News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.

Main Menu

Bridge Railings

Started by Georgia Guardrail, July 21, 2022, 09:28:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Georgia Guardrail

I'm fascinated by the different types of bridge railings. 

It seems like the older bridges have more of a metal pipe type railing and newer bridges constructed in the 1980s and later have concrete barriers. 

Although I have seem some newer bridges with pipe type railings, any reason why engineers prefer the concrete barrier rails to the pipe type rails nowadays?


Big John

AASHTO tests show the concrete sloped barrier to be safer during a crash, and they started to appear in the 1970s.

Tom958

#2
They're cheaper and more resistant to damage, too. Their biggest downside is that they're too plain. Georgia is one of many states that make no effort to add even modest ornamentation.

seicer

The sloped concrete barrier has been determined to be safer for all automobile types but that doesn't preclude agencies from using steel pipe.

- The Carl D. Perkins Bridge features a traditional Jersey barrier with a steel pipe atop: https://goo.gl/maps/3EECWg9yMnr4Y5ka8
- Some of the earliest bridges along I-64 in Kentucky feature a double pipe barrier. These have either been replaced with concrete barriers or augmented with traditional guardrails as the curbing can cause issues at high speeds: https://goo.gl/maps/dVEVCXTYGpSiFaKo7 , https://goo.gl/maps/4zPV86t4GaEwuAR96 and https://goo.gl/maps/6YmGkQRrSPGxcoPd9

Dirt Roads

Quote from: seicer on July 26, 2022, 08:57:58 AM
- Some of the earliest bridges along I-64 in Kentucky feature a double pipe barrier. <safety changes snipped> https://goo.gl/maps/dVEVCXTYGpSiFaKo7

These were also common on the early sections of I-64 in West Virginia, including bridges on the Interstate itself.  This one in Kentucky looks like it has an intentional walkway on the left side and a much narrower curbpath on the right side.  In West Virginia, they almost entirely had curbpaths on both sides with no room for pedestrians. 

plain

Quote from: Dirt Roads on July 27, 2022, 07:31:04 PM
Quote from: seicer on July 26, 2022, 08:57:58 AM
- Some of the earliest bridges along I-64 in Kentucky feature a double pipe barrier. <safety changes snipped> https://goo.gl/maps/dVEVCXTYGpSiFaKo7

These were also common on the early sections of I-64 in West Virginia, including bridges on the Interstate itself.  This one in Kentucky looks like it has an intentional walkway on the left side and a much narrower curbpath on the right side.  In West Virginia, they almost entirely had curbpaths on both sides with no room for pedestrians.

Common on earlier bridges in VA as well, though they have been getting replaced. Here's a few of the ones still around in the Richmond area:

I-95 over Deepwater Terminal Rd, double rail remains on NB side only (opened 1958)
https://maps.app.goo.gl/iKcNjEVD6G57xTgF6

US 1/301 over I-95/64 (1958)
https://maps.app.goo.gl/h19XtXZ29a9VEBs47

Fort Lee Rd over I-85 (1958)
https://maps.app.goo.gl/rVppDg3HoL3cymTX9

SR 657 over I-95 (1963)
https://maps.app.goo.gl/yJ4CQuSPc5ujMqse6

VA 33 over I-64 (1966)
https://maps.app.goo.gl/ASCqfzQkVZhfC1RA7
Newark born, Richmond bred

plain

And here's a newer type of single rail that VDOT have been installing lately

I-64 over VA 33 near Highland Springs and Sandston
https://maps.app.goo.gl/pnNDnR7QLHoCXRDb6
Newark born, Richmond bred

D-Dey65

Quote from: plain on July 27, 2022, 08:44:38 PM
Common on earlier bridges in VA as well, though they have been getting replaced. Here's a few of the ones still around in the Richmond area:

I-95 over Deepwater Terminal Rd, double rail remains on NB side only (opened 1958)
https://maps.app.goo.gl/iKcNjEVD6G57xTgF6

US 1/301 over I-95/64 (1958)
https://maps.app.goo.gl/h19XtXZ29a9VEBs47

Fort Lee Rd over I-85 (1958)
https://maps.app.goo.gl/rVppDg3HoL3cymTX9

SR 657 over I-95 (1963)
https://maps.app.goo.gl/yJ4CQuSPc5ujMqse6

VA 33 over I-64 (1966)
https://maps.app.goo.gl/ASCqfzQkVZhfC1RA7
I used to think this was the common standard though most of the country, and anything else I saw pre-dated the Interstate Highway System.


cl94

Late arrivals to the concrete barrier game were New York and the New England states, which preferred metal rails for most applications until the late 90s, far later than the rest of the country. Major benefits to using metal barriers are lower weight and narrower profile, which is a huge reason why you still see New England and New York installing metal rails for certain applications. On freeways, they tend to be limited to locations where they are replacing older metal rails and are almost never used on new bridges. Surface roads still use metal rails quite frequently, particularly when there is bike/ped traffic.

