AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: North Carolina  (Read 365861 times)

LM117

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1427
  • Age: 29
  • Location: Danville, VA 👎
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 04:29:04 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1725 on: January 10, 2018, 10:58:13 AM »

Bladen County is pushing for federal funding to widen NC-87 to 4 lanes between Elizabethtown and US-74.

http://www.bladenjournal.com/news/15979/peterson-wants-congressmans-help-with-n-c-87-expansion

Quote
Last week, during the Board of Commissioners’ “matters of interest to commissioners,” a simple request could have a tremendous, positive affect on Bladen County.

Commissioner Charles Ray Peterson asked County Manager to fashion a letter to U.S. Congressman Robert Pittenger asking that he support federal funding to extend N.C. 87 through the county and link up with U.S. 74.

“Robert Pittenger asked for our support in making U.S. 74 an interstate,” Peterson said. “I thought, if we are talking about growing Bladen, then we need N.C. 87 to become four lane. So, while it appears he wants us to help, then he needs to help us grow Bladen by four-laning N.C. 87.”

N.C. 87 now runs from the Cumberland County line through Tar Heel, Dublin and Elizabethtown — eanding at the Elizabethtown Industrial Park/Airport, where N.C. 87 meets East Broad Street.

There was a time, Peterson said, that the North Carolina Department of Transportation had money in the budget to finish N.C. 87 to U.S. 74, but it never materialized. He added the county has spoken with Drew Cox, the regional engineer for NCDOT, about extending N.C. 78, but it’s been several years since the conversation had potential.

But now, Peterson said, would be a good time to revive those talks.

“Bladen has so much to offer,” he added. “We have lots of vacant land on 87 and 211. We have natural gas and a railroad on N.C. 211. We have county water down both highways. We have the river on 87. It will make traveling from Wilmington to any destination better, quicker and easier. Houses will be built. Businesses will be build to support communities and travel.”

Beyond the local potential for housing and business development, a four-lane N.C. 87 to U.S. 74 will have positives beyond Bladen County.

“It will have a great impact on Southeast North Carolina,” Peterson offered. “If we could get N.C. 87 four-laned all the way to U.S. 74, it would give Bladen a gateway to the ports and other four-lane roads, which would open the doors for economic growth in Bladen.

“I think this would be the shot in the arm we need to grow Bladen,” he added.

Peterson knows getting the funding for the project is a long-shot, but said it’s worth fighting for.

”At the rate we are going it will never happen,” he said. “But, If we could get federal support, the state might put it back in the DOT budget. We must continue to keep Bladen opportunities in front of all elected officials and state agencies.

”If we are to grow Bladen we need help from the federal and state government,” he added. “People in Bladen deserve this opportunity. “
Logged
"You forget a thousand things everyday. How about you make sure this is one of them?"--Michael De Santa, GTA V

wdcrft63

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 445
  • Location: Durham, NC
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 05:56:17 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1726 on: January 10, 2018, 06:34:56 PM »

Bladen County is pushing for federal funding to widen NC-87 to 4 lanes between Elizabethtown and US-74.

http://www.bladenjournal.com/news/15979/peterson-wants-congressmans-help-with-n-c-87-expansion

Quote
Last week, during the Board of Commissioners’ “matters of interest to commissioners,” a simple request could have a tremendous, positive affect on Bladen County.

Commissioner Charles Ray Peterson asked County Manager to fashion a letter to U.S. Congressman Robert Pittenger asking that he support federal funding to extend N.C. 87 through the county and link up with U.S. 74.

“Robert Pittenger asked for our support in making U.S. 74 an interstate,” Peterson said. “I thought, if we are talking about growing Bladen, then we need N.C. 87 to become four lane. So, while it appears he wants us to help, then he needs to help us grow Bladen by four-laning N.C. 87.”

N.C. 87 now runs from the Cumberland County line through Tar Heel, Dublin and Elizabethtown — eanding at the Elizabethtown Industrial Park/Airport, where N.C. 87 meets East Broad Street.

