially) four-digit route markers, which require an awkwardly-elongated headress to make room for the route number (http://www.alaskaroads.com/US85B-end-sign-DSC_1896.jpg), and work better in the new designs' rectangular format. No sign of that, still plenty of old-design ND 1804 and ND 1806 markers, at late as June when I was last there.

-- Also no emphasis on replacing the old design markers on Indian reservations, including those of the Sioux tribes (notorious for their sometimes prickly relationships with the state governments of both Dakotas, such as over the use of Indian-themed imagery and names).
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on July 31, 2021, 09:53:51 PM
Two weeks out from the trip, and I'm now beginning to wonder if possibly there might not be a chance for an impromptu storm chase the first couple of full days (UP, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and North Dakota). I've been seeing a lot of severe weather warnings for that area in the past couple of weeks, so I wonder if that pattern will continue.

Hopefully the heat wave will break in the upper midwest if it hasn't already.

My brother came near a twister somewhere in that general area (South Dakota or Minnesota, I think) years ago, possibly coming home from his honeymoon.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: thspfc on August 01, 2021, 10:12:04 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on July 31, 2021, 09:53:51 PM
Two weeks out from the trip, and I'm now beginning to wonder if possibly there might not be a chance for an impromptu storm chase the first couple of full days (UP, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and North Dakota). I've been seeing a lot of severe weather warnings for that area in the past couple of weeks, so I wonder if that pattern will continue.

Hopefully the heat wave will break in the upper midwest if it hasn't already.

My brother came near a twister somewhere in that general area (South Dakota or Minnesota, I think) years ago, possibly coming home from his honeymoon.
We had a tornado warning in southern WI on Thursday morning. Haven't been keeping track of the weather up in northern WI/the UP but I do know that tornadoes are much rarer in that area than they are where I live. Further north the thunderstorms are less predictable, maybe due to the relative infrequency of weather stations compared to areas where more people live.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on August 01, 2021, 10:47:14 PM
Hopefully the I-70 closure in Glenwood Canyon will be fixed by the last full week of August, or else we'll be looking for an alternate way home.

Addendum: With the exception of seeing Glenwood Canyon, we are probably going to be in "get home as fast as we can" mode after we leave the Monument Valley area. With I-70 being closed, I would expect that mode of travel to involve taking US 550 to the Albuquerque area, where we would then probably make a left turn onto I-40, and take it and I-44 back to St. Louis.

Leaving out using US 160, since I would still love to drive that route end-to-end and any trip to get out of the Four Corners area using that route would probably involve significant mileage on it, what other good options might there be?

Trying to get to the Oklahoma panhandle somehow is intriguing. But on the map, US 64 to the Taos area doesn't look like an exceptionally fast route. And then once in the panhandle, there's the matter of quick access to I-44.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: Scott5114 on August 02, 2021, 11:03:23 AM
Quote from: hbelkins on July 16, 2021, 01:52:02 PM
Heck, I think you can still find some Oklahoma circles that haven't been replaced by meat cleavers in some places.

Maybe if you go alignment hunting or something. I haven't seen a standalone one posted on an active highway in years. Any stragglers are things like town installs, JCT signs on non-state-highway cross roads that ODOT forgot they even put up, and odd-sized markers on LGSes that are presumably too much of a pain to patch over.

Quote from: hbelkins on August 01, 2021, 10:47:14 PM
Trying to get to the Oklahoma panhandle somehow is intriguing. But on the map, US 64 to the Taos area doesn't look like an exceptionally fast route. And then once in the panhandle, there's the matter of quick access to I-44.

The Oklahoma panhandle is interesting for county-counting purposes, but that's about it. Otherwise, you're likely to find it less appealing than In-N-Out; it is by far the least interesting part of the state, and the main east-west access is a two-lane slog. I-44 access from that general area is probably best achieved by taking US-412 across the state and picking it up in Tulsa; this would let you see the Glass Mountains (the only interesting geological construct anywhere near the area) and would also net you the Cimarron Turnpike, which is the western half of the proposed Enid-to-Springdale interstate.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: US 89 on August 02, 2021, 12:17:21 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on August 02, 2021, 11:03:23 AM
Quote from: hbelkins on July 16, 2021, 01:52:02 PM
Heck, I think you can still find some Oklahoma circles that haven't been replaced by meat cleavers in some places.

