Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[vdeane]

What is the alignment of MD 2 between I-95 and US 40?  About the only thing that TM has nailed down is that it follows Hanover Street at I-95 and Light Street from Key Highway to the St. Paul-Calvert one-way pair.  OSM has it follow Montgomery Street northbound and Lee/Charles/Hughes southbound, but the southbound alignment appears to contradict TM.  Signage is non-existent in either direction.  Does anyone know more definitely where it goes?

I used to drive that stretch of MD 2 several times a week back in the 1980's and 1990's, so I thought this should be easy to answer.  Turns out not as easy as I thought.

I believe TM does not take one-way routings into consideration, just waypoints.  So a one-way pair would be drawn as an "average" of the two (I think).  So I would tend to discount TM if there is a discrepancy.

As far as I remember, northbound has always been:  Hanover -> Montgomery (one-way) -> Light

Southbound, memory is a little fuzzier (maybe 90% sure).  I believe it was Light -> Lee (one-way) -> Charles -> Hughes (one-way) -> Hanover.  But I seem to recall it being somewhat poorly marked (but at least marked) as opposed to non-existent marking like GSM now shows.

That's the thing... TM is not taking an average at Key Highway.  That point is directly on the NB direction, as if both directions are still on Light at that point even though SB is supposedly elsewhere at that point.  Incidentally, the reason I noticed this is because I might be driving on it SB at some point and wanted to make sure I get the correct route clinched.  Maybe it's like US 1 in the Bronx where NB can travel on US 1 but SB has to leave US 1 and take local streets because of a turn restriction.

[Mapmikey]

here's a MD 2 shield on SB Hanover at Montgomery - https://goo.gl/maps/ybRSZ6tXmY9uGMCz9

[jmacswimmer]

Google Maps seems to think that MD 2 SB follows Hughes the whole way from Light to Hanover, but it appears that traffic can only turn right at Charles and thus it is legally impossible to continue straight on Hughes across Charles (not that that stops people from trying, I imagine...). Combined with the fact the Hughes is rather narrow between Light & Charles (but a more standard city street width between Charles & Hanover), the Lee-Charles-Hughes routing would make more sense as others have suggested.

Another possible hint supporting the Lee-Charles-Hughes routing...looking at the HLR pdf that 74/171 linked to, the "route number" listed for MD 2 NB's intersection with E Hughes St is "MU 6145" (presumably some internal city designation...it's on page 24 of the HLR pdf for anyone interested). I would think that route number would instead show as MD 2 if SB did in fact follow Hughes the whole way? The intersection with Lee St isn't listed, unfortunately...the next intersection listed north of Hughes is Conway.

[Mapmikey]

page 161 of the 2021 HLR linked above has a map that appears to show the suspected routing.

page 2 of the 2004 HLR explicitly names the SB MD 2 couplet to be the suspected routing.

The SB couplet has had at least 2 other configurations: Light-Hill-Hanover and Light-Lee-Hanover

[kernals12]

I love how the staff absolutely rakes every single interior control lever (including the gear shifter) as hard as possible in their "testing". Knowing the build quality of some of these 80s cars, I'm surprised nothing came flying off after doing all that.

The cars that manufacturers give to the press aren't the same as the ones that people buy.

[kernals12]

These bottom 2 were filmed on MD 795.  See this video

which shows it signed (2:07 shows the opposite view at Franklin Blvd interchange; unobstructed MD 795 shield at 2:39).  They appear to be filming in this area: https://goo.gl/maps/YMF8agoX331ZT2kX6

What's going on here? The signs don't add up. There was never a MD 795; it was always I-795. And why the NYS state speed limit sign? Was this some kind of proving ground or a real freeway?

[epzik8]

Google Maps seems to think that MD 2 SB follows Hughes the whole way from Light to Hanover, but it appears that traffic can only turn right at Charles and thus it is legally impossible to continue straight on Hughes across Charles (not that that stops people from trying, I imagine...). Combined with the fact the Hughes is rather narrow between Light & Charles (but a more standard city street width between Charles & Hanover), the Lee-Charles-Hughes routing would make more sense as others have suggested.

Another possible hint supporting the Lee-Charles-Hughes routing...looking at the HLR pdf that 74/171 linked to, the "route number" listed for MD 2 NB's intersection with E Hughes St is "MU 6145" (presumably some internal city designation...it's on page 24 of the HLR pdf for anyone interested). I would think that route number would instead show as MD 2 if SB did in fact follow Hughes the whole way? The intersection with Lee St isn't listed, unfortunately...the next intersection listed north of Hughes is Conway.

According to a couple of the old Rand McNally atlases, it continued on St. Paul past North Avenue all the way to Charles Street near Loyola.

[mrsman]

Google Maps seems to think that MD 2 SB follows Hughes the whole way from Light to Hanover, but it appears that traffic can only turn right at Charles and thus it is legally impossible to continue straight on Hughes across Charles (not that that stops people from trying, I imagine...). Combined with the fact the Hughes is rather narrow between Light & Charles (but a more standard city street width between Charles & Hanover), the Lee-Charles-Hughes routing would make more sense as others have suggested.

