News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.

Main Menu

Traffic Signals exclusively for railroad crossings

Started by peterj920, September 12, 2016, 01:53:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

peterj920

On US 127 in Michigan, there are traffic signals in addition to the traditional flashing red lights for a railroad crossing.  Are there any other cases where there are traffic signals dedicated exclusively for trains?

https://www.google.com/maps/@43.1828573,-84.563221,3a,75y,355.75h,79.61t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1slOtRRouO175XBECIGxZrcg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en


roadfro

^ Interesting to note that this crossing omits the typical gate arms of a railroad crossing but still has the double red signal crossing lights–maybe that has something to do with it...? Also noting the regulatory sign upstream: "Trucks and buses do not stop on [green ball]" – perhaps this crossing was purposefully designed with the signal so to avoid the typical legal requirement for buses/certain trucks to stop on what appears to be a limited-access expressway?
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

peterj920

Quote from: roadfro on September 12, 2016, 03:13:22 AM
^ Interesting to note that this crossing omits the typical gate arms of a railroad crossing but still has the double red signal crossing lights–maybe that has something to do with it...? Also noting the regulatory sign upstream: "Trucks and buses do not stop on [green ball]" – perhaps this crossing was purposefully designed with the signal so to avoid the typical legal requirement for buses/certain trucks to stop on what appears to be a limited-access expressway?

It looks like that rail line isn't used much so I'm guessing that MDOT couldn't justify putting up an overpass for a lightly used rail line.  They must have felt that the traffic signals would help warn in the rare instances that there is a train.  Other signs could have been posted if they did not want trucks and buses to stop at the railroad crossing without the traffic signals.   

In Wisconsin, there's an exempt sign posted below a Railroad Warning sign and below the Railroad Crossing sign if buses and trucks aren't supposed to stop.  Usually they're posted on railroad tracks that either have little traffic or are out of service.  I have an example below on County AP.  The rail spur is still used, but only goes to the RR Donnely Plant to the right. 

https://www.google.com/maps/@44.2299727,-88.4387882,3a,75y,282.91h,85.72t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGur5fDOX2mJXJGRmUuDp7g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en

vdeane

There are a few in NY.  Off the top of my head:
-US 11 near Gouverneur
-NY 49 near Rome
-NY 840 near NY 5/8/12
-NY 825 just past Ellsworth Rd

You can also count the intersection of NY 32 and Spring St in Cohoes; the tracks run right through the middle of the intersection (it's a minor spur to an industrial building).
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

JCinSummerfield

Quote from: peterj920 on September 12, 2016, 03:45:35 AM
Quote from: roadfro on September 12, 2016, 03:13:22 AM
^ Interesting to note that this crossing omits the typical gate arms of a railroad crossing but still has the double red signal crossing lights–maybe that has something to do with it...? Also noting the regulatory sign upstream: "Trucks and buses do not stop on [green ball]" – perhaps this crossing was purposefully designed with the signal so to avoid the typical legal requirement for buses/certain trucks to stop on what appears to be a limited-access expressway?

It looks like that rail line isn't used much so I'm guessing that MDOT couldn't justify putting up an overpass for a lightly used rail line.  They must have felt that the traffic signals would help warn in the rare instances that there is a train.  Other signs could have been posted if they did not want trucks and buses to stop at the railroad crossing without the traffic signals.   

In Wisconsin, there's an exempt sign posted below a Railroad Warning sign and below the Railroad Crossing sign if buses and trucks aren't supposed to stop.  Usually they're posted on railroad tracks that either have little traffic or are out of service.  I have an example below on County AP.  The rail spur is still used, but only goes to the RR Donnely Plant to the right. 

https://www.google.com/maps/@44.2299727,-88.4387882,3a,75y,282.91h,85.72t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGur5fDOX2mJXJGRmUuDp7g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en

Actually, the traffic lights were put there when they made the crossing exempt, that is, where buses and other large trucks that normally stop at RR crossing don't have to, unless the light is red.  That way,  traffic on US-127 doesn't come to a screeching halt because of a tanker stopping for the crossing.

Along Telegraph Rd. in southern Monroe Co, Michigan, traffic lights were put up on various intersecting roads before the RR crossing that parallels US-24 (Telegraph).  This was done so cars wouldn't back up onto the crossing from the red light at the nearby intersection.