Maybe if you go alignment hunting or something. I haven't seen a standalone one posted on an active highway in years. Any stragglers are things like town installs, JCT signs on non-state-highway cross roads that ODOT forgot they even put up, and odd-sized markers on LGSes that are presumably too much of a pain to patch over.

Quote from: hbelkins on August 01, 2021, 10:47:14 PM
Trying to get to the Oklahoma panhandle somehow is intriguing. But on the map, US 64 to the Taos area doesn't look like an exceptionally fast route. And then once in the panhandle, there's the matter of quick access to I-44.

The Oklahoma panhandle is interesting for county-counting purposes, but that's about it. Otherwise, you're likely to find it less appealing than In-N-Out; it is by far the least interesting part of the state, and the main east-west access is a two-lane slog. I-44 access from that general area is probably best achieved by taking US-412 across the state and picking it up in Tulsa; this would let you see the Glass Mountains (the only interesting geological construct anywhere near the area) and would also net you the Cimarron Turnpike, which is the western half of the proposed Enid-to-Springdale interstate.

I'm sure it gets worse east of Boise City, but western Cimarron County actually has some fascinating terrain. I hiked Black Mesa a few months ago and very much enjoyed seeing the New Mexico-style plateau/mesa country in Oklahoma. SH 325 was a fun clinch.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: cl94 on August 02, 2021, 05:49:15 PM
Quote from: US 89 on August 02, 2021, 12:17:21 PM
I'm sure it gets worse east of Boise City, but western Cimarron County actually has some fascinating terrain. I hiked Black Mesa a few months ago and very much enjoyed seeing the New Mexico-style plateau/mesa country in Oklahoma. SH 325 was a fun clinch.

I enthusiastically second western Cimarron County and extreme NE New Mexico. That area is remote with beautiful scenery and fun driving. NM 406 is in miserable shape, but it is empty with nice views NB.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on August 02, 2021, 05:52:12 PM
Quote from: thspfc on August 01, 2021, 10:12:04 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on July 31, 2021, 09:53:51 PM
Two weeks out from the trip, and I'm now beginning to wonder if possibly there might not be a chance for an impromptu storm chase the first couple of full days (UP, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and North Dakota). I've been seeing a lot of severe weather warnings for that area in the past couple of weeks, so I wonder if that pattern will continue.

Hopefully the heat wave will break in the upper midwest if it hasn't already.

My brother came near a twister somewhere in that general area (South Dakota or Minnesota, I think) years ago, possibly coming home from his honeymoon.
We had a tornado warning in southern WI on Thursday morning. Haven't been keeping track of the weather up in northern WI/the UP but I do know that tornadoes are much rarer in that area than they are where I live. Further north the thunderstorms are less predictable, maybe due to the relative infrequency of weather stations compared to areas where more people live.

MN and WI aren't exactly Nebraska, Kansas, or Oklahoma when it comes to tornadic activity; we get maybe one mildly intriguing outbreak a year. In addition, much of the area has been dealing with drought conditions this summer, so it's unlikely there will be much storm activity. And if there is any significant storm activity, it'll likely be late in the evening or overnight which makes storm chasing impractical.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: US 89 on August 02, 2021, 07:05:11 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on August 01, 2021, 10:47:14 PM
Leaving out using US 160, since I would still love to drive that route end-to-end and any trip to get out of the Four Corners area using that route would probably involve significant mileage on it, what other good options might there be?

Trying to get to the Oklahoma panhandle somehow is intriguing. But on the map, US 64 to the Taos area doesn't look like an exceptionally fast route. And then once in the panhandle, there's the matter of quick access to I-44.

US 64 might not be your idea of "fast", but it does have some very nice mountain scenery and an impressive arch bridge over the Rio Grande (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Grande_Gorge_Bridge).
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: oscar on August 02, 2021, 07:38:27 PM
Quote from: US 89 on August 02, 2021, 07:05:11 PM
US 64 might not be your idea of "fast", but it does have some very nice mountain scenery and an impressive arch bridge over the Rio Grande (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Grande_Gorge_Bridge).

