AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New rules for political content in signatures and user profiles. See this thread for details.

Author Topic: Wisconsin notes  (Read 570787 times)

SEWIGuy

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2229
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 09:34:02 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3175 on: April 08, 2021, 09:33:06 AM »

Miller Park is now called American Family Field? This is the first I've heard of that, and I'm a native Wisconsinite. I still like my idea of naming the former Miller Parkway south of Interstate 94 the Stadium Parkway, instead of the chosen Brewers Boulevard designation, but then again, I'm not in charge of name changes.

It was announced over a year ago.

Good thing for you is many still call it Miller Park in defiance.

As many teams in many sports have no issue changing name of where they play, and the increasing frequency of changes......ballpark/stadium/arena etc names unless an iconic one(like Fenway or Wrigley) don't mean much anymore as a fan......now if it was Lambeau Field being rebranded to a different name that may be a special level of defiance coming



I guess I don't see much to be defiant about.  They lost a naming sponsor...and gained another.

But you are correct.  If they renamed Lambeau or Camp Randall, people would defiantly never refer to them by any other name.
Logged

gr8daynegb

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 127
  • Location: Coleman
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 07:07:15 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3176 on: April 13, 2021, 06:49:38 PM »

Miller Park is now called American Family Field? This is the first I've heard of that, and I'm a native Wisconsinite. I still like my idea of naming the former Miller Parkway south of Interstate 94 the Stadium Parkway, instead of the chosen Brewers Boulevard designation, but then again, I'm not in charge of name changes.

It was announced over a year ago.

Good thing for you is many still call it Miller Park in defiance.

As many teams in many sports have no issue changing name of where they play, and the increasing frequency of changes......ballpark/stadium/arena etc names unless an iconic one(like Fenway or Wrigley) don't mean much anymore as a fan......now if it was Lambeau Field being rebranded to a different name that may be a special level of defiance coming



I guess I don't see much to be defiant about.  They lost a naming sponsor...and gained another.

But you are correct.  If they renamed Lambeau or Camp Randall, people would defiantly never refer to them by any other name.

And as quoted from a previous post American Family insurance has a history with the Brewers.  Think Miller Park had to at least keep the name for another 20 years before people maybe would consider nostalgic to avoid name changes.  I would add Kohl Center/UW Fieldhouse to list of sports venues in Wisconsin that would get serious resistance if name change proposal came through.
Logged
So Lone Star now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb.

Big John

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2673
  • Age: 53
  • Last Login: Today at 06:01:44 AM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3177 on: April 15, 2021, 06:29:30 PM »

Logged

The Ghostbuster

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3088
  • Age: 36
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 02:06:44 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3178 on: April 15, 2021, 08:28:46 PM »

Again? At this rate, Interstate 94 between 70th St. and 16th St. will never be reconstructed.
Logged

JREwing78

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1193
  • Location: Janesville, WI
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 08:00:44 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3179 on: April 15, 2021, 08:53:28 PM »

I-94 project in Milwaukee put on hold: https://www.wpr.org/i-94-expansion-put-hold-department-transportation-opts-more-research

If WisDOT kicked in $50-100 million towards Bus Rapid Transit or some other substantial transit improvement in Milwaukee, it would be cheaper then continuing to battle the city over getting this rebuild done. Every kick of the can down the road drives the cost up.

There's no way only 3 lanes each way are going to cut it, but the legislature's middle finger towards Milwaukee in general means there's little willingness to cooperate on a project they weren't that crazy about to begin with.
Logged

SEWIGuy

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2229
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 09:34:02 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3180 on: April 15, 2021, 09:18:00 PM »

From the city's point of view, I understand it.  This project doesn't benefit them very much.
Logged

mgk920

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4124
  • Location: Appleton, WI USA
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 04:28:21 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3181 on: April 17, 2021, 04:57:31 AM »

In another local Milwaukee development forvm that I follow, the anti-car/road crowd in it is doing a collective Kabuki dance over that news.

