News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.

Main Menu

Oklahoma TAKE CARE OF YOUR ROADS

Started by texaskdog, February 20, 2017, 07:21:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

texaskdog

I-35 just north of OKC is so bad that last year we pulled over thinking we had a flat.  It still hasn't been fixed yet.

Plus they insist on not decommissioning US Highways yet they are in even worse shape.  I'm not sure why they have such a love for the US highways.

OK's top speed is only 70 unlike Texas & Kansas but there is no enforcement on the road.  In Texas from Austin to Gainesville we saw at least 4 speed traps each way.


Max Rockatansky

Couldn't help but thinking of this by the title of the thread:



All we need to do is change "Gotham" to "Oklahoma" and "city" to "roads." 

But isn't that kind of always been the case with Oklahoma?  I seem to recall things were kind of wonky with road maintenance every time I've been through.

kphoger

Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

Bobby5280

#3
Speed limits in OK are up to 75mph on the turnpikes and if I recall correctly rural stretches of I-40 and I-35 get up to 75mph too. 65mph and 70mph are common on US/State routes.

Oklahoma has only a fraction of the population base and tax base of Texas. The state doesn't put as high a priority on roads as neighboring states, hence issues like it taking over a decade just to piece-meal build an interchange like I-44/I-235 in Oklahoma City. The state has little to no real long term planning for major corridors, letting obvious corridors get covered up with development and then only reacting to disaster. There is a long tradition of "good ole boy network" nonsense going on with how highway funding is directed. They would rather build some turnpikes to nowhere than build new highways where they're most needed. Add to this the fact Oklahoma has hundreds upon hundreds of section line roads, many of which have bridges and other structures that suck money like crazy out of the roads budget.

Regarding OHP and its current level of enforcement, OHP troopers currently have a limit of driving no more than 100 miles per day. That's all thanks to the state's budget being totally busted, suffering major short-falls for the past 3 years. The state's single party government handed out tax cuts like candy to voters. Then oil prices tanked and royalty revenue for the state right along with it. Until gasoline gets back well over $3.00 per gallon Oklahoma isn't going to balance its budget, much have any real money to use on major highway projects.

hbelkins

Quote from: Bobby5280 on February 20, 2017, 09:50:36 PMOHP troopers currently have a limit of driving no more than 100 miles per day.

Wish more states would do this. Maybe, just maybe, it might mean saturation patrols in crime-ridden areas or parking in front of known drug dealers' homes instead of riding up and down the road looking for people who are driving faster than an arbitrarily-set speed.


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

texaskdog

no kidding  and I was talking about I-35 but yes the roads were all nice and safe without the ridicuolous speed traps.

Bobby5280

If OHP can't get you for speeding very easily there are plenty of police that can get you on roads away from the turnpikes. I tend to watch my speed the most whenever I'm driving through areas patrolled by tribal police. For instance OK-49 from the Medicine Park exit on I-44 over to the OK-53 turn to Lake Lawtonka can be really bad for speeders, especially the area just off I-44 by Loves and Burger King. The speed limit changes quickly from 65mph down to 45mph. Tribal police will hide out by the Dollar General and Liberty National Bank looking for anyone coming from the lake, headed back to Lawton that doesn't slow down fast enough.

Brian556

Oklahoma does decommission pretty much all former alignments, but Texas leaves them on the state highway system.

It is interesting how Oklahoma has the gridded county roads, but here in North Texas, county roads are random and far between

Scott5114

#8
Quote from: hbelkins on February 20, 2017, 10:01:22 PM
Quote from: Bobby5280 on February 20, 2017, 09:50:36 PMOHP troopers currently have a limit of driving no more than 100 miles per day.

Wish more states would do this. Maybe, just maybe, it might mean saturation patrols in crime-ridden areas or parking in front of known drug dealers' homes instead of riding up and down the road looking for people who are driving faster than an arbitrarily-set speed.

Not that OHP is going to be doing any of that. That's the city PD's job. If the state has to get involved, it would be OSBI, not OHP.

As far as I can tell OHP exists to write speeding tickets and have awkward relationships with the governor.

