I found something interesting.
In 2001, the Woodrow Wilson Bridge carried 200,000 vehicles per day
They then widened it from 6 lanes to 12
In 2019, traffic was just under 250,000.
So a 100% increase in capacity was followed by just a 25% increase in traffic.
That's a factoid that should be brought up every time some mouth breather claims widening the AL bridge won't reduce congestion.
Induced demand, or even the claim that it is induced demand, doesn't necessarily mean it's a one-to-one ratio. As long as traffic is still congested during rush hours, those that were against widening will claim that the widening did nothing to help, and traffic quickly filled up the lanes.
Usually though, they don't look at (or ignore) other times of day, especially midday traffic, after sporting events, etc, where traffic may have formerly congested but is now flowing freely. They will also ignore that traffic on other roads that were used to bypass congestion are now using the widened roadway, which would help reduce congestion in other areas of the region.
There's also additional factors at play here:
The highway, on either side of the bridge, is still four lanes wide. Even though there's interchanges within the widened roadway, the main highway is still going to be a limiting factor where there's only four lanes leading to the bridge. This also plays into why they didn't stripe the bridge to six lanes in each direction.
Also, people traveling through the area, not familiar with the area, may be inclined to use GPS, which wasn't as common prior to the bridge widening. The GPS routing often will take people on 295, or 495 west of DC, which may smooth traffic out over the entire region, especially during busy travel times.