AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  


New rules to ensure post quality. See this thread for details.

Author Topic: New Hampshire  (Read 103184 times)

Stephane Dumas

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2675
  • Last Login: May 27, 2023, 09:07:12 PM
Re: New Hampshire
« Reply #350 on: May 04, 2023, 06:02:28 PM »

Check out what New Hampshire wanted as part of the 1968 Interstate system extensions. And for their greed, they got nothing

Vermont OTOH was humble and requested no new interstate miles.

H/T: http://www.gribblenation.org/2023/02/1968-federal-highway-act-state.html

Surprising to learn a interstate idea along US-3 up to the Connecticut Lakes and the Quebec border. But still, that corridor might have better worked as an Appalachian corridor and but at West Stewartstown, it should have gone along VT-114 to reach QC-147 or QC-141 to reach Coaticook and Sherbrooke.


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.