News:

why is this up in the corner now

Main Menu

Unsignalized Double Left Turns

Started by MNHighwayMan, April 14, 2019, 06:05:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

mrsman

Quote from: Mr_Northside on May 18, 2021, 01:43:46 PM
From the northern suburbs of Pittsburgh (McCandless TWP, I do believe)The left turn from NB Babcock Blvd onto Corporate Drive is a dual left-turn that encounters a stop sign  (opposing traffic does NOT stop)

https://goo.gl/maps/PUp1G93aQF7ptP616

I know of a similar intersection in Sylmar, CA, but the left turn movement faces an all-way stop sign.  San Fernando at Truman.

https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2934263,-118.4519905,3a,75y,155.57h,74.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMV5WIPPJZPcdk0ny-Q9A9Q!2e0!7i16384!8i8192



fwydriver405

During the MPA basketball playoff games this year... this left into the Cross Insurance Center was made into a double unsignalised left at least for the duration of the playoffs... from Buck St there were two lanes turning into the parking lot to access the arena. Seems like the signage has been like this for a while... GSV below was from 2019 but still signed the same as of 4 March 2022.

From Buck St.
Turning into the Cross Insurance Arena

Quote from: jakeroot on October 03, 2019, 02:44:59 AM
Quote from: Ian on October 02, 2019, 08:03:12 PM
The intersection of Maine and Mason Streets in Brunswick, Maine has a double left-turn that's protected only by flashing beacons.

Damn, that's a great example! Almost all of these are decidedly rural or suburban. This one is definitely very urban.

Just for the heck of it (and looking for something in the local area), I looked up the intersection using the GSV history. Seems like it was signalised with protected-only lefts initially before sometime in the mid 2000's where the signals were set to flash, and eventually, the signals converted to beacons in 2012-ish.

jakeroot

Quote from: fwydriver405 on March 04, 2022, 11:06:08 PM
Quote from: jakeroot on October 03, 2019, 02:44:59 AM
Quote from: Ian on October 02, 2019, 08:03:12 PM
The intersection of Maine and Mason Streets in Brunswick, Maine has a double left-turn that's protected only by flashing beacons.

Damn, that's a great example! Almost all of these are decidedly rural or suburban. This one is definitely very urban.

Just for the heck of it (and looking for something in the local area), I looked up the intersection using the GSV history. Seems like it was signalised with protected-only lefts initially before sometime in the mid 2000's where the signals were set to flash, and eventually, the signals converted to beacons in 2012-ish.

I'm not sure I've ever heard of a line of events like that: fully protected, flashing arrow, flashing beacon (still a yield). Normally it's the opposite, even for single lane turns. To have the opposite with double left turns is, well, I can't imagine there has ever been such a thing elsewhere.

Perhaps, if this was done elsewhere, northbound Maine would have a stop sign.

I looked up the intersection on Historic Aerials; even back in 2001, traffic turning left was yielding, judging by the car stopped midway into the intersection. Still see no indication of there ever being a stop line. Based on nearby intersections, I have to assume that they always use stop lines in Maine (they don't always over here, although without a crosswalk there normally would be).

ran4sh

At the main exit to Six Flags coming from Atlanta, the off ramp has an unsignalized double left turn onto the crossroad: https://goo.gl/maps/eEPC32PxRoXCQQLP9
Center lane merges are the most unsafe thing ever, especially for unfamiliar drivers.

Control cities should be actual cities/places that travelers are trying to reach.

Travel Mapping - Most Traveled: I-40, 20, 10, 5, 95 - Longest Clinched: I-20, 85, 24, 16, NJ Tpk mainline
Champions - UGA FB '21 '22 - Atlanta Braves '95 '21 - Atlanta MLS '18

kphoger

Didn't want to start a separate thread for unsignalized right turn lanes.  Split it if you think it should be split.