Edited to add:  In Michigan, it is not common to have crossing gates with flashers.  Newer crossing upgrades have them, but many do not.

jeffandnicole

There's a few in Delaware, including this location on US 40 in Bear, which happened to stop the GSV...  https://goo.gl/maps/qrzoNsGnuH22

briantroutman

Quote from: peterj920 on September 12, 2016, 01:53:14 AM
On US 127 in Michigan, there are traffic signals in addition to the traditional flashing red lights for a railroad crossing.  Are there any other cases where there are traffic signals dedicated exclusively for trains?

https://www.google.com/maps/@43.1828573,-84.563221,3a,75y,355.75h,79.61t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1slOtRRouO175XBECIGxZrcg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en

On this assembly, is the progression: green - yellow - red - and then the wigwag lights come on?

JCinSummerfield



On this assembly, is the progression: green - yellow - red - and then the wigwag lights come on?
[/quote]

When railroad flashers activate, traffic light simultaneously urns yellow, then red.

xcellntbuy

There are two sets these traffic lights for rail crossings in Hudson, NY.  One is located at the very northern end of NY 9G and 23B on Columbia Street and a second set is located one block to the north on State Street.  The rail line is the old Boston and Albany Railroad tracks which also run through the 7th Street Park to the south.  The railroad tracks are also at street level through South 7th Street at Warren Street south to Union Street.  Never had any gates or flashing lights. 

Joe The Dragon

Quote from: JCinSummerfield on September 12, 2016, 01:11:17 PM


On this assembly, is the progression: green - yellow - red - and then the wigwag lights come on?

When railroad flashers activate, traffic light simultaneously urns yellow, then red.
[/quote]

also I think the trains have to wait for green as well.

Sam

#10
NY 332 in downtown Canandaigua has a 3-segment traffic signal with crossbucks. No red flashers or gates. NY 17 once had a traffic signal at an exempt crossing north of Middletown.

DaBigE

Prairie du Chien, WI has a couple: Blackhawk Ave & Iowa St, except in these cases, they're designed to meter any queues that have formed due to the roundabout downstream, preventing the grade crossing from being blocked. The signals kick-into service by means of a dozen or so loop detectors (at least they were loop detectors on the original plans) and railroad preemption.

WisDOT also has a simulation of how those signals work.
"We gotta find this road, it's like Bob's road!" - Rabbit, Twister

cl94

Quote from: vdeane on September 12, 2016, 12:51:04 PM
There are a few in NY.  Off the top of my head:
-US 11 near Gouverneur
-NY 49 near Rome
-NY 840 near NY 5/8/12
-NY 825 just past Ellsworth Rd

You can also count the intersection of NY 32 and Spring St in Cohoes; the tracks run right through the middle of the intersection (it's a minor spur to an industrial building).

NY 5/8/12 has one at its interchange with NY 840 (whose crossing you mentioned above). There are 6 along NY 425 in North Tonawanda. NY 39 through Arcade has 2. Warren CR 7 (Bay Rd) once had one in Queensbury, lights remain up.

US 4 has one in Rutland, VT. 65 mph section.

I will assume we're excluding signals at an intersection if they have rail preemption. The NY 425 ones do not have preemption: rail traffic faces a red and has to wait for its phase in the cycle.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

GenExpwy

Quote from: cl94 on September 12, 2016, 11:56:57 PM
Quote from: vdeane on September 12, 2016, 12:51:04 PM
There are a few in NY.  Off the top of my head:
-US 11 near Gouverneur
-NY 49 near Rome
-NY 840 near NY 5/8/12
-NY 825 just past Ellsworth Rd

You can also count the intersection of NY 32 and Spring St in Cohoes; the tracks run right through the middle of the intersection (it's a minor spur to an industrial building).

NY 5/8/12 has one at its interchange with NY 840 (whose crossing you mentioned above). There are 6 along NY 425 in North Tonawanda. NY 39 through Arcade has 2. Warren CR 7 (Bay Rd) once had one in Queensbury, lights remain up.

Also NY 15 in Henrietta, next to Marketplace Mall.

Brian556

Also, traffic signals have something railroad crossing signals don't...a yellow light.

