AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered at https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=33904.0
Corrected several already and appreciate your patience as we work through the rest.

Author Topic: I-69 in TN  (Read 301228 times)

sprjus4

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 8829
  • Location: Hampton Roads, VA
  • Last Login: Today at 12:54:52 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1000 on: February 21, 2024, 10:45:32 PM »

https://www.wbbjtv.com/2024/02/21/state-route-690-opens-for-travelers-in-obion-county/

From the pictures in this article, it looks like there’s no exit numbers.
Logged

rickmastfan67

  • The Invisible One
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3222
  • I want I-67 in PA!!!!

  • Age: 39
  • Location: Pittsburgh, Pa, USA
  • Last Login: March 16, 2024, 01:05:30 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1001 on: February 22, 2024, 01:09:58 AM »

OpenStreetMap and Wikipedia both have the exits numbered as 141 - 148. That's 7 miles. However if you measure the bypass on Google Earth it's over 10 miles and maybe closer to 11 miles with all the curves.



OSM got the numbers from Wikipedia as far as I know.  Not sure who added them to OSM however, as I haven't checked the history of those nodes.

https://www.wbbjtv.com/2024/02/21/state-route-690-opens-for-travelers-in-obion-county/

From the pictures in this article, it looks like there’s no exit numbers.

Anyways, based on this post, I've quickly gone ahead and removed the numbers from OSM.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2024, 01:17:19 AM by rickmastfan67 »
Logged

Rick Powell

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 815
  • Last Login: Today at 12:09:38 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1002 on: February 23, 2024, 09:24:35 AM »

Look at the Shelby Bypass in North Carolina, I’d rather have part of it be built first just to get it laid out. Complete it as money allows. It doesn’t have to function as the mainline I-69 or US-51 immediately if it causes a backtrack.

FYI here is the Troy Bypass budget item in the state TIP, see p. 81

https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/tdot/programdevelopment/2023-2026-stip-draft/Tennessee%20STIP%202023-2026%20Final_R%205-19-23.pdf
Logged

ITB

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 778
  • Location: Indiana
  • Last Login: Today at 01:21:01 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1003 on: February 23, 2024, 10:08:59 PM »


FYI here is the Troy Bypass budget item in the state TIP, see p. 81

https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/tdot/programdevelopment/2023-2026-stip-draft/Tennessee%20STIP%202023-2026%20Final_R%205-19-23.pdf

It's a welcome development to see the first phase of the Troy bypass in the State TIP. According to the document, the 90M project is fully funded and budgeted for FY25. If this is accurate and up to date, it leads me to assume the contract will be let either late this year or early next, with construction to commence soon thereafter. Maybe I'm missing something, but is that how others see it as well?
Logged

ITB

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 778
  • Location: Indiana
  • Last Login: Today at 01:21:01 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1004 on: February 23, 2024, 11:49:26 PM »


^^^^^

Well, in regards to the above, I did miss something. For some reason, I thought the TIP document reflected actual budgeted funding, when, in actuality, it only identified probable projected funding. This is made clear in the Proposed FY 2024-2026 Comprehensive Multimodal Program, submitted to the 113th Tennessee General Assembly, April 6, 2023, which does not include the first phase of the Troy bypass among the funded projects.

Now I know most of you who follow I-69 in Tennessee were already aware of this, and, on reflection, I did too. But seeing that FY25 in the TIP document made me reconsider, but wrongly. Yes, the project is construction ready, but, obviously, it's not a priority or it would be funded. I guess it's possible the project will pop up on the funded list sometime in the next few years, particularly if additional funds become available. More likely, however, it'll probably only move forward after the north Obion County segment has been funded.

Logged

Rick Powell

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 815
  • Last Login: Today at 12:09:38 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1005 on: February 24, 2024, 12:32:22 AM »

I guess it's possible the project will pop up on the funded list sometime in the next few years, particularly if additional funds become available. More likely, however, it'll probably only move forward after the north Obion County segment has been funded.

https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/tdot/build-with-us/Updated%2010-Year%20Project%20Plan_21.pdf

Here's an interesting item I have commented on before. The above is TN's first-ever 10-year plan, released last December after the STIP had been released earlier last year. It includes $127.7M for I-69 in Obion County, and infers that it's for the state line interchange. However, the earlier STIP says the interchange will come in at $60M. And I'm sure KY will contribute since a good chunk of the project is on their side of the state line (or maybe the $60M is just TDOT's portion). That leaves $67M, more or less, for I-69 and maybe some work on the Troy bypass, if the money is not diverted to something else. If we were insiders at TDOT, we'd know more about the internal advancement of the Troy bypass...you couldn't think about construction in FY25 without some good progress on design plans and land acquisition.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2024, 12:35:31 AM by Rick Powell »
Logged

GreenLanternCorps

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 521
  • What's behind me, is not important!