Mike
Logged

The Ghostbuster

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3088
  • Age: 36
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 02:06:44 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3182 on: April 17, 2021, 01:54:43 PM »

I am well aware of the Milwaukee's long-time opposition to expanding their freeways within their city limits. However, I think this is one case where expansion is warranted. Maybe the DOT should do what they did with the Zoo Interchange Reconstruction: keep the freeway 6 lanes, but build extra-wide shoulders to accommodate a fourth lane in the future. This segment of Interstate 94 needs to be reconstructed sooner rather than later, given the roadway first opened 60 years ago.
Logged

thspfc

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2084
  • I-180 in Wyoming >>>>> I-70 in Colorado

  • Age: 2013
  • Location: Madison, WI metro area
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 07:53:07 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3183 on: April 17, 2021, 02:22:32 PM »

With the Marquette Interchange, Mitchell Interchange, Zoo Interchange, and I-894 all recently done, the only major projects that remain undone in southeast WI are I-43 north of downtown and I-94 between 70th and 16th. A rebuild of the Stadium Interchange, which is needed, would cover a pretty sizeable chunk of the latter, when you consider the approaches to the new interchange on both sides.
Logged
Donate today to support the construction of I-19 from Ocean City, MD to Portland, OR.

Revive 755

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4356
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 10:13:21 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3184 on: April 17, 2021, 11:02:48 PM »

With the Marquette Interchange, Mitchell Interchange, Zoo Interchange, and I-894 all recently done, the only major projects that remain undone in southeast WI are I-43 north of downtown and I-94 between 70th and 16th. A rebuild of the Stadium Interchange, which is needed, would cover a pretty sizeable chunk of the latter, when you consider the approaches to the new interchange on both sides.

I-43 could use a rebuild between the Layton Avenue interchange and I-894, along with a redesign of the I-894 interchange so the NB I-43 ramp enters NB I-41/WB I-894 on the right.



For the time it appears the traffic signal on WI 794 at the Oklahoma Avenue connector has been removed down to the foundations.
Logged

SEWIGuy

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2229
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 09:34:02 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3185 on: April 18, 2021, 03:55:06 PM »

I am well aware of the Milwaukee's long-time opposition to expanding their freeways within their city limits. However, I think this is one case where expansion is warranted. Maybe the DOT should do what they did with the Zoo Interchange Reconstruction: keep the freeway 6 lanes, but build extra-wide shoulders to accommodate a fourth lane in the future. This segment of Interstate 94 needs to be reconstructed sooner rather than later, given the roadway first opened 60 years ago.


Again, how does this benefit the City of Milwaukee?
Logged

skluth

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1334
  • Age: 65
  • Location: Palm Springs, CA
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 09:15:00 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3186 on: April 19, 2021, 01:35:56 AM »

I am well aware of the Milwaukee's long-time opposition to expanding their freeways within their city limits. However, I think this is one case where expansion is warranted. Maybe the DOT should do what they did with the Zoo Interchange Reconstruction: keep the freeway 6 lanes, but build extra-wide shoulders to accommodate a fourth lane in the future. This segment of Interstate 94 needs to be reconstructed sooner rather than later, given the roadway first opened 60 years ago.


Again, how does this benefit the City of Milwaukee?

Thank you for reiterating this. Until WisDOT actually takes Milwaukee's concerns into the discussion, it's not going to happen. Does it need to happen? I think so. Do the residents of the city care if Waukesha County commuters save a few minutes on their commute? Absolutely not. It's a democracy and the power of voters around the construction site matters.
Logged

JoePCool14

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 1812
  • I'm surrounded by IDiOTs.

  • Age: 20
  • Location: Chicagoland, IL / Wisconsin
  • Last Login: Today at 07:20:55 AM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3187 on: April 19, 2021, 09:33:31 AM »

With the Marquette Interchange, Mitchell Interchange, Zoo Interchange, and I-894 all recently done, the only major projects that remain undone in southeast WI are I-43 north of downtown and I-94 between 70th and 16th. A rebuild of the Stadium Interchange, which is needed, would cover a pretty sizeable chunk of the latter, when you consider the approaches to the new interchange on both sides.

I-43 north of downtown definitely could use some upgrades. Driving from Chicagoland, it's crazy when you go from what you have south of downtown, through downtown, and then when you get north, you're on a subpar, overcrowded, 4-lane freeway for quite some time.

Are there any concrete plans or interest in improving that segment of I-43 anytime soon?
Logged

JDOT: We make the world a better place to drive.