Quote from: Bobby5280 on February 20, 2017, 11:23:24 PM
If OHP can't get you for speeding very easily there are plenty of police that can get you on roads away from the turnpikes. I tend to watch my speed the most whenever I'm driving through areas patrolled by tribal police. For instance OK-49 from the Medicine Park exit on I-44 over to the OK-53 turn to Lake Lawtonka can be really bad for speeders, especially the area just off I-44 by Loves and Burger King. The speed limit changes quickly from 65mph down to 45mph. Tribal police will hide out by the Dollar General and Liberty National Bank looking for anyone coming from the lake, headed back to Lawton that doesn't slow down fast enough.

It's a little murky (because what isn't with regard to tribal law), but I don't believe tribal police have jurisdiction to write speeding tickets on state highways. In order for tribal governments to have any authority they have to have what's called "consent to jurisdiction". This is usually because 1) you are a member of the tribe 2) you are on tribal land (e.g., you are in a tribally-owned business) 3) you have consented some other way, such as by filing suit in tribal court, being employed by the tribe, etc.

They can pull you over, because they are usually cross-deputized, but at that point I think the most they can do is run your license/plates and call whoever actually has jurisdiction, if needed. Most likely they are watching for speeders in order to have probable cause to check for arrest warrants.

My only interaction with tribal police as a private citizen was after leaving work (I work at a tribal casino). I had a tail light out; tribal police followed me out of the parking lot and pulled me over once we got to the state highway. Upon reaching the car, the officer simply said "Hey, your right side tail light is out. Have a good night" and walked off. Didn't even ask for my license. I'm guessing he probably recognized my uniform and didn't figure there was much point in running my info, as they would have yanked my gaming license if I had any warrants.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

jeffandnicole

Quote from: hbelkins on February 20, 2017, 10:01:22 PM
Quote from: Bobby5280 on February 20, 2017, 09:50:36 PMOHP troopers currently have a limit of driving no more than 100 miles per day.

Wish more states would do this. Maybe, just maybe, it might mean saturation patrols in crime-ridden areas or parking in front of known drug dealers' homes instead of riding up and down the road looking for people who are driving faster than an arbitrarily-set speed.

The downside of having no patrols on the road is that if someone has a breakdown, emergency, or accident, there's no cops around for quite a while.  If the OHP (you're missing the point of HIGHWAY PATROL) is in front of drug houses, that would mean they're assigned to that area and can't readily leave, or have easy access back to the highway.


hbelkins

Quote from: jeffandnicole on February 21, 2017, 08:20:55 AM
The downside of having no patrols on the road is that if someone has a breakdown, emergency, or accident, there's no cops around for quite a while.

That's what the cell phone is for. I'd say most situations like these are not just discovered by cops out on patrol. Instead, they're notified by callers.

QuoteIf the OHP (you're missing the point of HIGHWAY PATROL) is in front of drug houses, that would mean they're assigned to that area and can't readily leave, or have easy access back to the highway.

Highway Patrol/State Police is mostly a matter of semantics. They typically serve the same function no matter what they're called. In Kentucky they're called state police.


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

texaskdog

Quote from: Brian556 on February 21, 2017, 12:35:46 AM
Oklahoma does decommission pretty much all former alignments, but Texas leaves them on the state highway system.

It is interesting how Oklahoma has the gridded county roads, but here in North Texas, county roads are random and far between

I meant like US 77 has to be within a mile of I-35 is the law

kphoger

Quote from: texaskdog on February 21, 2017, 08:58:55 AM
Quote from: Brian556 on February 21, 2017, 12:35:46 AM
Oklahoma does decommission pretty much all former alignments, but Texas leaves them on the state highway system.

It is interesting how Oklahoma has the gridded county roads, but here in North Texas, county roads are random and far between

I meant like US 77 has to be within a mile of I-35 is the law

Say what??

US-77 is not within a mile of I-35 for most of its path through Oklahoma.  What law are you talking about?
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

texaskdog

I believe when the Interstate system started Oklahoma passed a law that it had to run within a mile of the US highway so the businesses wouldn't suffer.  Perhaps others know more about it than I do.

jeffandnicole

Quote from: hbelkins on February 21, 2017, 08:54:55 AM
Quote from: jeffandnicole on February 21, 2017, 08:20:55 AM
The downside of having no patrols on the road is that if someone has a breakdown, emergency, or accident, there's no cops around for quite a while.

That's what the cell phone is for. I'd say most situations like these are not just discovered by cops out on patrol. Instead, they're notified by callers.