There was a time, Peterson said, that the North Carolina Department of Transportation had money in the budget to finish N.C. 87 to U.S. 74, but it never materialized. He added the county has spoken with Drew Cox, the regional engineer for NCDOT, about extending N.C. 78, but it’s been several years since the conversation had potential.

But now, Peterson said, would be a good time to revive those talks.

“Bladen has so much to offer,” he added. “We have lots of vacant land on 87 and 211. We have natural gas and a railroad on N.C. 211. We have county water down both highways. We have the river on 87. It will make traveling from Wilmington to any destination better, quicker and easier. Houses will be built. Businesses will be build to support communities and travel.”

Beyond the local potential for housing and business development, a four-lane N.C. 87 to U.S. 74 will have positives beyond Bladen County.

“It will have a great impact on Southeast North Carolina,” Peterson offered. “If we could get N.C. 87 four-laned all the way to U.S. 74, it would give Bladen a gateway to the ports and other four-lane roads, which would open the doors for economic growth in Bladen.

“I think this would be the shot in the arm we need to grow Bladen,” he added.

Peterson knows getting the funding for the project is a long-shot, but said it’s worth fighting for.

”At the rate we are going it will never happen,” he said. “But, If we could get federal support, the state might put it back in the DOT budget. We must continue to keep Bladen opportunities in front of all elected officials and state agencies.

”If we are to grow Bladen we need help from the federal and state government,” he added. “People in Bladen deserve this opportunity. “

What am I missing here? NC 87 does not end at Elizabethtown, and it does meet US 74/76 at Delco, 37 miles farther southeast. This route was identified as a "strategic transportation corridor," which means NCDOT isn't opposed to improving it, but it is of course a question of priorities and funding.
Logged

michealbond

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12
  • Location: Raleigh / Greenville N.C.
  • Last Login: June 27, 2018, 01:02:08 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1727 on: January 11, 2018, 01:12:00 PM »

Elizabethtown wants NC87 to be 4-laned all the way to US74. Currently NC87 is only 2 lanes from directly south of Elizabethtown down to US74. The 4-laned portion of NC87 does end where the writer incorrectly states NC87 ends in its entirety.
Logged

Finrod

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 121
  • Age: 49
  • Location: Atlanta GA
  • Last Login: June 19, 2018, 01:39:31 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1728 on: January 11, 2018, 04:04:08 PM »

Give it time and they'll be asking for an Interstate number from Greensboro to Delco.
Logged
Internet member since 1987.

I came up with the idea to renumber the DC Beltway from I-495 to I-666.

cowboy_wilhelm

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15
  • Location: Raleigh
  • Last Login: July 11, 2018, 05:37:56 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1729 on: January 12, 2018, 06:13:47 PM »

NCDOT is building a new I-26/US-74 interchange.

https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/details.aspx?r=14511

Quote
The N.C. Department of Transportation is saddling up for serious construction.

The heavy lifting to build a new interchange at Interstate 26 and U.S. 74 in Polk County begins this month with the goal of providing a safer and smoother driving experience for all motorists, including visitors and participants of the 2018 World Equestrian Games.

“This is an important project to the area, one that has been needed for many years,” Acting Division 14 Engineer Brian Burch said. “We’re happy to get this project started and we’ll be working on an accelerated schedule to complete it prior to the World Games.”

The first phase of construction is to clear the project area in preparation of moving dirt and rocks and building embankments for the new roadway.  A creek channel change and 353-foot long concrete box culvert will be constructed during the early stages.

The new interchange, at a cost of $19 million, will separate through traffic from local traffic and be completed by Aug. 17, 2018, in time for visitors from across the globe to enjoy an event that is comparable to the Olympics.

Vecellio & Grogan, Inc DBA Sharpe Brothers, based in Beckley, W.V., will be creating a direct merge lane from U.S. 74 West to I-26 East, which will eliminate the need for drivers to navigate two roundabouts. It will also build a new ramp from I-26 West to U.S. 74 and it will include two bridges and eight retaining walls.

Multiple operations will be performed at the same time in order to finish the job ahead of the completion date.  There will be times in which work will be performed around the clock utilizing multiple crews.