Last times I was there, at the west end of the bridge, there was a viewing area with a chain-link fence. Conveniently, both times someone cut a hole in the fence, large enough for a wide-angle lens (which you'll need to photograph the whole bridge in one shot).
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on August 02, 2021, 07:50:15 PM
The whole prospect of finding an alternate route should I-70 still be closed has brought out just fickle Google Maps routing can be.

Just for the heck of it, I ran Kayenta to Owenton for the best route back to my brother's. The first time, it routed me to a point near Gallup (I didn't zoom in for the particulars) and then I-40 and I-44 to St. Louis to pick up I-64.

I refreshed the page, and it ran a route across southern Colorado to hit I-70 at what I assume is Limon, Colo.

Then I refreshed a third time, and it did the I-40 to I-44 routing, but it took us off I-44 at Springfield to use US 60 into Kentucky, and then the WK Parkway to Elizabethtown.

I realize that Google adjusts for traffic and other issues, but it would be nice to calculate a route that doesn't take any current problems, slowdowns, etc., into determining which of several very different routings is the best.

Just for fun, I may run Grand Junction to Owenton to see how Google handles the I-70 closure.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: texaskdog on August 02, 2021, 08:56:37 PM
Quote from: webny99 on June 03, 2021, 05:55:27 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on June 03, 2021, 04:34:34 PM
... I thought about crossing the Mighty Mac and going west through the UP of Michigan. Everything I've ever read about the UP indicates that it's a whole 'nother world up there.

If he's amenable to going that far north out of the way and then making a 90-degree left turn, what would be a good suggested routing to get the full flavor of the UP? It looks like US 2 skirts the lake for much of its length. What would be a fairly-direct route west that would still provide the UP experience?

And from there, routes west to Rugby that aren't too terribly slow but still allow for a good taste of northern Wisconsin, Minnesota, and North Dakota?

Taking the Mackinac Bridge has the advantage of avoiding Chicagoland and the Twin Cities, which could at least partially counter any added time depending on when you'd be passing through. It is absolutely a worthwhile detour in my opinion, especially if you've never been to the UP.

My recommendation would be to stay on US 2 heading west from the Mackinac Bridge until at least M-117, and then take your choice of routing (likely M-117, M-77, or M-94) up to M-28. That route meets back up with US 2 at Wakefield not far from the Wisconsin line. Personally, I think M-28 is preferable to US 2 for several reasons: it's less mileage, it has better scenery (including of the Lake Superior shoreline, which you can't go to the UP and not see), and it passes through the "heart" of the UP, including Marquette, the largest city in the UP.

Max mentioned taking the detour up to Copper Harbor, but if you don't have time for that, the Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore (just east of Munising) is a great stop that's not far from M-28.

US 2 is probably going to be your best bet west of the UP. There are some two-lane sections, especially in Wisconsin and Minnesota, but much of it is four-lane divided west of Bemidji.



Every...single...person posting about the UP says Pictured Rocks and Mackinac Island and never mentions Soo Locks, Tahquamenon Falls, and the shipwreck museum
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: Bruce on August 03, 2021, 05:23:07 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on August 02, 2021, 07:50:15 PM
I realize that Google adjusts for traffic and other issues, but it would be nice to calculate a route that doesn't take any current problems, slowdowns, etc., into determining which of several very different routings is the best.

Just for fun, I may run Grand Junction to Owenton to see how Google handles the I-70 closure.

Just change the time from "Leave now" to "Depart at X" and set it in the middle of the night.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on August 03, 2021, 07:33:15 PM
Quote from: Bruce on August 03, 2021, 05:23:07 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on August 02, 2021, 07:50:15 PM
I realize that Google adjusts for traffic and other issues, but it would be nice to calculate a route that doesn't take any current problems, slowdowns, etc., into determining which of several very different routings is the best.

Just for fun, I may run Grand Junction to Owenton to see how Google handles the I-70 closure.

