Quote from: 1995hoo on Today at 11:21:59 AMMore like aQuote from: Alex on Today at 10:03:43 AMUntil there is something formal announced about a name change for a replacement bridge, let's move on from that speculation, Francis Scott Key's legacy, and also philosophical concepts involving demographics.
Half an hour later....Quote from: RobbieL2415 on Today at 10:34:21 AMRename it to the George Herman Ruth Bridge.
The Babe was born in Baltimore.
Not sure whether that warrants a or a .
Quote from: SSR_317 on Today at 02:06:34 PMYou mentioned the whole corridor at the end of your post and seemed to imply that this interchange was the only thing preventing I-11 from being signed from I-40 to the Nevada border. To get that finished, they would also need to address the stuff north of I-40, and quite a few more things to the south, not "just" the ones you listed.Quote from: vdeane on Today at 12:53:43 PMAnd what of the part north of this interchange? There's even a traffic light.That signalized intersection will (eventually) be replaced by an interchange. I was talking about the part from US 95's East Junction with I-40 south through Wikieup to just north of Wickenburg.
Quote from: ilpt4u on Today at 08:29:49 PMWould AASHTO or FHWA consider not giving final approval to sign the final segment of 69 being constructed now and also not along 465 until the mileage is fixed?
Quote from: sprjus4 on April 22, 2024, 11:00:12 PMQuote from: cowboy_wilhelm on April 22, 2024, 10:19:47 PMI agree... I can understand the ramps for redundancy, but 2 lane flyovers seem a bit excessive. Well... at least they will never be congested!Quote from: ARMOURERERIC on April 11, 2024, 08:37:28 PMI don't get the need for full access at all 3 interchanges.
I was wondering this as well. Who is going from I-40 westbound to I-74 westbound or eastbound, or I-74 (either direction) to I-40 EB? There are no plans to continue the beltway south/west, right? Seems like a massive interchange for very little traffic.