Lane closures and lane shifts will be in place at various times during construction on both I-26 and U.S. 74. Drivers need to adjust their travel times, be aware in this work zone and obey all posted signs and flagging instructions.

“We are pleased to be improving area transportation in time for the World Games,” Burch said, “It’s also an improvement that will have a lasting positive impact on residents and visitors for many years to come.”

Hmmmm......wonder if this is the opening salvo regarding the much bandied-about upgrading of US 74 to Interstate standards (and then seeing about getting a I-designation; after all, this is NC!).
I think that the interchange is already interestate standard. It’s only putting in the missing freeway to freeway movements.


iPhone

Can anyone venture a guess as to how/why US 74 east is going to have two exit numbers? The exit will be signed as Exit 66 from I-26 WB, but NCDOT isn't updating the signage on I-26 EB. It will remain as Exit 67. They're also eliminating the right travel lane on US 74 EB to accommodate the new ramp from I-26 WB.

I-4729A Signing Plan
Logged

wdcrft63

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 445
  • Location: Durham, NC
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 05:56:17 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1730 on: January 12, 2018, 07:01:03 PM »

WRAL-TV in Raleigh had a story tonight about two upcoming major projects in the area. These are both Design-Build projects, and NCDOT has started the process of seeking companies that are interested in bidding. Both projects could be under contract by late 2018. They are:

(1) Widen I-40 from 4 lanes to 8 lanes between I-440 and NC 42, including the interchange with US 70/Future I-42. The diamond interchange at NC 42 will be replaced by a DDI.

(2) Widen I-440 from 4 lanes to 6-8 lanes between Wade Avenue and I-40 on the west side of Raleigh. The obsolete interchange with Western Avenue (it includes a nasty merge from the left into SB I-440). will be replaced by a DDI, but I don't know what the decision is on the interchange with Wade Avenue; there were several very different possibilities there at the time of public hearings.
Logged

LM117

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1427
  • Age: 29
  • Location: Danville, VA 👎
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 04:29:04 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1731 on: January 12, 2018, 07:50:06 PM »

A contract has been awarded for the construction of the NC-540/Morrisville Parkway interchange.

https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/details.aspx?r=14759

Quote
The N.C. Department of Transportation has awarded a $15.2 million contract to create a new interchange on the Triangle Expressway at Morrisville Parkway between Green Level West Road and N.C. 55 near mile marker 64.

The new project, awarded to Barnhill Contracting Co. of Rocky Mount, can begin as early as January 29. It will extend the parkway to the bridge from west of Highcroft Drive on the east side, and from east to near Mills Park Elementary School. It will also add ramps for the interchange, as well as signs and tolling infrastructure.

Construction would link the two sections of the road that are now separated by the expressway with a four-lane roadway. This added interchange was in the planning stages when the expressway was built, so part of that project was the building of a bridge over the expressway to minimize impacts to motorists during the interchange construction.

The new interchange is expected to be open for traffic in late 2019, with additional vegetation work to go to late March 2020.

The project is being built through a partnership with the Town of Cary, the N.C. Department of Transportation and the N.C. Turnpike Authority. The Town worked with the NCDOT and NCTA on the required designs and environmental studies. The new interchange is expected to improve connectivity in western Cary and help alleviate congestion on nearby roads, as drivers who want to use the Triangle Expressway will not have to travel to the existing interchanges at Green Level West Road and N.C. 55. Traffic along Morrisville Parkway is projected to increase from 11,850 vehicles per day in 2017 to 23,005 vehicles per day in 2037.

The interchange was requested by local transportation planners, and included in the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) Long Range Transportation Plan and will improve mobility for current traffic, as well as for much larger volumes of traffic anticipated as a result of substantial growth/development.

This is the second interchange to be added along North Carolina’s first modern toll road since its final phase opened in 2013. The Morrisville Parkway interchange will provide additional access to the Triangle Expressway, similar to the Veridea Parkway interchange in Holly Springs, which opened to traffic in April 2017.