And is the State Police going to call the accident victims and conduct their investigation over the phone?  No...they still need to respond, which is why they should still out there somewhere.

kphoger

Quote from: texaskdog on February 21, 2017, 10:09:07 AM
I believe when the Interstate system started Oklahoma passed a law that it had to run within a mile of the US highway so the businesses wouldn't suffer.  Perhaps others know more about it than I do.

The physical reality is that they are not typically within a mile of each other.  As you can see in the list below, the majority of towns along US-77/US-177 were bypassed by more than a mile.

Braman - bypassed by ¾ mile
Blackwell - bypassed by 3 miles
Tonkawa - bypassed by 3 miles
Perry - bypassed by 2 miles
Orlando - bypassed by 5 miles
Mulhall - bypassed by 4 miles
Guthrie - bypassed by 1½ miles
Edmond - bypassed by 3 miles
Norman - bypassed by 2 miles
Noble - completely severed
Purcell - still close to I-35, with a good business loop
Wayne - bypassed by 2 miles
Paoli - bypassed by 2½ miles
Pauls Valley - bypassed by 2½ miles
Wynnewood - bypassed by 3 miles
Davis - bypassed by 3 miles
Springer - bypassed by 1½ miles
Ardmore - bypassed by 1 miles
Marietta - bypassed by ½ mile
Thackerville - bypassed by ½ mile

In contrast, I-35 in Texas goes within a mile of the center of most towns it passes through–Denton and Hillsboro being notable exceptions.  Unlike most of the country, Texas viewed the construction of Interstates not merely as a means of getting Joe Traveler from A to Z, but also as a means of getting Joe Farmer from E to F to G to H along the way.  So, in contrast to Oklahoma, there are usually frontage roads with frequent interchanges, and the path usually goes closer to town.  So there is less need to keep both highways on the books, whereas towns in Oklahoma are less well-served by the nearby Interstate, so it makes more sense to keep the routes between them on the books.
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

Bobby5280

Quote from: Scott5114It's a little murky (because what isn't with regard to tribal law), but I don't believe tribal police have jurisdiction to write speeding tickets on state highways. In order for tribal governments to have any authority they have to have what's called "consent to jurisdiction". This is usually because 1) you are a member of the tribe 2) you are on tribal land (e.g., you are in a tribally-owned business) 3) you have consented some other way, such as by filing suit in tribal court, being employed by the tribe, etc.

What ever the case may be, tribal police will ticket you on that part of OK-49 if they get a chance. I think that bit of road qualifies as a speed trap.

texaskdog

Quote from: kphoger on February 21, 2017, 10:50:05 AM
Quote from: texaskdog on February 21, 2017, 10:09:07 AM
I believe when the Interstate system started Oklahoma passed a law that it had to run within a mile of the US highway so the businesses wouldn't suffer.  Perhaps others know more about it than I do.

The physical reality is that they are not typically within a mile of each other.  As you can see in the list below, the majority of towns along US-77/US-177 were bypassed by more than a mile.

Braman - bypassed by ¾ mile
Blackwell - bypassed by 3 miles
Tonkawa - bypassed by 3 miles
Perry - bypassed by 2 miles
Orlando - bypassed by 5 miles
Mulhall - bypassed by 4 miles
Guthrie - bypassed by 1½ miles
Edmond - bypassed by 3 miles
Norman - bypassed by 2 miles
Noble - completely severed
Purcell - still close to I-35, with a good business loop
Wayne - bypassed by 2 miles
Paoli - bypassed by 2½ miles
Pauls Valley - bypassed by 2½ miles
Wynnewood - bypassed by 3 miles
Davis - bypassed by 3 miles
Springer - bypassed by 1½ miles
Ardmore - bypassed by 1 miles
Marietta - bypassed by ½ mile
Thackerville - bypassed by ½ mile

In contrast, I-35 in Texas goes within a mile of the center of most towns it passes through—Denton and Hillsboro being notable exceptions.  Unlike most of the country, Texas viewed the construction of Interstates not merely as a means of getting Joe Traveler from A to Z, but also as a means of getting Joe Farmer from E to F to G to H along the way.  So, in contrast to Oklahoma, there are usually frontage roads with frequent interchanges, and the path usually goes closer to town.  So there is less need to keep both highways on the books, whereas towns in Oklahoma are less well-served by the nearby Interstate, so it makes more sense to keep the routes between them on the books.