  • Age: 57
  • Location: Ohio
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 08:36:33 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1006 on: February 26, 2024, 01:18:30 PM »

As of this morning Google maps has added the TN 690 Union City bypass, but has it signed as I-69.

https://www.google.com/maps/@36.4477828,-89.0534829,11z
Logged

edwaleni

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1988
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 11:22:34 PM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1007 on: February 26, 2024, 01:29:22 PM »

As of this morning Google maps has added the TN 690 Union City bypass, but has it signed as I-69.

https://www.google.com/maps/@36.4477828,-89.0534829,11z

But they still show the southbound exit ramp to US45W as closed until June of 2024. Perhaps this is the "sinker" someone noted earlier.
Logged

jlam

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 2040
  • Lowest untraveled route number: 97

  • Age: 16
  • Location: Weld County, CO
  • Last Login: Today at 01:15:23 AM
    • All important highways in US (WIP)
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1008 on: February 26, 2024, 01:30:17 PM »

As of this morning Google maps has added the TN 690 Union City bypass, but has it signed as I-69.

That's Google Maps for you. This isn't even the only future segment of I-69 erroneously signed as such. I-69 in Indiana is marked up to I-465 along surface streets on Google Maps. Good luck getting Google to listen to a report.

ilpt4u

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3262
  • Location: Southern IL
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 10:54:22 PM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1009 on: February 26, 2024, 09:47:44 PM »

As of this morning Google maps has added the TN 690 Union City bypass, but has it signed as I-69.

https://www.google.com/maps/@36.4477828,-89.0534829,11z
Shielded as I-69, but in text over the freeway: “Tennessee State Rte 690”

Very similar to how Google Maps took a long time to give IL 390 a Shield (literally years), but had the text-based name of “IL 390 Tollway” along the route for quite a while. That is a bit of that route’s history, since before ISTHA took over the roadway from IDOT, the route was unnumbered and known merely as the “Elgin-O’Hare Expressway”
Logged

The Ghostbuster

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4948
  • Age: 39
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 11:02:06 PM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1010 on: February 26, 2024, 10:40:25 PM »

I can't wait for Google Maps Street View to be updated so we all can travel the Interstate 69 Union City Bypass without having to get off our computers. Also, as I previously mentioned, I hope it doesn't take as long to build the Troy Bypass.
Logged

Great Lakes Roads

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1091
  • Always gotta stop at a Buc-ee's!

  • Age: 24
  • Location: La Porte, IN
  • Last Login: Today at 01:12:12 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1011 on: February 26, 2024, 11:36:35 PM »

I drove on the Union City Bypass yesterday (Sunday, February 25)... a video of me driving both directions will be going up on my YouTube page on February 29th.

Here are my observations:

1. The control cities on SR 690 are Fulton, KY (northbound) and Dyersburg (southbound).
2. The exit ramps to SB US 51 on the north end are currently closed (I don't know why).
3. There are SIX exits for Union City, and the city has a population of ~11k.
4. Let's hope that it doesn't take another 10+ years to build the Troy Bypass.
Logged

GreenLanternCorps

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 521
  • What's behind me, is not important!

  • Age: 57
  • Location: Ohio
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 08:36:33 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1012 on: February 27, 2024, 06:58:35 AM »

I drove on the Union City Bypass yesterday (Sunday, February 25)... a video of me driving both directions will be going up on my YouTube page on February 29th.

Here are my observations:

1. The control cities on SR 690 are Fulton, KY (northbound) and Dyersburg (southbound).
2. The exit ramps to SB US 51 on the north end are currently closed (I don't know why).
3. There are SIX exits for Union City, and the city has a population of ~11k.
4. Let's hope that it doesn't take another 10+ years to build the Troy Bypass.

Looking forward to it, northbound or southbound?

As far as the six exits are concerned, it is what it is.  Adding the ramps during initial construction is probably cheaper than adding them later.
Logged

Great Lakes Roads

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1091
  • Always gotta stop at a Buc-ee's!

  • Age: 24
  • Location: La Porte, IN
  • Last Login: Today at 01:12:12 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1013 on: March 01, 2024, 12:23:00 AM »

Logged

civilengineeringnerd

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 118
  • Location: Huntingdon, Tennessee
  • Last Login: March 09, 2024, 07:27:26 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1014 on: March 01, 2024, 11:15:08 AM »

man the union city bypass looks great.
Logged
Every once in awhile declare peace! it confuses the hell outta your enemies!

