News:

The AARoads Wiki is live! Come check it out!

Main Menu

Highway Oddities

Started by Voyager, January 20, 2009, 02:01:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Voyager

Other than Interstate 238, which other highways have oddities in them, or are oddities in themselves?

Interstate 84 in Oregon and Connecticut is one example.
Back From The Dead | AARoads Forum Original


agentsteel53

why is 84 an oddity? because it appears twice?  or because Conn I-84 in the western half of the state goes back to 1952 and is comically substandard?
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Voyager

Just because they have the same number and they were never connected. Like the two interstate 76's. Interstate 99 is a good example.
Back From The Dead | AARoads Forum Original

Darkchylde

I-95 strikes me as a better example of that sort of oddity... here it is, 2009, and its two parts are still unconnected through Jersey.

Alex



This doesn't happen too often, where a road changes numbers without intersecting anything.

agentsteel53

similarly, I-290 changes to I-395 at the Mass Pike, but without intersecting it.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

FLRoads

Here is another highway oddity:


Shield assembly showing Florida 85 co-signed with Alabama 55 in Florala, Alabama

More on this odd find here.

Voyager

#7


Not only do they contradict each other, but they're both going south here.
Back From The Dead | AARoads Forum Original

agentsteel53

Quote from: voyager on January 20, 2009, 02:43:57 AM
[80/580]

*shudder*

There have been times where I've had to stop at the on-ramps and consult the map because I could not, for the life of me, remember which way was "south".
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Chris

Quote from: Darkangel on January 20, 2009, 02:36:38 AM
I-95 strikes me as a better example of that sort of oddity... here it is, 2009, and its two parts are still unconnected through Jersey.

I've read they want to construct an interchange with the I-276 Pennsylvania Turnpike and divert the I-95 south of Trenton to the NJ Turnpike. I wonder which number the existing part west and north of Trenton would get.

Scott5114

Don't forget the OK 20/AR 43 (mis-signed as MO 43) oddity.

As for layout oddities, I present US 77 in Ardmore, OK, aka Commerce Street. Four lane divided street with service roads and on and off ramps. Yes, you heard that correctly.



Arrows show the preferred method of making turns onto the cross street for northbound traffic and turns onto Commerce for westbound traffic on the cross street.

Here's a Google Street View shot of how it looks from the ground. I need to get a better shot of it, but my camera is lost...maybe next time I go down there.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

Voyager

Back From The Dead | AARoads Forum Original

agentsteel53

that 11 green sign is long gone, right?
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Voyager

Nope, last I heard it was still there.
Back From The Dead | AARoads Forum Original

akotchi



I've read they want to construct an interchange with the I-276 Pennsylvania Turnpike and divert the I-95 south of Trenton to the NJ Turnpike. I wonder which number the existing part west and north of Trenton would get.
[/quote]
At first, it was supposed to be an extension of I-295 from its current end at U.S. 1.  The latest is that it would be an extension of I-195 from the existing I-195/I-295 interchange, overtaking the northerly 8 miles of I-295.

Personally, considering the cardinal direction changes and the similarity between "295" and "to 95" that the Trenton Loop has experienced in the last 20-odd years, it should be given its own number (such as 895) rather than an extension of an existing number.
Opinions here attributed to me are mine alone and do not reflect those of my employer or the agencies for which I am contracted to do work.

Alex

Well all states want to do is extend existing numbers rather than make new ones, so I see Interstate 195 being extended.  :-/

agentsteel53

really?  at what cross street?
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

deathtopumpkins

Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 20, 2009, 11:11:30 PM
really?  at what cross street?

You're referring to the road I mentioned, correct?
Disclaimer: All posts represent my personal opinions and not those of my employer.

Clinched Highways | Counties Visited

agentsteel53

no, I refer to this photo:



the title of the image is Anaheim Street at 110, and I looked there about two years ago and found nothing.  But this is Joel we're talking about, so he may very well have biffed the cross street.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Alex

Most of Joel's images (and webpages) are severely outdated, so expect all of those errors to have long since been corrected. He was going to start http://www.goldenstatehwys.net/ in more recent times, but as you can see by clicking, it still states opening soon (been that way since 2006!)

agentsteel53

sweet technological Jesus, what font is he using??
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

deathtopumpkins

I got a weird highway oddity. None of the 3dis of I-78 east of NYC actually interchange with I-78 itself. The closest any of them come is I-478, whose terminus, the Brooklyn-battery tunnel is just a little way down NY-9A from I-78's terminus, the Holland Tunnel. But they never actually meet. I wonder who's genuis idea it was to do that...
Disclaimer: All posts represent my personal opinions and not those of my employer.

Clinched Highways | Counties Visited

agentsteel53

was 78 supposed to be extended?  495 was supposed to go under Manhattan.  Here is an optimistic trailblazer on the west side of the island!

live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Chris

Well, they don't have an I-478 for nothing. I believe it was supposed to run all the way on Long Island.

ComputerGuy

WA-100 ends at itself, about 2 miles south of its western terminus! It is also the only highway in Washington not to use a cardinal direction (north, south, east, west), but uses the direction "LOOP".



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.