Before the intersection was rebuilt a few years ago, the EB K-254 exit for 45th Street here in Wichita had one.  And the SB I-135 exit for 9th Street still does.  But are there examples at non-interchange locations?
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

webny99

Also at an interchange, there's this absurdity at I-64 and KY 11 in Mount Sterling, KY. Fortunately, it's now been signalized. (I don't think I've ever seen an unsignalized double left or right turn in the wild, I just happened to remember this example from another thread.)

plain

Quote from: kphoger on December 02, 2022, 02:01:21 PM
Didn't want to start a separate thread for unsignalized right turn lanes.  Split it if you think it should be split.

Before the intersection was rebuilt a few years ago, the EB K-254 exit for 45th Street here in Wichita had one.  And the SB I-135 exit for 9th Street still does.  But are there examples at non-interchange locations?

VA 30 EB at Meadow Event Park

https://maps.app.goo.gl/voukmnMMra2yw3eW9
Newark born, Richmond bred

CardInLex

I use this one in Louisville, KY all the time. https://maps.app.goo.gl/ZvtjkYqckQkiLouFA?g_st=ic

Although there are now plans to change the ones way streets to two way streets in this area and this will be eliminated.

roadfro

A double unsignalized right turn in Nevada: WB Meadows Lane at Decatur Blvd.

Off hand, I can't think of another spot in Nevada where a double right turn situation is not signalized.
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

jakeroot

Quote from: roadfro on December 04, 2022, 05:34:42 PM
A double unsignalized right turn in Nevada: WB Meadows Lane at Decatur Blvd.

Off hand, I can't think of another spot in Nevada where a double right turn situation is not signalized.

The right turn slip lane from Neil Rd to Southbound I-580 in Reno is two lanes with a yield: https://goo.gl/maps/cubTdoi1h4AYSgyj7

roadfro

#35
Quote from: jakeroot on December 06, 2022, 12:59:55 AM
Quote from: roadfro on December 04, 2022, 05:34:42 PM
A double unsignalized right turn in Nevada: WB Meadows Lane at Decatur Blvd.

Off hand, I can't think of another spot in Nevada where a double right turn situation is not signalized.

The right turn slip lane from Neil Rd to Southbound I-580 in Reno is two lanes with a yield: https://goo.gl/maps/cubTdoi1h4AYSgyj7

Forgot about that one.

I'm pretty sure that movement was signalized when it first became a double right turn (concurrent with construction of the roundabout at Kietzke/Neil/Del Monte in the mid-2000s). I can't confirm that in Street View, but the presence of a stop bar instead of a yield line and there being pedestrian signals across the movement despite the yield in older Street Views seems to corroborate that memory.
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

countysigns

https://goo.gl/maps/gRhd5KSBf67K5oX7A
Until Jackson Street was changed to two-way traffic, this was a double left turn from 11th Street in uptown Toledo.

fwydriver405

Reviving a long dormant thread from hibernation, but just had to mention this unsignalised double left turn on the Daniels Pkwy EB in Ft Myers FL near JetBlue Park, as I passed by this while I was on a FGCU MTE trip back in November 2024. Earliest date I could find on GSV of this existing was in Nov 2013.

74/171FAN

I am now a PennDOT employee.  My opinions/views do not necessarily reflect the opinions/views of PennDOT.

Travel Mapping: https://travelmapping.net/user/?units=miles&u=markkos1992
Mob-Rule:  https://mob-rule.com/user/markkos1992

jakeroot

In Phoenix, at North 50th and McDowell Road, there is a double left from a side-street that only has stop signs. The second left turn also can go right.

Most of the examples in this thread are pretty safe and would operate just fine. But this one is highly unorthodox in my opinion.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/FTwovtdMHaMmhXEZ8


McDowell Road / N 50th, Phoenix, AZ by Jacob Root, on Flickr

webny99

^ I'm not convinced that shared left/right arrow isn't supposed to be a shared thru/right arrow.

