New rules to ensure post quality. See this thread for details.
Lake effect bands are often quite specific about where they hit. Nothing unusual about that.
Wacky? Um, there this thing called winter with lake-effect snow bands, happens every year. Maybe you've heard of it?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake-effect_snow
Unlike other recent weather threads, this is not to be strictly snow- or winter-related.
Thundersnow, anyone? That is pretty rare.
Quote from: vdeane on December 28, 2017, 01:22:52 PMLake effect bands are often quite specific about where they hit. Nothing unusual about that.Of course. However, I have never seen that dramatic a difference between two places I frequent. So this is the first time I can offer anecdotal evidence to prove your statement true.In my experience, Lake Erie is the most famous of the Great Lakes for producing narrow, intense bands. Lake Ontario snows tend to be more widespread, with more gradual changes in intensity and total accumulation. I find it is rare that only portions of the Rochester area get snow. Total accumulation may differ by an inch or two, but if it's snowing, it will almost always be area-wide. Buffalo, on the other hand, is famous for getting feet of snow in the Southtowns and no accumulation north of the city. Of course, I have no statistics to back this theory up, but I intend to stand by it anyways.
Quote from: Hurricane Rex on December 29, 2017, 04:08:01 AMThundersnow, anyone? That is pretty rare.Now that is an event. It's enough to make Cantore go nuts.