News:

The AARoads Wiki is live! Come check it out!

Main Menu

North Carolina

Started by FLRoads, January 20, 2009, 11:55:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

WashuOtaku

Quote from: ARMOURERERIC on May 14, 2018, 08:32:16 PM
I have heard that the 485  rebuild will have median HOT lanes.

Yep, the lanes already exist between I-77 and Johnston Road now, just not used yet for anything.  The plans will be to have toll lanes from I-77 to US 74 (southeast section) and build the Weddington Road exit.  The tolls will be operated by NCDOT, so no controversy.


LM117

“I don’t know whether to wind my ass or scratch my watch!” - Jim Cornette

fillup420

Quote from: WashuOtaku on May 15, 2018, 07:55:06 AM
Quote from: ARMOURERERIC on May 14, 2018, 08:32:16 PM
I have heard that the 485  rebuild will have median HOT lanes.

Yep, the lanes already exist between I-77 and Johnston Road now, just not used yet for anything.  The plans will be to have toll lanes from I-77 to US 74 (southeast section) and build the Weddington Road exit.  The tolls will be operated by NCDOT, so no controversy.

What that section really needs is 3 lanes on the outer side between US 521 and US 74. The lane drop at Rea Rd creates backups all the time due to the entrance ramp from 521 merging into the lane that ends a mile ahead, causing most cars to have to cut across 2 lanes. I was just in traffic there yesterday and it could easily be solved by extending the 3rd lane past the Rea Rd exit.

https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0649823,-80.8391473,3a,98.8y,83.2h,78.74t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1svnGporsfGm_EJUa2XUo_bA!2e0

The ending lane you see on the right is from the 521 entrance ramp, and you can see the sign for Rea Rd as "Exit Only". It makes no sense why they would design it like that. 

LM117

NCDOT has selected a preferred alternative for the US-158 widening project between US-421/Business 40 in Winston-Salem and I-73/US-220 just north of Summerfield.

https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/details.aspx?r=15228
“I don’t know whether to wind my ass or scratch my watch!” - Jim Cornette

LM117

#1904
NCDOT will soon be taking public comments in preparation for the upcoming draft 2020-2029 STIP. Comment period is from June 4-July 9.

https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/details.aspx?r=15242

EDIT: Interactive map can be found here: https://www.ncdot.gov/strategictransportationinvestments/2020-2029.html
“I don’t know whether to wind my ass or scratch my watch!” - Jim Cornette

LM117

A public meeting is being held on June 5 in Barco to discuss widening US-158 between NC-34 in Camden County and NC-168 in Currituck County.

https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/details.aspx?r=15249
“I don’t know whether to wind my ass or scratch my watch!” - Jim Cornette

WashuOtaku

AASHTO approved three items this week submitted by NCDOT.

  • Extension of I-140 (Brunswick County)
  • Establishment of I-285 (Lexington-Winston-Salem)
  • Elimination of US 311 (Randleman-Winston-Salem)

Here is the paperwork: https://route.transportation.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/05/004_USRN_Part-3-NC-OK.pdf

My thoughts... US 311 is shown longer in Randolph County than it actually is, currently it is concurrent with I-74 till exit 84, not exit 79. What remains of US 311 should probably become a state highway as well.  It's interesting how the AASHTO committee was concern if US 52 will be abandoned or concurrent; I'm guessing it will be together since it didn't mention moving US 52 anywhere.  Why didn't they request I-140 extended east of I-40 as well?

LM117

Quote from: WashuOtaku on May 25, 2018, 05:06:38 PMIt's interesting how the AASHTO committee was concern if US 52 will be abandoned or concurrent; I'm guessing it will be together since it didn't mention moving US 52 anywhere.

Probably. I'm surprised there was even an application for I-285 at all since FHWA had already signed off on it back in February. NCDOT got FHWA approval to sign the Knightdale Bypass as I-87 and did so, yet they never submitted an application to AASHTO for it.

QuoteWhy didn't they request I-140 extended east of I-40 as well?

Yeah, that doesn't make sense to leave out that short stretch. The only explanation I can think of is perhaps they want I-140 to follow the future Hampstead Bypass. :hmm:
“I don’t know whether to wind my ass or scratch my watch!” - Jim Cornette

Takumi

Now combining US 360 and US 311 makes even more sense.
Quote from: Rothman on July 15, 2021, 07:52:59 AM
Olive Garden must be stopped.  I must stop them.

Don't @ me. Seriously.

WashuOtaku

Quote from: Takumi on May 25, 2018, 09:55:01 PM
Now combining US 360 and US 311 makes even more sense.

I believe Virginia needs to make the move on that, and that state doesn't care much for highway numbers.

Mapmikey

Quote from: WashuOtaku on May 25, 2018, 09:59:45 PM
Quote from: Takumi on May 25, 2018, 09:55:01 PM
Now combining US 360 and US 311 makes even more sense.

I believe Virginia needs to make the move on that, and that state doesn't care much for highway numbers.

Not sure why Virginia would care.  They would do so if North Carolina requested it which is how we got US 311 back into Virginia in the first place...

http://www.ctb.virginia.gov/resources/2012/july/pres/Resolution_Agenda_Item_4_rte311_transfer_CTBresolution_July18_12rev.pdf


LM117

A neighborhood in Surf City is charging a $5 toll on Cedar Avenue...

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/nation-world/national/article212029334.html
“I don’t know whether to wind my ass or scratch my watch!” - Jim Cornette

plain

Newark born, Richmond bred

The Ghostbuster

Would any other posters like to toll other drivers on the streets they reside on, in order to keep them away?