In other news, an upcoming public meeting will be held concerning two sections of the US-74 Shelby Bypass.

https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/details.aspx?r=14758

Quote
The N.C. Department of Transportation will hold a public meeting next week regarding two sections of the Shelby Bypass project in Cleveland County.

Section D will extend the bypass from west of N.C. 150 to U.S. 74, west of Long Branch Road. Section E will continue the bypass from U.S. 74 west of Long Branch Road to west of Stony Point Road at U.S. 74 Business in Kings Mountain.

The meeting will be held Thursday, Jan. 18 from 4 to 7 p.m. at Elizabeth Baptist Church, 301 North Post Road in Shelby. Interested citizens may attend the meeting at any time to view maps of the recommended alternatives for both sections and meet project team members, as no formal presentation will be made. Comments can be submitted at the meeting or by phone, mail, or email through Feb. 19, 2018.

For additional information about the proposed project, please contact Jackie McSwain, NCDOT Division 12 Project Engineer at jmcswain@ncdot.gov, (980) 552-4208, or Joe Kelvington, NCDOT Consultant Project Manager at joseph.kevington@stantec.com, or (919) 865-7390.
Logged
"You forget a thousand things everyday. How about you make sure this is one of them?"--Michael De Santa, GTA V

Finrod

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 121
  • Age: 49
  • Location: Atlanta GA
  • Last Login: June 19, 2018, 01:39:31 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1732 on: January 13, 2018, 03:33:59 AM »

(1) Widen I-40 from 4 lanes to 8 lanes between I-440 and NC 42, including the interchange with US 70/Future I-42. The diamond interchange at NC 42 will be replaced by a DDI.

I believe I-40 is currently 6 lanes from I-440 to US 70/Business 70.  Glad to see this widening planned to be executed soon, it's always been busy every time I've gone through there.
Logged
Internet member since 1987.

I came up with the idea to renumber the DC Beltway from I-495 to I-666.

wdcrft63

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 445
  • Location: Durham, NC
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 05:56:17 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1733 on: January 13, 2018, 06:25:57 PM »

(1) Widen I-40 from 4 lanes to 8 lanes between I-440 and NC 42, including the interchange with US 70/Future I-42. The diamond interchange at NC 42 will be replaced by a DDI.

I believe I-40 is currently 6 lanes from I-440 to US 70/Business 70.  Glad to see this widening planned to be executed soon, it's always been busy every time I've gone through there.

That's correct. The 4-lane section from US 70/Business 70 to US 70/Future I-42 is a horrible bottleneck at rush hour and lots of other times as well.
Logged

wdcrft63

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 445
  • Location: Durham, NC
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 05:56:17 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1734 on: January 13, 2018, 06:33:53 PM »


Quote
The N.C. Department of Transportation will hold a public meeting next week regarding two sections of the Shelby Bypass project in Cleveland County.

Section D will extend the bypass from west of N.C. 150 to U.S. 74, west of Long Branch Road. Section E will continue the bypass from U.S. 74 west of Long Branch Road to west of Stony Point Road at U.S. 74 Business in Kings Mountain.

The meeting will be held Thursday, Jan. 18 from 4 to 7 p.m. at Elizabeth Baptist Church, 301 North Post Road in Shelby. Interested citizens may attend the meeting at any time to view maps of the recommended alternatives for both sections and meet project team members, as no formal presentation will be made. Comments can be submitted at the meeting or by phone, mail, or email through Feb. 19, 2018.

For additional information about the proposed project, please contact Jackie McSwain, NCDOT Division 12 Project Engineer at jmcswain@ncdot.gov, (980) 552-4208, or Joe Kelvington, NCDOT Consultant Project Manager at joseph.kevington@stantec.com, or (919) 865-7390.
[/quote]

These two sections will complete the project. Construction is scheduled for 2021. Here's the site for the project:
https://www.ncdot.gov/projects/us74bypass/
Logged

Mppheel

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 7
  • Location: Greenville, NC
  • Last Login: June 09, 2018, 12:32:12 AM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1735 on: January 16, 2018, 10:50:47 PM »

Just got back to Greenville NC from a cruise out of Charleston. 2 things I saw.... Really bad pavement on 95 in SC north of Manning.

