News:

Thank you for your patience during the Forum downtime while we upgraded the software. Welcome back and see this thread for some new features and other changes to the forum.

Main Menu

Most Unnecessary Interstate

Started by theroadwayone, October 02, 2017, 01:03:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Alps

In hindsight, I-180 IL, but hindsight is 20/20. In terms of something that was actually unnecessary from the moment it was conceived, I will have to go with I-73.


MCRoads

No one has mentioned I-27 yet... it might not be totally useless as a road, but it could probably be signed as a state route, or, at most, a US route.
I build roads on Minecraft. Like, really good roads.
Interstates traveled:
4/5/10*/11**/12**/15/25*/29*/35(E/W[TX])/40*/44**/49(LA**)/55*/64**/65/66*/70°/71*76(PA*,CO*)/78*°/80*/95°/99(PA**,NY**)

*/** indicates a terminus/termini being traveled
° Indicates a gap (I.E Breezwood, PA.)

more room plz

Henry

Quote from: Alps on October 03, 2017, 08:26:57 AM
In hindsight, I-180 IL, but hindsight is 20/20. In terms of something that was actually unnecessary from the moment it was conceived, I will have to go with I-73.
Along with the extensions of I-69 and I-74.
Go Cubs Go! Go Cubs Go! Hey Chicago, what do you say? The Cubs are gonna win today!

dgolub

I-895 in New York.  They're been talking about demolishing it for this reason.

inkyatari

Quote from: Henry on October 03, 2017, 08:41:52 AM
Quote from: Alps on October 03, 2017, 08:26:57 AM
In hindsight, I-180 IL, but hindsight is 20/20. In terms of something that was actually unnecessary from the moment it was conceived, I will have to go with I-73.
Along with the extensions of I-69 and I-74.

I'll agree on the I-74 extensions, but only everything on I-69 south of Memphis.
I'm never wrong, just wildly inaccurate.

Strider

Quote from: inkyatari on October 03, 2017, 08:54:03 AM
Quote from: Henry on October 03, 2017, 08:41:52 AM
Quote from: Alps on October 03, 2017, 08:26:57 AM
In hindsight, I-180 IL, but hindsight is 20/20. In terms of something that was actually unnecessary from the moment it was conceived, I will have to go with I-73.
Along with the extensions of I-69 and I-74.

I'll agree on the I-74 extensions, but only everything on I-69 south of Memphis.


I also agree on I-74 extension into NC and I-69 south of Memphis too.

sparker

I-175 and I-375 in FL:  essentially glorified ramp networks. 

21stCenturyRoad

I-381 in Bristol is more of a ramp that an actual freeway.
The truth is the truth even if no one believes it, and a lie is a lie even if everyone believes it.

hbelkins

Everyone's picking the wrong I-180. The one in Illinois was built for legitimate reasons. The bad one is the one in Wyoming, which isn't a real freeway.


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

inkyatari

Quote from: hbelkins on October 04, 2017, 01:38:49 PM
Everyone's picking the wrong I-180. The one in Illinois was built for legitimate reasons. The bad one is the one in Wyoming, which isn't a real freeway.

Why choose?
I'm never wrong, just wildly inaccurate.

jp the roadgeek

I-12, as a 2di, is unnecessary.  Could very well survive as I-410 (I-476 in PA and I-495 in MA are both longer).
Interstates I've clinched: 97, 290 (MA), 291 (CT), 291 (MA), 293, 295 (DE-NJ-PA), 295 (RI-MA), 384, 391, 395 (CT-MA), 395 (MD), 495 (DE), 610 (LA), 684, 691, 695 (MD), 695 (NY), 795 (MD)

froggie

Quote from: hbelkinsEveryone's picking the wrong I-180. The one in Illinois was built for legitimate reasons. The bad one is the one in Wyoming, which isn't a real freeway.

At least the Wyoming one has traffic...

Quote from: jp the roadgeekI-12, as a 2di, is unnecessary.  Could very well survive as I-410 (I-476 in PA and I-495 in MA are both longer).

Says most people who aren't familiar with either Louisiana or its early Interstate planning.  Long story short:  I-12 was not originally proposed to meet I-10 and I-59 at the same interchange.

fillup420

Quote from: froggie on October 04, 2017, 05:57:00 PM
Says most people who aren't familiar with either Louisiana or its early Interstate planning.  Long story short:  I-12 was not originally proposed to meet I-10 and I-59 at the same interchange.