There are several of these in Chattanooga, TN. Some are straight-up traffic signals only, while some others are a strange combination of traffic and RR Xing signals

Amnicola Hwy: Amnicola Hwy lanes have traffic signals only; ramp traffic has RR Xings signal only:
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0958219,-85.2454248,3a,75y,68.07h,81.45t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sGo_WYwn2r_x50_CupF51xA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DGo_WYwn2r_x50_CupF51xA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D316.7673%26pitch%3D0!7i13312!8i6656
Note: Amnicola Hwy used to be SR 58. The section from SR 317 to SR 153 became SR 317, the remaining section went to the city.

McCallie Av/ Bailey Av:
Track is still active, but RR lights were removed from cantilevers, and now there are only traffic signals. This street used to be one way, so maybe they didn't want to spend the money on reconfiguring the cantilevers when it was converted to two way:https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0387875,-85.2824687,3a,47.6y,306.55h,87.31t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sr9FpuBKvEbn_e6B_pLMAwg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Dr9FpuBKvEbn_e6B_pLMAwg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D342.16937%26pitch%3D0!7i13312!8i6656
Note: This used to be US 11/64/SR 2 WB, and Bailey Av was US 11/64/ SR 2 EB. It has a similar setup:
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0363425,-85.2839021,3a,75y,276.67h,82.03t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sNUpw3ZOexqm1UNAOPU-E0Q!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DNUpw3ZOexqm1UNAOPU-E0Q%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D49.937157%26pitch%3D0!7i13312!8i6656

Google maps has it wrong, it says these two streets are still on the state highway system.

And, in Dallas, Tx, there are several traffic signals that are for the DART line on Pacific Street, which is a trains-only street:
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7802894,-96.806381,3a,26.5y,341.11h,87.79t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sVzsNIDq414QzZdMq2DTAlQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

This is a bad time for Mike's RR Crossing Website to be down.




peterj920

It looks like the common theme is that the traffic signals are used for railroad crossings that aren't very busy, with the exception of Prairie Du Chien with the "road metering" signals before the roundabout.  Would probably be for another topic but would be interesting to see if there are metering signals for non freeway or expressway situations since I've only seen those signals that meter traffic counts on freeway on ramps until now. 

kphoger

I'm not sure if this qualifies, but...

In Wichita, where 29th Street North crosses a freight yard, there is a 14-track level crossing immediately before a stoplight at Broadway.  Because of the distance involved, there is a secondary signal in advance of the crossing, to ensure people don't get stuck on the tracks.

Street view here
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

Joe The Dragon

Quote from: kphoger on September 13, 2016, 06:19:49 PM
I'm not sure if this qualifies, but...

In Wichita, where 29th Street North crosses a freight yard, there is a 14-track level crossing immediately before a stoplight at Broadway.  Because of the distance involved, there is a secondary signal in advance of the crossing, to ensure people don't get stuck on the tracks.

Street view here

Not odd and the fox river grove bus crash let to alot of them being put it all over the place.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1995_Fox_River_Grove_bus%E2%80%93train_collision

Michael

Here's a few in CNY that I can think of off the top of my head:

US 20/NY 5 in Auburn (note the train signal on the right side)
There used to be a second crossing just after this one (move ahead to see the curb cuts), but it was removed in the late 90s or early 2000s.  When I was in high school, I was surprised that our BOCES bus driver didn't stop at this crossing.  He told me that it's not required if there's a stoplight.  I Googled it, and sure enough, that's the law.  I would think a crossing without a gate would be more dangerous.

NY 840, Utica (mentioned earlier)

NY 481, Fulton
I haven't been through there in at least 10 years, but it looks like the tracks have been partially paved over, so it may not be active anymore and just stays green all the time

One I've been through but forgot about is NY 297 in Solvay.  It's a seperate signal from the intersection to the south.  Note the red light in the background and the mast arm for oncoming traffic before the tracks.  It also has train signals like the one in Auburn.

Another one I've been through but forgot about until seeing it in an earlier post is NY 49 in Rome.  NY 49's frontage roads have signals too, and there are also train signals on each of the outermost mast arm poles.

I also forgot about NY 332 in Canandaigua until seeing it in this thread, but I haven't been through there in probably at least 12 years.