MNHighwayMan

No, because my residence is on a public street. Perhaps you missed the part in the article where they mention Cedar Ave is a private street, and as such they're more than welcome to charge what they please for other people to use it.

index

[tweet]1001645422744690688[/tweet]


Mudslides are currently affecting I-40.
I love my 2010 Ford Explorer.



Counties traveled

ccurley100


ccurley100


Mppheel

The last few times I drove from Greenville to Raleigh on US 264 / I-587 I noticed the beautiful wooded median full of trees between Wilson and Zebulon is being cleared.  Does anyone know what they are doing, and to what extent they will clear it?  That, to me, was one of the prettiest stretches of highway around.  You don't see many medians that wide anymore

LM117

Quote from: Mppheel on June 04, 2018, 10:41:03 PM
The last few times I drove from Greenville to Raleigh on US 264 / I-587 I noticed the beautiful wooded median full of trees between Wilson and Zebulon is being cleared.  Does anyone know what they are doing, and to what extent they will clear it?  That, to me, was one of the prettiest stretches of highway around.  You don't see many medians that wide anymore

I looked on NCDOT's progress report page for Wilson and Nash counties and I didn't see anything related to US-264. I would say that they're preparing for roadwork, but none of the I-587 corridor was included in the 2018-2027 STIP, so I'm not sure what the deal is. :hmm:
“I don’t know whether to wind my ass or scratch my watch!” - Jim Cornette

VTGoose

Quote from: Mppheel on June 04, 2018, 10:41:03 PM
The last few times I drove from Greenville to Raleigh on US 264 / I-587 I noticed the beautiful wooded median full of trees between Wilson and Zebulon is being cleared.  Does anyone know what they are doing, and to what extent they will clear it?  That, to me, was one of the prettiest stretches of highway around.  You don't see many medians that wide anymore

The same thing is happening on I-95 in South Carolina -- large swaths of trees are being clear-cut from the median. When questioned elsewhere here, someone said it is a federal mandate that medians be cleared in the name of "safety" (although it doesn't make sense to remove beneficial trees around highways).
"Get in the fast lane, grandma!  The bingo game is ready to roll!"

Beltway

Quote from: VTGoose on June 05, 2018, 08:47:00 AM
Quote from: Mppheel on June 04, 2018, 10:41:03 PM
The last few times I drove from Greenville to Raleigh on US 264 / I-587 I noticed the beautiful wooded median full of trees between Wilson and Zebulon is being cleared.  Does anyone know what they are doing, and to what extent they will clear it?  That, to me, was one of the prettiest stretches of highway around.  You don't see many medians that wide anymore
The same thing is happening on I-95 in South Carolina -- large swaths of trees are being clear-cut from the median. When questioned elsewhere here, someone said it is a federal mandate that medians be cleared in the name of "safety" (although it doesn't make sense to remove beneficial trees around highways).

After a few decades of growth trees can encroach too close to the roadways, and it is appropriate to do some tree removal to restore about 20 to 25 feet of clear roadside.  But I can't see clearing the whole median unless it is narrow enough to interfere with the distances above.

How wide are these medians?  Up to about 60 or 70 feet it may be justified to have no trees.  Medians 100 feet or wider should be able to accomodate trees in the middle.
http://www.roadstothefuture.com
http://www.capital-beltway.com

Baloney is a reserved word on the Internet
    (Robert Coté, 2002)

LM117

Quote from: Beltway on June 05, 2018, 10:13:33 AM
Quote from: VTGoose on June 05, 2018, 08:47:00 AM
Quote from: Mppheel on June 04, 2018, 10:41:03 PM
The last few times I drove from Greenville to Raleigh on US 264 / I-587 I noticed the beautiful wooded median full of trees between Wilson and Zebulon is being cleared.  Does anyone know what they are doing, and to what extent they will clear it?  That, to me, was one of the prettiest stretches of highway around.  You don't see many medians that wide anymore
The same thing is happening on I-95 in South Carolina -- large swaths of trees are being clear-cut from the median. When questioned elsewhere here, someone said it is a federal mandate that medians be cleared in the name of "safety" (although it doesn't make sense to remove beneficial trees around highways).

After a few decades of growth trees can encroach too close to the roadways, and it is appropriate to do some tree removal to restore about 20 to 25 feet of clear roadside.  But I can't see clearing the whole median unless it is narrow enough to interfere with the distances above.

How wide are these medians?  Up to about 60 or 70 feet it may be justified to have no trees.  Medians 100 feet or wider should be able to accomodate trees in the middle.

There's a really wide stretch of median on US-264 just east of Middlesex.

https://goo.gl/maps/NDDU3e6EhkK2
“I don’t know whether to wind my ass or scratch my watch!” - Jim Cornette

Beltway

Quote from: LM117 on June 05, 2018, 11:19:05 AM
Quote from: Beltway on June 05, 2018, 10:13:33 AM
After a few decades of growth trees can encroach too close to the roadways, and it is appropriate to do some tree removal to restore about 20 to 25 feet of clear roadside.  But I can't see clearing the whole median unless it is narrow enough to interfere with the distances above.
How wide are these medians?  Up to about 60 or 70 feet it may be justified to have no trees.  Medians 100 feet or wider should be able to accomodate trees in the middle.
There's a really wide stretch of median on US-264 just east of Middlesex.
https://goo.gl/maps/NDDU3e6EhkK2

Over 500 feet wide.  Are they clearing out the trees there?
One half mile west of there the median is about 60 feet wide and has no trees.
Where are they clearing out all the trees?
http://www.roadstothefuture.com
http://www.capital-beltway.com

Baloney is a reserved word on the Internet
    (Robert Coté, 2002)

wdcrft63

As the widening of I-85 in Rowan and Cabarrus Counties nears completion, NCDOT has opened the new overpass carrying Centergrove Road over the expressway.
https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/details.aspx?r=15302



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.