In the 50s and early 60s, this was the standard used for freeways in much of New York, many examples being supplemented by other barriers: https://goo.gl/maps/KZPzDBgKkWWY6ZfX6
Mid-60s into the 70s, you had a lot of these: https://goo.gl/maps/s9VdVLDU98xU9xvy8
70s-90s was this style, which I still think of as the "dominant" style on New York roads: https://goo.gl/maps/QniWk8FtyGjHmtRa6
The modern style of metal rail is this: https://goo.gl/maps/AYFqwiJPjMizn9TQA

Each of these styles can be modified depending on bike/ped traffic to have up to 5 rails. For example, this is the modern rail used in pedestrian areas: https://goo.gl/maps/iusc5fjk4adm4rcM6
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

Mr_Northside

I recall when they were doing major rehab on the Ft. Pitt Bridge (here in Pittsburgh) around the turn-of-the-millennium, the original "pipe" railings were to be replaced with the standard concrete barrier, as it was reported it was the mandated method for safety reasons.   There was enough of an "outcry" about how it would make the views from the bridge (known for it's iconic views of downtown coming out of the tunnel) a lot more blocked on the sides.

They were able to find a compromise that met safety standards, but utilized a metal railing with a sturdier concrete base than the original.  Since then, it's a style used quite often now.

https://goo.gl/maps/giwXUHzEV2JWYrMp8
I don't have opinions anymore. All I know is that no one is better than anyone else, and everyone is the best at everything

Georgia Guardrail

I like the decorative railing.  I notice with the regular concrete barriers more and more they put in grooves to make them look more artistic and fancy from the outside.

It's always a pet peeve of mine when they make the railings too high to see over unless you have a taller vehicle.  Another thing that's really annoying is when they put sound barriers on the guardrail and you can't even tell if you're on a bridge.  (unless you hear yourself go over some concrete)

Tom958

Texas leaves almost everyone else in the dirt lately.

Two-tube metal rails from Planet Vulcan: https://goo.gl/maps/pUbBLNREP65PuGyNA

Precast Art Deco open concrete rails:  https://goo.gl/maps/fr7dfjNLDqSv62Vv6

Big John

Quote from: Tom958 on July 30, 2022, 08:07:54 PM
Texas leaves almost everyone else in the dirt lately.

Two-tube metal rails from Planet Vulcan: https://goo.gl/maps/pUbBLNREP65PuGyNA

Precast Art Deco open concrete rails:  https://goo.gl/maps/fr7dfjNLDqSv62Vv6
So much that the Art Deco one is called a Texas railing.

Tom958

Quote from: Georgia Guardrail on July 29, 2022, 03:47:07 PMIt's always a pet peeve of mine when they make the railings too high to see over unless you have a taller vehicle.

I think you're gonna be out of luck in Georgia. 42 inches of solid concrete seems to be the new standard, at least for state highways.

amroad17

Here are two different railings for the James River Bridge: https://goo.gl/maps/7L5Yd9wQr54YwHxr7
The southbound bridge, which is the one the GSV has, was completed in the mid 1970's (1975 or 1976) and had the metal railing parapets atop the concrete.  There is also curbing.  The northbound bridge just has the concrete barrier because that bridge was completed in 1980.  Apparently, the design plans changed between the two bridges, possibly for safety reasons or for cost savings with the metal rails.

A similar occurrence is in Tarboro, NC on the US 64 freeway: https://goo.gl/maps/khJfLTwX2kkCYGqR6
The eastbound bridge over the Tar River, which is the GSV, was completed in the late 1960's as a US 64 two-lane bypass of Princeville and part of Tarboro.  The bypass  began at the intersection of US 64 and Commercial Rd and ended at current Exit 485 (US 258 South).  There was also an intersection where Exit 486 currently is.  When US 64 was constructed as a freeway through the area in the late 1980's, a new westbound bridge needed to be built.  That was constructed to more modern standards with a concrete barrier and no metal railing.
I don't need a GPS.  I AM the GPS! (for family and friends)

cowboy_wilhelm

#15
Here are a bunch of cut up railings from the current I-26 Green River rehab project. Not sure if these are the OG railings from the 60s or if they were replaced during the rehab completed in the 90s. Being replaced with sloped concrete barrier.
https://goo.gl/maps/1TA2QVFywzADEX4aA

CtrlAltDel

Quote from: Georgia Guardrail on July 29, 2022, 03:47:07 PM
It's always a pet peeve of mine when they make the railings too high to see over unless you have a taller vehicle.

Me too. I like seeing the water, but I don't always get to.
Interstates clinched: 4, 57, 275 (IN-KY-OH), 465 (IN), 640 (TN), 985
State Interstates clinched: I-26 (TN), I-75 (GA), I-75 (KY), I-75 (TN), I-81 (WV), I-95 (NH)



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.