News:

The AARoads Wiki is live! Come check it out!

Main Menu

Crescent City Connection losing lots of money

Started by brownpelican, September 29, 2010, 01:33:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

brownpelican

http://www.nola.com/traffic/index.ssf/2010/09/legislative_auditor_ccc_losing.html

Crescent City Connection losing $110,000 monthly, legislative audit says
Paul Rioux, The Times-Picayune

The cash-strapped Crescent City Connection  is losing an estimated $110,000 a month in toll revenue because an electronic monitoring system to catch toll violators is not working properly, according to a legislative audit released Monday.

The audit also found that bridge officials apparently violated state laws in awarding contracts and improperly used Crescent City Connection toll revenue to pay for expenses on the new Louisiana 1 toll bridge in Leeville.

In a written response to the 18-page audit, state Transportation Secretary Sherri LeBas emphasized that the CCC has been fully reimbursed for all expenses related to the Leeville bridge.

She attributed the faulty toll-monitoring system to a contractor who walked off the job, prompting the state to file a lawsuit.

The audit scrutinizing the bridge's finances comes as the debate heats up about whether to renew CCC tolls that are set to expire at the end of 2012.

With bonds financing the bridge's second span set to be paid off before the tolls expire, some motorists have questioned why the tolls should be renewed.

Renewal proponents say the tolls provide a reliable source of revenue for bridge maintenance while subsidizing three Mississippi River ferry routes that could be scaled back or eliminated if the bridge tolls expire.

Prepared by Legislative Auditor Daryl Purpera, the audit said widespread problems with the toll monitoring system implemented in 2008 are draining revenue from the bridge, which relies on cash reserves to make ends meet.

Video of some toll violators is inaccessible, causing the bridge to lose about $110,000 a month in uncollected tolls, a figure that does not include the $25 fine per violation, the audit found. Given that the bridge takes in $1.7 million a month in tolls, this suggests that more than 6 percent of bridge users are skirting the tolls with impunity.

Adding insult to injury, the system "frequently sends erroneous violation notices to drivers who have properly paid tolls," the audit said.

LeBas, who took office in February, said Electronic Transaction Consultants of Richardson, Texas, walked away from its contract to design and implement the system in January without getting it to function properly. The state has filed a lawsuit against the company, which was paid $7.3 million of its $8.4 million contract.

The audit said transportation officials are considering replacing the system at a cost of about $10 million, but a decision hinges on whether the tolls are renewed.

The audit said the Crescent City Connection was not immediately reimbursed for office space and personnel devoted to collecting tolls on the Leeville bridge, an apparent violation of state law.

LeBas disputed this finding, saying the state transportation department pays all CCC expenses up front and is then reimbursed with toll revenues. She said the CCC always owes the state at least $1 million, which means any CCC toll revenue used for Leeville bridge expenses can be viewed as state funds for accounting purposes.

Noting that the CCC has been fully reimbursed using Leeville bridge revenue, LeBas said toll-processing operations for both bridges are handled at the CCC's Algiers offices to achieve greater efficiency.

The audit said bridge officials "appear to have violated" state laws in awarding a couple of contracts in recent years.

In 2004, Gulf Engineers and Consultants of Baton Rouge was awarded a no-bid contract to help with the toll-monitoring system, but bridge administrators failed to estimate the costs up front as required when seeking approval for such a contract from the transportation department, which oversees the CCC. The audit said the contract ended up being worth $360,000.

In 2006, a $120,000 contract awarded to Arthur D. Darden Inc. of Metairie for engineering work on the bridge's six ferries was increased to $184,000, an apparent violation of a state law prohibiting increases of more than 50 percent without rebidding bridge contracts, the audit said.

LeBas disputed that a violation occurred, saying a total of just $67,000 was paid on the contract.

The audit can be viewed on the legislative auditor's website, http://app1.lla.state.la.us/PublicReports.nsf


Anthony_JK

My opinion: Either renew the tolls (adding tolls for the WB birdge)  and use the revenue to help finish the Westbank Expressway upgrade all the way to US 90, or just eliminate them altogether.

They're eliminating ferry service anyway, so why not use the revenue for what is truly needed?


Anthony

UptownRoadGeek

Well from my understanding, the money collected over the last 10 years is "missing" anyway. Maybe if we could get some accountability for a change something may come up. The N.O. ferries won't be going anywhere anytime soon IMO. Tourist $'s are the last thing to be cut around here and the 2 out of 4 of the ferries benefit from it.

Hot Rod Hootenanny

Money missing in Louisiana?! Since when did the sun start rising in the west.  :pan:
Please, don't sue Alex & Andy over what I wrote above



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.