Regional Boards > Southeast

North Carolina - Lighting at interchanges

(1/4) > >>

tolbs17:
Should all of I-87, and I-587 get lighting along the highway and at interchanges?

I would say these would all be the most useful spots.

https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6093951,-77.4391524,15z

https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6186056,-77.6112,15z

https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6778208,-77.854015,15z

This junction really needs it!
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6787446,-77.9613034,14z

Here!
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.715022,-78.0020964,15z

Both these interchanges..
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.7473335,-78.0242836,14z

Here would be nice. I wish this interchange got upgraded to something like this though.
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.8354838,-78.3091518,15z

Make the interchange of US64/US264 look like this (without the flyover) and traffic would be better I'm sure to prevent weaving.
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.7539661,-78.5970587,15z

You can post more than just I-87 and I-587!

Which interchanges should get lighting at what highways?

goobnav:
Why?  I-40 SE of the Triangle doesn't have it, except for the I-95 interchange.  87 east of Zebulon is rural except for Rocky Mount and Tarboro and what will be 587 is rural until Wilson. 

tolbs17:
To prevent accidents and people wouldn't forget where to turn. I'm sure that part will get lighting once I-40 to I-95 is widened.

I say towns with a population of 5k and where the interchanges go to should have lighting. We live in a town where there's no lighting and our highways are very dark.

tolbs17:
Telling you man, when they make I-587 it will be so goddamn dark. Even New Jersey has brighter highways.

I-87 too as well as the Knightdale bypass.

1995hoo:
If anything, the trend is towards less light pollution, not more.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version