US 89

Quote from: webny99 on January 14, 2025, 05:35:46 PM^ I'm not convinced that shared left/right arrow isn't supposed to be a shared thru/right arrow.

I don't think there would be two dashed lines painted through the intersection if the second lane weren't also for left turns.

jakeroot

Quote from: US 89 on January 14, 2025, 05:59:06 PM
Quote from: webny99 on January 14, 2025, 05:35:46 PM^ I'm not convinced that shared left/right arrow isn't supposed to be a shared thru/right arrow.

I don't think there would be two dashed lines painted through the intersection if the second lane weren't also for left turns.

My thought as well. Those dashed line are almost exclusively used when there are multiple turn lanes, to keep traffic from drifting into the wrong lane. Single turns virtually never have them since drifting isn't really a concern.

webny99

Quote from: jakeroot on January 14, 2025, 06:16:13 PM
Quote from: US 89 on January 14, 2025, 05:59:06 PM
Quote from: webny99 on January 14, 2025, 05:35:46 PM^ I'm not convinced that shared left/right arrow isn't supposed to be a shared thru/right arrow.

I don't think there would be two dashed lines painted through the intersection if the second lane weren't also for left turns.

My thought as well. Those dashed line are almost exclusively used when there are multiple turn lanes, to keep traffic from drifting into the wrong lane. Single turns virtually never have them since drifting isn't really a concern.

That's fair, but then the painted arrow in the right lane should be a triple header (including an arrow pointing straight) instead of just a double header.

Revive 755


mrsman

Quote from: webny99 on January 14, 2025, 06:37:03 PM
Quote from: jakeroot on January 14, 2025, 06:16:13 PM
Quote from: US 89 on January 14, 2025, 05:59:06 PM
Quote from: webny99 on January 14, 2025, 05:35:46 PM^ I'm not convinced that shared left/right arrow isn't supposed to be a shared thru/right arrow.

I don't think there would be two dashed lines painted through the intersection if the second lane weren't also for left turns.

My thought as well. Those dashed line are almost exclusively used when there are multiple turn lanes, to keep traffic from drifting into the wrong lane. Single turns virtually never have them since drifting isn't really a concern.

That's fair, but then the painted arrow in the right lane should be a triple header (including an arrow pointing straight) instead of just a double header.
I agree that it seems somewhat unsafe.  For an intersection that is stop signed controlled on the side street alone, it would seem that McDowell has a lot more traffic than 50th.  Going straight or making a left from side street to big street is usually difficult, so right turns are generally preferred, or at least a dedicated right turn lane is formed so that right turning traffic can go when there is a gap in the eastbound right lane.  Obviously, that gap is much more frequent than a gap in all of eastbound and the left lane of westbound which is necessary to complete the left turn.

My guess is that there is a lot of traffic making a left here since more of Phoenix is to the west.  Plus, there is a nearby onramp to AZ-143.  The left turns might back up so much traffic that two lanes were needed to prevent blocking driveways, but it's likely only needed for a relatively small part of the day, so it wasn't enough to warrant a traffic signal.

Still a weird and unusual setup.

jakeroot

I suppose it's worth mentioning that the lane use sign approaching the intersection matches the arrows painted on the road. No straight-through movement permitted, apparently.

This left turn is leaving some kind of industrial facility; the gate leaving it does seem to operate part-time. It is hard to believe it produces enough traffic to warrant a double left.

michiganguy123


Big John


kphoger

Quote from: jakeroot on January 16, 2025, 06:16:28 PMI suppose it's worth mentioning that the lane use sign approaching the intersection matches the arrows painted on the road. No straight-through movement permitted, apparently.

Straight through onto what?  It doesn't look to me like what's on the far side of the intersection is actually a city street.  I think it's just a big driveway for the storage unit business.  The lack of a STOP sign on the far side of the intersection reinforces that for me.  And if that's the case, then there wouldn't need to be a straight-through arrow for approaching traffic.
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.