Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.
Number | Highway | State |
1 | I-235 | OK |
2 | I-235 | OK |
3 | I-240 | OK |
4 | I-240 | OK |
5 | I-240 | OK |
6 | I-435 | KS |
7 | I-40 | OK |
8 | I-435 | KS |
9 | I-635 | MO |
10 | I-215 | NV |
11 | I-215 | NV |
12 | I-215 | NV |
13 | ? | |
14 | I-11 | NV |
15 | CC-215 | NV |
16 | CC-215 | NV |
17 | I-11 | NV |
Quote from: silverback1065 on Today at 02:11:40 PMThey've already been working on the north end of this today with some large concrete sections completely removed at the 42.7 mile marker.Quote from: Interstate 69 Fan on Today at 10:25:58 AMThe I-465 closure on the southeast side is completely stupid. I drove the entire route in the opposite direction, and only saw ONE area being worked on - just past Emerson Avenue just before I-65. Complete waste of INDOT's time. Most of the lanes are fine, just do some nighttime lane closures and you'll be fine.
it's a yearly tradition! in all seriousness I expect a ton of workers out starting Monday. it just started and its rained a lot. it's already making the downtown interstates permanently backed up.
Roadgeek | Exit |
JayhawkCO | 314 |
formulanone | 198 |
74/171FAN | 112 |
Jim | 65 |
hotdogPi | 44 |
epzik8 | 37 |
jlam | 7 |
WillWeaverRVA | 3 |
Hunty2022 | 2 |
Gary V | 0 |
dlsterner | 0 |
Quote from: mrsman on June 01, 2024, 11:44:23 PMJoliet would work if accepting the N/S 355/53 corridor as the "main"/through route, even tho it is signed as 290 here. IDOT has precedent for that, signing Aurora for 290 WB/OB Downtown, seeing the 290/88 corridor as the "main"/through routeQuote from: hobsini2 on May 30, 2024, 09:13:42 AMI would also argue that if the control has a second control with it, like the West Memphis example upthread, it's perfectly fine because you are still distinguishing between they highways.I've got no problem with this. Both roadways lead to Chicago Loop (via Kennedy or via Eisenhower). I'm not been a fan of the "West Suburbs" and would prefer listing something more specific like Joliet.
We have a perfect example here in Chicagoland on I-90.
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.0597926,-88.0477017,3a,75y,94.9h,95.49t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sGT4Gtc-23EowoQAUMwULSQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DGT4Gtc-23EowoQAUMwULSQ%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D94.90047966303493%26pitch%3D-5.494987672854862%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu
Quote from: 1995hoo on Today at 03:45:01 PMQuote from: Rothman on Today at 02:17:32 PMQuote from: Scott5114 on Today at 01:40:21 PMQuote from: SSOWorld on Today at 07:30:10 AM"Did you check your eggs?"
Most people don't mind this, but I find it rude that this is asked of me when I shop at the local supermarket here in town. As if they're lazy and don't want to keep a high quality.
In my experience, the cashier will often check the eggs themselves before scanning them. Seems like less effort than asking the customer, anyway.
That practice is horrifically inconsistent depending on location, even within the same chain.
I have never seen a cashier check the eggs that I can recall. At Wegmans some cashiers will rubber-band the egg cartons closed, but that's about it.
I don't lift up each egg like vdeane describes, but I do "wobble" the eggs in the carton, for lack of a better way of describing it—I kind of move each egg back and forth and if one sticks, I presume it's broken and I select a different carton.
Quote from: Rothman on Today at 02:17:32 PMQuote from: Scott5114 on Today at 01:40:21 PMQuote from: SSOWorld on Today at 07:30:10 AM"Did you check your eggs?"
Most people don't mind this, but I find it rude that this is asked of me when I shop at the local supermarket here in town. As if they're lazy and don't want to keep a high quality.
In my experience, the cashier will often check the eggs themselves before scanning them. Seems like less effort than asking the customer, anyway.
That practice is horrifically inconsistent depending on location, even within the same chain.
Quote from: Amaury on June 01, 2024, 05:00:28 PMI'm sure there's a reason for the safety of the public that it won't reopen until 2026.
Quote from: english si on Today at 08:14:04 AMI'm pretty sure AR/OK had pencilled in the 42 number for the 412 corridor before AASHTO dumped it on NC in what was a very strange meeting.And? NC already got I-42. There is no need to duplicate an interstate when there are plenty of other numbers available. Sure, the "drop the 1" gimmick might have been fun, but as they say, you snooze, you lose. If they wanted to do such that bad, they should have requested it as soon as they came up with the idea.
Quote from: english si on Today at 08:14:04 AMIndeed, including I-42 in NC (the state had submitted I-36 - and gave reasons in the submission why I-42 was not preferred), and I-87 (state had chosen I-56 if E-W, or I-89 if N-S, talked informally with AASHTO before submission and found they wanted to give this E-W highway a N-S number, so submitted I-89).I-42 makes more sense from a national perspective than I-36 because it's north of I-40. I-46 would work fine for US 412. The Southway certainly should be I-56, though. It's an east-west corridor by both looking at a compass and by the "north-south is parallel to the coast" convention used down there. It's perpendicular to I-95 and we all know the real purpose of this road is to connect Elizabeth City to the interstate system, not to connect Raleigh and Norfolk/Virginia Beach.
That same meeting that approved (having changed the numbers of) those interstates rejected I-14 as the number was unacceptable, despite it being written into law - I'd argue that that Spring '16 meeting (and the build up where I-56 was rejected as a N-S number was sought by AASHTO) is where the oddness happened, not this one!
Quote from: english si on Today at 08:14:04 AMThey didn't tell them to pick another number 6 months ago, at least not according to the minutes!I remember reading here that Oklahoma and Arkansas had agreed to withdraw their applications and resubmit with a different number, so I read the withdrawal/renumber as one of the conditions; if they were just going to keep this I-42 duplication nonsense anyways, why do that? Why not just have those applications stand?
The application was withdrawn, but was still 'Approved with Condition', which is what they gave it this time.
Quote from: Scott5114 on Today at 02:34:13 PMI think the Crest in Norman did it as a matter of policy, but I don't buy eggs very often, so I could be wrong. In any case, I check the eggs myself, so it doesn't really matter whether the cashier does or not.