Just change the time from "Leave now" to "Depart at X" and set it in the middle of the night.

Just did it, and it suggests US 50, CO 115, and US 24 through Colorado Springs to Limon.

A five-hour-longer option involves CO 69, I-25, US 87, TX 125 and OK 6 to hit I-40 near Elk City -- and then surprisingly enough, on to Nashville and then north on I-65. No I-44.

But changing the starting point from Grand Junction to Gallup uses the I-44 routing.

I scratch my head in wonderment at the logic applied.

It's like when I went to Annapolis a few years ago. I got routed over I-68, but when I started out from Weston, WV (which the route passes through) it preferred Corridor H and I-66.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: vdeane on August 03, 2021, 07:43:04 PM
Quote from: Bruce on August 03, 2021, 05:23:07 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on August 02, 2021, 07:50:15 PM
I realize that Google adjusts for traffic and other issues, but it would be nice to calculate a route that doesn't take any current problems, slowdowns, etc., into determining which of several very different routings is the best.

Just for fun, I may run Grand Junction to Owenton to see how Google handles the I-70 closure.

Just change the time from "Leave now" to "Depart at X" and set it in the middle of the night.
Google also still reports the "without traffic" time.  Do note, however, that Google's definition of "without traffic" isn't so much "without random slowdowns and current problems" but "how long it would take if you drove very fast, got every light green, and there were no other cars on the road" - basically unattainable in the real world.  It's also worth noting that Google factors in both live traffic and predicted traffic based on prior data.  Getting a route at a time where traffic along the trip would be substantially similar to when you'd actually leave can yield very accurate results (for how I drive, it's usually very accurate, nearly down to the minute, though I have noticed inaccuracies around the DC area for whatever reason).

Getting a time down to that level of accuracy with the "depart at" feature is harder as I'm not sure how the ranges are defined, though I'm starting to suspect that the long range might be the one where you don't exceed the speed limit.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: froggie on August 04, 2021, 10:43:44 AM
A few notes:

- Your mileage with Google may vary.  My experience with Google travel times is much less dystopic than Val's.

- Despite the current drought, it is not uncommon to have decent severe weather and tornadic scenarios during afternoon/evening daylight hours across Minnesota and the Dakotas through the month of August.  Sure, it's not as frequent as Tornado Alley across the Central Plains, but it's not as rare as HighwayMan394 made it out to be, either.

- Agree with Rothman in that there are a number of decent eateries in Duluth, especially near downtown and the lakefront.  Up the hill in Hermantown gets more into "chain restaurant territory".

- Despite growing up in Minnesota, I've never been a Culver's fan.

- If you're planning on taking US 2 across northern Minnesota, beware of pavement work and a detour east of Grand Rapids (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/d1/projects/hwy2-reclaim/index.html), pavement replacement requiring single-lane traffic between Erskine (US 59) and MN 32 (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/d2/projects/2021/hwy2-rci/index.html), and more pavement/single-lane between Fisher and East Grand Forks (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/d2/projects/2021/hwy2b-egf/index.html).
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on August 04, 2021, 11:37:59 AM
The old static software routing programs like MS Streets & Trips and DeLorme Street Atlas would give consistent routings, and they generally had two options: "shortest" and "fastest."

Running Kayenta or Mexican Hat to Owenton would be instructive if I still had those apps, or the machines on which they ran. I don't even know if Street Atlas is still a thing, and Streets & Trips hasn't been released in something like eight years.

Quote from: froggie on August 04, 2021, 10:43:44 AM


- If you're planning on taking US 2 across northern Minnesota, beware of pavement work and a detour east of Grand Rapids (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/d1/projects/hwy2-reclaim/index.html), pavement replacement requiring single-lane traffic between Erskine (US 59) and MN 32 (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/d2/projects/2021/hwy2-rci/index.html), and more pavement/single-lane between Fisher and East Grand Forks (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/d2/projects/2021/hwy2b-egf/index.html).