Okay you are arguing semantics instead of my point.  US 81 was decommissioned in most of Texas.  US 77 lives on and I-35 was built to hug US 77. 

kphoger

Quote from: texaskdog on February 21, 2017, 01:30:36 PM
Quote from: kphoger on February 21, 2017, 10:50:05 AM
Quote from: texaskdog on February 21, 2017, 10:09:07 AM
I believe when the Interstate system started Oklahoma passed a law that it had to run within a mile of the US highway so the businesses wouldn't suffer.  Perhaps others know more about it than I do.

The physical reality is that they are not typically within a mile of each other.  As you can see in the list below, the majority of towns along US-77/US-177 were bypassed by more than a mile.

[...list...]

In contrast, I-35 in Texas goes within a mile of the center of most towns it passes through–Denton and Hillsboro being notable exceptions.  Unlike most of the country, Texas viewed the construction of Interstates not merely as a means of getting Joe Traveler from A to Z, but also as a means of getting Joe Farmer from E to F to G to H along the way.  So, in contrast to Oklahoma, there are usually frontage roads with frequent interchanges, and the path usually goes closer to town.  So there is less need to keep both highways on the books, whereas towns in Oklahoma are less well-served by the nearby Interstate, so it makes more sense to keep the routes between them on the books.

Okay you are arguing semantics instead of my point.  US 81 was decommissioned in most of Texas.  US 77 lives on and I-35 was built to hug US 77. 

No, I'm arguing that...

<1> the phrase "has to be within a mile of I-35 is the law" is nonsense, which should be obvious by just looking at a map;

<2> I-35, not going through or very near most towns in Okla., did not truly replace US-77, so US-77 deserves to remain a state highway; and

<3> I-35 did truly replace US-81 in Texas by virtue of going through or very near most towns, so US-81's decommissioning was reasonable.
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

texaskdog

Okay well I didn't make it up!  And you do see that the Interstate does hug the us highway. 

kphoger

Quote from: texaskdog on February 21, 2017, 02:51:09 PM
Okay well I didn't make it up! [citation needed] And you do see that the Interstate does hug [vague] the us highway. 

My point, in fact, was that I do not see it hug the US highway.  Not any more than I-70 "hugs" US-40 through Illinois or Ohio, not any more than I-80 "hugs" US-30 through Nebraska, not any more than I-79 "hugs" US-19 through Pennsylvania, no more than I-87 "hugs" US-6 through New York, etc...
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

hotdogPi

Quote from: kphoger on February 21, 2017, 03:43:16 PM
Quote from: texaskdog on February 21, 2017, 02:51:09 PM
Okay well I didn't make it up! [citation needed] And you do see that the Interstate does hug [vague] the us highway. 

My point, in fact, was that I do not see it hug the US highway.  Not any more than I-70 "hugs" US-40 through Illinois or Ohio, not any more than I-80 "hugs" US-30 through Nebraska, not any more than I-79 "hugs" US-19 through Pennsylvania, no more than I-87 "hugs" US-6 through New York, etc...

(edited)
Do you consider I-91 and US 5 to "hug"?

Also, you meant US 9, not US 6.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 44, 50
MA 22, 40, 107, 109, 117, 119, 126, 141, 159
NH 27, 111A(E); CA 133; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

kphoger

My working definition of "hugging" in this discussion is that the Interstate runs close enough to the towns that traffic going between said towns no longer has much use for the US Highway anymore.  I'd say that is the case with US-81 in Texas (decommissioned) but not in the examples I cited–or at least most of them.  The US Highways still serve as important links between the towns they go through.
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

Bobby5280

I just saw a notice that the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority will raise tolls roughly 12% to help pay for the $939 million Driving Forward program of turnpike improvements.

kphoger

Quote from: 1 on February 21, 2017, 03:49:55 PM
(edited)
Do you consider I-91 and US 5 to "hug"?

Also, you meant US 9, not US 6.

In New Hampshire and Massachusetts at least, yes. Connecticut, I could go either way. So yes, I think it would be reasonable to wonder why US-5 is still commissioned through there.

Wow, how did I put 6 instead of 9? They don't even run the same direction!
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.