SEWIGuy

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2229
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 09:34:02 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3188 on: April 19, 2021, 11:37:53 AM »

In the long run, both I-94 E/W and I-43 expansions are needed.  But I completely understand why the City of Milwaukee wouldn't really be a fan of either.  It has been scarred by a history of over-zealous highway expansion in the past.
Logged

The Ghostbuster

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3088
  • Age: 36
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 02:06:44 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3189 on: April 19, 2021, 01:01:01 PM »

What overzealous highway expansion? Only about half of Milwaukee County's freeway system was built, and only two routes were built after the 1974 freeway referendum: the STH-119 Airport Spur (completed in 1978), and the STH-794 Lake Parkway (initially completed in 1999, short extension to intersect Pennsylvania Ave. completed in 2004). Prior to the reconstruction of the Marquette Interchange in 2004, none of the freeways in Milwaukee County were ever expanded (as far as I know). If you are referring to the initial construction of the Milwaukee freeway system when you say "overzealous highway expansion", or to the routes that were canceled in the 1970s, Milwaukee is not unique in that aspect. The Wisconsin Highways website has a great and in-depth history into the highway system of Wisconsin, including the evolution of the Milwaukee freeway system: wisconsinhighways.org.
Logged

SEWIGuy

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2229
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 09:34:02 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3190 on: April 19, 2021, 02:32:29 PM »

What overzealous highway expansion? Only about half of Milwaukee County's freeway system was built, and only two routes were built after the 1974 freeway referendum: the STH-119 Airport Spur (completed in 1978), and the STH-794 Lake Parkway (initially completed in 1999, short extension to intersect Pennsylvania Ave. completed in 2004). Prior to the reconstruction of the Marquette Interchange in 2004, none of the freeways in Milwaukee County were ever expanded (as far as I know). If you are referring to the initial construction of the Milwaukee freeway system when you say "overzealous highway expansion", or to the routes that were canceled in the 1970s, Milwaukee is not unique in that aspect. The Wisconsin Highways website has a great and in-depth history into the highway system of Wisconsin, including the evolution of the Milwaukee freeway system: wisconsinhighways.org.


I'm fully aware of the history.  I am fully aware of neighborhoods that were cut in two by ROWs cleared for highways that were either never built or partially built.
Logged

tchafe1978

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 486
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Wisconsin
  • Last Login: Today at 12:10:12 AM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3191 on: April 19, 2021, 11:14:51 PM »

https://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/projects/by-region/se/43crdr/default.aspx

I-43 is supposed to undergo a reconstruction and expansion project starting later this year, from Silver Spring Dr. to WIS 60.
Logged

Great Lakes Roads

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 477
  • Ain't nobody got time for that!!

  • Age: 21
  • Location: La Porte, Indiana
  • Last Login: Today at 03:48:43 AM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3192 on: April 19, 2021, 11:25:41 PM »

https://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/projects/by-region/se/43crdr/default.aspx

I-43 is supposed to undergo a reconstruction and expansion project starting later this year, from Silver Spring Dr. to WIS 60.

Long overdue! That section should've been widened 10-20 years ago...
Logged

peterj920

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 774
  • Location: Green Bay, WI
  • Last Login: June 01, 2021, 12:39:38 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3193 on: April 20, 2021, 12:11:42 AM »

https://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/projects/by-region/se/43crdr/default.aspx

I-43 is supposed to undergo a reconstruction and expansion project starting later this year, from Silver Spring Dr. to WIS 60.

Long overdue! That section should've been widened 10-20 years ago...

The roadbed is completely shot and resurfacing does nothing anymore. Within 2 years of new asphalt it crumbles. With a complete rebuild the road should last for decades to come.
Logged

SEWIGuy

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2229
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 09:34:02 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3194 on: April 20, 2021, 09:25:22 AM »

https://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/projects/by-region/se/43crdr/default.aspx

I-43 is supposed to undergo a reconstruction and expansion project starting later this year, from Silver Spring Dr. to WIS 60.

Is Silver Spring where it currently goes down to two lanes?
Logged

JoePCool14

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 1812
  • I'm surrounded by IDiOTs.

  • Age: 20
  • Location: Chicagoland, IL / Wisconsin
  • Last Login: Today at 07:20:55 AM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3195 on: April 20, 2021, 11:08:51 AM »

https://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/projects/by-region/se/43crdr/default.aspx

I-43 is supposed to undergo a reconstruction and expansion project starting later this year, from Silver Spring Dr. to WIS 60.

