We're spending a frigid holiday in St. Petersburg (but warmer than the mountains of Virginia). On this and other visits, I've noticed that many of the major surface streets have broad rights of way and have 6 or 8 lanes in places. How and when did the planning occur to allow all this room in the major urban area of Tampa Bay?
I've got a couple guesses, but I think they apply more to the rapidly-growing areas in the outlying areas of Citrus/Hernando/Pasco Counties than Tampa Bay/Pinellas County:
- The major corridors may have gotten wide ROW (100+ ft) at the time they were designated, allowing for future growth.
- As developments are plotted out and built, could counties have required a certain setback easement to allow for future growth of the main road?
What's the point of decommissioning state routes into county routes if they keep their number and still fit into the overall grid system?
State doesn't want to/can't afford to maintain the route anymore, but locals know it by a certain number so it's not worth it to the Counties to change it
Why does FL 528 say you need E-Pass rather than SunPass? They're interoperable now; just switch the signs over.
E-Pass roads and SunPass roads are owned and maintained by different entities - Central Florida Expressway (CFX) maintains E-Pass roads like SR 528 and others in the area like 429, 408, parts of 417, etc. SunPass roads are maintained by the Turnpike authority, a subset of FDOT. The transponders are interoperable, but I think the different agencies mean the interoperability could theoretically go away at some point. It won't, but it could.
Wasn't the longest gap (excluding rest areas) on a freeway in the United States supposed to be on one side of Yeehaw Junction and be 4 miles shorter if you had a SunPass? That exit didn't appear to be SunPass-only.
I think there was a brief time before pay-by-plate was possible on the Turnpike. That went away with the pandemic when they removed cash transactions.
The northern end of I-589 (sic, lol) was fairly empty. Does it really need an extension due north?
No. Unless it's extended far enough to actually provide relief for I-75. But for that to happen it would also need a better connection to I-75 near the south end, and at some point it just doesn't become worth it.