Also, why is the interchange between 95 and NC 24 in Fayetteville such a large interchange?  There are never more than a few cars using the exit.  Was something planned, but never built ?
The other exits are much more simple on that stretch of 95
 
Logged

sparker

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3884
  • Location: Bay Area, CA
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 06:36:01 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1736 on: January 17, 2018, 02:05:43 AM »

Just got back to Greenville NC from a cruise out of Charleston. 2 things I saw.... Really bad pavement on 95 in SC north of Manning.

Also, why is the interchange between 95 and NC 24 in Fayetteville such a large interchange?  There are never more than a few cars using the exit.  Was something planned, but never built ?
The other exits are much more simple on that stretch of 95
 

I-95 is a very old and underpowered freeway within much of NC; it never seems to have garnered as much attention (officially and otherwise) -- although it seems that plans to upgrade the corridor have gotten off the blocks as of late (whether any actual projects have been let is something I'm not personally aware of).  As far as the NC 24 interchange is concerned, you have a good point regarding its seeming overbuilding -- a cloverleaf with C/D lanes in both directions; NC 24 is controlled (not limited) access for about a mile in either direction from I-95 (the first intersection on the east side features an interesting configuration using J-turns).  Whether originally conceived as the main access point to downtown Fayetteville or as a more extensive NC 24 freeway or expressway is something for NC posters to answer a bit more definitively!
Logged

slorydn1

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1023
  • If I pass you on the right, you're doing it wrong.

  • Age: 48
  • Location: New Bern, North Carolina
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 05:40:21 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1737 on: January 17, 2018, 03:28:30 AM »

Just got back to Greenville NC from a cruise out of Charleston. 2 things I saw.... Really bad pavement on 95 in SC north of Manning.

Also, why is the interchange between 95 and NC 24 in Fayetteville such a large interchange?  There are never more than a few cars using the exit.  Was something planned, but never built ?
The other exits are much more simple on that stretch of 95
 

I-95 is a very old and underpowered freeway within much of NC; it never seems to have garnered as much attention (officially and otherwise) -- although it seems that plans to upgrade the corridor have gotten off the blocks as of late (whether any actual projects have been let is something I'm not personally aware of).  As far as the NC 24 interchange is concerned, you have a good point regarding its seeming overbuilding -- a cloverleaf with C/D lanes in both directions; NC 24 is controlled (not limited) access for about a mile in either direction from I-95 (the first intersection on the east side features an interesting configuration using J-turns).  Whether originally conceived as the main access point to downtown Fayetteville or as a more extensive NC 24 freeway or expressway is something for NC posters to answer a bit more definitively!



This is not the definitive answer, but I think alot of it has to do with when that section of I-95 was built. IIRC the section east of Fayetteville between the ends of Green 95 was the last portion of I-95 to be completed in NC in the late 70's/early 80's (too lazy to look it up right now) and the two main exits (NC-87 and NC-24) both have the C/D + cloverleaf set up. I can only guess the state was planning for expansion to the east of Fayetteville that never really materialized (?)
Logged
Please Note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of any governmental agency, non-governmental agency, quasi-governmental agency or wanna be governmental agency

Counties: Counties Visited

LM117

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1427
  • Age: 29
  • Location: Danville, VA 👎
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 04:29:04 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1738 on: January 17, 2018, 01:25:58 PM »

NCDOT has updated the schedule for NC-540's extension to I-40.

https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/details.aspx?r=14760
Logged
"You forget a thousand things everyday. How about you make sure this is one of them?"--Michael De Santa, GTA V

LM117

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1427
  • Age: 29
  • Location: Danville, VA 👎
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 04:29:04 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1739 on: January 17, 2018, 05:57:45 PM »

In other news, an upcoming public meeting will be held concerning two sections of the US-74 Shelby Bypass.

https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/details.aspx?r=14758

That meeting has been postponed.

https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/details.aspx?r=14766

Quote
(Editor's Note: Due to inclement weather, the public meeting scheduled for Thursday Jan. 18 will be postponed. NCDOT will announce a new meeting date when it is scheduled. Below is the original press release from Jan. 12.)
Logged
"You forget a thousand things everyday. How about you make sure this is one of them?"--Michael De Santa, GTA V

index

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 366
  • Resident loathsome one

  • Age: 15
  • Location: Indian Trail, N.C.
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 06:49:26 AM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1740 on: January 18, 2018, 12:32:31 AM »

I thought they had plans to convert that interchange to a DDI to help out with traffic on race weekends.