Is Silver Spring where it currently goes down to two lanes?

Correct.

Widening the road that far north would work wonders. I remember driving that route up to Door County both in summer 2019 and 2020. Even with the virus, that stretch was fairly congested. Not to mention the road surface itself is in poor shape. I assume they'll be using concrete on it as well.
Logged

JDOT: We make the world a better place to drive.

SEWIGuy

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2229
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 09:34:02 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3196 on: April 20, 2021, 11:31:11 AM »

https://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/projects/by-region/se/43crdr/default.aspx

I-43 is supposed to undergo a reconstruction and expansion project starting later this year, from Silver Spring Dr. to WIS 60.

Is Silver Spring where it currently goes down to two lanes?

Correct.

Widening the road that far north would work wonders. I remember driving that route up to Door County both in summer 2019 and 2020. Even with the virus, that stretch was fairly congested. Not to mention the road surface itself is in poor shape. I assume they'll be using concrete on it as well.

Also none of the project (I believe) lies within the City of Milwaukee.
Logged

The Ghostbuster

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3088
  • Age: 36
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 02:06:44 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3197 on: April 20, 2021, 01:02:07 PM »

There once was a Wisconsin Senator (Mordecai Lee) who got a budget amendment passed in 1983 that forbade the expansion of Interstate 43 between Bender Rd. and the Ozaukee County Line. It was overturned in the 1990's. Source: http://wisconsinhighways.org/milwaukee/northsouth.html. I'm surprised the moratorium didn't go all the way south to the Marquette Interchange, but maybe the moratorium only covered the area the senator represented. The Interstate 43 reconstruction and expansion project greatly interests me, and I hope it and the new Highland Rd. interchange (Exit 87) will be beneficial to the corridor.
Logged

JoePCool14

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 1812
  • I'm surrounded by IDiOTs.

  • Age: 20
  • Location: Chicagoland, IL / Wisconsin
  • Last Login: Today at 07:20:55 AM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3198 on: April 20, 2021, 01:08:20 PM »

https://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/projects/by-region/se/43crdr/default.aspx

I-43 is supposed to undergo a reconstruction and expansion project starting later this year, from Silver Spring Dr. to WIS 60.

Is Silver Spring where it currently goes down to two lanes?

Correct.

Widening the road that far north would work wonders. I remember driving that route up to Door County both in summer 2019 and 2020. Even with the virus, that stretch was fairly congested. Not to mention the road surface itself is in poor shape. I assume they'll be using concrete on it as well.

Also none of the project (I believe) lies within the City of Milwaukee.

That's also correct. Though if you go straight west, you're in Milwaukee.
Logged

JDOT: We make the world a better place to drive.

triplemultiplex

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2581
  • "You read it; you can't unread it!"

  • Location: inside the beltline
  • Last Login: July 23, 2021, 05:17:32 PM
Re: Wisconsin notes
« Reply #3199 on: April 20, 2021, 06:04:54 PM »

Maybe we can save everyone time and skip ahead to the part where WisDOT has to kick in some sheckles to Milwaukee County Transit just like the last big court fight over the Zoo Interchange.
The thing about going from a six lane freeway to an eight lane freeway is you can almost always do it without additional right of way and it makes it much easier and safer to handle the traffic coming into/out of the system interchanges.  And in terms of cost, rebuilding and modernizing this stretch of 94 as 6 lanes vs 8 lanes is minor relative to the cost of the whole project.  It's gonna cost a billion dollars whether it has 6 lanes or 8.  I think the only difference would be your bridge widths over 70th, 68th, Hawley, Mitchell, the river, etc; maybe a few extra retaining walls.  A pittance in the scheme of things.  All overpasses would be built to physically span an 8 lane freeway anyway due to shoulder widths and embankments. 

This is one of those situations where I think my peeps in the city should compromise if they can get something out of it.  The car people can expand some more freeways and in exchange, we legalize weed in Wisconsin and use the tax revenue from it to beef up public transit.  Turn that token street car line into a bonafide light rail system; I dunno.  That's right, it's grand bargain time 'sconnie!

SB 43/94/420; the "Legalize Cannabis and Expand the Beltline and Milwaukee Freeways Act of 2021".
Logged
"That's just like... your opinion, man."

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.