US 550 in Bernalillo, New Mexico:

New rules to ensure post quality. See this thread for details.
1
on: Today at 07:45:00 AM
|
||
Started by 1 - Last post by formulanone | ||
2
on: Today at 07:31:53 AM
|
||
Started by MDOTFanFB - Last post by Flint1979 | ||
This one happened at the Knox Road over pass on I-96 in Portland but I-94 is also prone for these kind of accidents.
|
3
on: Today at 06:26:14 AM
|
||
Started by geek11111 - Last post by 1 | ||
but at least around here, Über and Lyft drivers have special lighted signs on the dash boards of their cars, so they're not allowed This is an option for Uber and Lyft drivers, but they're not required to have the lighted signs. I've been in many Uber vehicles without one. |
4
on: Today at 06:24:46 AM
|
||
Started by 1 - Last post by 1 | ||
TX Toll 550 → FL not sure which county CR 550
![]() |
5
on: Today at 03:58:00 AM
|
||
Started by Buummu - Last post by Terry Shea | ||
The source I looked at actually said less than 1.8 million. I rounded up. At any rate, an increase of almost 50% by 2050 seems quite unlikely, but 2050 is still about 3 decades away, not 1. I agree that something needs to be done and the sooner the better, but there's no need to exaggerate or sensationalize the facts and figures, which this writer seems to have done. I drove through Delaware County 40 years ago and traffic was terrible then. I'm thinking this should have been addressed in the 1960's or earlier. https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/22963/columbus/population |
6
on: Today at 03:47:39 AM
|
||
Started by Desert Man - Last post by ZLoth | ||
7
on: Today at 03:35:37 AM
|
||
Started by Grzrd - Last post by Anthony_JK | ||
Texas has taken more of a go slow approach to I-69/I-369, relying on upgrading sections through major cities (Lufkin/Nacogdoches, Marshall) and upgrading preexisting freeway and near-freeway segments near Shepherd and Cleveland and southwest of Houston. Given their mass of projects statewide, that's no surprise.
An Brownsville/Victoria/Houston/Texarkana freeway along US 59 has been a major goal of Texas officials almost as much as a Laredo/Houston/Texarkana corridor as part of a national I-69 corridor connecting South Texas to the Midwest. The I-69 Colossus simply combined those two distinct corridors into one system. I don't think they would take too kindly to removing Texarkana from the system by diverting US 59 traffic through Shreveport. I do think that US 59 and I-49 are far enough apart from each other and have different enough objectives to warrant them coexisting and meeting at Texarkana. Until the ICC of I-49 is built through Shreveport, you would have a situation of traffic using I-20/LA 3132/I-220 and I-49 north (or I-49/LA 3132/I-20). Plus, Texarkana has made it clear that they want US 59 upgraded from Loop 151 southward as part of their own access to their downtown area. |
8
on: Today at 03:17:22 AM
|
||
Started by Max Rockatansky - Last post by pderocco | ||
^^^
I think they renumbered it because they wanted to 96 to connect to a significant through route. I don't see any analogous thing one could do with routes 190 or 168 on either side of the mountains. |
9
on: Today at 03:06:37 AM
|
||
Started by TheStranger - Last post by pderocco | ||
Total aside with CA 232, somehow that the fifth most viewed blog all time on Gribblenation. I know it’s not a fluke/bot thing because of the analytics and reader comments suggest it got shared somewhere that took it serious. I have no idea why CA 232 out of all the blogs we’ve done on California took off like it did. The only California blog ahead of it for views is the San Juan Grade (which is number four).Well, they could extend 118 down Santa Clara to 101/1, and then turn 232 90 degrees and run it along Los Angeles, relinquishing Vinyard. |
10
on: Today at 03:01:03 AM
|
||
Started by Buummu - Last post by vtk | ||
Which is exactly why this should have been done 40 years ago. Delaware County has exploded in development in that time, making the upgrades we're talking about now so difficult. |