I thought I knew of one in Rochester, but I couldn't find it.  I thought I might have been misremembering until seeing GenExpwy's post.  Here's a Street View link of that one.  While looking for it, I did come across one crossing with gates on both sides, but one side also had a signal with the gate.  I've never seen a setup like it before.

epzik8

The Baltimore Light Rail has at least one, at Shawan Road in Hunt Valley/Cockeysville.
From the land of red, white, yellow and black.
____________________________

My clinched highways: http://tm.teresco.org/user/?u=epzik8
My clinched counties: http://mob-rule.com/user-gifs/USA/epzik8.gif

kj3400

Quote from: epzik8 on September 14, 2016, 09:16:34 PM
The Baltimore Light Rail has at least one, at Shawan Road in Hunt Valley/Cockeysville.
Don't forget the one at Waterview Av. in Cherry Hill, which is also for a rail line.
Call me Kenny/Kenneth. No, seriously.

Roadrunner75

The NJ Transit Hudson-Bergen Light Rail line has a number of crossings in Jersey City with just traffic signals such as here:
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7134067,-74.0507033,3a,95.6y,26.64h,90.33t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sQ8VraicgywEGFmbUCnFIYw!2e0?
At other locations they use traditional signals and gates, and still finally they do some street running with traffic in the downtown area.

freebrickproductions

Quote from: Brian556 on September 13, 2016, 01:50:24 AM
This is a bad time for Mike's RR Crossing Website to be down.
As a current admin of that site, I can tell you it's still up, but we've moved from rxrsignals.net to rxrsignals.com (and if you encounter any errors accessing a page, check to see if it's pointing at the right address). We kept having issues with hitting the monthly bandwidth limit on the old hosting plan, and it was getting to the point where we needed a new hosting plan before the old one expired. Sadly, the old URL was tied to the old hosting plan, so we changed from .net to .com.
I'll probably go look through it sometime soon and see what I can find.
Here's the link for those whom are curious though: http://www.rxrsignals.com/
It's all fun & games until someone summons Cthulhu and brings about the end of the world.

I also collect traffic lights, road signs, fans, and railroad crossing equipment.

(They/Them)

cl94

Quote from: freebrickproductions on September 15, 2016, 01:53:42 AM
Quote from: Brian556 on September 13, 2016, 01:50:24 AM
This is a bad time for Mike's RR Crossing Website to be down.
As a current admin of that site, I can tell you it's still up, but we've moved from rxrsignals.net to rxrsignals.com (and if you encounter any errors accessing a page, check to see if it's pointing at the right address). We kept having issues with hitting the monthly bandwidth limit on the old hosting plan, and it was getting to the point where we needed a new hosting plan before the old one expired. Sadly, the old URL was tied to the old hosting plan, so we changed from .net to .com.
I'll probably go look through it sometime soon and see what I can find.
Here's the link for those whom are curious though: http://www.rxrsignals.com/

Now I have a new nerd site to bookmark. Wonderful. Give me a few days and I'll be sending over a boatload of pictures from the Albany area.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

freebrickproductions

Quote from: cl94 on September 15, 2016, 11:56:33 AM
Quote from: freebrickproductions on September 15, 2016, 01:53:42 AM
Quote from: Brian556 on September 13, 2016, 01:50:24 AM
This is a bad time for Mike's RR Crossing Website to be down.
As a current admin of that site, I can tell you it's still up, but we've moved from rxrsignals.net to rxrsignals.com (and if you encounter any errors accessing a page, check to see if it's pointing at the right address). We kept having issues with hitting the monthly bandwidth limit on the old hosting plan, and it was getting to the point where we needed a new hosting plan before the old one expired. Sadly, the old URL was tied to the old hosting plan, so we changed from .net to .com.
I'll probably go look through it sometime soon and see what I can find.
Here's the link for those whom are curious though: http://www.rxrsignals.com/

Now I have a new nerd site to bookmark. Wonderful. Give me a few days and I'll be sending over a boatload of pictures from the Albany area.
Send me a PM and I can send you my e-mail to submit pictures via. Make sure you read the 103 page as well, you don't have to follow it exactly, but it gives a good idea of the shots we're looking for:
http://www.rxrsignals.com/103/
It's all fun & games until someone summons Cthulhu and brings about the end of the world.

I also collect traffic lights, road signs, fans, and railroad crossing equipment.

(They/Them)



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.