Whats the long version of the story?

kkt

Quote from: Quillz on October 02, 2017, 10:08:28 AM
I'd rather have 305 signed than the 80 business loop.

I agree...

In fact now that the number  California I-480 is available again, maybe I'd make the bypass loop I-480 and restore I-80 to the original route.

ZLoth

Interstate 587 - Kingston, New York
I'm an Engineer. That means I solve problems. Not problems like "What is beauty?", because that would fall within the purview of your conundrums of philosophy. I solve practical problems and call them "paychecks".

ekt8750

I'm surprised no one has mentioned MD I-595. Hell they don't even bother to sign it.

freebrickproductions

Quote from: ekt8750 on October 05, 2017, 02:42:00 PM
I'm surprised no one has mentioned MD I-595. Hell they don't even bother to sign it.
One could argue the same about I-124 in Chattanooga.
It's all fun & games until someone summons Cthulhu and brings about the end of the world.

I also collect traffic lights, road signs, fans, and railroad crossing equipment.

(They/Them)

cbeach40

I-15 south of the Alberta border. 2016 AADT of 1,924.

It's so dead you could have a one lane bridge with "yield to oncoming traffic" signs plopped down and it would still function well.
and waterrrrrrr!

bing101

I-980 mainly because its a continuation of CA-24.

jp the roadgeek

Forgot I-790.  It's multiplexed with NY 5 and NY 12 the entire route
Interstates I've clinched: 97, 290 (MA), 291 (CT), 291 (MA), 293, 295 (DE-NJ-PA), 295 (RI-MA), 384, 391, 395 (CT-MA), 395 (MD), 495 (DE), 610 (LA), 684, 691, 695 (MD), 695 (NY), 795 (MD)

myosh_tino

Quote from: Quillz on October 02, 2017, 07:24:35 PM
Quote from: catsynth on October 02, 2017, 05:22:06 PM
Quote from: Quillz on October 02, 2017, 01:05:16 AM
I-180 (Wyoming)
I-238
I-97


I-238 is actually quite useful, despite its infamous number.  It is a major trucking route for traffic coming from I-5 coming to the Bay Area - all trucks must exit I-580 onto I-238 and take I-880 N to SF/Oakland or S to San Jose and the bridge crossings.

The number is specifically why I consider it unnecessary. I'm of the opinion just leaving it as CA-238 would have been better, although I'm aware of the history and why it was given the badge.

While I agree the number is definitely funky, an Interstate designation for that stretch of freeway is important as it provides truckers the assurance that the route they have to take to reach the Port of Oakland (because trucks are banned on I-580) is built to Interstate-standards.
Quote from: golden eagle
If I owned a dam and decided to donate it to charity, would I be giving a dam? I'm sure that might be a first because no one really gives a dam.

SSOWorld

either drop I-41 or remove I-894.  Both actually - the number doesn't make the road - and here is an entry from the department of redundancy department.
Scott O.

Not all who wander are lost...
Ah, the open skies, wind at my back, warm sun on my... wait, where the hell am I?!
As a matter of fact, I do own the road.
Raise your what?

Wisconsin - out-multiplexing your state since 1918.

sparker

Quote from: dgolub on October 03, 2017, 08:49:17 AM
I-895 in New York.  They're been talking about demolishing it for this reason.

More than talk -- it just got decommissioned at the last AASHTO meeting (details in another thread); the first step toward "boulevardization"! 

Max Rockatansky

Quote from: sparker on October 17, 2017, 06:00:11 AM
Quote from: dgolub on October 03, 2017, 08:49:17 AM
I-895 in New York.  They're been talking about demolishing it for this reason.

More than talk -- it just got decommissioned at the last AASHTO meeting (details in another thread); the first step toward "boulevardization"!

Similar to that situation you have I-375 in Detroit.  Back in 2013/2014 MDOT was talking about making I-375 into a parkway but never went through with it.  My understanding was that there was supposed to be some impact survey this year to determine what to do with I-375.

kphoger

Quote from: plain on October 02, 2017, 07:09:37 PM
Anything in southern Texas  :sombrero:

I was thinking that at first, but then I remembered I-35 between San Antonio and Laredo.  I wouldn't want that downgraded.
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.