Another possible hint supporting the Lee-Charles-Hughes routing...looking at the HLR pdf that 74/171 linked to, the "route number" listed for MD 2 NB's intersection with E Hughes St is "MU 6145" (presumably some internal city designation...it's on page 24 of the HLR pdf for anyone interested). I would think that route number would instead show as MD 2 if SB did in fact follow Hughes the whole way? The intersection with Lee St isn't listed, unfortunately...the next intersection listed north of Hughes is Conway.

According to a couple of the old Rand McNally atlases, it continued on St. Paul past North Avenue all the way to Charles Street near Loyola.

Arguably, there is good reason to combine MD 139 and MD 2 for a continuous route all the way north to the Beltway.

Northbound MD 139 starts at Charles/North and follows Charles all the way to the Beltway (by way of Charlcote and St Paul in the one-way section north of JHU.  The southbound MD 139 is a little murky.  What happens in the area around JHU?  Does it simply follow St. Paul all the way to North Ave, or does it transition onto St Paul by way of University Parkway or does it transition onto Maryland Ave by way of 29th street.  I assume it's the last one, but it's hard to determine.

[epzik8]

Was 213 from Bohemia Manor to just south of US 40 always 50 miles per hour, or did they lower it from 55 since I drove it last?

[sprjus4]

Was 213 from Bohemia Manor to just south of US 40 always 50 miles per hour, or did they lower it from 55 since I drove it last?

Google Street View shows 50 mph dating back to the earliest imagery.

[epzik8]

It looks like new mast lights have been installed on the north side of the White Marsh interchange on 95.

[MASTERNC]

It looks like new mast lights have been installed on the north side of the White Marsh interchange on 95.

Was wondering when they were going to finally activate those.  The lights have been there for a while but were covered up.

[epzik8]

The daily backup on 95 south approaching 543 is close to reaching Stepney Road. It's crazy.

[MASTERNC]

The daily backup on 95 south approaching 543 is close to reaching Stepney Road. It's crazy.

That's why I was hoping the sound barrier work was actually for that auxiliary lane.  Any idea when that is scheduled?

[74/171FAN]

The Brookeville Bypass on MD 97 apparently opened yesterday.  (https://mdot-sha-md97-brookeville-bypass-mo7465171-r-maryland.hub.arcgis.com/)

May 2023: The Brookeville Bypass will officially open the week of Sunday, May 21st. Crews will perform a traffic switch on the morning of May 21st to open the newly constructed bypass to the traveling public. This switch will not affect County roads. Variable Message Signs (VMS) are in place to notify motorists of the upcoming change.

[famartin]

The Brookeville Bypass on MD 97 apparently opened yesterday.  (https://mdot-sha-md97-brookeville-bypass-mo7465171-r-maryland.hub.arcgis.com/)

May 2023: The Brookeville Bypass will officially open the week of Sunday, May 21st. Crews will perform a traffic switch on the morning of May 21st to open the newly constructed bypass to the traveling public. This switch will not affect County roads. Variable Message Signs (VMS) are in place to notify motorists of the upcoming change.

Will MD 97 thru Brookville will revert to a county road?  Or will it get one of those high numbered MD route assignments?

[74/171FAN]

The Brookeville Bypass on MD 97 apparently opened yesterday.  (https://mdot-sha-md97-brookeville-bypass-mo7465171-r-maryland.hub.arcgis.com/)

May 2023: The Brookeville Bypass will officially open the week of Sunday, May 21st. Crews will perform a traffic switch on the morning of May 21st to open the newly constructed bypass to the traveling public. This switch will not affect County roads. Variable Message Signs (VMS) are in place to notify motorists of the upcoming change.

Will MD 97 thru Brookville will revert to a county road?  Or will it get one of those high numbered MD route assignments?

I would expect it to become a county road just based on it being in Montgomery County.  I am sure that the town of Brookville would love to road diet it.

Anyway, apparently the removal of this abandoned railroad crossing on MD 343 in Cambridge is related to intersection improvements. 

Also I am thankful not to be taking US 50 to Ocean City this week. 

[Mapmikey]

A colleague of mine at work asked:

Has there been a suspension of HOV enforcement on I-270?  He says the violators seem to be on the increase with state troopers out there but not enforcing...

[74/171FAN]

The Brookeville Bypass on MD 97 apparently opened yesterday.  (https://mdot-sha-md97-brookeville-bypass-mo7465171-r-maryland.hub.arcgis.com/)

May 2023: The Brookeville Bypass will officially open the week of Sunday, May 21st. Crews will perform a traffic switch on the morning of May 21st to open the newly constructed bypass to the traveling public. This switch will not affect County roads. Variable Message Signs (VMS) are in place to notify motorists of the upcoming change.

Will MD 97 thru Brookville will revert to a county road?  Or will it get one of those high numbered MD route assignments?

I would expect it to become a county road just based on it being in Montgomery County.  I am sure that the town of Brookville would love to road diet it.

Well MD 97 through Brookeville is already treated as if it was never in town when I clinched the bypass this morning.