That would probably be up in Concord, the interchange/intersection here is for Concord Mills, which is just a mall. If a DDI is the case, I don't know much about what's going on up there.
Logged
North Carolinian born in Fairfax County, VA. Advocate for slapping an interstate shield over every single freeway and U.S. route corridor in NC.

Avalanchez71

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1009
  • Location: Middle Tennessee
  • Last Login: May 09, 2018, 05:19:13 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1741 on: January 18, 2018, 02:20:22 PM »

Elizabethtown wants NC87 to be 4-laned all the way to US74. Currently NC87 is only 2 lanes from directly south of Elizabethtown down to US74. The 4-laned portion of NC87 does end where the writer incorrectly states NC87 ends in its entirety.
They will probably ask AASHTO to number that as US 801 or US 3 or US 464.
Logged

Avalanchez71

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1009
  • Location: Middle Tennessee
  • Last Login: May 09, 2018, 05:19:13 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1742 on: January 18, 2018, 02:25:23 PM »

Actually I think SR 87 is a perfect candidate to become US 421W.
Logged

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 9437
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: Today at 06:16:31 AM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1743 on: January 18, 2018, 03:00:33 PM »

Won't happen.  AASHTO's US highway policy prohibits any new split/suffixed US routes (unless it's an "A" which stands for Alternate) and encourages removal of existing split/suffixed routes.

Same policy also prohibits any new intrastate routes less than 300 miles long.  So unless they figure out a way to logically extend it into South Carolina, they likely won't even bother asking.
Logged

Avalanchez71

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1009
  • Location: Middle Tennessee
  • Last Login: May 09, 2018, 05:19:13 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1744 on: January 18, 2018, 03:07:01 PM »

They allowed I-69C, I-69E and I-69W.
Logged

NE2

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 13444
  • not a kook

  • Age: 10
  • Location: central Florida
  • Last Login: Today at 03:56:13 AM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1745 on: January 18, 2018, 03:45:08 PM »

:banghead:
Logged
Florida route log | pre-1945
I will do my best to not make America hate again.
Global warming denial is barely worse than white privilege denial.

Avalanchez71

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1009
  • Location: Middle Tennessee
  • Last Login: May 09, 2018, 05:19:13 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1746 on: January 18, 2018, 04:08:44 PM »

Actually if connect VA 87 to NC 87 you could make it US 420.
Logged

lordsutch

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1039
  • Last Login: May 27, 2018, 03:56:27 AM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1747 on: January 18, 2018, 04:32:24 PM »

They allowed I-69C, I-69E and I-69W.

AASHTO can be overruled by Congress and forced to accept a number that violates their policy—heck, they could call a route "Interstate Avalanchez71" and it'd be up to FHWA, AASHTO, and/or the states to figure out how to sign it. Hence the I-69 RGV suffixes, I-99, etc.
Logged

Avalanchez71

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1009
  • Location: Middle Tennessee
  • Last Login: May 09, 2018, 05:19:13 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1748 on: January 18, 2018, 04:37:22 PM »

Tennessee is flush with directional suffixed US highways.
Logged

sparker

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3884
  • Location: Bay Area, CA
  • Last Login: July 20, 2018, 06:36:01 PM
Re: North Carolina
« Reply #1749 on: January 18, 2018, 04:50:54 PM »

Tennessee is flush with directional suffixed US highways.

Which preceded AASHTO's "non-suffix" policy, dating from the late 1970's; existing suffixed US routes were permitted to remain (AASHTO had no intention or desire to disrupt regional navigation idioms) -- but no new suffixed numbers could be designated.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.