Rick Powell

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 815
  • Last Login: Today at 12:09:38 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1015 on: March 01, 2024, 11:36:31 AM »

As far as the six exits are concerned, it is what it is.  Adding the ramps during initial construction is probably cheaper than adding them later.

Watching the videos, it seemed that there were additional exit signs coming up right after passing each exit. About twice the number of exits you'd expect for a town of 11,000 but I'm sure there are other comparables across the US.
Logged

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12911
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 11:08:21 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1016 on: March 02, 2024, 02:49:24 PM »

North(east) of Brevard Rd technically meets FHWA rural spacing criteria of 3 miles, so I'd make the argument that it's more like FOUR interchanges with "town spacing" instead of six.

One comparison: Austin, MN has 7.5 interchanges along I-90, though to be fair Austin is about twice the size of Union City.
Logged

civilengineeringnerd

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 118
  • Location: Huntingdon, Tennessee
  • Last Login: March 09, 2024, 07:27:26 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1017 on: March 04, 2024, 08:08:34 AM »

at the very least, the new freeway would encourage more development in union city tn, with the expectation of the freeway being completed to dyersburg in the future. you'll likely see some additional development, as union city starts to grow into a good size town and a mini regional centre of commerce for northwest tennesse, the missouri bootheel and southeastern missouri, far western kentucky, and northeastern arkansas.
i imagine the city might replace dyersburg in a way, as recent decades since I-155 being built has not been kind to that town.
another thing that could happen is both towns acting as a set of twin cities, union city providing the jobs and tourism, while dyersburg acts like a suburb and regional population centre of commerce.
whatever happens in the coming decades tho, its gonna be great for both towns.
Logged
Every once in awhile declare peace! it confuses the hell outta your enemies!

edwaleni

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1988
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 11:22:34 PM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1018 on: March 04, 2024, 04:07:40 PM »

at the very least, the new freeway would encourage more development in union city tn, with the expectation of the freeway being completed to dyersburg in the future. you'll likely see some additional development, as union city starts to grow into a good size town and a mini regional centre of commerce for northwest tennesse, the missouri bootheel and southeastern missouri, far western kentucky, and northeastern arkansas.
i imagine the city might replace dyersburg in a way, as recent decades since I-155 being built has not been kind to that town.
another thing that could happen is both towns acting as a set of twin cities, union city providing the jobs and tourism, while dyersburg acts like a suburb and regional population centre of commerce.
whatever happens in the coming decades tho, its gonna be great for both towns.

In some TDOT strategic planning document I saw several years ago, there is a plan to connect Union City to Cates Landing Port Facility on the Mississippi by making several improvements to TN-22. At the same time, TNDOT wants to connect the Port of Cates Landing to the national railroad network by building a state owned spur from the port to the TennKenn Railroad to a point near Wright.

« Last Edit: March 05, 2024, 11:00:14 AM by edwaleni »
Logged

civilengineeringnerd

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 118
  • Location: Huntingdon, Tennessee
  • Last Login: March 09, 2024, 07:27:26 AM
Re: I-69 in TN
« Reply #1019 on: March 05, 2024, 12:38:31 AM »

at the very least, the new freeway would encourage more development in union city tn, with the expectation of the freeway being completed to dyersburg in the future. you'll likely see some additional development, as union city starts to grow into a good size town and a mini regional centre of commerce for northwest tennesse, the missouri bootheel and southeastern missouri, far western kentucky, and northeastern arkansas.
i imagine the city might replace dyersburg in a way, as recent decades since I-155 being built has not been kind to that town.
another thing that could happen is both towns acting as a set of twin cities, union city providing the jobs and tourism, while dyersburg acts like a suburb and regional population centre of commerce.
whatever happens in the coming decades tho, its gonna be great for both towns.

In some TDOT strategic planning document I saw several years ago, there is a plan to connect Union City to Cates Landing Port Facility on the Mississippi by making several improvements to TN-21. At the same time, TNDOT wants to connect the Port of Cates Landing to the national railroad network by building a state owned spur from the port to the TennKenn Railroad to a point near Wright.
thats another good way of doing it. the paducah riverport helped that town grow when kentucky built the riverport some time ago, and last i heard some years ago, the riverport was getting some upgrades.
the interstate combined with the cates landing port and the railroad line to the tennkenn railroad is a good way of getting goods over longer distances.
especially if they decide to turn TN-22 into a freeway to huntingdon.
Logged
Every once in awhile declare peace! it confuses the hell outta your enemies!

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.