Well, there goes the clinch of US 2 in Minnesota.  :ded: Although technically I guess I can count it if there's a signed detour and we follow it. (Since I don't do Travel Mapping to keep track of route clinches.)
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: Mapmikey on August 04, 2021, 11:43:42 AM
Also be prepared for short-notice wildfire detours.

Had two of them on a trip I did to Yellowstone/Glacier a number of years back.  One was near Jackson WY and the other was US 16 between Newcastle WY and Custer SD
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on August 12, 2021, 10:15:13 AM
T-minus one day until the trip commences. This time tomorrow (as I type) I will be on the way to Lexington for a doctor's appointment, after which I head to my brother's to start the journey.

At least it looks like I-70 in Glenwood Canyon will be back open, although I'm sure the scenic nature of the area will be affected by the slide and the ongoing construction work. This probably means no new counties in Colorado (or New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, or any of the other states that would have been impacted by an alternate route) unless we hit something in the northwestern part of the state if we go to Dinosaur.

North Dakota and Montana will be new states for me. That will put me up to 46 total (lacking only Washington and Oregon in the lower 48, and obviously Alaska and Hawaii to round out the 50). I'll get new counties in Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Idaho and Utah, and possibly Colorado. The only non-state route clinch I foresee is US 2 in North Dakota (owing to the route's second foray into Wisconsin, which we'll miss, and the closure mentioned upthread in Minnesota). Possibly US 163, depending on how much of it we end up driving.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: Scott5114 on August 13, 2021, 01:41:00 PM
Quote from: US 89 on August 02, 2021, 12:17:21 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on August 02, 2021, 11:03:23 AM
Quote from: hbelkins on July 16, 2021, 01:52:02 PM
Heck, I think you can still find some Oklahoma circles that haven't been replaced by meat cleavers in some places.

Maybe if you go alignment hunting or something. I haven't seen a standalone one posted on an active highway in years. Any stragglers are things like town installs, JCT signs on non-state-highway cross roads that ODOT forgot they even put up, and odd-sized markers on LGSes that are presumably too much of a pain to patch over.

Quote from: hbelkins on August 01, 2021, 10:47:14 PM
Trying to get to the Oklahoma panhandle somehow is intriguing. But on the map, US 64 to the Taos area doesn't look like an exceptionally fast route. And then once in the panhandle, there's the matter of quick access to I-44.

The Oklahoma panhandle is interesting for county-counting purposes, but that's about it. Otherwise, you're likely to find it less appealing than In-N-Out; it is by far the least interesting part of the state, and the main east-west access is a two-lane slog. I-44 access from that general area is probably best achieved by taking US-412 across the state and picking it up in Tulsa; this would let you see the Glass Mountains (the only interesting geological construct anywhere near the area) and would also net you the Cimarron Turnpike, which is the western half of the proposed Enid-to-Springdale interstate.

I'm sure it gets worse east of Boise City, but western Cimarron County actually has some fascinating terrain. I hiked Black Mesa a few months ago and very much enjoyed seeing the New Mexico-style plateau/mesa country in Oklahoma. SH 325 was a fun clinch.

Oh, yes, SH-325 is an excellent drive. But part of what makes it so excellent is that there isn't another highway like it in the whole state. That sort of terrain stops at Boise City. By the time you get to Texas County, it's mostly flat-as-a-pancake Great Plains scenery.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on August 13, 2021, 03:58:35 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on August 13, 2021, 01:41:00 PM
By the time you get to Texas County, it's mostly flat-as-a-pancake Great Plains Illinois scenery.

Sorry, had to do it...I'll show myself out.
Title: Re: Montana?
Post by: hbelkins on September 10, 2021, 01:49:31 PM
Figured I'd put this here instead of one of the trip summary threads.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/nby9nhxjbjbot6o/2021%20Western%20vacation%20photos%20slideshow%20with%20music.mov?dl=0

This is a compilation of scenery photos. It's a slideshow and I did put a musical backdrop in it to provide entertainment while sitting through 12 minutes of photos. These are mostly not road-related, although I did put some pics of the US 95 corridor in the Salmon/Little Salmon valleys because it was a scenic area. I also put the Glenwood Canyon pictures in there as well.

That Dropbox link should be open to the general public.